And before that he values imaginary Internet points over talking to a person then mocks incels for being losers. I thought I was the bottom of the barrel but IT makes me feel better every day.
They only see what they want to see. It is indeed remarkable how they can engage with a contrary proposition for a great length of time yet never come to appreciate that they may, in fact, not initially be completely right about everything. And the confidence and smugness with with they assert their ignorance is odious.
Arguing with incelqueers is like chatting with Cleverbot: it's a waste of time, the argument goes nowhere, and it doesn't take long for them to derail the subject completely.
18 comments
1 petedaman13 2018-05-22
The OP’s comments are currently sitting on 14 upvotes (except the last one which is deleted) and mine are at -12.
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-22
banging your head against a wall would be more productive
1 Pirateojack 2018-05-22
That's what you get for using facts and valid questions.
1 1122334wy 2018-05-22
lol he thought putting your argument through a spongebob text generator was some sort of rebuttal. what a fucking moron
1 literallyarealperson 2018-05-22
It's the best they can do.
All they have are ad hominem attacks, shaming, stupid shit like this, and corny jokes.
1 ur_waifus_prolapse 2018-05-22
And before that he values imaginary Internet points over talking to a person then mocks incels for being losers. I thought I was the bottom of the barrel but IT makes me feel better every day.
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-05-22
IT are lifefuel, pitiable even by us.
1 acoverover1 2018-05-22
the writing style seems feminine. and the fact that they thought infantile mocking constituted a rebuttal suggests it's a woman.
1 AyeThatsAGoodNagger 2018-05-22
I thought it was an Edgar Mellemcamp text generator
1 sfcel 2018-05-22
I swear I can picture him doing the numaleface while posting it...
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
Trying to argue or have a conversation with IT is like trying to talk about whether or not objective morality exists with a toddler.
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-22
Dude these guys IQ are lower than room temperature don’t even bother with them.
1 trevmon2 2018-05-22
whiteknighting for incels?
1 acoverover1 2018-05-22
they want to appropriate our terminology and insults to try and 'throw it back at us' but they have absolutely no idea how to use it properly
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-22
it always amazes me how these retards spend so much time obsessing over a topic yet don't know the most basic things about said topic
redditors are really, really fucking cancerous
1 acoverover1 2018-05-22
They only see what they want to see. It is indeed remarkable how they can engage with a contrary proposition for a great length of time yet never come to appreciate that they may, in fact, not initially be completely right about everything. And the confidence and smugness with with they assert their ignorance is odious.
Surely amongst the lowest of life forms
1 Ryzasu 2018-05-22
-5 kHaRmA
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-05-22
Arguing with incelqueers is like chatting with Cleverbot: it's a waste of time, the argument goes nowhere, and it doesn't take long for them to derail the subject completely.
1 Rambo1stBlood 2018-05-22
I actually recently had the same conversation almost...with the same user.
His username was one letter off, if you ask me.
1 Hideouslyric 2018-05-22
And this is why it was IT that black pilled me, not you guys or anyone else.
1 finnanut27 2018-05-22
Arguing with a sub 115 I.Q individual is analogous to banging your head against the wall.
However you are likely also sub 115 I.Q if you would even do such a thing. Smart people know not to waste their time on stupid shit