[DEEP SPACE RAGE FUEL][WARNING:DON'T CLICK IF YOU ARE SUICIDAL]Incels are now 18 % of the population. That's 1 in every 5 guys. It will get worse with time, of course.

39 2018-05-20 by hermopietrobon

25 comments

1 Salvador66 2018-05-20

Proof that females can't be incel these days. Since Tinder was invented, female celibacy plummeted to 0%.

1 minoxidilcel 2018-05-20

seems like a made up graph tbh

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

It's not "made up" (anyone can go on norc's GSS website and download the data), but it's erroneous.

https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/992105680000749570

1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-05-20

Above all, it counts one year without sex as "celibacy"

1 BF8211 2018-05-20

Nope. Lyman Stone is a pretty well known economist/statistician who works for the USDA.

1 Revoltization 2018-05-20

those numbers are low and inaccurate, but still. femoids are at fault.

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

Here's the fixed version:

https://twitter.com/lymanstoneky/status/992105680000749570

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

Yeah, "fixed". Once they realized that incels are justified, they quickly fixed it. Give me a break.

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

There's still a large discrepency between the female and male celibacy. 0% female celibacy is unrealistic and it's not like (((they))) changed the GSS/NORC data.

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

Yeah and what kind of mistake did he make, lol... How obvious is that? So there were 0 women reporting absence of sex and all of a sudden it turned out that there are women that have reported celibacy... Seriously? How dumb is this the world to believe that fix?

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

The original data wasn't changed, the graph he drew was just erroneous.

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

There either were or weren't females reporting celibacy. You can't report that there aren't, which is obviously true btw, and all of a sudden, later, say that there are actually 8%?!?

You believe everything, don't you?

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

It's not a conspiracy, anyone can download the data on the NORC/GSS website... The female celibates have always been there in the data, his graph just failed to show that. And again, he's just a random guy who downloaded the data from NORC, he isn't in the position to (((change))) the data.

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

But how can his graph "just fail to show that"? He had literally one job. Are you hearing yourself?

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

Are you actually retarded?

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

God you are fucking thick.

You gather data of men and women reporting "yes" or "no" to the question of celibacy
You put that data on X and Y diagram corresponding to the year it was gathered in

Two steps and you believe that somehow he fucked them up and missed those reports of women that said they were celibate? You actually believe that? You pretty god damn naive.

What happened was that this is a long kept secret from society. Tinder and OKCupid deleted all their similar gatherings of data that showed that all women fuck constantly a minority of the men and that a significant amount of guys are celibate.

They deleted these studies after the incel shootings happened. Why? Because They don't want half of the fucking male population realizing that it's all a scam.

Please, think before replying, don't make it personal. Reconsider your emotion and primitive instinct to get defensive. THINK and then reply.

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

Again, he isn't associated with the data collectors. He just downloaded an open data set and attempted to make a graph from the data. There's no coverup here since the original data hasn't been changed.

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

But how do you know it hasn't been changed? First of all. Second of all, how does one fuck up something so simple that a 1th grader can do?

And third of all, how does one not realize that (((they))) don't want this out in the open and are covering every leaks of info on this subject?

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

There are people who've downloaded the data before and you can look at the commit dates on github.
He fucked, I don't know how. But it has to be his fault if the original data hasn't been changed.
Not a good coverup if it "still" shows a large discrepency. Especially among ethnic men and women (which would confirm "it's over for ethnicels, ethic roasties go for white men")

1 Ploard 2018-05-20

Here's a bigger blackpill:

https://twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/992108016597127168

1 hermopietrobon 2018-05-20

GOYIM KNOWS

SHUT IT DOWN

1 azucel 2018-05-20

IT: t-they aren’t incels!!1 they dont have your shitty attitude

1 Korangar_Begins 2018-05-20

The Twitter bro has some pretty good points

1 cookin_breakfast 2018-05-20

1998 tho