I notice that study is from 1995, and reading other articles associated with the data, it would appear that it is now outdated.

The results are somewhat similar, however as attitudes change the data will change. At the moment we seem to be going through a very rapid change in dynamic on sexual activities outside of marriage.

I also note that the graph and associated material only focuses on women though, almost like men don't want any of the blame for anything.

No, these trends still hold true.

Women with 10 or more partners were the most likely to divorce, but this only became true in recent years;

Women with 3-9 partners were less likely to divorce than women with 2 partners; and,

Women with 0-1 partners were the least likely to divorce.

The interesting thing about it is that women who have exactly 2 partners before marriage are slightly more likely to divorce in the first 5 years than women who have 3-9 (29% vs 26%). But virgin brides are still the most stable by very far (5% only)

But the most stable number is dropping sharply, and may continue to drop.

My question would be why there is a higher divorce rate based on an increase in sexual partners and who is the one prompting the split, whether it's male or female.

I'd also be interested to see the numbers based on male sexual partners for comparison.

And the reason most often cited is "unreasonable behaviour" on the part of the man, which used to be termed "cruelty".

The fuck are you on about you dry cunt? Are you seriously implying that all these betas, who cannot even fucking pick the model of the car they are going to pay for("we need a big family car that is safe tee hee") are literally abusing their wives? And that's why the divorce rate is so high?

Fuck off back to IT with this kind of retarded grasping.

You again?

I'm just quoting the statistics of what the biggest reason for divorce is, and what it used to be called. You're the one that read so much more into it.

And if you keep calling me names, I shall respond in kind as usual, and then you'll whine, as usual.

You aren't quoting shit, and what proof do you have that they changed "abuse" into "unreasonable behaviour"?

You have google. And it was "cruelty"

So you have no quote or proof and are just talking out of your ass. What a surprise.

https://smab.co.uk/divorce-unreasonable-behaviour-can-stay-a-private-matter/

Unreasonable behaviour’ is the most common ground for divorce in UK divorce law.

https://austinkemp.co.uk/2017/11/28/grounds-for-divorce-uk/

or wives who have petitioned for divorce, unreasonable behaviour has consistently been the most common ground since the late 1970s (before this it was named ‘cruelty’).

Too lazy to google anything and want spoon fed as usual.

So your source/proof... is some legal shill blog?

Oh good grief. I just chucked a couple of sites at you as proof of what I've said, and you don't like it.

Fine. Go look on google and refute it.

Nothing to refute.

So why complain about it? Or is it just in your nature to complain about everything?

What is the point? In the 1950s when the divorce rate was near 0 husbands used to beat their wives like they were knocking the dust out of the car's floor mat were they happier then?

Yes

all husbands beat their women in the 1950s

Nice fallacy, dickhead.

Misandrous comment tbh

Fun fact: Women were happier then

Incredible to think guys would marry a foid with so many past partners

When i think about it... The divorce rate isnt high.... Even if it was 90%... Think about getting good grades and how to have something good it need to be rare and in the top percentile. What percentage of people actually get married?

I guess it does say something... To me i feel like they can tell after a partner or two that sex/love isn't special.

What's the point of marrying some clueless virgin?

Thanks to her vast sexual experience, my wife knows exactly how to make my yearly handjob that much more exciting.

Marriage stability doesn't necessarily drop. The amount of stable marriages droo, which isn't weird as you have to be married by 25 to count as a stable marriage in this statistic. Staceys are still fucking around at 25 so they are guarenteed to not show up, even if they turned out to be very loyal in marriage. I'm not attacking or defending anyone, I've just been working on a paper all day with tons of statistics so I'm just in the mindset. This statistic objectively sucks, although everyone knows stacys are less reliable.

Nothing to refute.