The is very true.

Alpha fucks, Normie Buxs

Why are normies, especially men, more willing to accept that money matters a lot in dating rather than looks being the primary factor?

Because it took years before the idea of women wanting money for sex was acceped by society. It will take a couple of years before the blackpill is swallowed by society. We're in the first phase of extreme resistence (denial) of the blackpill. You will see more and more people coming out, until celebrities share the blackpill. That will be the moment society is blackpilled.

Hey, everythingshewants7, just a quick heads-up:
resistence is actually spelled resistance. You can remember it by ends with -ance.
Have a nice day!

^{The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to delete this comment.}

Good bot.

Thank you, John_Ritano, for voting on CommonMisspellingBot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.

^{Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!}

You're also a good bot, i wonder whether or not you can also be voted for?

Stop talking to inanimate objects John.

Not when they answer back.

You can acquire money. You can't change your genetics.

Because class privilege and the social status associated with money is already widely understood. There is a belief that rich people worked hard and deserve to be rich so it's easier to accept the inequality and privilege that comes with money.

Post-worthy thought

Because you can get money.

Because naive men think women are SEXUALLY attracted to wealth/status.

There is also the fact that money can buy plastic surgery, grant you an interesting life, and project social superiority. Money is your greatest tool if you know who to use it. it won't help 1-2/10's but 4-7/10's can be saved by it.

Everyone believes that anyone can earn money if they work hard, even though by it's very nature everyone can't be rich, everyone thinks they're special and will make money that they're just in a slump. While if your chin is recessed you know it's over.

Because they wanna cope .if they accept that looks are everything that means theyre fucked theg cant do anything about it but at least they can hope they can get pussy by money

With money she will only tolerate you, but never lust and love you like Chad

Yepp, looks trump money in 95% cases

Very depressing once I learned even if I got a good, stable job and women were attracted to me it wouldn't really be me they like

Just my money

Why is it bad to be desired for something extrinsic such as wealth, but it's okay to be desired for physical appearance, which is another extrinsic attribute.

What are the applications of that difference? I don't see how that makes a tangible difference.

You know it's kinda funny you say that because wealth is actually a very not tangible thing. It's a made up concept for the purposes of economics and trading. Kind of like all that hype with cryto. Bitcoin is never tangible but in the "ideal" bitcoin world, it is wealth.

A billionaire will never hold a billionaire dollars, it's all under investments, real estate, stocks, credit, etc. None of it is really tangible except the real estate part.

You're train of thought is solid, I'd guess that people feel like money isn't a part of them, but looks are.

Tbh you have more control over your wealth as well in many ways.

Money is tangible because it can get you stuff.

If youre inferring that beauty cant get you stuff in life then that contradicts the theory that women live their lives on tutorial mode.

Throw away my wallet and you take away my wife. Take my body and you finish the job. You are loved for what you are on a base level not what you have done.

Chads house catch on fire and he becomes two-face. Its over.

Wealth and physical appearance are very similar.

[removed]

Because they don't like YOU for having money, they like the money.

They dont like YOU for having good looks, they like the good looks.

That's different. They want to have sex with you if they like your good looks. They'll bear having sex with you if they like your money.

I think it's very possible and likely for women to be turned on by wealth, fame, and power.

Who do you think gets more offers for no strings attached sex, this guy or this guy?

Literally being in the top 0.001% of wealth doesn't weigh up to having your bone structure in order.

I think both men would be able to get pussy easily, however, only one of them will be able to get the top 0.001% of pussy such as VS model level pussy, and it's the guy with wealth.

Look at some ugly ass rappers for example: 6IX9NINE has literally 4 tattoos of 69 on his ugly ass and he still get tons of hot bitches wanting to smash with no strings attached. Look at guys like 21 savage, postmalone, Rick Ross, They aren't Chads at all but they got money, fame, and wealth. I bet you they fuck hotter girls than a typical Chad any day.

I don't get why incels are so against being desired for wealth. It's the same as being wanted for beauty.

I'm talking about *no strings attached* sex. Sex where the woman *wants* to have sex with him because he makes her wet. I'm *not* talking about the type of sex where she thinks she may get something out of it. Do you really, actually think that's Bill Gates and not Pietro Boselli (the other dude)?

Being a bad ass musician beats wealth too, you're right about that.

Go read a youtube thread under a Pietro Boselli video and a youtube thread under a Bill Gates video. One of those two has hundreds of comments of women saying they'd do ANYTHING for him.

But ultimately it's still a transaction no matter what. Based on your logic, women are trying to get something from Chad too: to feel good/feel happy. Women sleep with rich guys for extravagant lifestyle because that's what makes her happy.

So you're saying fame > looks > wealth? Fame is just as extrinsic as looks.

I already explained the difference twice. If you don't want to address the point or you don't understand that most people prefer having sex with somebody who actually enjoys the sex rather than with somebody for whom it is a chore to get something out of you, that's fine.

looks > fame > power > wealth

And I explained that it's just another transaction. They have sex with chad because Chad's looks make them feel good. They have sex with millionaire because millionaire can provide them with a luxurious lifestyle which makes them feel good too.

I think you underestimate wealth and fame. Women can easily be turned on by wealth, power, and fame. Those things can get pussy wet just as much as looks can.

They have sex with chad because Chad's looks make them feel good. They have sex with millionaire because millionaire can provide them with a luxurious lifestyle which makes them feel good too.

Are you really pretending to be retarded to not have to admit that you're wrong?

I think you underestimate wealth and fame. Women can easily be turned on by wealth, power, and fame. Those things can get pussy wet just as much as looks can.

You repeated your thesis without any justification for it, again bringing in fame to muddy the waters. Women can get turned on by wealth somewhat, but not nearly as much as by looks.

Do this thought experiment. Ask random girls who they'd rather spend a night of no strings attached sex with: Bill Gates or Pietro Boselli. The conditions are that it would be a one time thing and nothing will be exchanged except bodily fluids. Who would they choose?

Are you really pretending to be retarded to not have to admit that you're wrong?

No need to be hostile and trying to pressure the opposition into defeat seems more of one's own battle cry for defeat. Perhaps you lack reading comprehension which could explain why you seem to be having a difficult time understanding this.

Do this (thought) experiment. Ask random girls who they'd rather spend a night of no strings attached sex with: Bill Gates or Pietro Boselli. The conditions are that it would be a one time thing and nothing will be exchanged except bodily fluids. Who would they choose?

You keep using Bill Gates who is a 62yo old man which really shows your bias. Let's try a different example: would a stacy sleep with Post Malone or Pietro Boselli? Postmalone is not attractive in any means but he has wealth and fame and I bet you more girls would choose a no strings attach night with postmalone than dime in a dozen chad.

American femoids are very different from European femoids.

For example, American femoids are only interested in $$$$$$$

On the other hand, European femoids are interested in €€€€€€€

[removed]

They dont like YOU for having good looks, they like the good looks.