Theory: a reason why females have to actively hate men they don't like

184  2018-05-17 by kholaris

Something that has been discussed multiple times is men and women both have standards but men have much lower beauty standards. This disparity has been explained by these facts 1) eggs are expensive and sperm is cheap 2) women can only have limited number of children in their lifetime 3) women have to invest heavily in their children from the moment the child is conceived. Nothing controversial here.

But another phenomenon, equally important, that is often overlooked, except in marginal groups like incels, is the disparity between men and women as far as their reaction is concerned when they are approached by, or even are in position of being approached, like being in the same hallway or room, by someone that is physically lower than their standard.

Ask yourself: what'll be your reaction if there's a 2/10 (say, minimum average standard for a male is 3/10), obese girl in your class. At best, you'll treat her as a human being; just someone who you are not sexually attracted to. At worst, you'll even feel pity for her that she will never be able to get married, have sex, etc. (Even though, it's probably untrue.)

Things get complicated when a female has to interact with a male that is lower than her standard, say 5/10. It's almost common sense here on this forum that she'll be as mean to him as she can and get away with it. At best, she'll frown at the subhuman if he has to interact with her, even though the interaction is entirely nonsexual like a group assignment, and secretly wish him to die. At worst, if he even dares as so much as to complement, she is predictably going to turn to an alpha authority to get him removed from her field of vision. "Alpha authority" can be her boyfriend, Twitter followers, HR, police, etc. It's not outlandish to think that a woman would not restrain herself from killing a male, or preferably getting him killed, for his crime of being ugly if she could get away with that.

Analyzing this scenario from an evolutionary-psychological and biological prospective, it's not difficult to reason why it is so.

This disparity has it roots in the differences in physical strength between the genders. It boils down to the fact that the male, even the betast of the beta male, can overpower a female physically. In a lawless jungle society, it's not hard to grasp that forced sex was commonplace thing, considering male frustration combined with lawlessness. So a single rape incidence had the possibility to foil all her plans and shit tests to get alpha genes and she could end up raising a beta male's seed for like two years. Not the ideal ending and probably the worst thing to happen to her after death. Naturally, the alpha and his disciples were the only authorities she could turn to to get the beta removed.

Here comes the complex part: removing the beta after rape, in accord with modern laws, was completely useless. He had achieved his mission of spreading his seed and she was going to have the child anyway because of lack of "Plan B" and handy abortion. So, she had to detect and preferably get the culprit killed or beaten BEFORE he was going to rape. It's a little complicated thing to do but here's rule of thumb: alphas, the desired mates, had harems and women came without efforts to them. So they had no reason to rape. So it was only a frustrated, virgin beta thing. That's why the correlation.

What the thumb rule is not:

beta male = rapist

what it is:

beta male = potential rapist

For a cave woman's prospective, the difference didn't matter. That's why women give all sorts of signals to the alphas to remove the "potential rapist" by being unconsciously (and sometimes consciously) bitchy in case of interaction, any interaction, between the beta male and the female.

tl;dr; Women have high standards but also an outright hatred for lower-than-standard males. It can be explained by the fact that low SMV men are not getting laid, probably frustrated and can resort to forcing females to have sex. By wanting to get the beta removed, women are subconsciously motivated by the desire to remove a potential "rapist" and safely execute their evolutionary strategy without interference.

122 comments

Proven true. Being 5/10 or lower as a man is frowned upon by women.

Goes along with my theory that women are literally Hitler. They'd breed sub-5s out of existence if they could

"all people of this gender are literally the same as a fascist, genocidal Nazi leader, considered one of the most disgusting people in human history, who was responsible for the brutal slaughter of millions of innocent adults and children"

"because they won't sleep with me"

Some say He did nothing wrong!

nah they're hitler because even though they're horrible monsters, people still agree with them and want them to succeed

was responsible for the brutal slaughter of millions of innocent adults and children"

[Citation needed]

I assumed the comment was a joke, but I could be wrong

Holocaust Memorial

lmfao you could have at least went with Encyclopedia Brittannica or some source which pretends to be neutral. This is literally straight from the heebs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgcrtvomXoI&feature=youtu.be&t=60&bpctr=1526652246&has_verified=1

You’re an incel and a holocaust denier... this is one of few cases where suicide is recommended

People don't deserve to die just because you (and others, it doesn't matter how many people) find their opinions objectionable or even abhorrent.

[removed]

So you're the type of person who uses literally figuratively.

Do you believe in free markets or free will?

The problem is 5/10 men seek 9/10 women. Lower your standards bruh. Tubbies and tubbies. Uglies date uglies. Or just make a lot of money.

You are naive, my child.

Women complaining about average-looking men chasing them believing that they are 9/10, but they are actually the men's looks-match.

This. Everyone claims Incels are only pursuing 9/10 women but I think most of them want their LooksMatch or a 3/10 - 5.5/10 female.

I know what my LooksMatch is because I have multiple sisters and yet I've never been with a woman who was good looking as them (if that doesn't sound unironically incestuous).

If only they had the forethought or ability to work in a team with other women 😂

This post will get maximum 20 upvotes, meanwhile the shitty meme that was postead twenty times last week already will get 200.

The meme about me getting brutally mogged got close to 200 upvotes.

That was a good meme

It sure was. Why even try getting a woman? I am a shortcel.

can you link that meme?

Me too

It's over for Salvycels in 2018.

Looks are all that matter to women. This is completely yet increasingly obvious. Men need to wake up.

Idk, Ugly men get laid all the time, I mean, your dad fucked your mum and I'm sure you're ugly

My dad, while not exactly a Chad, was good looking when he was my age. Had several cute girlfriends before marrying.

Seriously, cmon. How the fuck do you think Trump got laid? The man is a fat orange.

He was a filthy rich high tier normie, maybe even Chadlite when younger. He got fat and old.

There’s plenty of ugly people who find love. I just gave one example. Women aren’t that shallow.

Also you use “normie” “chad” and “stacy” unironically lol

Low IQ

Bullshit. Trump is tall and big boned, and was pretty damn good looking when younger. Combined with his wealth, fame, and power, he was a literal 9 or 10.

Powerful men don't need looks.

failing to grasp that people age

conflating getting laid with a woman that actually cares about him.

He said looks are all that matter to women. He didn't say if a guy has billions of dollars she won't look past his looks to fuck him, or even marry him. Fucking a rich guy doesn't mean his looks don't matter to her. Living in denial and rationalizing that his looks don't matter because you fucked him for his money doesn't mean his looks don't matter. People do shit begrudgingly all the time. Internal protest is the beginning of civil disobedience.

He was also a billionair and had thr amount of power billionaires had. Women are also attracted to powerful males.

He's rich and high status. He was also good looking in his late teenage years into his 20s.

High IQ post. Too bad no one will fucking read it because only shitty memes get upvoted in this sub anymore.

+1

I read it but I can understand why many don't. Most incels are depressed and tired of life in general. Part of that is feeling mentally worn out all the time so it's hard to get yourself to read long effortposts.

Many incels come here because incel communities are the only ones where you can talk about incel related things without everyone yelling "REE MISOGYNIST" "you're not entitled to sex" etc. to them. Memes are popular in part because they're easy to consume and they let incels connect to each other through shared ideas and feelings.

This is a really shitty, low iq post.

Stop trying to logically justify shitty treatment toward other people. If you want it for yourself, that's fine, but stop trying to create these elaborate bullshit hyperlogical justifications for why women are being shitty. It's no different than trying to explain why we're biologically compelled to eat sugar until we get diabetes and die.

This website is a low iq, pseudointellgient place for cuckolds to flagellate themselves like those religious sects of old who feel they deserve to be punished for being born.

Nobody is blaming himself, is just pointing the psychological-evolutive reasons of why roasties of an fertile age act like they like around genetically inferior man, this is not supposed to rid them off of guilt.

I will point that i don't deeply believe that females are evil, but rather their sexuality is, just to compare how prepubescent and very old ladies treated me vs females of my age, it's like heaven and hell.

U stupid ass fag

Nigga come to eat my ugly ass lmao wtf areyou?

Faggot

This website is a low iq, pseudointellgient place for cuckolds to flagellate themselves like those religious sects of old who feel they deserve to be punished for being born.

I like a good insult as much as the next guy. Cheers.

wew lad

not to mention evolutionary psychology is largely bullshit

This website is a low iq, pseudointellgient place for cuckolds to flagellate themselves like those religious sects of old who feel they deserve to be punished for being born.

I like a good insult as much as the next guy. Cheers.

Pretty intelligent post. Women evolved to find us disgusting and to hate us as the gatekeeping sex.

I like men, I fuck one on a regular basis. And he's not a Chad (although that is his cat's name)

We are talking about legit UGLY men not what females consider "ugly"(aka average).

High IQ as fuck.

Truly a void pill.

Great post. V high IQ

Damn, probably the highest IQ post I've seen on this subreddit. Never even thought of that before.

I love this sub.

Yup.

Chad: "Hey girl how you doing?"

Stacy: starts flirting with him

Incel: "Hey girl how you doing?"

Stacy: rudely ignores him. Later tells her friends how some creepy thug catcalled her

8+ SD IQ post.

To nature, there is nothing more immoral than sub-par genes and their expression.

Indeed. Idk why you got downvoted. Nature hates unfit genes.

Wow I've never seen someone try to dress up utter bullshit so eloquently since Jordan peterson

nice argument, where is he wrong?

He wont give any examples of why its wrong. However I agree. While well written, most of this post past the intro is speculation.

where? give an explicit example

Phone is freaking out rn so cant quote but sometbing about women wanting to kill the betas before they could rape them. It's an ok hypothesis but the guy references no studies.

studies? How could you ever test this thesis with a study lol

Maybe hook up women to some neurological diagnostic device and show them pics of betas. Make them play fortnite or any game which goal is that you kill people, and see if the brain scans for seeing beta are the same as killing people in a vidja game. IDK tbh Im not a scientist though.

Something like this study, its quite informative. Give it a read. Although I conclude that the reason women get aroused by anything sexual is because women get raped, and to protect themselves they lube up easily to reduce scarring.

The genitals of the volunteers were connected to plethysmographs — for the men, an apparatus that fits over the penis and gauges its swelling; for the women, a little plastic probe that sits in the vagina and, by bouncing light off the vaginal walls, measures genital blood flow. An engorgement of blood spurs a lubricating process called vaginal transudation: the seeping of moisture through the walls. The participants were also given a keypad so that they could rate how aroused they felt.

The men, on average, responded genitally in what Chivers terms “category specific” ways. Males who identified themselves as straight swelled while gazing at heterosexual or lesbian sex and while watching the masturbating and exercising women. They were mostly unmoved when the screen displayed only men. Gay males were aroused in the opposite categorical pattern. Any expectation that the animal sex would speak to something primitive within the men seemed to be mistaken; neither straights nor gays were stirred by the bonobos. And for the male participants, the subjective ratings on the keypad matched the readings of the plethysmograph. The men’s minds and genitals were in agreement.

All was different with the women. No matter what their self-proclaimed sexual orientation, they showed, on the whole, strong and swift genital arousal when the screen offered men with men, women with women and women with men. They responded objectively much more to the exercising woman than to the strolling man, and their blood flow rose quickly — and markedly, though to a lesser degree than during all the human scenes except the footage of the ambling, strapping man — as they watched the apes. And with the women, especially the straight women, mind and genitals seemed scarcely to belong to the same person. The readings from the plethysmograph and the keypad weren’t in much accord. During shots of lesbian coupling, heterosexual women reported less excitement than their vaginas indicated; watching gay men, they reported a great deal less; and viewing heterosexual intercourse, they reported much more. Among the lesbian volunteers, the two readings converged when women appeared on the screen. But when the films featured only men, the lesbians reported less engagement than the plethysmograph recorded. Whether straight or gay, the women claimed almost no arousal whatsoever while staring at the bonobos.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?scp=1&sq=&st=nyt&pagewanted=all&_r=1&

Where is he right? Where is his proof? It’s not even fucking anecdotal proof it’s pure speculation! “Let’s say blah blah blah.” He made up all the responses on his own. No girl acts like this and you guys are a bunch of losers

3rd guy who fails to give a single examplle where OP is wrong. When normies send their white knights, theyre really not sending their best lol

The whole thing is wrong mate 😂 I ain’t no white knight, you just blind. Just to clarify, since you seem mentally deficient. OP didn’t use a single example. All his ‘evidence’ for his theory was mentally concocted. He said “imagine if this happened, this will happen,” with no proof or evidence of it ever happening. It didn’t even need to be scientific, however, there isn’t even any anecdotal evidence (as weak as that kind of evidence is). However, in my experience and many others, females don’t react like this to anyone. Females are just like you and me, there are bitchy guys, bitchy girls, smart guys, smart girls, ugly guys, ugly girls. 😌

Females are just like you and me

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humansSex differences in humans - Wikipedia

Try not to be so narrow minded. 😇

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans

Sex differences in humans - Wikipedia

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans


HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 183702

point proven

Quite the opposite. If you took a minute to read it you would know.

Even reading that article, it literally says that beyond the physical there is subtle and small differences in the sexes when it comes to psychology. We aren’t animals. Stop treating women and men like animals

"we arent animals"

Yes, yes we are animals. There is no discussion that we are animals and thriven by evolutionary forces.

The fact that you and I can have this argument, make decisions based of morals and ethics and not off pure instinct means our brains are highly (by a mile) more developed than any other animal. If you want to classify us as animals by the sheer definition of life and evolution then go for it, but otherwise, in every other sense of the word we are not.

morals and ethics are very much based on instincts too. Attraction is even more based on instincts, and thats what really matters at the end doesnt it

No it isn’t. The fact that humans can reason beyond their own survival as individuals. And by this I mean conscious reflection, deliberation, imagination and weighing of various facts and moral beliefs against each other. But whatever dude, you do you.

You have to realize to some alien species out there, we are ants, simple biological beings. Its all relative m8 and at the end of the day we are governed by our instincts, to disagree is naive.

If alien life really does exist, remember according to the big bang theory and evolution our species had a <0.0001% chance of even existing. To think there is an alien species out there beyond our intelligence level, i think, is quite silly to base your argument on. We are not governed by instinct, in moments of anger our instinct is to lash out and attack, however laws and morals that govern our society say we shouldn’t.

It is just an analogy my dude, we are animals

Mandarin ducks are so cute :3

The FIRST WORD in his post is 'Theory'.

THEORIES NEED EVIDENCE 😇 No evidence provided, thus, theory is incorrect. In fact, there is evidence that girls are not like that so theory is null.

THEORIES DO NOT NEED EVIDENCE to be presented for debate, Einstein.

That’s actually the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. They need evidence to even be considered.

No, YOU are the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Ideas are to be debated, not just outright accepted or dismissed, dummy.

Here's an idea: go soak your head in a vat of gorilla urine.

AWALT, dummy.

Lmao true

I think the reason is competition with other women. She thinks of heraelf as a goddess that will possess all Chads to herself (because women are delusional) and of the sub5 man as a potential mate to other women who she hates, therefore she hates him.

The other moral of this story is that if you can't be attractive to women, then you should be disarming so that you can still at least be friends with them. This is why feminine betas and gay men have so many female friends but masculine betas are shunned

This is also why women are kind to cutecels and babyfaced manlets since they consider them children and not a threat.

Yes, man you guys finally came up with something I agree with. Any woman who sees the vile shit you put out into the world on this sub is going to hate you with an intensity like no other. 10/10 post would read again.

a bad bone structur is 1000 times worse then the viliest shit anyone could put intot his world. i am pretty sure i could reveal my reddit account to foids and it wouldnt matter to them if i had chad looks

Fucking based

Facts!

If you are sub8 and approach a women she will give the deer in the headlights look.

It's as simple as this.. if you let ugly men with bad genes close to you.. the chances of you having sex/or being raped by them is incredibly higher. It's like when you are in line at a store and you see one of those disgusting Wal-Mart whales.. you'd do everything in your power to stay away. And that's men.. we don't even carry the child we can go make more.

You can't hate the women, they are simply playing biology's game and they certainly aren't writing the rules. What I hate is the game, and that's coming from a 6'0 white male who has it relatively easy although I will never get an 8-10 probably unless I do some crazy looksmaxing but I'm scared to do it and fail.

Wow this is a really good post.

Humanity. Such a beautiful thing.

American Indian and Ashkenazi Jew IQ.

also the women needs to socially show herself as higher up than the incel, and to show everyone that he has zero chance and isnt anywhere near her level.

Ask yourself: what'll be your reaction if there's a 2/10 (say, minimum average standard for a male is 3/10), obese girl in your class. At best, you'll treat her as a human being; just someone who you are not sexually attracted to. At worst, you'll even feel pity for her that she will never be able to get married, have sex, etc. (Even though, it's probably untrue.)

yeah i'm gonna stop you right here. if you're going to drop some big scientific theory on how evil women are it's not gonna help to just throw in a completely untrue sentence because you want it to be true because it helps your argument. many men are repulsed by unattractive women. hell, men are ANGERED by unattractive women daring to be in the spotlight--look at the criticism and vitriol heaped on any woman in the public eye. or try spending a day as a fat woman, arguably the worst and most offensive thing a woman can be even if it's unspoken. if you're going try to make some evolutionary psychologically "just-so-stories" based argument on why women hate ugly men, be my guest. but don't just toss something important like that to the side and write it off because you personally don't think that ugly women get treated like shit.

Agreed. However depends on how fat she is. Chubby people have it better in this decade where "thicc" has somehow become popular

Oh please. Even obese women can go on Tinder or OKCupid and get hundreds of thirsty dudes showering them with compliments.

Extremely well thought out post.

anyone with basic knowledge in biology will realize that the black pill is true

Biochemist here. Nope.

Spend less time in the lab, and more time people-watching in a bar.

I am pretty social actually. This is just pop evolutionary psychology no more serious than your average PUA manual. Hard pass.

So YOU say.

Biochemistry is a different discipline than sociobiology. Just because molecules are made of atoms doesn't make a physicist a biologist, or a biologist a physicist. Now, if you said you were a sociobiologist...

Is he a sociologist? You ask for basic knowledge of biology. I have that.

Ask yourself: what'll be your reaction if there's a 2/10 (say, minimum average standard for a male is 3/10), obese girl in your class. At best, you'll treat her as a human being; just someone who you are not sexually attracted to. At worst, you'll even feel pity for her that she will never be able to get married, have sex, etc. (Even though, it's probably untrue.)

I think this is false. Most men will still avoid close contact with women in the 0-3 range. But beyond that, they are certainly hardwired to be willing to settle with someone 2-3 points below their score, which women are not hardwired to do at all. But women also do not really aim at giga chad even though they obviously fancy him. They will realistically select someone 0-3 points above. The attraction criteria differ a lot though: Social standing, confidence, intelligence and wealth are much more important for women, looks somewhat less so. For men, looks are much more important and they find much higher intelligence, skills, wealth and social standing intimidating, and low social standing does not matter at all in most cases.

betast

Upvoted

Brigade is strong in this thread.

You need to leave your house more often...

Throughout history polygyny was a common practice. Given that populations tend to be equal in gender such as 50/50 male to female ratio, one man taking two women leaves half of men alone.

I think rape law in many cultures throughout history was pretty severe -usually a death sentence. Rape law ensured the alpha's harems were kept intact and unsullied by other males - to protect their genes.

For a while, monogamy was the norm. But as religious values and marriage become less common, what we have today are Chad harems where women either are dating Chad or Chadlite, or holding out for Chad to become single instead of dating a beta.

yes YES!!!!

I know that:/ is this even controversial

you triggered r/againsthatesubreddits kek

Here, have an honorary PhD.

Ask yourself: what'll be your reaction if there's a 2/10 (say, minimum average standard for a male is 3/10), obese girl in your class. At best, you'll treat her as a human being; just someone who you are not sexually attracted to. At worst, you'll even feel pity for her that she will never be able to get married, have sex, etc.

Have you read the way guys react to fat girls on this sub? Fat girls are treated terribly by most people regardless of gender. (So are fat guys.) But they're treated worse than average by your intended audience.

Online reactions to anything are fairly meaningless. The internet is the place where people say any and everything that pops into their minds.

Irl, i am sure fat people get more hate than most, but its not all day every day all encompassing. Fat women have friends, boyfriends, families. They are not ostracized. I think most of the "hate" fat people feel comes from within, and because they don't fit in to what society has deemed beautiful.

Yes I have thought about this. How women react to snakes and spiders. That's how they are internally reacting to non-Chads approaching them. They don't do it openly (yet) because its still slightly socially unacceptable. The only way to POSSIBLY overcome this is if, in spite of your looks/genetics, you have some kind of social status (real or perceived) that mogs theirs.

Women are children

the worst thing to happen to her after death

look how easily morbidly obsessed some women are with death? I would say death is preferable to many women than the jungle law scenario of having to raise a low value man's child tbh

Meh I deserve what I get. Life is easier to take when you know it will always be terrible.

"because they won't sleep with me"

Some say He did nothing wrong!

nah they're hitler because even though they're horrible monsters, people still agree with them and want them to succeed

You are naive, my child.

Women complaining about average-looking men chasing them believing that they are 9/10, but they are actually the men's looks-match.

was responsible for the brutal slaughter of millions of innocent adults and children"

[Citation needed]

People don't deserve to die just because you (and others, it doesn't matter how many people) find their opinions objectionable or even abhorrent.