I fail to see how your words are relevant to this article. If you are talking about sex redistribution in general, there are other ways to achieve that than literally enforcing women to fuck incels. Be more imaginative (for example off the top of my head, government funded plastic surgery, government incentives to stay monogamous etc).
Although you are right, an attempt at maintaining the moral high ground should be a serious priority. Just because your enemy tortures and kills the PoWs it catches doesn't mean you should, even if you would derive a level of righteous satisfaction from it.
That's not what he is trying to say. Enforcing monogamy goes both ways. High status men get ONE wife and stick with her. That way the average women cannot hope to just be the next in line on Chad's spinning plates and has to actually try to engage with men of her own status, invest in them and see them as human and not simply swipe left.
Monogamy can't be forced in good faith. There must be strong incentives. Prior to the 20th century women were far more humble and pragmatic because the fact that they have zero(possibly even negative) productive economic value was a reality that they had to face. Today they are largely shielded from having to confront the harsh negative aspects of being a woman, due to government policies and initiatives that have transferred enough wealth and opportunities from men to women, that they no longer NEED men to survive, as it stands at the moment. However this arrangement is wholly unsustainable.
He's right tho. The oldest marriage laws we have records of state that they were limiting the number of wives a man could have because there were too many civil disputes over wives.
No, he's not. Marriage is an economical construct. Like almost everything humans do. Now economics have changed and marriage is simply not needed anymore. It became obsolete, like slavery.
That idiot just completely burned himself publicly. He's fucking over lol. No one is going to take a word he says seriously from now on.
You're kinda right, but marriage isn't obsolete (neither is slavery, unfortunately). Most people still are getting married, but people are getting married later and for different reasons.
Because more women and men are going further in their education than past generations, more young people are putting off marriage. This also means more young people are taking on debt, moving around, and, ultimately, staying single for longer because of it.
Furthermore, the institution of marriage evolves. People are getting married for different reasons and have different expectations. For most of human history, marriage has basically been a contract between families, and it was mainly about economic and status interests between those families. But over time, marriage has become more of a personal contract and people are mostly marrying for love and connection. One possible issue, though, is that it could be that individuals are expecting too much from a partner. Many people want to find another person that they can connect to emotionally, intellectually, sexually, spiritually, etc., but that's a tall order. How rare is it to find someone who is compatible with every single part of you?
Or maybe qe could make it so needing a woman isn’t the end all solution to life. Too many guys put their entire self worth into this. My dad is married and he doesn’t get any love and affection from my mom, hes just a walking wallet/ATM. Hes married and hes probably hoping for death just as much as us.
The solution isn’t forced marriage, you can’t force attraction.
It's not a fucking choice to hang our self-esteem on whether we can get a woman or not. It's impossible to be happy without ever being loved in your life and being uniquely important to anyone. Fuck you for belittling us.
Make $20,000. Buy a Zero SR. Go split lanes at 80mph between cars that are stopped due to traffic. Then tell me if you are still crying about not being loved.
I’m a curry. I’ve seen my white 6’2 friends get the actual attraction from women while I got the fake attraction because I have money and could be their provider. This is why i understand the black pill and frequent this sub.
I decided to leave that shit behind and if I never get laid or have a girlfriend in my life again i’ll be fine. Honestly i could chop my dick off and the only thing that will change is i’ll have to sit down to take a piss.
Women are not worth it and they will never be. If you aren’t a 6’2 white chad its over. Why complain? Just move on and spend your money on yourself.
The solution isn’t forced marriage, you can’t force attraction.
THIS! You can't force attraction. Instead of trying to force people into relationships, we should work to make men more sexually appealing. Subsidize male plastic surgery. Legalize anabolic steroids. Ugliness should be seen for what it is - a medical disorder, and treatment shouldn't be just an option only affordable to the wealthy, but a god damn RIGHT that men of all social classes are entitled to!
Fuck forcing people into relationships. When women hit their 30's and get desperate for marriage/family, they already force THEMSELVES into relationships with beta males, and what's the result? High divorce risk, sexless marriages, cheating, constant nagging, high demands (he has to compensate for his looks), game playing, testy behavior, etc. You can't expect a happy or healthy relationship with a woman who isn't genuinely into you.
You don't understand how hypergamy works, if you have a society where every man is a total Chad, the lesser chads will become the incel. Getting rid of ugly people won't stop incel. There will always be a relatively less attractive class, and they will become the incels, if hypergamy is not kept in check.
Nobody should be forced into relationships, I agree, but if we lived in a balanced, fair society, a patriarchal society (I'm talking a soft patriarchy), on general terms, a monogamous marriage leading to a family would be the standard model of society. In such a state, a female 3/10 has no idea what it is like to sleep with Chad. She's never been anywhere close to fucking chad, all she ever had access to was a male 3/10. But they took time to get to know one another, married young and stayed happy. Women loose their ability to relate to or empathize with men when they've had too many sexual partners. They are most loyal in monogamous societies, when they've only been with one man.
what is enforced monogamy? is it like arranged marriage system where you and your parents choose your partner and you stick with her/him for the most of your life?
monogamy can be socially reinforced, rewarding good behavior and shaming bad behavior. Back in the monogamous patriarchal days, if a single woman was dating more than 3 potential mates at a time, she'd be ran out of town as the village whore and her reputation would be ruined. Actually, this was also enforced onto men too.
monogamy can be socially reinforced, rewarding good behavior and shaming bad behavior. Back in the monogamous patriarchal days, if a single woman was dating more than 3 potential mates at a time, she'd be ran out of town as the village whore and her reputation would be ruined. Actually, this was also enforced onto men too.
38 comments
1 Board_Gaming 2018-05-18
Because women aren't like EBT cards to be handed out to sexually poor men.
1 RaginAssholeThroaway 2018-05-18
where does he say that?
1 Board_Gaming 2018-05-18
Those are my words, not a quote from the article.
1 RaginAssholeThroaway 2018-05-18
I fail to see how your words are relevant to this article. If you are talking about sex redistribution in general, there are other ways to achieve that than literally enforcing women to fuck incels. Be more imaginative (for example off the top of my head, government funded plastic surgery, government incentives to stay monogamous etc).
1 vindicay2070 2018-05-18
Just get rid of HR and other unproductive make-work jobs along with welfare. It will force women to confront pragmatism.....boom! Balance restored.
1 LooksMatterToWomen 2018-05-18
THIS!
1 ShinJoe 2018-05-18
JFL @ a mod of Braincels making this comment. That comment belongs on Inceltears.
1 Board_Gaming 2018-05-18
I'm stating that women aren't objects. That statement belongs everywhere.
1 Disappointedshorty 2018-05-18
Meanwhile women literally treat men like they’re objects.
1 vindicay2070 2018-05-18
Although you are right, an attempt at maintaining the moral high ground should be a serious priority. Just because your enemy tortures and kills the PoWs it catches doesn't mean you should, even if you would derive a level of righteous satisfaction from it.
1 yuyuyuyuu 2018-05-18
That's not what he is trying to say. Enforcing monogamy goes both ways. High status men get ONE wife and stick with her. That way the average women cannot hope to just be the next in line on Chad's spinning plates and has to actually try to engage with men of her own status, invest in them and see them as human and not simply swipe left.
1 vindicay2070 2018-05-18
Monogamy can't be forced in good faith. There must be strong incentives. Prior to the 20th century women were far more humble and pragmatic because the fact that they have zero(possibly even negative) productive economic value was a reality that they had to face. Today they are largely shielded from having to confront the harsh negative aspects of being a woman, due to government policies and initiatives that have transferred enough wealth and opportunities from men to women, that they no longer NEED men to survive, as it stands at the moment. However this arrangement is wholly unsustainable.
1 yuyuyuyuu 2018-05-18
I agree with this, of course. It's eventually going to change as society descends into madness, though.
1 Mercury1245 2018-05-18
How is it not sustainable?
1 Sovs 2018-05-18
However men are just tax money cash cows for finding the daddy-state.
1 norwood_victim 2018-05-18
Anybody want to bet a Steam game that he'll have a blackpill book on the shelves this holiday season?
1 Space-Pirate-Calico 2018-05-18
He's right tho. The oldest marriage laws we have records of state that they were limiting the number of wives a man could have because there were too many civil disputes over wives.
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-05-18
No, he's not. Marriage is an economical construct. Like almost everything humans do. Now economics have changed and marriage is simply not needed anymore. It became obsolete, like slavery.
That idiot just completely burned himself publicly. He's fucking over lol. No one is going to take a word he says seriously from now on.
1 Marcadius_ 2018-05-18
Ruh roh Raggy, rownrotes roming rour ray.
1 PuleaSpataru69 2018-05-18
Then why the hell are single mothers using the state to raise children???? Putting the burden on the state is good for you??
1 AgreeableBlacksmith9 2018-05-18
You're kinda right, but marriage isn't obsolete (neither is slavery, unfortunately). Most people still are getting married, but people are getting married later and for different reasons.
Because more women and men are going further in their education than past generations, more young people are putting off marriage. This also means more young people are taking on debt, moving around, and, ultimately, staying single for longer because of it.
Furthermore, the institution of marriage evolves. People are getting married for different reasons and have different expectations. For most of human history, marriage has basically been a contract between families, and it was mainly about economic and status interests between those families. But over time, marriage has become more of a personal contract and people are mostly marrying for love and connection. One possible issue, though, is that it could be that individuals are expecting too much from a partner. Many people want to find another person that they can connect to emotionally, intellectually, sexually, spiritually, etc., but that's a tall order. How rare is it to find someone who is compatible with every single part of you?
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-05-18
Social inertia. I mean you are talking about an institution as old as civilization itself. It's not going to disappear overnight.
The economic incentive for marriage is long gone. And human behaviour is economic behaviour.
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-18
Or maybe qe could make it so needing a woman isn’t the end all solution to life. Too many guys put their entire self worth into this. My dad is married and he doesn’t get any love and affection from my mom, hes just a walking wallet/ATM. Hes married and hes probably hoping for death just as much as us.
The solution isn’t forced marriage, you can’t force attraction.
1 yuyuyuyuu 2018-05-18
It's not a fucking choice to hang our self-esteem on whether we can get a woman or not. It's impossible to be happy without ever being loved in your life and being uniquely important to anyone. Fuck you for belittling us.
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-18
Stop being a slave to pussy.
Make $20,000. Buy a Zero SR. Go split lanes at 80mph between cars that are stopped due to traffic. Then tell me if you are still crying about not being loved.
1 trevmon 2018-05-18
you don't know what it's like that's why you think it must be easy to do without
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-18
I’m a curry. I’ve seen my white 6’2 friends get the actual attraction from women while I got the fake attraction because I have money and could be their provider. This is why i understand the black pill and frequent this sub.
I decided to leave that shit behind and if I never get laid or have a girlfriend in my life again i’ll be fine. Honestly i could chop my dick off and the only thing that will change is i’ll have to sit down to take a piss.
Women are not worth it and they will never be. If you aren’t a 6’2 white chad its over. Why complain? Just move on and spend your money on yourself.
1 Mercury1245 2018-05-18
What a stupid fucking comment lol
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-18
Ok spend the rest of your life chasing pussy thag doesn’t give a fuck about you then mr. big shot
1 LooksMatterToWomen 2018-05-18
THIS! You can't force attraction. Instead of trying to force people into relationships, we should work to make men more sexually appealing. Subsidize male plastic surgery. Legalize anabolic steroids. Ugliness should be seen for what it is - a medical disorder, and treatment shouldn't be just an option only affordable to the wealthy, but a god damn RIGHT that men of all social classes are entitled to!
Fuck forcing people into relationships. When women hit their 30's and get desperate for marriage/family, they already force THEMSELVES into relationships with beta males, and what's the result? High divorce risk, sexless marriages, cheating, constant nagging, high demands (he has to compensate for his looks), game playing, testy behavior, etc. You can't expect a happy or healthy relationship with a woman who isn't genuinely into you.
1 Ji6S4W 2018-05-18
You don't understand how hypergamy works, if you have a society where every man is a total Chad, the lesser chads will become the incel. Getting rid of ugly people won't stop incel. There will always be a relatively less attractive class, and they will become the incels, if hypergamy is not kept in check.
Nobody should be forced into relationships, I agree, but if we lived in a balanced, fair society, a patriarchal society (I'm talking a soft patriarchy), on general terms, a monogamous marriage leading to a family would be the standard model of society. In such a state, a female 3/10 has no idea what it is like to sleep with Chad. She's never been anywhere close to fucking chad, all she ever had access to was a male 3/10. But they took time to get to know one another, married young and stayed happy. Women loose their ability to relate to or empathize with men when they've had too many sexual partners. They are most loyal in monogamous societies, when they've only been with one man.
1 RedPillMGTOW 2018-05-18
I bet my finest shower sponge that he didn´t said this.
1 The_Real_Cannaman 2018-05-18
Fake as fuck
1 yuyuyuyuu 2018-05-18
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life.html
It's real. Holy shit that lifefuel. That feel when the most influental intellectual in the Western world has NO disagreements with incels. NONE.
1 dullsite 2018-05-18
They're so toasty lmao. Don't they understand the continuation of the cycle is inevitable?
1 Westcoastincel 2018-05-18
he's wrong, being incel doesnt mean you should kill people
1 trevmon 2018-05-18
no one "should" kill anyone that's why we make laws to prevent it tho
1 SaltShaker8383 2018-05-18
No one should kill anyone, he is simply explaining aggravating factors that cause some people to
1 trevmon 2018-05-18
Jordan blackpillerson
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-05-18
10,000 years ago with the introduction of farming came the introduction of the concept of property.
Historically even tyrannical kings and heads of states realized enforced monogamy was a necessity to have a productive labour force.
If you had too many single men there would be mass unemployment, crime, and and civil unrest.
1 AntiAbleism 2018-05-18
This is absolutely true. Sexual frustration causes aggressiveness.
1 gand_khau 2018-05-18
what is enforced monogamy? is it like arranged marriage system where you and your parents choose your partner and you stick with her/him for the most of your life?
1 Ji6S4W 2018-05-18
monogamy can be socially reinforced, rewarding good behavior and shaming bad behavior. Back in the monogamous patriarchal days, if a single woman was dating more than 3 potential mates at a time, she'd be ran out of town as the village whore and her reputation would be ruined. Actually, this was also enforced onto men too.
1 Tiren9 2018-05-18
The rational solution is legalizing prostitution. What he said it was the only option for other species during evolution
1 Ji6S4W 2018-05-18
monogamy can be socially reinforced, rewarding good behavior and shaming bad behavior. Back in the monogamous patriarchal days, if a single woman was dating more than 3 potential mates at a time, she'd be ran out of town as the village whore and her reputation would be ruined. Actually, this was also enforced onto men too.