Oooof. Ugly is death.

The roastie is our tools against us

They're evolving.

CS is turning into a meme degree. Pure mathematics or physics is the only way to go.

What do u mean?

It's super easy because more & more people (read women) with no skills or effort whatsoever are enrolling.

I don't think it's easy, but women get an orbiter to study with and help them

then they get a job coding but don't actually have to work

Compared to math and physics it is easy, at least where I live.

just as hard but at least there are jobs besides in acadamia for it.

dont a lot of people leave cs once they realize its actually a challenging major a year in

Low IQ cels on suiwatch

Teehee++

I can't believe she speaks code. So strange for a woman to do that!

I thought sexist insults were one of the barriers to programming for women. It couldn't be because women are a bunch of soft-skinned pussies who can dish it but can't take it.

assert(it is Over);

Don't be mean to her. Her code would almost compile.

It WILL compile. In fact, that’s a well-known search algorithm. IP is in the public domain.

No it would not. Girl needs an int to be created. You can't initialise an object if you don't give it the needed parameters.

The only thing she's using as a rejection is looks. But cuckqueers are still in denial.

Yea, it's almost like jokes don't have to be universally true to still be funny or something right

Yea, ot's almost like

oh boi here we go again

It’s funny because all of those statements in the picture are true

Your hubris is unbearable.

What exactly do you mean, I have self esteem issues along with other things. Nice assumption boyo

Thinking you can judge strangers’ lives through the internet is hubris.

I’m not judging. I’m simply stating the sentences in that linked picture were true.

Which is in turn judging incels stating that it’s their personalities causing their issues.

It's almost like /s thanks for the gold kind stranger my good sir!

Wow, this blew up, RIP my inbox.

Edit: a word

What blackpilled school is this

this was originally posted on the UC Irvine subreddit

Imagine if a guy did this as a presentation in school. “isGirlUgly”

he would get Damore'd so fast

isFat for more trigger points

Blackpill: that was the origins of facebook and made Zuckerberg a billionaire. Now feminists use that platform to control men.

feminists control men

lol

well technically, (((they))) control men via feminism (and other means)

Who's (((they)))?

look up who was behind feminism (women's right to vote, AoC laws, etc.), gay rights, etc. in the early 20th century

I tried to look it up, but couldn't find it. Can you just tell me, since you know the answer?

the jewish elite.

Tell me more about this Jewish elite.

They're predominantly secular Zionist Jews who happen to be bankers.

jews.

Can you elaborate?

someone from the right stuff (a white supremacist blog/podcast) created a google chrome app/extension called the cohen-incidence detector and everytime you opened an article and the authors name was jewish and that person was in the cohen-incidence database, 3 parathensis would appear our their name. so lets say i wrote a blog post bashing white people or incel men and my name jewishsupremacist88 was in the database..it would say (((jewishsupremacist88))) on the post author tag or whatever.

No, I meant that I want to hear about the Jewish conspiracy that is controlling men via feminism.

jews certainly are a big force behind feminism. its even doing damage in israel

metoo

I don't need to imagine I saw that exact thing happen and nobody cared.

>guys ugliness is private

>automatically instantiating a girl object

>"age" in willGoOutWithGuy will give an error, has to be this.age

absolutely shit coding

It doesn't have to be this.age.... this is java right?

It should. Good coding practice if an idiot(usually yourself) creates another variable of the same name in the method scope

then your tests will fail and you will see you're an idiot for doing that.

Yep. Like I said if an idiot does that.

I'm kind of a java god so yeah... I don't work with people like that.

i was thinking it was typescript

teaching OOP in Typescript??? That would be a really odd choice.

Wouldn't expect any less from a hole.

https://i.imgur.com/n0Kel2p.jpg

Voids can't program

crazy_strings.rb

Sadly this level of coding will get a woman a great job with perks just for having a hole

this is the best meme on the internet

"age" in willGoOutWithGuy will give an error, has to be this.age

WRONG

Not to mention that including the girl into the guy class as a member variable means that the guy is dependant on the girl. Not only is this horrible coding practise but I dislike the implication immensely

Can you go in-depth with that? I'm new-ish to Java

Everytime you instantiate a guy he'll come with a paramenter that will be an object of the type Girl (that you inform). Women are objects even in programming hahah

Ah yes, they should be separate, right?

one Girl obj in the main and one Guy obj, him too in the main

Not necessarily, some application could need a girl linked to a guy and this code would be right.

But it won't.

Hardcore OOP in a nutshell. EVERY MEMBER VARIABLE MUST BE PRIVATE OR IT ISN'T ENCAPSULATED, YOU SHITLORD

Kinda new-ish to Java, so lemme ask something.

guys ugliness is private

Isn't that a good thing though? Information masking and shit, I usually make getters and setters for private variables.

automatically instantiating a girl object

Yeah that's pretty retarded, that should be done in the Guy constructor.

"age" in willGoOutWithGuy will give an error, has to be this.age

Are you sure about this? I write code in NetBeans / Android Studio and "age" in that method shouldn't give an error to me, as nothing with the name of "age" to the willGoOutWithGuy method, and as such, the "age" used in the return statement is the same age of the "private int age" variable at the top of the class. I still use this.whatever to avoid confusion.

What confuses me the most however is that return statement, I've never seen someone return something like that before

putting the comment after the function

aye that's retarded

i thought it was javascript/typescript, but whatever

guys ugliness is private

well, its clearly visible in real life.

automatically instantiating a girl object

why is it even in the boy class? why not have the boy in the girl class then? both should be separate and have nothing to do with each other. its retarded

Those return statements are the only good thing about this code. It's just that there is no point writing out an extra variable assignment and return it on the next line.

Fucking lmao.

Not actually a computer scientist but it's funny to see this analysis.

I mean the thing would not compile. Girl girl = new girl() would force an error since you are not giving it the int it needs. not to mention it's a shit way to initialise such a thing.

Won't compile you don't have a default constructor dumb woman.

Might be female lecturer trying to help red pill guys. Maybe she knows they are all nerds and virgins so she is helping them out.

if she was trying to red pill them it'd be like

if (lifting = bro)

then [that shit = actually works]

}}}

Dang...Where did you find this?

Fucking cringy joke. Did anyone find this shit funny?

Yes it's absolutely hilarious

                                       - CuckTears

I dont think chad would find this hillarious either, he called the roastie a bitch and shed laugh

Object oriented program is such a mess, her code could be put in a single function and be more readable.

It is overused. It only becomes viable for large projects.

over for Booleancels

true

when cucktears are going on a reeeee rant their mind is basically having a compilation error

this is why women don't enter stem. this is the type of thing they think about 24/7, and since most of the stem field is comprised of smart, sane men, their narcissism doesn't fit in. but they're oppressed!! don't you know?

Being a girl with a computer science degree is life on easy mode, even if you graduating with a 2.0 GPA.

I suck at programming can anyone explain?

You can't code? GET OUT OF HERE CHAD.

Poorly written code that won't compile

if guy is older than or equal to 22 AND if hes not ugly, she will go out with him.

its over for Programmercels

just be greater than or equal to 22 theory

It's actually if the girl is older than or equal to 22.

I like how the guy class owns a girl object

Maybe she's implying there's a girl inside every guy (just trying to get out)?

Female koders tehehe.

Feeemales

None of your female friends in tech will want to fuck you lol. They all want a rugged Chad as well.

Those women aren't shallow. They just like smart guys that wear glasses teehee.

https://cdn.movieweb.com/img.news.tops/NENnxcUbyz9zQV_3_b/Batman-V-Superman-Disguise-Glasses-Henry-Cavill-Video.jpg

100k starting

pure math 400k starting, its over for cscucks

Could you show some sources, please? Preferably one that doesn't include your ass.

    return (age >= 22) && (!isGuyUgly);

age used to initialise Girl()? or the age of the guy? semantic error.

also 'Girl' is private to 'Guy' doesn't matter whether girl willgooutwithguy. girl is still guy's private bitch.

C#?

“Why don’t incels want women in programming.”

That traditionally incel profession is being invaded by femoids who are going to bring in Chads, who will belittle, harass, and ultimately remove incels from the workplace just as they would like to remove us from existence.

isBlackPilled? return true.

#kodewithkarlie

"And you thought neither women nor programmers had a sense of humour, TEE-HEE!"

I don't know anything about cs but my guess is that she's being a cunt like always

(Fart)=x=y-1

not using a member initialization list in 2018

This is literally why women didn't have rights for thousands of years.

They're gaslighting narcissistic pieces of shit.

Who the fuck does that? A WOMAN.

Oh come on she is in CS she will date anybody. Heck we had a few hotties in my CS class but the women more or less evaporate and its all dudes by the time you get to the 3000 level courses.

then your tests will fail and you will see you're an idiot for doing that.