Topical, inhalable, oral and anal blackpill all in one image. Medicine so potent that leftist SJW cucks are trying to get it removed from the Internet. PROTIP: once something has been posted on the Internet, it stays there forever.

Greatest blackpill graph of all time. Lol at people thinking that personality is so magic it distorts what other people think of your looks(as IT has argued often).

Swallow it or have it forced down your throat; its truth is undeniable.

The blackpill in its full beauty and ugliness in one graph.

cupid is like hawkeye with a trick arrow and right before the arrow hits you it explodes into a million black pills

This is a black pill that needs reminding to numale cucks, who will continue to ignore it, as usual.

Lmao Okcupid tried to do delete all its studies when roasties complained..

Thank god we archived it all.

Why won't they admit lookism is real? Are roasties that retarded

Money, it threatens their business model. They need as many men as possible signing up.

And roasties benefit from the deception.

I think your giving roasties to much credit , they're too retarded

No, I'll admit it. Looks and intelligence are positively correlated.

The uglier you are the more IQ you have.

That would be negative correlation.

No.

Perhaps a dictionary? Or the research?

This is unironically true though.

Smart men get more money = more status so can get better women on average. Hot women can get higher status and wealthier therefore smarter men on average. So IQ and intellect are correlated. Which is why this is a low IQ sub.

sorry bros

Citation needed.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222558910_Intelligence_and_Physical_Attractiveness

There is a correlation, but it's not genetic. It has to do with, as was mentioned, intelligence positively correlating with resource acquisition, which in turn allows for more access to better genes.

Any positive correlation of looks and intelligence is secondary or tertiary.

I didn't claim either way, but your hypothesis does cover a now existing genetic correlation as well.

Reminds me of this: http://i.imgur.com/1DxCMWo.png

Why admit reality when there's a perfectly good pile of sand for you to stick your head into?

saved this. very high IQ.

Top KEL.

Sticky this shit nigga

While it does seem that this means people find others' personalities are better if they're more attractive, there could be more factors in this.

For example, maybe less attractive men and women are more self-conscious and reserved, or maybe going through depression or anxiety. This could lead to a "worse personality".

Also, there is no source here. Just because it's a graph doesn't make it reliable.

lurk more newfag

I love how y'all are all out the "blackpill" and "learning the truth of society", but whenever someone challenges your own beliefs, you just go to ad hominem attacks.

Hey, guess what? I'm ugly, too. I'm a fucking nerd. I have 2 people who I would call actual friends. But you can live your life without hating women because one girl was a bitch to you in high school.

Y'all

(I am a bot beep boop. PM me Suggestions!)

It's not a "belief", you retard, but it was from a now deleted post on OkCupid's blog. The guy who made the graph (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Rudder) has a BsC in math from Harvard and founded a startup worth tens of millions of dollars.

I have 2 people who I would call actual friends.

So? I have also had friends and more than you. Does not matter for getting into relationships.

But you can live your life without hating women because one girl was a bitch to you in high school.

One girl? Oh please you sweet summer child. You can talk about being ugly when random drunk women on the street start making fun of your looks. Until then, get the fuck out.

It's so cute when you fight over who is sadder

Very low IQ insult.

r/iamverysmart

Negative IQ comment.

OMG had the same experience with drunk girls. Also, one time I was with some friends and one told me I should never get laid.

Bitch, please.

/r/BlackPillScience

This is from OK cupid from 2011 iirc. They have been deleting all these studies since the Toronto van attack.

Thanks.

“Just adjust for every single factor in the universe bro”

the classic mental gymnastics of a coper.

So according to your theory almost everyone with looks below 2 has a terrible personality and almost everyone with looks above 4 has a great personality.

I said that there looks to be a correlation with looks and "personality", but it's been my experience that less attractive people are more likely to be depressed or have anxiety, as well as having worse social skills. I know this from experience.

Also, it seems like this study also included men judging women. I haven't read the article, but there is no specification that this was only women judging men. So, if this is true (which, again, I am not definitively saying that there is not a bias with looks and "personality"), men do it just as much as women, which means they aren't the "chooser" sex. If I am wrong about this and the article says that it was women judging men exclusively, I will edit this out.

Fine, but how much of the correlation do you think your theory explains?

I don't know, it's just a theory. What I do know is that there are certain factors that go into this that don't just make it "if you're a Chad people will think your personality is better"

Be real. To explain the correlation in that graph there needs to be a ridiculously massive effect. Do you really think good looking people have such amazing personalities and bad looking people have such terrible personalities? Or maybe it's more likely that people vote according to whether they have positive feelings about the person, and those positive feelings are determined almost exclusively by the picture?

Citation?

are you as interested now that the citation was provided? or are you back to pretending this isn't reality?

I asked for the source and found it. I didn't feel any need to continue the conversation. It's interesting that the reaction towards asking for the source is so negative.

It’s negative because you were only asking in an attempt to discredit the post. Since when you got the source, you just ignored it and moved on, instead of learning from it and adding to the conversation.

I posted a singular word in question, there is no way you could possibly know my intention from that single word.

so what have you learned from the source? what are your new thoughts on the situation? have you learned anything about the degree to which women base their perception of your "personality" on your looks?

I thought the source was interesting and certainly provides some evidence towards a variety of conclusions. However the method of collection left a certain amount to be desired and I would love to see more research on the topic. People may be trying to game the algorithm for more favorable matches by making their personality scores reflect their attractiveness scores. The people who use a dating app may also be more likely to judge a book by its cover than other groups. I also wonder about the relationship between the variables, and the chance that they may not be causative. For example, maybe people who are typically considered unattractive, due to different or poor treatment in younger life, actually do develop more undesirable personalities as opposed to simply being assessed with bias. That would be particularly interesting, and highlight how important it is to treat others kindly and with affection no matter how they look.

Sounds like you didn’t even read it and wrote out a generic dismissal that really could have applied to any article ever written on the subject, because you decided from the beginning you didn’t want to believe it.

I haven't dismissed anything. I thought the study had interesting implications and will be looking for more on the subject. Pointing out ambiguities on the nature of the research isn't being dismissive at all, it's just pointing out areas I'd be wanting to hear more about. For example the relationship between personality and attractiveness, it seems quite relevant to wonder about how one may impact the other and how the other might impact the first.

Wonder how long this was made up.

lmao is this how you cope? This was made by OKCupid studies.

https://daily.jstor.org/dont-fall-in-love-okcupid/ As someone with autism who doesn’t understand social cues. You guys are kind of funny to me. I don’t see the world as this persistent field where you have to be this in order to attract the most females or males.

true I don't think you need to be a Chad to attract women. But if you have undesirable trait, well,.. tough luck.

Then who cares? I’m autistic and the idea of marriage just doesn’t quite sit well with me. I don’t care about trying to please people, I do what makes me happy, not others. What I blame society such as pop culture for is the monumental pressure to make both genders participate in sex without learning and taking in rejection.

Sexuality still exists

The man with the single most shittiest personality out of apparently thousands of attractive men with a rating of 4 or higher on looks gets a better personality score than literally anyone with looks rated lower than 2. Unbelievable.

Dude is this real

yes

You know data like this is very well known. There is a link between perceived attractiveness and perceived personality. This link however, is not the only factor involved in perceiving personality. Even more, OKCupid likely isn’t a representative sample of the general population, and even if you assume that it is, this shows no indication that looks is the sole or even strongest determining factor in the decision for a long term relationship.

The live science article doesn’t correlate at all to what the actual study says. On top of that, the study you linked, shows over 10 different factors that ranked more important than physical attractiveness. The procedure that the article reported doesn’t even match what the study did.

This was the study used in the article.

The study I linked says science direct on the upper left corner while your's doesn't.

“study is invalid because it does not take into account every single factor in the universe unless it supports my Just world worldview bro”

so this proves the better your personality, the more attractive you appear.

Thanks for the blue pill doc

Naw

Graphs are functions. X is the input, y is the result. X to Y . Not Y to X.

Source? No hate. Genuinely curious.

So not a single outlier? Not one? Where even is the source on this?

OKcupis themselves posted the study, but they removed it from their website after Toronto van attack.

Are you guys seriously taking OkCupid as an example on to how Humans interact?

Yes.

Mainstream researchers don't really tackle these things and their sample pools are laughably small. Meanwhile OkCupid's research is based off a data pool of millions (tens of millions?) of active users. There's no uncertainty about these results.

Yes I do take a dating website's data about dating as an example of how dating works

I think it speaks volumes to the pathetic shut-in mentality of incels when they take statistics of social media as being an accurate representation of real life decision-making.

what? you don't make any sense.

I implied its self-evident that people's decision-making differs on social media compared to real life. Enough so that a statistic like this is quite useless if you try to apply it to real life interactions.

Do I really have to spell everything out?

Do you think you might be misinterpreting this data toward your confirmation bias? I find people more physically attractive when I like their personalities. That could also explain the trend in this graph. A graph with a linear trend doesn't actually indicate which axis is influencing the other.

I get that that doesn't confirm to your worldview.

It is a dating site. They are judging people based on photographs and a short self description. Where does the "personality" part comes from, if you never interacted with that person? They infer your personality based on your looks!!!

Yeah you definitely can't get any idea of what a person is like with a sample of their communication. Also the study does not indicate that the ratings are made with no interaction between the subjects. WHY would they ask people to rate the personality of people they have never spoken to?

"OkCupid found that ratings for attractiveness and personality correlate very closely" https://qz.com/241479/okcupid-experimented-on-users-and-proved-everyone-just-looks-at-the-pictures/

WHY would they ask people to rate the personality of people they have never spoken to? Personality was judged based on the self description and pics. But ultimately pics are the only thing that truly matters.

Finding out that there are shallow people on a dating site is hardly definitive proof that all women are shallow and that Incels are the true victims of a violation of human rights. Next you'll point to tinder for more outrage.

If there is ONE ugly misogynist with a wife in the world, incel theory kind of falls apart.

If there is ONE ugly misogynist with a wife in the world, incel theory kind of falls apart.

No it doesn't, many rich guys have hot wifes even though they act like bastards and are ugly.

Incels are the true victims of a violation of human rights

Nobody makes that argument, women are not evil for wanting to fuck good looking guys. It's natural, because good looks are a sign of genetic quality, and why wouldn't they want to have progeny of high genetic quality. We are not victims of women or society, but of genetics.

So why bother with Intel culture? Why stoke this hated and victim complex? Why associate with people who say things like "one day all jailbait will become our rapeslaves" and exclusively refer to women as cunts?

Is this incel nonsense really going to get you laid? Or is it going to add to the cycle of frustration and anger and bitterness and resentment until you do something you shouldn't do? Or until one of your brethren does? What are you getting out of this?

So why bother with Incel culture?

It is conforting to know that there are other guys in a similar situation in which i am. It is a sort of coping mechanism.

Is this incel nonsense really going to get you laid?

Well it helps, knowing what the real causes of your problems are, so you can deal with them to the degree that you can. Lifting, plastic surgery...

until you do something you shouldn't do? I don't wish to hurt myself or the people around me, there are other things that i can do with the time that i still have on this planet. In regards to the nasty comments that other guys make. I think that they do it just to vent their frustration. They don't really mean it.

They don't really mean it.

Except the fucker who killed all those people.

Knowing what your real problems are.

I really don't think you do. I think commiserating and confirmation bias is convincing you that you do. When we say that you could try being nice to women you say "WE ARE NICE IT'S JUST THAT WE'RE UGLY" I don't believe for a solitary second that you're as nice to the women that you bitterly loathe as you think you are.

There are solutions to this issue that you are not going to find in incel culture, and I wouldn't be shocked to find that some of the problems Incels are facing are ones they created for themselves.

Except the fucker who killed all those people.

A guy with some psychological issues does something, the entire community is guilty by association. Hm...

I don't believe for a solitary second that you're as nice to the women

If i'm such an evil person with such an awful personality, how come i have many friends, even female friends. That is right women like my personality enough to be friends with me. Could it just be that i'm not good looking enough for them to consider me as a sexual partner?

I've got some friends with some particularly vile politics. Would fuck them with someone else's dick. If I were a woman and found out that someone was part of this community I wouldn't fuck them if we were the last people on earth. But I'm sure none of this community's culture comes out in your interaction with women

Are you familiar with the NiceGuy phenomenon?

As for the murderer, the violence makes him something of an outlier. The hatred does not.

Not at all surprised.

Perhaps a dictionary? Or the research?

So why bother with Incel culture?

It is conforting to know that there are other guys in a similar situation in which i am. It is a sort of coping mechanism.

Is this incel nonsense really going to get you laid?

Well it helps, knowing what the real causes of your problems are, so you can deal with them to the degree that you can. Lifting, plastic surgery...

until you do something you shouldn't do? I don't wish to hurt myself or the people around me, there are other things that i can do with the time that i still have on this planet. In regards to the nasty comments that other guys make. I think that they do it just to vent their frustration. They don't really mean it.

They don't really mean it.

Except the fucker who killed all those people.

Knowing what your real problems are.

I really don't think you do. I think commiserating and confirmation bias is convincing you that you do. When we say that you could try being nice to women you say "WE ARE NICE IT'S JUST THAT WE'RE UGLY" I don't believe for a solitary second that you're as nice to the women that you bitterly loathe as you think you are.

There are solutions to this issue that you are not going to find in incel culture, and I wouldn't be shocked to find that some of the problems Incels are facing are ones they created for themselves.

I don't know, it's just a theory. What I do know is that there are certain factors that go into this that don't just make it "if you're a Chad people will think your personality is better"