To be honest, fuck that and fuck marriage. People should be having sex as much as they want and who cares about reproducing. As long as they don't leave the subhumans out, be a sex crazed maniac.

This will not work for us. Only way us subhumans can get in a relationship is marriage and when adultery is punished.

Spot the aids infested mongrel.

All I hear is crying. Who cares about the future of society when you're going to die anyways.

Low IQ

High IQ for pointing out his Low IQ

It's not just low IQ it's fucking shocking. They don't care about the collapse of society.

Not only that but they're practically admit they can see that this is the conclusion of the direction that we are headed, and still don't care. That is tantamount to playing a willful part in it's destruction, if you ask me.

This is how Rome fell. Citizens stopped giving a fuck about Rome. Apathy from the populace about maintaining the morals and ethics of society always leads to a collapse.

I'm not anti-immigrant, I'm not racist (unless it's white women, fuck white women) nor am I religious. It's just observable truth. Decadence is bad because excess in pleasure leads to apathy towards the things that allowed you to experience such pleasure.

Food tastes better when you've cooked it yourself. It gives you a better appreciation for it.

This can be applied on a wider scale. Unless you played a part in (or at least saw) society's growth, you have no appreciation for how far we've come; and conversely, how far we can fall.

You say Rome fell because romans simply didn’t care?

Apathy is one of the reasons Rome fell.

Nice reading bucko

"Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society."

-Aristotle

I said in-depth man putting out quotes isn’t in-depth

So you're just going to ignore the first part of my comment? lol

All he said was that it was a factor, you retard. There's no depth of explanation required for that beyond stating it's existence.

If you care how much of a factor it was, you can look that up yourself. I'm not your personal googler.

Calm down man no need to call me names also other dude replied properly, if you say something I expect you to list it with you statement you don’t go to debates and say google it if you make a statement you better have credible sources and a good knowledge of the subject

You're the only one who thinks it's a debate kiddo. And even if it were, everything after you said after my first reply is just you proving my assertion that you're an idiot. Have you ever been in a real debate?

His assertion:

This is one of the reasons Rome fell. [Emphasis mine]

You asked for proof, so I gave the Aristotle quote as proof (albeit not the greatest) that apathy can be a factor in a society's collapse. I may not have proved that it was apparent in Rome at the time, but that wasn't the source of your qualm. You said:

Durr.... Akshually I need more depth Durr....

That's not how a debate works. I offered evidence to prove my assertion the onus would then be on you to either question the validity of my evidence of offer a refutation by presenting your own evidence. But you didn't do that, you basically conceded you don't have an argument (if this is a debate which we apparently are, by your own omission).... You fucking retard.

Alright whatever helps you sleep at night chill out peace.

I'd sleep better knowing retards like you weren't breathing and propogating their retard spawn.

Please find your nearest piece of rope and use it so your genes can stop holding back the rest of humanity.

You’re piece of shit dude holy shit, I am not a Incel but fuck people like you, going to a support sub and telling people to kill themselves fucking sad piece of shit you are damn

[removed]

OMG NO YOULL LOSE THE DEBATE

/s?

It was one of the reasons. Most historians agree that the average Roman's zeal for the Empire declined dramatically when Rome first showed signs of decline. In the Republic era and early Imperial era, most of the Rome's legions and military forces were made up of Roman citizens, with importance of 'true Roman blood' placed on men from Italia. By the end of the WRE, most of Rome's military comprised auxiliary forces - men from assimilated barbarian tribes, or mercenaries.

Rome fell for various reasons, however, and as far as I'm aware, there's no general consensus as to why. Some anthropologists and historians argued that Rome's bureaucracy and infrastructure were simply too limited to properly manage the entire Empire; or if they were, they were too inefficient. Some argue that the constant migrations during the Great Migration period contributed to the decline due to many barbarian tribes encroaching upon Roman territory on too many fronts for Rome to properly muster defenses in time. Some argue that corruption and state decay were the causes, leading to numerous civil wars, succession crises, etc.

I don't think, by virtue of the age that we live in, that the U.S. or the West will 'fall' like Rome did. I don't see civilization 'collapsing' in the Roman sense for any modern nation unless it was due to nuclear warfare. I definitely think that a few will suffer due to decadence and indulgence. Incels being one of these few groups, but since we're so small, our suffering is negligible and therefore insignificant.

Nothing can be done anymore.... it’s too late to reverse this.

Exactly, we can only watch as the world slowly burns

unfortunately these things can never take into account just how damn much women lie, so it's always far worse than they depict

So true, it‘s probably even worse since femoids aren‘t even capable of saying the truth.

Very very high IQ post! Thanks for these graphs and statisics!

I always knew that roasties with several sex partners aren‘t capable of being loyal and happy in a relationship/marriage.

No wonder almost all religions almost exclusively forced marriage and punished adultery.

But i'm just exploring what i sexually like teehee.

From a data standpoint, those graphs are meaningless.

Go take a sip of soymilk

If objectively looking at data is considered unmanly, that seems counterproductive.

why?

white roasties would rather be a spinster than to start a family

meanwhile all my muslim cousins are popping out 5+ kids

Ill give the west another 100 years tops

any society that gives women rights will be replaced by one that doesnt.

Ill give the west another 100 years tops

That's what i'm saying, we're defenitely right.

Anybody see that 20 minute Vox/Netflix documentary about how monogamy is wrong? It's all downhill from here :/

(((Vox)))

I wonder how many Vox staffers are in non-monogamous relationships. Probably 0, but I guess their advice is for the goyim only.

Did you ever hear the tragedy of Western Society?

I thought not. It's not a story the roasties would tell you.

A sure sign of a failing civilization is the over saturation of sex everywhere you turn.

Let's say that the average women starts having sex at 15 .If they fuck at 3 different partners per year then from age (15- 30).If they get married at 30 n count is

15 × 3 = 45

I know the actual number is way way higher.Someone already posted few days ago that n - count of a 19 year old girl was 50.I just used the number for theories sake.

Women in modern societies don't get married before 30 so make of it what you will.

The ultimate crutch that props up the state is the people; with the rise of AI and robotics, people become obsolete and, for the first time in history, the state will be able to cast away that crutch and truly overpower the populace. If the people fall from grace, society won't be replaced by anything we've seen before, but instead a dystopian technocracy; this sort of technopoly is already being manifest in China with their [social credit system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System). People need to get away from the distractions, and infighting, that the internet and social media provide and do whatever they can to exercise democratic power before it is removed completely. The only people truly benefitting from all this shit are the ruling classes.

Kinda do want to ruin society tho

Can we start posting other things from a poorly translated 1000+ year old book now? Or is this cherry picking to support arguments?

[removed]

(((Vox)))

I wonder how many Vox staffers are in non-monogamous relationships. Probably 0, but I guess their advice is for the goyim only.