What does it mean for everyone to be top tier though? Wouldn't they all have to be the same? Which doesn't seem possible short of some Brave New World type eugenics.
If they're not all the same then bdoguru's idea is at least plausible. I mean, female sexual selection has affected our evolution for at least a few thousand generations, so why haven't we bred out the ugly yet?
What is "top tier" of noy better than the rest?
Why do women so often have a requirement for men to be 6 feet tall? Because its such a magical number? No, its because it makes him taller than the majority of men. If all men were 5 inches taller on average, then the requirement would be 6'5. See what i mean?
Bro if everyone was top tier they'd just make a new standard tier that fewer people are. Remember the Dr Sueiss (?) story about the Whos with stars on their belly? Exact same thing. It's a weird part of human nature, the instinct to exclude some and prioritize others. We just find a way.
It's impossible to everyone be top tier. If everyone is top tier then nobody is. For a top tier existing there must have a low tier, if there's no low tier there's no top tier.
Yet we still have people calling incels "entitled" and then immediately go on to bitch about how rich people make too much money on a different subreddit.
If we could all admit it the world would be a better place. It's funny how those who are honest about their intentions of doing things out of self interest are considered psychopaths.
Men are attracted to features in women that will increase the likelihood of an alive and healthy baby, whereas women are basically attracted to features that make a guy likely to win a fight (big facial bones, wide skull, thick neck, big frame) or strong jaws that allow you to take in Moreno nutrients when chewing on plant fiber and animal tissue all day like our hunter gatherer ancestors. Yet women are considered by society the superior gender in regards to mate selection.
Women are attracted to good looking men you don't really have to be a woman to see which of these men is more attractive, your theory implies that only women would think the pic on the right is better
Well also the pic on the right is just more harmonious and pleasing to look at :/ I don't really get the whole "hunk" theory when the biggest slayers usually look like this https://imgur.com/a/4Z2TZz8
that man is pretty, but still masculine looking in my opinion. strong jaw, strong chin, looks fit and strong. I've seen ppl say that girls find more effeminate looking men more attractive in times of plenty, and more masculine, even caveman looking dudes when times are tough, and that kinda makes sense I guess.
A woman is supposed to be low test you indoctrinated retard. Estrogen is the female sex hormone. Testosterone is the male sex horome. If a women has high T she would have a beard and muscles
We had a system for this.
We HAD monogamy that leashed female desire, and more or less paired them up based on economic success/societal desires.
But just like empires that begin their descent we LOST that technology. We LOST monogamy like that, and because we lost that technology our standard of living as a society will decrease.
the rich, mainly rothschilds, pushed sjw shit on us as a way for them to divide and conquer us. i understand why they did it but fucking hell if it did not just ruin all of humanity, they still have power but it's not gonna last much longer at this rate. i mean they will rule over a burnt out husk of a planet, good for them i guess.
Really it's only natural. It is hard to ignore the fact that without their meddling inceldom wouldn't even exist. About no other group can this definitively and singularly be said.
just because it's easy doesn't mean it isn't true. I don't have any self interest in believing that people and culture are being respectively subverted and deconstructed by international Jewry. It's a fact that depresses me everyday as the situation appears more and more hopeless.
But I mean in this case that it is easy to believe the world is flat than it is a sphere when you are simply observing.
You do have self interest to believe that. But it is the same self interest I have as a socialist to believe that rich people do those things. The problem is that identifying them as Jewish, when they transcend religion and ethnic identity because their interest is money, is to misidentify the problem.
The problem is not a Jewish cabal, it is capitalism.
(((They))) have been doing this for thousands of years in some form or another. An explicit plan for a worldwide Jewish oligarchy (whereby every Jew has hundreds or thousands of Goy slaves) is literally detailed in their Talmud. For hundreds of years we have retaliated and resisted but now more than ever it is reaching a fever pitch. Our patience has run out before and it will run out again, only this may be the last time. This shit simply cannot continue or it will be the death of us.
i do think male jews made up a lot of rules to try to take control of their degenerate jewish women. lot of kek rules in the talmud. they want jewish lineage to be based on having a jewish mom, cuz they didn't want jewish roasties having sex with riman chad, like mother mary did with pantera.
The jig would be up if society swallowed that red pill. The next pill would be the realization that female instincts are fundamentally broken, unsuited for the onset of agriculture, much less the industrial age. Their subconscious tells them to go seek out Cave Chad the mammoth hunter but gets confused and soon a bastard child fathered by some unemployed alcoholic is on the way.
The final pill is realizing that letting them pick their own mate is like letting a toddler pick their bedtime.
This kind of rhetoric is exactly why it doesn’t matter that you guys say that you don’t support the Toronto attacks, by spreading this bullshit that women are too inferior to choose who they want to be with, just because they don’t find you attractive. Women are people. You will never get a girl until you understand that.
Oh okay all women are shitty people? 50% of the worlds population? Good luck with never interacting with anyone of the opposite sex, it seems to be working out great for you. I’m sure it’s not your fault at all, ALL WOMEN are just so dumb and retarded for not seeing what a great catch you are
No, it's just that every woman I've ever met has been a steaming pile of shit, and the one who was the least shitty on the surface turned out to be just as shitty on the inside. I was really just responding to your suggestion that I'd never interact with anyone of the opposite sex and that I'm not a catch.
The problem is that your personal experiences aren’t the same as facts. All women aren’t shitty people, just like all men aren’t shitty people. You can’t generalize everybody like that.
What makes all the shitty women you meet shitty btw?
This world was created by men. Nearly everything around you exists because a man willed it to exist. Women have scarcely been more than tools which exist for men's sexual pleasure, and to give birth to more men.
Strong jaw means they probably have a healthy and broad dental structure. If someone had a narrow mouth and weak jaw it will probably be a lot harder for them to do something like this: https://youtu.be/JQU6o4ooL5E?t=37s
I learned about this in one of my classes a couple years ago. It has to do with parental investment.
The mate-selection process is ingrained within us, and it has been developed and refined via natural selection since we've been a lil microbe.
In regards to direct biological requirements needed for raising offspring, women are required to provide much more than men. The process of gestation/birthing/weaning a child is solely on the female (biologically speaking... not saying men don't provide other useful things; that's not related to the topic tho). Theoretically, a child can survive if it is left after weaning, so that's a minimum of 2-3 years of mother dependency. Men don't have to be there.
Additionally, to create a child all a man really has to do is provide sperm, which in itself is recycled extremely rapidly and hasn't been observed to degrade with age. Woman have a set amount of eggs at birth that only get worse with age.
This is the accepted biological reason for why the selection process differs so much between males and females.
Because jaw width contributes to a masculine appearance and making the jaw softer makes a man more feminine, therefore the uglier. Meeks has a well jaw with good with and a developed mid-face, notice that when the jaw width is shortened, the mid-face also suffers.
The Photoshops are always the most fascinating. That said, if you chew more your jaw gets wider. If you don't, you get a narrow jaw and impacted molars.
People have different genetic makeup. For some they don't need to chew much and their jaws form as designed. But for most others they need to chew regularly and forcefully. The jawbone will literally grow wider to accomodate a full arch. If it does not it will remain narrow.
I usually only come to this sub to laugh at all the cringy pathetic people saying insane things but I have to admit its crazy how the slight changes really make a huge difference here. Left guy could still get girls but big difference. Left would still be in jail. Right is a model now.
What's with the obsession with wanting to participate in these mainstream ideas of beauty? It's like you guys glorify this way of looking as though it's the ultimate form of being. You need to stop giving the "chads" and "Stacies" all this power by simply not giving a fuck about them and their superficiality. It's like you're just bummed out that you don't get the attention of these idiots because you can't compete with their own unrealistic ideas of beauty. Stop competing. Find beauty in other ways. As long as you continue comparing yourselves to them, you are as vain and vapid as they are.
All women? Why are you pursuing women who are are the female version of this guy? They are vain and superficial, how is that attractive? Is is that you are so superficial that you only want to date Stacies but get rejected by them because they only want chads? I don't know any women who categorically reject men based on their facial bone structure. And I avoid any people like this because they are boring.
All women do it you idiot, they just say they don't. Why do you think chicks date abusers, bad boys, serial killers? It's because those guys are often good looking.
Ok so every hetero couple now are in an abusive relationship? Besides it being comforting for you think, why is it that only good looking men are abusive?
I'm curious to hear your response to these questions: How do you measure attractiveness? How do you decide who's a Stacie or a chad? Where/when do you interact with women? And how do you think people should initiate/express attraction for each other?
https://youtu.be/EFnJMPQow7A You can watch this video if you want to know what makes a man attractive. To sum it up, strong jaw and chin, short philtrum, defined nose, defined cheekbones, wide maxilla, hooded eyes with positive canthal tilt, good hairline, thick hair.
Stacies and Chads are attractive, popular people.
Mostly at college.
People already hint attraction, especially women. Approaching a woman who has never so much as looked at you is stupid. I don't really care how people express it, since no one is attracted to me.
I want to actually know how YOU measure attractiveness, in both men and women. You have referred to what you think everyone else finds attractive, but how do YOU measure attractiveness?
99.99% of women. i don't want to date stacies, only looksmatch and not after she's been through several chads which makes sex with me repulsive to her
i don't want to date stacies, only looksmatch and not after she's been through several chads which makes sex with me repulsive to her but she only does it for financial security and it dries up the second i put a ring on it.
i have not had sex with a woman. i didn't say that they'd regret having it, i said that they'd find it repulsive. it's like the people who clean the shit and piss off dead bodies that they're covered in because the sphincter and bladder muscles don't work when you're dead. they don't regret doing it because they get paid, and over time they get desensitised.
because by "scoring" chad on tinder she thinks she is stacy and deserves better. and because having sex with me is literally repulsive compared to having it with chad
ofc they don't do a scientific comparison. it's all intuitive. if you don't think this is the top priority of women's sexual choices then you're in denial
He's still cute, actually more my type a bit trimmed out. The original one looks like he could rip my throat out with a love bite...no thanks.
The soul less eyes he has in this pic are still creepy though.
Yet we still have people calling incels "entitled" and then immediately go on to bitch about how rich people make too much money on a different subreddit.
146 comments
1 Tookthemethpill 2018-05-11
DUDE! Why the fuck do you guys have to be right about this stuff.
1 thumpar72 2018-05-11
how the fuck do incels make consistent high iq blackpills. their archive is massive now.
1 Mr-Mercedes- 2018-05-11
Blackpill mining should be rewarded monetarily
1 SlashSero 2018-05-11
The meekcel shall inherit the earth.
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-11
His mouf look like a butthole
1 re-cognition 2018-05-11
You would know
1 subhumanforever 2018-05-11
Subhuman.
1 103359245T 2018-05-11
He needs a bit of that negative canthal tilt
1 chillenyo2 2018-05-11
We're the genius sub you know its true
1 subhumanforever 2018-05-11
Holy shit dude.
Gave him a narrower jaw, pencil neck, and just an all around smaller skull and he went from Tyrone to some meth addict. Jesus Christ.
1 jsxjs 2018-05-11
Genetics aren’t fair
1 TechnomancerSage 2018-05-11
Nothing in life is.
1 jsxjs 2018-05-11
Only because genetics aren’t fair. The root of all life’s problems.
1 bdoguru 2018-05-11
If everyone was top tier would just create a higher tier with smaller/different differences we focus on because thats how the brain works.
Some people are just destined to be on the low tier
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
No, if everyone was top tier then life would simply be more fair. Stop bullshiting yourself please. The hypergamy would no longer be 80 twenty.
1 wprtogh 2018-05-11
What does it mean for everyone to be top tier though? Wouldn't they all have to be the same? Which doesn't seem possible short of some Brave New World type eugenics.
If they're not all the same then bdoguru's idea is at least plausible. I mean, female sexual selection has affected our evolution for at least a few thousand generations, so why haven't we bred out the ugly yet?
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
You act as if steaks can be apples. If we were all meat none would be fruits.
1 wprtogh 2018-05-11
That.... could be read too many different ways. Can you say what you mean without a metaphor so that it's clear?
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
I already did with the if everyone was top tier we would fuck more randomly, rather than have hypergamy, comment up there.
1 wprtogh 2018-05-11
So... you were just restating the thing that I had questioned?
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
To argue with people is to dance, waltzing goes in circles.
1 minoxidilcel 2018-05-11
What is "top tier" of noy better than the rest? Why do women so often have a requirement for men to be 6 feet tall? Because its such a magical number? No, its because it makes him taller than the majority of men. If all men were 5 inches taller on average, then the requirement would be 6'5. See what i mean?
1 Bot_Metric 2018-05-11
6.0 feet = 1.8 metres.
I'm a bot. Downvote to 0 to delete this comment. Info
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
RANDOMLY CHOSEN MOTHA FUCKA DO YOU SPEAK IT!!!
1 minoxidilcel 2018-05-11
yeah, right. women just ranfonly require men to be in the tallest 20%, mogging the remaining 80% of men. pareto principle, do you speak it?
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
As it is, dumb ass. If we all looked good thhen 80 percent wouldn't look bad you moron.
1 minoxidilcel 2018-05-11
nope, women always gravitate to the top 20%.
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
life can't get better if people were the same we'd create a social construct to screw over people just so you can feel better by comparison
1 minoxidilcel 2018-05-11
lowiqcel
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
too ironic
1 abbie_yoyo 2018-05-11
Bro if everyone was top tier they'd just make a new standard tier that fewer people are. Remember the Dr Sueiss (?) story about the Whos with stars on their belly? Exact same thing. It's a weird part of human nature, the instinct to exclude some and prioritize others. We just find a way.
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
"are you implying that they would fuck no one then"
"yameroo"
1 blackpillnormie 2018-05-11
It's impossible to everyone be top tier. If everyone is top tier then nobody is. For a top tier existing there must have a low tier, if there's no low tier there's no top tier.
1 neetrobot 2018-05-11
Are you implying that females would just not fuck anyone?
Stop it.
1 dwarfarchist9001 2018-05-11
Entropy isn't fair.
1 zsiwpoprod 2018-05-11
Yet we still have people calling incels "entitled" and then immediately go on to bitch about how rich people make too much money on a different subreddit.
1 TheiWindFelt 2018-05-11
Everyone's a hypocrite.
1 zsiwpoprod 2018-05-11
If we could all admit it the world would be a better place. It's funny how those who are honest about their intentions of doing things out of self interest are considered psychopaths.
1 GymcellingisCope1 2018-05-11
Dis
1 GotTigerBloodWinning 2018-05-11
Yep... an we're also blamed for our genetics too.
1 tedubitsky 2018-05-11
Nice skills
1 yuyuyuyuu 2018-05-11
JFL.
1 rileymils 2018-05-11
Men are attracted to features in women that will increase the likelihood of an alive and healthy baby, whereas women are basically attracted to features that make a guy likely to win a fight (big facial bones, wide skull, thick neck, big frame) or strong jaws that allow you to take in Moreno nutrients when chewing on plant fiber and animal tissue all day like our hunter gatherer ancestors. Yet women are considered by society the superior gender in regards to mate selection.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
Women are attracted to good looking men you don't really have to be a woman to see which of these men is more attractive, your theory implies that only women would think the pic on the right is better
1 rileymils 2018-05-11
As a man it’s very easy to see which one is more threatening and a higher risk for me to engage in a confrontation with.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
Well also the pic on the right is just more harmonious and pleasing to look at :/ I don't really get the whole "hunk" theory when the biggest slayers usually look like this https://imgur.com/a/4Z2TZz8
1 BomptonBrotha88 2018-05-11
that man is pretty, but still masculine looking in my opinion. strong jaw, strong chin, looks fit and strong. I've seen ppl say that girls find more effeminate looking men more attractive in times of plenty, and more masculine, even caveman looking dudes when times are tough, and that kinda makes sense I guess.
1 crestind 2018-05-11
Only L O W T E S T women are into those men.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
A woman is supposed to be low test you indoctrinated retard. Estrogen is the female sex hormone. Testosterone is the male sex horome. If a women has high T she would have a beard and muscles
1 crestind 2018-05-11
I think you are just too retarded to realize you are retarded. Read more.
1 VoidPillz 2018-05-11
We had a system for this. We HAD monogamy that leashed female desire, and more or less paired them up based on economic success/societal desires.
But just like empires that begin their descent we LOST that technology. We LOST monogamy like that, and because we lost that technology our standard of living as a society will decrease.
1 trevmon 2018-05-11
the rich, mainly rothschilds, pushed sjw shit on us as a way for them to divide and conquer us. i understand why they did it but fucking hell if it did not just ruin all of humanity, they still have power but it's not gonna last much longer at this rate. i mean they will rule over a burnt out husk of a planet, good for them i guess.
1 masternater10 2018-05-11
I will never not love the overlap of inceldom and the ((Jewish question))
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
Really it's only natural. It is hard to ignore the fact that without their meddling inceldom wouldn't even exist. About no other group can this definitively and singularly be said.
1 masternater10 2018-05-11
Haha, I mean it is hard to ignore the problems that exist.. I get that. But it is easy to blame it on a cabal.
Incels choose the easy way out instead of looking for the more difficult answers.
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
just because it's easy doesn't mean it isn't true. I don't have any self interest in believing that people and culture are being respectively subverted and deconstructed by international Jewry. It's a fact that depresses me everyday as the situation appears more and more hopeless.
1 masternater10 2018-05-11
Eh sure.
But I mean in this case that it is easy to believe the world is flat than it is a sphere when you are simply observing.
You do have self interest to believe that. But it is the same self interest I have as a socialist to believe that rich people do those things. The problem is that identifying them as Jewish, when they transcend religion and ethnic identity because their interest is money, is to misidentify the problem.
The problem is not a Jewish cabal, it is capitalism.
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
(((They))) have been doing this for thousands of years in some form or another. An explicit plan for a worldwide Jewish oligarchy (whereby every Jew has hundreds or thousands of Goy slaves) is literally detailed in their Talmud. For hundreds of years we have retaliated and resisted but now more than ever it is reaching a fever pitch. Our patience has run out before and it will run out again, only this may be the last time. This shit simply cannot continue or it will be the death of us.
1 trevmon 2018-05-11
i do think male jews made up a lot of rules to try to take control of their degenerate jewish women. lot of kek rules in the talmud. they want jewish lineage to be based on having a jewish mom, cuz they didn't want jewish roasties having sex with riman chad, like mother mary did with pantera.
1 NormansGetOut 2018-05-11
The jig would be up if society swallowed that red pill. The next pill would be the realization that female instincts are fundamentally broken, unsuited for the onset of agriculture, much less the industrial age. Their subconscious tells them to go seek out Cave Chad the mammoth hunter but gets confused and soon a bastard child fathered by some unemployed alcoholic is on the way.
The final pill is realizing that letting them pick their own mate is like letting a toddler pick their bedtime.
1 cactuscoke 2018-05-11
This kind of rhetoric is exactly why it doesn’t matter that you guys say that you don’t support the Toronto attacks, by spreading this bullshit that women are too inferior to choose who they want to be with, just because they don’t find you attractive. Women are people. You will never get a girl until you understand that.
1 balloonanusanimals 2018-05-11
yeah, shitty people
1 cactuscoke 2018-05-11
Oh okay all women are shitty people? 50% of the worlds population? Good luck with never interacting with anyone of the opposite sex, it seems to be working out great for you. I’m sure it’s not your fault at all, ALL WOMEN are just so dumb and retarded for not seeing what a great catch you are
1 balloonanusanimals 2018-05-11
I had a gf for 10 years.
1 cactuscoke 2018-05-11
Okay so one girl means that 50% of the world’s population are shitty people?
1 balloonanusanimals 2018-05-11
No, it's just that every woman I've ever met has been a steaming pile of shit, and the one who was the least shitty on the surface turned out to be just as shitty on the inside. I was really just responding to your suggestion that I'd never interact with anyone of the opposite sex and that I'm not a catch.
1 cactuscoke 2018-05-11
The problem is that your personal experiences aren’t the same as facts. All women aren’t shitty people, just like all men aren’t shitty people. You can’t generalize everybody like that.
What makes all the shitty women you meet shitty btw?
1 Detoxification- 2018-05-11
This world was created by men. Nearly everything around you exists because a man willed it to exist. Women have scarcely been more than tools which exist for men's sexual pleasure, and to give birth to more men.
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
lmao fuck off
1 cactuscoke 2018-05-11
lmao sick comeback
1 BomptonBrotha88 2018-05-11
never heard of the "strong jaw chew better more nutrients" theory before. seems counterintuitive to say the least. i agree with your point though.
1 rileymils 2018-05-11
Strong jaw means they probably have a healthy and broad dental structure. If someone had a narrow mouth and weak jaw it will probably be a lot harder for them to do something like this: https://youtu.be/JQU6o4ooL5E?t=37s
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
you're overthinking it, could be a proxy indicator of heath or sexual selection run amok like peacock tails
1 notshortenough 2018-05-11
I learned about this in one of my classes a couple years ago. It has to do with parental investment.
The mate-selection process is ingrained within us, and it has been developed and refined via natural selection since we've been a lil microbe.
In regards to direct biological requirements needed for raising offspring, women are required to provide much more than men. The process of gestation/birthing/weaning a child is solely on the female (biologically speaking... not saying men don't provide other useful things; that's not related to the topic tho). Theoretically, a child can survive if it is left after weaning, so that's a minimum of 2-3 years of mother dependency. Men don't have to be there.
Additionally, to create a child all a man really has to do is provide sperm, which in itself is recycled extremely rapidly and hasn't been observed to degrade with age. Woman have a set amount of eggs at birth that only get worse with age.
This is the accepted biological reason for why the selection process differs so much between males and females.
1 StBlackOps2Cel 2018-05-11
I admit , the guy on the left look a lil bit suspicious. Just a millimeter bit suspicious .
1 trevmon 2018-05-11
suspicious? whats that supposed to mean. why are you masquerading around with the greatest name ever.
1 StBlackOps2Cel 2018-05-11
Masquerading? Im not
1 ItsOkToBeBlack 2018-05-11
He looks like a creep that masturbates to tentacle porn and seldom takes shawrs
1 SignorSolitudine 2018-05-11
He looks thinner, and it brings him closer to the methhead aesthetic.
1 BettyCogburn 2018-05-11
Well it looks like I just took the neckpill. That’s crazy.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
The main thing morphed is the jaw. Not just neck
1 BettyCogburn 2018-05-11
Well yeah but I always knew that the jaw made a big difference. Never realized how much the neck helped as well.
1 yodubsmaneo 2018-05-11
That’s fucking it. I’m getting jaw implants
1 crestind 2018-05-11
If you're not Mewing what are you doing?
1 rest_me123 2018-05-11
Meeking
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
Jaw implants are cope, meeks jaw is actually terrible, just look at some profile shots. What makes meeks so good looking is his maxilla.
1 balloonanusanimals 2018-05-11
then why is the left so much worse looking?
1 SquiffyAbyss000 2018-05-11
Because jaw width contributes to a masculine appearance and making the jaw softer makes a man more feminine, therefore the uglier. Meeks has a well jaw with good with and a developed mid-face, notice that when the jaw width is shortened, the mid-face also suffers.
1 rest_me123 2018-05-11
Yes, his chin is indeed recessed
1 SquiffyAbyss000 2018-05-11
But the mid-face is developed, gives eye support and cheekbone projection.
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
His maxilla is also a lot narrower. His jaw is good in terms of width, but it's recessed when looked from the side.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
Just
No.
Meeks hyoid bone is fucked up, that's why his profile is bad.
His actually jaw is top tier
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
Meek's jaw is pretty good in terms of width, but his midface is what makes him so attractive. His jaw is recessed when you look at his profile tho.
1 ReadyPlayer15 2018-05-11
U realize he has a recessed chin right?
1 BomptonBrotha88 2018-05-11
from crackhead to "america's hottest convicted felon" just like that. U_______________U
1 crestind 2018-05-11
He can be both.
1 BomptonBrotha88 2018-05-11
true, but not for long.
1 PokeMaster420 2018-05-11
Left guy could still get laid but not billionaire daughter level.
1 silverfang45 2018-05-11
I didn’t even notice a difference until I looked closely
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-11
Lefty still mogs the fuck out of us all.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
He would still be in jail though rotting instead of being a millionaire model
1 crestind 2018-05-11
The Photoshops are always the most fascinating. That said, if you chew more your jaw gets wider. If you don't, you get a narrow jaw and impacted molars.
1 bacinshakinsteakin 2018-05-11
Ah yes! The guy on the left hadnt been chewing his food for 30 years! You sir are very intellect
1 crestind 2018-05-11
People have different genetic makeup. For some they don't need to chew much and their jaws form as designed. But for most others they need to chew regularly and forcefully. The jawbone will literally grow wider to accomodate a full arch. If it does not it will remain narrow.
1 CommonMisspellingBot 2018-05-11
Hey, crestind, just a quick heads-up:
accomodate is actually spelled accommodate. You can remember it by two cs, two ms.
Have a nice day!
The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to delete this comment.
1 subhumanforever 2018-05-11
Wow this is absolutely retarded
1 crestind 2018-05-11
mkay brainlet
1 ummyourdaddy 2018-05-11
you very smert bruh
1 crestind 2018-05-11
You clearly don't Mew.
1 Mattb907 2018-05-11
I usually only come to this sub to laugh at all the cringy pathetic people saying insane things but I have to admit its crazy how the slight changes really make a huge difference here. Left guy could still get girls but big difference. Left would still be in jail. Right is a model now.
1 mikepencetheincel 2018-05-11
If your jaw isn’t strong enough to behead an incel with, it’s over for you.
1 renownedquietkid 2018-05-11
Left still mogs us to oblivion either way. Meeks is a demigod.
1 dumbkidaccount 2018-05-11
lmao this shit is legit , he'd be lurking here
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
What's with the obsession with wanting to participate in these mainstream ideas of beauty? It's like you guys glorify this way of looking as though it's the ultimate form of being. You need to stop giving the "chads" and "Stacies" all this power by simply not giving a fuck about them and their superficiality. It's like you're just bummed out that you don't get the attention of these idiots because you can't compete with their own unrealistic ideas of beauty. Stop competing. Find beauty in other ways. As long as you continue comparing yourselves to them, you are as vain and vapid as they are.
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
we don't glorify it, women do
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
All women? Why are you pursuing women who are are the female version of this guy? They are vain and superficial, how is that attractive? Is is that you are so superficial that you only want to date Stacies but get rejected by them because they only want chads? I don't know any women who categorically reject men based on their facial bone structure. And I avoid any people like this because they are boring.
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
All women do it you idiot, they just say they don't. Why do you think chicks date abusers, bad boys, serial killers? It's because those guys are often good looking.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
Ok so every hetero couple now are in an abusive relationship? Besides it being comforting for you think, why is it that only good looking men are abusive?
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
Nope, every couple is in a relationship where they're attracted to each other visually.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
I'm curious to hear your response to these questions: How do you measure attractiveness? How do you decide who's a Stacie or a chad? Where/when do you interact with women? And how do you think people should initiate/express attraction for each other?
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
https://youtu.be/EFnJMPQow7A You can watch this video if you want to know what makes a man attractive. To sum it up, strong jaw and chin, short philtrum, defined nose, defined cheekbones, wide maxilla, hooded eyes with positive canthal tilt, good hairline, thick hair.
Stacies and Chads are attractive, popular people.
Mostly at college.
People already hint attraction, especially women. Approaching a woman who has never so much as looked at you is stupid. I don't really care how people express it, since no one is attracted to me.
1 BigLebowskiBot 2018-05-11
Ummmm, sure. That and a pair of testicles.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
I want to actually know how YOU measure attractiveness, in both men and women. You have referred to what you think everyone else finds attractive, but how do YOU measure attractiveness?
1 Tha_Crock 2018-05-11
I measure male attractiveness the way I told you, by looking at their features.
I measure female attractiveness by similar features, although for women a round jaw and non-hooded eyes are more attractive.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
Okay, so you measure attractiveness on purely physical features? What would you want in the person who wanted to be in a relationship with?
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
99.99% of women. i don't want to date stacies, only looksmatch and not after she's been through several chads which makes sex with me repulsive to her
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
E N T I T L E D
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
Is this your experience of 99% of women you've encountered? "Money-grabbing whores" who regret having sex with you?
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
i have not had sex with a woman. i didn't say that they'd regret having it, i said that they'd find it repulsive. it's like the people who clean the shit and piss off dead bodies that they're covered in because the sphincter and bladder muscles don't work when you're dead. they don't regret doing it because they get paid, and over time they get desensitised.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
Also, why would sex with you be repulsive to her after she's had sex with other people before you?
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
because by "scoring" chad on tinder she thinks she is stacy and deserves better. and because having sex with me is literally repulsive compared to having it with chad
1 WaterRacoon 2018-05-11
Mate, it's not women sitting around here talking about this guy's jawline. You care more about how the dude looks than women do.
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
ofc they don't do a scientific comparison. it's all intuitive. if you don't think this is the top priority of women's sexual choices then you're in denial
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
What's your top priority of sexual choices?
1 retsamyob 2018-05-11
wants to have sex with me
1 blackpillnormie 2018-05-11
Lol definitely not, women compare it naturally with just a glance in a man.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
So how do you determine whether a woman is a Stacie or not?
1 blackpillnormie 2018-05-11
Stacies are stereotypical as chads, they are carbon copies of each other. It's basically your attractive college girl trope
1 blackpillnormie 2018-05-11
Lol we aren't the ones who give them power. Women give them power and praise we just point it.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
Is the issue that you believe that women objectify men?
1 blackpillnormie 2018-05-11
No, women reward bad behavior in men, the same bad behavior they complain about. The difference is that they only complain when ugly guys act bad.
1 heinousmonk 2018-05-11
How would you prefer women to behave? What behaviour in men do you believe women should value?
1 MyNameIsDalton 2018-05-11
you’re volcel if u havent neckmaxxed
1 NewestNightmare 2018-05-11
Change his eye color and it’s completely over for him
1 Muscalp 2018-05-11
First Guy is chadlite, too
1 reika881 2018-05-11
He's still cute, actually more my type a bit trimmed out. The original one looks like he could rip my throat out with a love bite...no thanks. The soul less eyes he has in this pic are still creepy though.
1 SoonelyDoodely 2018-05-11
JFL. Funniest shit i've seen in days
1 sailorgangordie 2018-05-11
The guy on the left looks so creepy
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
He's a misogynist
1 Lorsss 2018-05-11
interesting topic. I didn't know the jaw width was so important in male appearance
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
It's the most important thing in male appearance
1 Waffledustcrumb 2018-05-11
As a reasonably attractive female. I find neither attractive. Its about preference and personality. If you have a bad attitude its a huge turn off.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
"As a reasonably attractive female"
https://imgur.com/a/tJ4p6eX
1 Waffledustcrumb 2018-05-11
😂😂😂 yes thank you.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
Sorry for doxing you.
1 Waffledustcrumb 2018-05-11
Im not sure what doxing is but i love your humor😂 It made my day
1 acoverover1 2018-05-11
LMAO
1 sipuliina 2018-05-11
Is it just me or does the left one look better to anyone else?
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
Just stop
1 Nega-Chin 2018-05-11
Guy on the left still looks fine, cuck.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
From looks fine to male model.
1 Nega-Chin 2018-05-11
That is a fair enough point. But for the purposes of getting a bit of pussy here and there, being left him would still be nice. I'm not exactly picky
1 TechnomancerSage 2018-05-11
Nothing in life is.
1 jsxjs 2018-05-11
Only because genetics aren’t fair. The root of all life’s problems.
1 zsiwpoprod 2018-05-11
Yet we still have people calling incels "entitled" and then immediately go on to bitch about how rich people make too much money on a different subreddit.
1 GotTigerBloodWinning 2018-05-11
Yep... an we're also blamed for our genetics too.
1 superman1145 2018-05-11
He's a misogynist