True but overall many people want love and dislike sharing a partner.

i only want an open marriage teehee

Why have a marriage in the first place?

i dunno, ask the femoids that ask for it and the same femoids that then call for divorces. btw will you be my GF? :)

I dont know anyone irl that is dumb enough to want an open marriage. And no, im monogamous and taken.

thats where modern marriages are headed boyo, be ready

I doubt it tbh i would never want that with my future husband

if you're married to an average guy he wouldn't be able to get sex dates anyway, but you would. that's why they push for it.

What do you mean? If i love someone i want them to feel amazing and one way i can do that is with sex, why marry someone i dont love?

because that gets boring and like this you'll be able to fuck men way above your league

When is it supposed to get boring ? So far it just keeps getting better? I dont want sex with other men

a couple of years in. i didn't say that it applies to you, i explained why some women want it

Femoids would rather be chad's weekend pump and dump than the lifetime partner of an incel. This is why Femoids passed on their genes 4 times more than men on average .

I mean... is there ANY incel here who doesn't accept the fact that humans are naturally polygynous species?

Just isn't true though. Human infants need loads of care, we evolved to pair up, at least for the first few years of the child's life.

All polygamous mammals have infants that learn to walk on day 1, can be looked after by just the mother, can fend for themselves in a year or so. Humans are useless and defenceless until they are about 8 years old.

I've read somewhere that the honeymoon period of about 2-3 years is evolutuonary wise time for the child to reach 2 years old and can start walking/gathering nuts to eat

Hahahaha this dumbfuck.

How about this, do the bare minimum of research on how other primate groups function.

What sets humans apart from other primates is brain size - to accommodate our large heads human babies are born relatively prematurely (ie they are useless babies for a long time after being born).

If human babies developed as fast as chimp babies they wouldn't need 2 parents

Seriously, stop posting and delete your account.

You guys always use the language of evolutionary psychology but cherry pick the parts you believe in!

Women are designed to act faithful while they cuck the beta provider with the strong alpha stud. So ideally, they get the superior genes and a babysitter.

This is a high risk mating strategy that happens in a minority of cases, the normal human female mating strategy is to find the best all rounder, resources and genetics. Cuckoldry is pretty rare, it's only common among people already asking for a paternity test

Then why are women attracted to different types of men during different parts of their cycle? Alphas at peak fertility, betas when the chance of impregnation is minimal. That seems pretty damning to me.

Yes, humans are polygynous and females are the ones pushing for it. There cannot be a stable society unless female sexuality is tamed and controlled to reduce the effect of this poligyny.

This is why budhism, all three monotheist religions, ancient chinese dynasties and the roman empire were all obsessed with controlling female sexuality. They were right to do so, and western societies will soon learn why.

Yeah. Ultimately female sexual freedom gas catastrophic consequences.

that's us, we get left out, and that's fine, nothing wrong with that

but can't we at least get euthanasia?

Femoids want to get pumped and dumped by chads until they get pregnant and after they have 2-3 mini-chads they need some resources and protection but chad wont do that shit, why would he ?. So the femoids settle for less attractive men because these men would do everything for her to get sex and make babies. Fembots will get everything they need out of both worlds but of course this means 20% are kings while the other 80% are slaves to them. No real man(smart man) would raise another mans child, so the 80% had to do something about this shit. THe answer was and still is monogamy, marriage and patriarchy. If we return to the 80/20 rule everything will turn to shit, crime, wars, terror will happen more and more but in the end it has to return to patriarchy if we want to keep everything our ancestors have built. At least for a bit longer until we are able to change our genes through genetic engineering, when we come that far this ancient problem will be solved forever.

Damn dude that’s intense. So all of human society was incels vs. Chads?

men vs female nature -_-

It will be a return to the days before the agrarian model kicked in. That's all.

In a purely natural state, yes. But civilization kept this reality in check for thousands of years (or perhaps rather, civilization was made possible because this reality was kept in check) through marriage.

This is an undeniable fact.

i dunno, ask the femoids that ask for it and the same femoids that then call for divorces. btw will you be my GF? :)

if you're married to an average guy he wouldn't be able to get sex dates anyway, but you would. that's why they push for it.