Ikr, seriously, these people from IT should just fuck off. but, I guess it makes things more interesting.

Trust we find it endlessly entertaining to mock the stupid things said here as well ;)

An average conversation between an IncelTears member and an incel:

IT: hahaha incels you are so wrong, get out of your basement

I: here, these are the reasons why I believe women are only attracted to looks, and here are some studies proving it

IT: hahaha, who hurt you? women aren’t objects, just improve your personality

Clearly we’re the stupid ones.

Where are those studies?

https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/?st=JH9DK8TX&sh=29ae7448

Ive taken the last half hour to go through that sub and see what type of stuff your claiming as psych studies, are you serious? You realize none of those sources would be consider professional or be taken seriously right? Some of those "articles" even claimed twitter posts referencing loose conversations on podcasts as sources on "studies". If that is good enough for you to believe what will happen if I supply you with a plethora of info stating the opposite? Would your studies just be more accurate than others, or you just know those are true over others?

There are no twitter links there lol. And if you look at the sidebar, you can see multiple peer-reviewed studies.

But please, if you have other studies I’d be more than happy to see them.

Those "articles" of proof off of the top rated posts are what cited and linked twitter posts as their evidence. Try reading this piece, "Relational mate value: Consensus and uniqueness in romantic evaluations". Its a longer read, and you will either have to torrent or buy the piece.

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-08116-001

Funny enough, this is one of the studies (among many) I intend to some day cover on my sub. Paul Eastwick is an interesting guy -- sometimes he decides to be blackpilled, other times he goes full bluepill (particularly in press releases).

The full-text to the linked study is on his website (http://pauleastwick.com/publications-by-year/ , specifically here). Study 2 in that paper would be the most relevant for our interests. Intriguing findings indeed, but:

1. with a N=129, of which only 28 were male, split up into 9 small group sections = on average ~13 females rating ~3 males (i.e., only in their section), on a likert scale of 1 (terrible) to 5 (excellent) how would you rate the external validity of this study in being able to predict IRL patterns?
2. On that note, with 34% of the class reporting they were already involved in a romantic relationship at the start of the semester (and participants asked to "pretend" they were in a relationship with their target classmate for the relational mate value measures), on a likert scale of 1 (terrible) to 5 (excellent) how would you rate the ecological validity of this study in being able to predict actual proceptive behavior?

Nevertheless, Eastwick and Hunt have been doing a good job of at least trying to fill in the gap in this area of attraction research -- it's difficult target scientific inquiry into the dynamics of slower romantic interest formation via propinquity (in contrast to revealed preferences / initial attraction studies). I cover their looksmismatch paper on my sub (although I have a few questions for Hunt about her methodology/data interpretation there)

If that is good enough for you to believe what will happen if I supply you with a plethora of info stating the opposite?

Please supply.

Ragcel giving normos the business!

muslims are never cels because they have arranged marriage so even if you are ugly you can still get a girl and nobody would know because they all wear niqabs.

this lack of natural selection is why muslims have low IQ and are ugly as fuck

Weak argument. The rich and powerful in the Middle East generally have multiple wives and like 50+ children (Google bin Laden family), something that's the other way around in the West.

Low IQ could be explained by other reasons like not undergoing intense Ice Age evolution or Black Death selection.

yes because black death only killed stupid people...

The stupidest! The rich and powerful hightailed it to country housrs/castles ensuring the Hapsburg Chin survived!

Muslims are so based. Watch the full interview with this guy, I agree with him completely.

Shaving your beard diminishes your masculinity.

Shaving your beard doesn't diminish masculinity, shaving your IMAN does ya akhi

you mean he made a fool of himself on TV?

This sub could benefit from more memri tv memes

Memri tv memes are too misogynistic and antisemitic, that will make females like us less.

And you care? You really care?

memritv is fake mossad propaganda.

Dude lay off the soy lol.

when normies expect me to respond to their same old platitudes

the chad sheikh vs the incel infidel

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/256/507/902.jpg

All women should be circumcised to prevent depravity and debauchery.

How do you circumcise a woman?

What do they even have down there?

based sheikh

Shaving your beard diminishes your masculinity.

you mean he made a fool of himself on TV?

There are no twitter links there lol. And if you look at the sidebar, you can see multiple peer-reviewed studies.

But please, if you have other studies I’d be more than happy to see them.

If that is good enough for you to believe what will happen if I supply you with a plethora of info stating the opposite?

Please supply.