She stated her comment as though it disproves the OP when what she stated was literally the OPs point. Her IQ is lower than the temperature of a refrigerator.
She explained why eggs are expensive (because they're limited, demand and supply is basic economics, and because it requires surgery to retrieve them as well as lots of time and medication). How is this anything like OPs point which is 'THEY'RE EXPENSIVE BECAUSE THEYRE FROM A WOMAN REEEE' making it out like it's some sexual bias
We all know what analogy the OP is trying to make, it's not my fault it doesn't work because the OP has failed to actually realise WHY is that way and has nothing to do with female to male worth and sexual behaviour. This isn't hard to grasp.
Apparently for you it is. OP stated the biological fact that sperm has less value than eggs. The commenter backed this up by posting the economic reason why, yet was too stupid to realize that she was not countering the OP but rather proving his point. This is very simple yet you seem to have such low reading comprehension skills that you cannot understand it. Is english your second language?
And you're talking about how my reading comprehension is bad? He's literally using the line about eggs and sperm as an anology to human sexual behaviour you dumb fuck. He's saying that eggs are more valuable because women are or are seen as more valuable (which one of your posters below has already said btw).
The woman posting has explained that no, the cost of eggs has nothing to do with the value of women. It's to do with the fact sperm can be easily and cheaply collected whereas collecting eggs involved months of injections and a surgical procedure. Which is expensive.
He's saying that eggs are more valuable because women are or are seen as more valuable
They are. That is a biological fact that comes, in part, from the facts posted by the commenter in the picture. Females have inherent value due to having the babies. If we did not evolve a sense of inherent value towards females then they would be much more likely to be harmed and that would make it more likely that the baby would die and with it the bloodline that would have lived on. Men have inherent disposability due to the natural male role being that of provider and protector. These roles are hihgly deadly in a time period when the most advanced weaponry was a rock and a stick. Hunting prey, defending against predators, and fighting enemy tribes were all deadly tasks that men had to be able to perform at a moments notice since the the death of the male does not necessarily guarantee the death of the baby whereas the death of the female does guarantee the death of the baby since it is inside her. This is why the natural form of mate selection in our species requires males to impress the females and compete for her 'yes' that would allow them to procreate. If a man got that 'yes' he would be much more likely to receive another one from another female as the females instinctually see that he, the inherently disposable male, was able to impress a female, which has inherent value. (This is likely the biological foundation for why many married men report getting more female attention after getting married and wearing their ring on their finger in public.) This is why we as a species have twice as many female ancestors as we have male ancestors. Females have a huge incentive to find the best provider and protector possible as they are incapable of providing for and protecting themselves when they are pregnant and after giving birth they have to be with the child for a very long time. This is why females prefer taller men. Taller men had more mass and thus were more capable of fighting and hunting that the smaller males during our evolution when no advanced weaponry of martial art existed. This is why females have a natural 'gold digging' instinct. They are biologically programmed to try to find the best provider that they can. I can go on, but I will conclude here. Females are valuable because they have the babies and can only have a certain number of them over a certain period of time. The breeding strategies of the sexes are not at all the same and our evolution reflects that.
It's to do with the fact sperm can be easily and cheaply collected whereas collecting eggs involved months of injections and a surgical procedure.
Nice job ignoring the first part about how men can produce sperm for their whole lives while females have a limit to how many eggs they can produce.
I already mentioned it in another comment actually. I didn't feel the need to repeat it when yes, I've already stated that's one of the reasons why eggs are expensive. It's basic supply and demand, which again, I've already said.
They are...
I'm not going to read some archaic hunter-gather breeding bullshit theory you all cling to to make yourselves feel vindicated. In a modern society women aren't valued more highly then men, yet you choose to use some bullshit basic economics driven example to try to prove that it's the case. Eggs being more expensive is economical, it is not sociological like you're trying to say it is.
It's funny because another of you in this thread are trying to deny this was the point of the post at all
I'm not going to read some archaic hunter-gather breeding bullshit theory you all cling to to make yourselves feel vindicated.
lol. You are literally ignoring anything that goes contrary to what you idiotically believe. What I posted was biologically based fact. Continue to blind yourself if you want.
In a modern society women aren't valued more highly then men
Yes they are. Women's only shelters, higher funding for women's health related issues, greater amount of women in universities, etc, etc all prove this.
It's funny because another of you in this thread are trying to deny this was the point of the post at all
Oh wow. It's almost like incels are individuals and not a collective like IT told me that we are.
Here's your '/s' since I know normies complain abut not being able to comprehend sarcasm (likely related to low reading comprehension abilities).
Have a nice day. I am done since you refuse to address anything that proves you wrong.
It's interesting how you've flip flopped from 'what analogy, that wasn't what the OP was saying your reading comprehension is shit' to 'I'm going to defend the idea I previously said you were stupid for thinking OP had... also your reading comprehension is shit'.
So now you accept that I was right when I said that the OP was using it to discuss females being worth more, so you must accept that the poster was actually refuting the point by explaining its due to economical reasons.
And yes I do realise that he's saying women are more valuable. But using this ridiculous analogy is wrong because it has nothing to do with inherent sex value it has everything to do with the cost of extraction.
Yeah, they were. But she explained why the analogy doesn't work. Eggs aren't expensive because of what point they're trying to make. They're expensive because of supply and demand and the cost and effort of retrieving them.
They're expensive, meaning they're seen as more valuable. The thought being that women are seen as more valuable, whereas men are expendable pieces that no one cares about.
Yes and as I've stated, it has fuck all to do with women being more valuable. It's the fact it's expensive as fuck to retrieve them and whilst sperm can be collected in minutes with a man and a pot, retrieval of eggs requires months of the women injecting herself and then having to undergo surgical procedures. I'm not sure why people don't understand why one wouldn't obviously be more expensive
Cavier is more expensive than sperm. Do you think fish are more valuable than men? No.
This guy. We're not discussing why one would be more expensive than the other. The just fact that they already are. The op in the pic was trying to use this as some allegory where by the woman is the egg, and the man is the sperm.
The only thing you all say is LMAOOOO YOUR IQ OMG YOUR READING COMPREHENSION. Do you like to think you're all more intelligent to make up for the fact you haven't got the emotional intelligence to get a partner?
It's not an insult when funnily enough, everyone but incels agree with what I'm saying. Funny that isn't it.
She clearly doesn't support it. OP is trying to imply that men and women have an inherit difference of value in society because of the difference of value of eggs and sperms. But the girl is saying that no, you can't say that because the price of eggs or sperms has nothing to do with how men or women are treated, its just a biological fact that there are much much fewer eggs than sperm and therefore more expensive.
Had the OP stopped at "there is a difference in the price of sperm and eggs", then yeah, the girl would be agreeing with him. But he didnt stop there, he continued and said that this is all we need to know to understand social behavior
I'm sorry but your point hinges on her saying that the price of eggs and sperm has nothing to do with how men and woman are treated, something she doesn't mention at all
She clearly doesn't support it. OP is trying to imply that men and women have an inherit difference of value in society because of the difference of value of eggs and sperms. But the girl is saying that no, you can't say that because the price of eggs or sperms has nothing to do with how men or women are treated, its just a biological fact that there are much much fewer eggs than sperm and therefore more expensive.
Had the OP stopped at "there is a difference in the price of sperm and eggs", then yeah, the girl would be agreeing with him. But he didnt stop there, he continued and said that this is all we need to know to understand social behavior
47 comments
1 rompermia 2018-05-22
But is she wrong?
1 Salvador66 2018-05-22
She is low IQ.
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
She stated her comment as though it disproves the OP when what she stated was literally the OPs point. Her IQ is lower than the temperature of a refrigerator.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
She explained why eggs are expensive (because they're limited, demand and supply is basic economics, and because it requires surgery to retrieve them as well as lots of time and medication). How is this anything like OPs point which is 'THEY'RE EXPENSIVE BECAUSE THEYRE FROM A WOMAN REEEE' making it out like it's some sexual bias
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
"Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive. Everything you need to know about the human sexual behavior derives from that law."
Is your reading comprehension level in the single digit percentiles?
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
We all know what analogy the OP is trying to make, it's not my fault it doesn't work because the OP has failed to actually realise WHY is that way and has nothing to do with female to male worth and sexual behaviour. This isn't hard to grasp.
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
What analogy is that? I see no analogy.
Apparently for you it is. OP stated the biological fact that sperm has less value than eggs. The commenter backed this up by posting the economic reason why, yet was too stupid to realize that she was not countering the OP but rather proving his point. This is very simple yet you seem to have such low reading comprehension skills that you cannot understand it. Is english your second language?
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
And you're talking about how my reading comprehension is bad? He's literally using the line about eggs and sperm as an anology to human sexual behaviour you dumb fuck. He's saying that eggs are more valuable because women are or are seen as more valuable (which one of your posters below has already said btw).
The woman posting has explained that no, the cost of eggs has nothing to do with the value of women. It's to do with the fact sperm can be easily and cheaply collected whereas collecting eggs involved months of injections and a surgical procedure. Which is expensive.
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
They are. That is a biological fact that comes, in part, from the facts posted by the commenter in the picture. Females have inherent value due to having the babies. If we did not evolve a sense of inherent value towards females then they would be much more likely to be harmed and that would make it more likely that the baby would die and with it the bloodline that would have lived on. Men have inherent disposability due to the natural male role being that of provider and protector. These roles are hihgly deadly in a time period when the most advanced weaponry was a rock and a stick. Hunting prey, defending against predators, and fighting enemy tribes were all deadly tasks that men had to be able to perform at a moments notice since the the death of the male does not necessarily guarantee the death of the baby whereas the death of the female does guarantee the death of the baby since it is inside her. This is why the natural form of mate selection in our species requires males to impress the females and compete for her 'yes' that would allow them to procreate. If a man got that 'yes' he would be much more likely to receive another one from another female as the females instinctually see that he, the inherently disposable male, was able to impress a female, which has inherent value. (This is likely the biological foundation for why many married men report getting more female attention after getting married and wearing their ring on their finger in public.) This is why we as a species have twice as many female ancestors as we have male ancestors. Females have a huge incentive to find the best provider and protector possible as they are incapable of providing for and protecting themselves when they are pregnant and after giving birth they have to be with the child for a very long time. This is why females prefer taller men. Taller men had more mass and thus were more capable of fighting and hunting that the smaller males during our evolution when no advanced weaponry of martial art existed. This is why females have a natural 'gold digging' instinct. They are biologically programmed to try to find the best provider that they can. I can go on, but I will conclude here. Females are valuable because they have the babies and can only have a certain number of them over a certain period of time. The breeding strategies of the sexes are not at all the same and our evolution reflects that.
Nice job ignoring the first part about how men can produce sperm for their whole lives while females have a limit to how many eggs they can produce.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
I already mentioned it in another comment actually. I didn't feel the need to repeat it when yes, I've already stated that's one of the reasons why eggs are expensive. It's basic supply and demand, which again, I've already said.
I'm not going to read some archaic hunter-gather breeding bullshit theory you all cling to to make yourselves feel vindicated. In a modern society women aren't valued more highly then men, yet you choose to use some bullshit basic economics driven example to try to prove that it's the case. Eggs being more expensive is economical, it is not sociological like you're trying to say it is.
It's funny because another of you in this thread are trying to deny this was the point of the post at all
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-05-22
lol. You are literally ignoring anything that goes contrary to what you idiotically believe. What I posted was biologically based fact. Continue to blind yourself if you want.
Yes they are. Women's only shelters, higher funding for women's health related issues, greater amount of women in universities, etc, etc all prove this.
Oh wow. It's almost like incels are individuals and not a collective like IT told me that we are.
Here's your '/s' since I know normies complain abut not being able to comprehend sarcasm (likely related to low reading comprehension abilities).
Have a nice day. I am done since you refuse to address anything that proves you wrong.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
It's interesting how you've flip flopped from 'what analogy, that wasn't what the OP was saying your reading comprehension is shit' to 'I'm going to defend the idea I previously said you were stupid for thinking OP had... also your reading comprehension is shit'.
So now you accept that I was right when I said that the OP was using it to discuss females being worth more, so you must accept that the poster was actually refuting the point by explaining its due to economical reasons.
Great. Have a nice day.
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-05-22
What the hell else are eggs and sperm used for, other than sex, you fucking troglodyte?
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR you fucking imbecile. Hes using them to demonstrate that women must be valued because eggs are more expensive.
What else do you think he's trying to say. Go on I'll wait.
And they're not 'used for' sex. They're a product of sex.
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-05-22
Which is true.
I'm pretty sure I can produce sperm without sex. In fact, I have, and I'm a virgin.
1 Crackcel 2018-05-22
Are you retarded?
1 TruthInBlack 2018-05-22
You might just be the lowest IQ poster to ever post on braincels
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-05-22
Holy shit I cannot imagine being this dumb
1 ctech_n 2018-05-22
I lost like 5 iq points reading this thread
1 ChromeHomeDome 2018-05-22
Why would you think it was talking literally? The post isn’t about extraction cost.
1 Gooi-a-weg 2018-05-22
Lol you're a real dumb dumb
1 based_meme 2018-05-22
You DO realize that the OP is posting something that says men are worthless compared to women, right?
REEEE! MISOGYNY!
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
I'm not a feminist so don't put that one on me.
And yes I do realise that he's saying women are more valuable. But using this ridiculous analogy is wrong because it has nothing to do with inherent sex value it has everything to do with the cost of extraction.
1 Shrek_Ogre_Lord 2018-05-22
Goes on to agree with op. Mfw 🤦♀️
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
They explained why it's expensive to get eggs, unlike OP who thinks it's some sex based conspiracy against men.
1 Shrek_Ogre_Lord 2018-05-22
Pls don’t reply to me normie scum.
1 Hodgey54 2018-05-22
I'm pretty the op in the pic was using it as an analogy.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
Yeah, they were. But she explained why the analogy doesn't work. Eggs aren't expensive because of what point they're trying to make. They're expensive because of supply and demand and the cost and effort of retrieving them.
1 Hodgey54 2018-05-22
They're expensive, meaning they're seen as more valuable. The thought being that women are seen as more valuable, whereas men are expendable pieces that no one cares about.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
Yes and as I've stated, it has fuck all to do with women being more valuable. It's the fact it's expensive as fuck to retrieve them and whilst sperm can be collected in minutes with a man and a pot, retrieval of eggs requires months of the women injecting herself and then having to undergo surgical procedures. I'm not sure why people don't understand why one wouldn't obviously be more expensive
Cavier is more expensive than sperm. Do you think fish are more valuable than men? No.
1 Hodgey54 2018-05-22
This guy. We're not discussing why one would be more expensive than the other. The just fact that they already are. The op in the pic was trying to use this as some allegory where by the woman is the egg, and the man is the sperm.
1 GazzaRowe 2018-05-22
Eggs being more valuable makes women more valuable, not the other way around.
1 PerfectFormCel 2018-05-22
lmao your IQ
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
Are you all the same person?
The only thing you all say is LMAOOOO YOUR IQ OMG YOUR READING COMPREHENSION. Do you like to think you're all more intelligent to make up for the fact you haven't got the emotional intelligence to get a partner?
It's not an insult when funnily enough, everyone but incels agree with what I'm saying. Funny that isn't it.
1 Crackcel 2018-05-22
Where did you read that? You're making things up
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
Go on, what point do you think he's trying to make then?
1 Crackcel 2018-05-22
Copy and paste which words you see that imply a sex based conspiracy against men.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
He is saying that eggs being expensive shows that women are more valued. Aka a sex based conspiracy
Or do you want people to believe this guy is just so deeply concerned about how expensive fertility treatment is
1 Crackcel 2018-05-22
That's not a conspiracy. That's just fucking biology.
1 Derpetite 2018-05-22
Eggs being more expensive is economical not sociological (aka women being valued more) but arguing with incel theory is like pissing into the wind.
1 Ryzasu 2018-05-22
This is so ridiculous, she is literally supporting OP's post while caing it silly.
1 Mr_StealYoGirl69 2018-05-22
feminists are low IQ.
1 Hoeasss 2018-05-22
Proof that women are retarded
1 DukeBluee 2018-05-22
The mental gymnastics some of you go through to prove a point and discredit women....jesus christ lol
1 Karpiem 2018-05-22
Whenever someone says something they don't agree with they just revert to the "low IQ" and "retarded" name calling. Its insane.
1 azucel 2018-05-22
low IQ
1 DukeBluee 2018-05-22
Well, there you have it. There's no counter to this response.
1 Karpiem 2018-05-22
Sorry mate, looks like we're both just low IQ.
1 Gooi-a-weg 2018-05-22
This is just a funny post. She supports op's point completely, true or not, and calls it silly. Lighten up, or everything is a warzone.
1 DukeBluee 2018-05-22
She clearly doesn't support it. OP is trying to imply that men and women have an inherit difference of value in society because of the difference of value of eggs and sperms. But the girl is saying that no, you can't say that because the price of eggs or sperms has nothing to do with how men or women are treated, its just a biological fact that there are much much fewer eggs than sperm and therefore more expensive.
Had the OP stopped at "there is a difference in the price of sperm and eggs", then yeah, the girl would be agreeing with him. But he didnt stop there, he continued and said that this is all we need to know to understand social behavior
1 Gooi-a-weg 2018-05-22
I'm sorry but your point hinges on her saying that the price of eggs and sperm has nothing to do with how men and woman are treated, something she doesn't mention at all
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-05-22
She says it's silly, and then goes on to explain exactly how it's right. Does she actually have the IQ of a cannoli?
1 Mr_StealYoGirl69 2018-05-22
feminists are low IQ.
1 DukeBluee 2018-05-22
She clearly doesn't support it. OP is trying to imply that men and women have an inherit difference of value in society because of the difference of value of eggs and sperms. But the girl is saying that no, you can't say that because the price of eggs or sperms has nothing to do with how men or women are treated, its just a biological fact that there are much much fewer eggs than sperm and therefore more expensive.
Had the OP stopped at "there is a difference in the price of sperm and eggs", then yeah, the girl would be agreeing with him. But he didnt stop there, he continued and said that this is all we need to know to understand social behavior