Vaginas stretch when aroused. While they will be able to stretch further with practice, that doesn’t mean it won’t return to its normal size and still be tight. Also that’s the inside. Amount of partners won’t make a girl a roastie. Her genetics will.
There's surely more to prove here provided from this graph. I seriously doubt the women were aroused when their vaginas circumference was being measured.. Common sense lad
We have live examples. Pornstars. Monique Alexander has one godsend pussy when she started porn. Now it still looks good but certainly she looks much more used. Also pornstars that gave birth. Their pussies are totally different after giving birth naturally. Whoever says that sex with big dicks had no lasting impact on vaginas is lying.
I know about sanitary towels, yes. Those get stuck in the knickers and catch the menstrual flow as it exits the vagina. Tampons get inserted. They absorb the flow while being inside the vagina.
I'm incredibly knowledgeable about them having used them for over half my life, and even an old roastie like me could use the mini and regular tampons up to the point they removed the bits that produced all the mess.
I've heard of tampons and pads, but tampon pads are new to me. How do they work? Do you stuff a pad inside you, or leave a tampon out? Or is it like wearing a tampon and a pad simultaneously?
He means sanitary towels... Maybe he thinks women have to swap from tampons to towels after a certain number of sexual partners. Poor wee guy. Is he in for a shock.
Oh yeah. And after childbirth, women would have to use sheep on a rope as tampons to stop them falling out if their vag that looks like a wizard's sleeve...
(for those that didn't get it, that was a. a joke and b. sarcasm)
You know, even though this graph is fake, it is claimed to be from a study conducted by gynecologists. Not to be combative, I have the same anti incel stance you do, but the whole "some one who has never seen a vagina" thing kinda falls flat here.
Fake news. Source doesn't exist. Feel free to meme about roast beef, but don't try to pretend there is scientific evidence of it. Vagina loosen when aroused the same way our dicks get hard. If this "theory" held any merit, every woman who gave birth would have to have tampons the size of a yeti cup.
I went to the trouble of going to the website on the graph. Here is the link for anyone too lazy to type it.
Can’t seem to find that graph in the link though. Strange. Link it if I’m wrong.
The article is a study on vaginal anatomy, albeit using only a small pool of 28 women. They also used a small age range of 18-39 years.
There is absolutely no mention of sexual activity throughout the entire article. If I’m wrong, feel free to link sources.
The only thing that the article states regarding any pattern for vaginal width is this:
“We noted that age of a woman is associated with an increase in the transverse diameter at the pelvic flexure. This is consistent with the clinical finding of increasing laxity of the vaginal walls in women of advanced age. Interestingly, by contrast, height of the subject was negatively associated with width of the vagina at the level of the flexion.”
So I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that the graph is bullshit.
Most here actually believe these graphs. I'm OK with the roastie meme if it's just said because it gets women so worked up but not if there's people actually attempting to spread it as truth. It makes us look really fucking dumb and I'm not convinced these graphs aren't IT bait to try and expose us as dumb.
The added link gave some credibility here but there were still some obvious tells. No real data points have ever fit that tightly with a linear or exponential curve unless there was literal direct causation with no other alternative factors. Additionally, there wouldn't be a <10 sample size or the study wouldn't exist, and these studies rarely give the actual data behind their findings.
The biggest way to break the public mold on taboo topics like black pill concepts is to face the public with well-substantiated facts they won't be able to deny. They can refute it out loud but if we've planted a seed of doubt in them that's a W. Stuff like this gives normies an easy cope by saying that nothing that comes from us is truly credible - "Ah well that guy's a proven idiot so I don't need to take what he's saying here seriously".
This guy is making the same mistake /pol/ does with their propaganda where he overestimates the stupidity of the public and underestimates the ease of looking something up and confirming or denying its validity within minutes. It almost always backfires publicly and only really succeeds within the private board circlejerk.
The biggest way to break the public mold on taboo topics like black pill concepts is to face the public with well-substantiated facts they won't be able to deny.
Yeah that's an awesome sub and I love its potential. Unfortunately it still needs to pick up some traction as it's mostly Subsaharan posting threads there.
It's plain critical thinking. All this talk about how it never changes no matter what and how it just snaps back is GARBAGE and always has been. A virgin and a whore do not and never will have the same vagina. Period. Not a single person with sense ever bought that nonsense.
Just look at the treatment for vaginusmus. Inserts increasing in size are used to exhaust and stretch out the vaginal muscles and walls over time. And for the fucks who want to call it a psychological condition; "It is not known if vaginusmus is caused by psychological factors."
Also, I am convinced that roastflaps are also a result of continuing friction on the labia minora. I ain't never seen no 18 year old with batwings unless she was a whore.
Just sexually active...4 inches in circumference for only 10 people..what? If a girl at rest was 4 inches open in diameter, vaginas wouldn't work in day to day activity. I mean most girls use tampons and that just wouldn't be feasible based on this.
I realize that...go look at a ruler and look at an inch and a half. Most girls lips are just touching each other at rest. If it was just constantly even an inch apart....tampons wouldn't work right, most girls would probably have to change pants atleast once a day...I mean that's just stupid.
You realize most girls lips are touching each other right? 10 partners is active but that's not uncommon at all. If vaginas had an inch and a half gap constantly...tampons dont work correctly, women probably have to change pants atleast once a day. Keep in mind this is also the just where the graph starts too. According to this my vagina should be over 5.5 inches in circumference....what? That's almost 2 inches in diameter...c'mon now.
You try, and link me to it. I have tried searching all the terms, plus the link goes to a 2006 issue of Human Reproduction. I can't find an S Clark PhD at Exeter with vaginal studies either.
So this is saying at 0 partners, a woman has a vaginal diameter of ~3cm. The average diameter of a super tampon is ~1.5cm. So even a virgin would struggle to wear one.
At the high end, we're talking women with vaginas 5 - 6cm wide, which is ludicrous! Women who have pushed children out of their vagina ( a newborn's head ~10cm) continue to wear tampons after birth.
If you want to be incel fine, but if you're going to make up data at least make it somewhat believable!
By that graph even virgin vaginas should be way too loose for tampons to stay inside during periods. And such a big hole would leak so much that we'd need to change panties every hour.
Mods, could we please make it a rule that prohibits fake science posts? It really undermines the actual blackpill science.
If I was a conspiracy nut, I'd say somebody is trying to discredit incel arguments made with science as supporting evidence, by posting fake science like it's real science (and leaving themselves the "jk u guise omg lol" out), so the actual science gets thrown out with the trash in the minds of outside observers. Classic disinformation propaganda tactics.
The problem is causation. A vagina doesn't know the difference between penises, so one guy fucking a thousand times is the same as a thousand guys fucking one time. So if this graph is real it probably means women with larger vaginas find they want more partners, not the other way around.
This is so stupid. Completely false, and less than ten partners is a abnormal with today's young women, while by some accounts are more conservative than pre-tinder days.
Get a life and stip spreading sexist lies.
P.S. and to sink to the idocy of this posts logic, doesn't the size of the partners and the frequency of intercourse matter more than the number if partners. Like 35 one night stands with tiny dudes wouldn't equal a thousand screws with John Holms. Fucking garbage post.
If wiping your greasy Doritos fingers over your starwars pullover in-between gulps of mountain dew code red in you mom's basement fabricating nonesensical sexist graphs on your carpal tunnel fanboy "self-help" thread is having a life, then I guess I'm good. I'll continuey my "no-life" existence.
You try, and link me to it. I have tried searching all the terms, plus the link goes to a 2006 issue of Human Reproduction. I can't find an S Clark PhD at Exeter with vaginal studies either.
109 comments
1 Gr0ssss 2018-05-09
Vaginas stretch when aroused. While they will be able to stretch further with practice, that doesn’t mean it won’t return to its normal size and still be tight. Also that’s the inside. Amount of partners won’t make a girl a roastie. Her genetics will.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
There's surely more to prove here provided from this graph. I seriously doubt the women were aroused when their vaginas circumference was being measured.. Common sense lad
1 Gr0ssss 2018-05-09
Lmao ok bud
1 Bigly1821 2018-05-09
We have live examples. Pornstars. Monique Alexander has one godsend pussy when she started porn. Now it still looks good but certainly she looks much more used. Also pornstars that gave birth. Their pussies are totally different after giving birth naturally. Whoever says that sex with big dicks had no lasting impact on vaginas is lying.
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
Lies different dicks make it loose
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
How? I could maybe begin to take you serious if you said that lots of sex makes it loose but not different dicks.
1 Dirtbag717 2018-05-09
Most women only have 7 partners in her life, so.......
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
So we think...
1 xtsv 2018-05-09
That's because they don't count one night stands or fwbs.
1 Dirtbag717 2018-05-09
Man, you guys really hate facts
1 -SpinxS 2018-05-09
women tend to lie about these things. its commonly known.
1 Dirtbag717 2018-05-09
Only to guys that think women who won't fuck them must be sluts. Which makes total sense by the way
1 -SpinxS 2018-05-09
i didn't say that.
1 lonely_suicidal_cel 2018-05-09
They dont count short term relationships, fwbs and one night stands in that study
1 mronion82 2018-05-09
You really couldn't be bothered to put in more data points than that?
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
That's because it's the "Average" please read more closely
1 mronion82 2018-05-09
Ok mate.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
And yet tampons are still only little things that don't tend to fall out.
Strange that.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
Ever heard of tampon pads?
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
I know about sanitary towels, yes. Those get stuck in the knickers and catch the menstrual flow as it exits the vagina. Tampons get inserted. They absorb the flow while being inside the vagina.
I'm incredibly knowledgeable about them having used them for over half my life, and even an old roastie like me could use the mini and regular tampons up to the point they removed the bits that produced all the mess.
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
You do know being a slut is dissapoiinting God right? Fucking idiot
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
I don't believe in an invisible sky-fairy watching everything I do. I don't need the crutch of religion to get me through the night.
As for being a slut? Meh... Beyond that now, since it's all broken.
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
Does it look like I care what god thinks?
1 sipuliina 2018-05-09
I've heard of tampons and pads, but tampon pads are new to me. How do they work? Do you stuff a pad inside you, or leave a tampon out? Or is it like wearing a tampon and a pad simultaneously?
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
He means sanitary towels... Maybe he thinks women have to swap from tampons to towels after a certain number of sexual partners. Poor wee guy. Is he in for a shock.
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
Right? Lol with this graph tampons would need some engineering changes.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
Oh yeah. And after childbirth, women would have to use sheep on a rope as tampons to stop them falling out if their vag that looks like a wizard's sleeve...
(for those that didn't get it, that was a. a joke and b. sarcasm)
1 AnimalFactsBot 2018-05-09
The Giant Panda is seen as so valuable that the Chinese government has used them as gifts to other countries!
1 35yoGeneticTrash 2018-05-09
Aren't you in menopause already?
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
Nope. Still got one functioning ovary, thanks.
1 brazilianincel 2018-05-09
Femoids will try to deny this and make excuses but we know that graphs speak the truth
1 AcrylicAcid79107 2018-05-09
Lol what kind of bullcrap is this
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-09
Incel science is too blackpilled for the general normie public
Watch the normies deny this
1 foppish_aplomb 2018-05-09
Ah yes someone who's never seen a vagina clearly has made a medical breakthrough on the topic
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
You know, even though this graph is fake, it is claimed to be from a study conducted by gynecologists. Not to be combative, I have the same anti incel stance you do, but the whole "some one who has never seen a vagina" thing kinda falls flat here.
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
Yep femoids try to say there vagina is busted because xyz when it’s really because they’re slitting around
1 thisnameisunique123 2018-05-09
Fake news. Source doesn't exist. Feel free to meme about roast beef, but don't try to pretend there is scientific evidence of it. Vagina loosen when aroused the same way our dicks get hard. If this "theory" held any merit, every woman who gave birth would have to have tampons the size of a yeti cup.
1 m41aspd 2018-05-09
Source exists. Check for yourself, there is a link/
1 Jiandao79 2018-05-09
Ok I’ll bite.
I went to the trouble of going to the website on the graph. Here is the link for anyone too lazy to type it.
Can’t seem to find that graph in the link though. Strange. Link it if I’m wrong.
The article is a study on vaginal anatomy, albeit using only a small pool of 28 women. They also used a small age range of 18-39 years.
There is absolutely no mention of sexual activity throughout the entire article. If I’m wrong, feel free to link sources.
The only thing that the article states regarding any pattern for vaginal width is this:
“We noted that age of a woman is associated with an increase in the transverse diameter at the pelvic flexure. This is consistent with the clinical finding of increasing laxity of the vaginal walls in women of advanced age. Interestingly, by contrast, height of the subject was negatively associated with width of the vagina at the level of the flexion.”
So I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that the graph is bullshit.
1 m41aspd 2018-05-09
Dude, it's a meme. Did you do a source check here too?
1 asdlkjpoiqwer0981234 2018-05-09
Most here actually believe these graphs. I'm OK with the roastie meme if it's just said because it gets women so worked up but not if there's people actually attempting to spread it as truth. It makes us look really fucking dumb and I'm not convinced these graphs aren't IT bait to try and expose us as dumb.
1 m41aspd 2018-05-09
Some do, but, since those who don't are doing their best to appear like they do, it's impossible to tell how many "actually believe".
And, even if they do, let them. Just have fun man. I applaud OP for making it more believable that usual.
1 asdlkjpoiqwer0981234 2018-05-09
The added link gave some credibility here but there were still some obvious tells. No real data points have ever fit that tightly with a linear or exponential curve unless there was literal direct causation with no other alternative factors. Additionally, there wouldn't be a <10 sample size or the study wouldn't exist, and these studies rarely give the actual data behind their findings.
The biggest way to break the public mold on taboo topics like black pill concepts is to face the public with well-substantiated facts they won't be able to deny. They can refute it out loud but if we've planted a seed of doubt in them that's a W. Stuff like this gives normies an easy cope by saying that nothing that comes from us is truly credible - "Ah well that guy's a proven idiot so I don't need to take what he's saying here seriously".
This guy is making the same mistake /pol/ does with their propaganda where he overestimates the stupidity of the public and underestimates the ease of looking something up and confirming or denying its validity within minutes. It almost always backfires publicly and only really succeeds within the private board circlejerk.
1 m41aspd 2018-05-09
/r/BlackPillScience/
1 asdlkjpoiqwer0981234 2018-05-09
Yeah that's an awesome sub and I love its potential. Unfortunately it still needs to pick up some traction as it's mostly Subsaharan posting threads there.
1 Jiandao79 2018-05-09
Did you forget to switch accounts or something?
You replied to a poster above saying that the graph is real and contains a link verifying the graph.
Checked link, which doesn’t verify graph.
Now you’re saying that the graph is nothing more than a harmless meme?
1 m41aspd 2018-05-09
There is a Reddit Golden Seal Of Approval in the post title confirming that the graph is 100% authentic.
1 Jiandao79 2018-05-09
r/quityourbullshit
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-09
r/ihaveautism
1 IracibleManlet 2018-05-09
Also how does this account for monogamous women who have lots of sex?
1 I_TRY_TO_BE_POSITIVE 2018-05-09
(psssst, it doesn't) but to me this just makes it clear that marriage is Jesus magic that... keeps... vaginas... tight... For some reason...
1 e_z_p_z_ 2018-05-09
I'm amazed these people are able to survive this long in the wild
1 thisnameisunique123 2018-05-09
This isn't a meme. This is a fake scientific study. There is a line you can cross in memeland when you become akin to an edgelord.
Not to mention some idiots on here believe this shit. It's literally fake news.
And it's a shit meme, it isn't funny.
1 DonaldNeedsAFatBitch 2018-05-09
Shut the f word up faggot
1 thisnameisunique123 2018-05-09
finger guns
1 reddituser321824 2018-05-09
lol you're just salty because you're too low IQ to know its fake and actually tried to look it up.
1 thisnameisunique123 2018-05-09
U guiz got me gud I tell u that
1 bopoll 2018-05-09
The whole point of this "fake study" is to add to the roastie meme lol you guys fall for every. Single. Time.
1 AyeThatsAGoodNagger 2018-05-09
Not that shocking tbh. Only a retard would think the number of dicks a vagina takes has no physiological effect on it.
1 NekowMai 2018-05-09
It's plain critical thinking. All this talk about how it never changes no matter what and how it just snaps back is GARBAGE and always has been. A virgin and a whore do not and never will have the same vagina. Period. Not a single person with sense ever bought that nonsense.
Just look at the treatment for vaginusmus. Inserts increasing in size are used to exhaust and stretch out the vaginal muscles and walls over time. And for the fucks who want to call it a psychological condition; "It is not known if vaginusmus is caused by psychological factors."
Also, I am convinced that roastflaps are also a result of continuing friction on the labia minora. I ain't never seen no 18 year old with batwings unless she was a whore.
1 4bricks 2018-05-09
THIS. Vaginas don't become MAGICALLY IMPERVIOUS just because you want them to, femoid whores. LIVE WITH IT.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
1 ratshitbatshit69 2018-05-09
Fake
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
This is ridiculous haha. According to this my vagina should be messed up.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
TEEHEE I'm a slut btw xd
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
Just sexually active...4 inches in circumference for only 10 people..what? If a girl at rest was 4 inches open in diameter, vaginas wouldn't work in day to day activity. I mean most girls use tampons and that just wouldn't be feasible based on this.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
You're a fucking slut, dumb bitch. Bet your pussy looks like sun dried roast beef.
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
Lol if you say so. I think it looks great, nice and cute 😌
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
Post a pic and prove it then with a timestamp next to it. I guarantee it looks worn and torn
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
I'll get right on that lol
1 I_TRY_TO_BE_POSITIVE 2018-05-09
Damn these guys are the real deal :x
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
God will judge you one day
1 SoonelyDoodely 2018-05-09
what kind of degenerate cucks are upvoting this worthless slut foid
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
Fascinating isnt it?
1 SoonelyDoodely 2018-05-09
Absolutely. Incredible that even in this environment there are enough cucks to go ''omg grill 😍 have upvote"
1 lpo33 2018-05-09
Do you not know math? 4" circumference isn't even 1.5" diameter. Nowhere near 4"...
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
I realize that...go look at a ruler and look at an inch and a half. Most girls lips are just touching each other at rest. If it was just constantly even an inch apart....tampons wouldn't work right, most girls would probably have to change pants atleast once a day...I mean that's just stupid.
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
You realize most girls lips are touching each other right? 10 partners is active but that's not uncommon at all. If vaginas had an inch and a half gap constantly...tampons dont work correctly, women probably have to change pants atleast once a day. Keep in mind this is also the just where the graph starts too. According to this my vagina should be over 5.5 inches in circumference....what? That's almost 2 inches in diameter...c'mon now.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
Wow that's disgusting. And to think you claim your pussy looks amazing. Jog on roastie.
1 lpo33 2018-05-09
Yeah the actual numbers seem odd, but maybe we're misinterpreting. You can read about it here
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
Wtf two inches yuck
1 theonetruekike 2018-05-09
Sluts like you should be publicly executed
1 mary1j 2018-05-09
Well that seems a bit aggressive
1 Rubissrox 2018-05-09
I thought this was shopped and made up?
There's no source, Google doesn't have it and it's not peer reviewed and published. Is this the legendary incel science?
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
There is a "source", but this graph isn't even from said source. the source doesn't even mention sexual activity.
1 Gengarsweep 2018-05-09
Thats a horribly small sample size. Ill call bullshit on this, not enough proof
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
/u/MagratM Still denying that cunts get roasted?
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
https://www.thealternativedaily.com/sex-vagina-size/
https://www.webmd.com/women/features/vagina-size#1
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5106737/Can-sex-stretch-vagina-Gynecologists-explain.html
Yes.
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
That's the opinion of cucked doctors spreading the bluepill lies. Reality is that cunts get roasted, as proved by OPs post.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
Oh, and OP knows all about vaginas...
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
His source does.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
I'd love to see the source for the image.
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
It's written on the bottom right.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
If you read other comments though, apparently that chart doesn't show anywhere in it.
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
Not our fault you can't find it.
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
You try, and link me to it. I have tried searching all the terms, plus the link goes to a 2006 issue of Human Reproduction. I can't find an S Clark PhD at Exeter with vaginal studies either.
This is what it links to:
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/21/6/1618/724374
1 celaway1696 2018-05-09
I'm at work right now. I'll search for it when I get home.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
LE THANKS FOR LE GOLD KIND STRANGER LE XDDDD
1 mrssunshine1 2018-05-09
Wait, so I’ve only had sex with my husband, but we’ve had lots of sex over the past 8 years. Does this make my vagina tight or loose??????
This chart doesn’t make any damn sense lol 🤦🏼♀️
1 snapcracklepop45 2018-05-09
Wait, so I’ve only had sex with my husband, but we’ve had lots of sex over the past 8 years. Does this make my vagina tight or loose??????
This chart doesn’t make any damn sense lol 🤦🏼♀️
1 Wingedangelsuo 2018-05-09
Different dicks make it loose
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
Sure, okay.
1 subhumanforever 2018-05-09
Shut up you stupid skank.
1 thumpar72 2018-05-09
only chads had the ability to stretch it out. your husband was probably plan H so it's no surprise you haven't noticed any changes.
1 snapcracklepop45 2018-05-09
What the fuck does this even mean lol 😂 “only chads have the ability to stretch it out” ok there
1 thumpar72 2018-05-09
it's pretty simple.
only when you rode the cock carousel did you stretch. now those days are over.
1 snapcracklepop45 2018-05-09
This makes absolutely no sense but hey go on believing whatever I don’t really care
1 thumpar72 2018-05-09
it's really not a difficult concept to understand.
1 Osmosis_Flows 2018-05-09
From a neutral perspective the upvotes and comments on back-to-back photoshopped graphs makes you look lowiq as fuck.
1 Ryzasu 2018-05-09
This can never be this correlated as there are certainly girls out there who only had a few partners but fucked them daily for several years
My guess is it broadens due to age and the older the woman the more sexual partners she had
1 Ryzasu 2018-05-09
This can never be this correlated as there are certainly girls out there who only had a few partners but fucked them daily for several years
My guess is it broadens due to age and the older the woman the more sexual partners she had
1 EmmaLemming 2018-05-09
So this is saying at 0 partners, a woman has a vaginal diameter of ~3cm. The average diameter of a super tampon is ~1.5cm. So even a virgin would struggle to wear one.
At the high end, we're talking women with vaginas 5 - 6cm wide, which is ludicrous! Women who have pushed children out of their vagina ( a newborn's head ~10cm) continue to wear tampons after birth.
If you want to be incel fine, but if you're going to make up data at least make it somewhat believable!
1 kyasurina 2018-05-09
this is such obnoxious garbage, my sides hurt from laughing
1 EmmaLemming 2018-05-09
You'll also notice there is a difference of ~0.1cm circumference, 0.05cm diameter, between a woman with 0 partners and a woman with 10...
1 sipuliina 2018-05-09
By that graph even virgin vaginas should be way too loose for tampons to stay inside during periods. And such a big hole would leak so much that we'd need to change panties every hour.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
Roastie cope
1 based_meme 2018-05-09
Mods, could we please make it a rule that prohibits fake science posts? It really undermines the actual blackpill science.
If I was a conspiracy nut, I'd say somebody is trying to discredit incel arguments made with science as supporting evidence, by posting fake science like it's real science (and leaving themselves the "jk u guise omg lol" out), so the actual science gets thrown out with the trash in the minds of outside observers. Classic disinformation propaganda tactics.
1 RosalieAndShit 2018-05-09
Lol again with the fake studies? I think thats even more pathetic than you usually are
1 DocHoladay 2018-05-09
Pretty sure this is fake.
1 Sasssblaster 2018-05-09
If you guys are so mad about women not wanting to fuck you, fuck guys literally fuck other dudes I mean who knows
1 Rub_my_turkey 2018-05-09
I don't know dawg, I haven't slept with many women, but I hooked up with a pretty big ho when I was really drunk and she was the tightest by far
1 gnovos 2018-05-09
The problem is causation. A vagina doesn't know the difference between penises, so one guy fucking a thousand times is the same as a thousand guys fucking one time. So if this graph is real it probably means women with larger vaginas find they want more partners, not the other way around.
1 TheCircleMethod 2018-05-09
This is so stupid. Completely false, and less than ten partners is a abnormal with today's young women, while by some accounts are more conservative than pre-tinder days.
Get a life and stip spreading sexist lies.
P.S. and to sink to the idocy of this posts logic, doesn't the size of the partners and the frequency of intercourse matter more than the number if partners. Like 35 one night stands with tiny dudes wouldn't equal a thousand screws with John Holms. Fucking garbage post.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
get a life
1 TheCircleMethod 2018-05-09
If wiping your greasy Doritos fingers over your starwars pullover in-between gulps of mountain dew code red in you mom's basement fabricating nonesensical sexist graphs on your carpal tunnel fanboy "self-help" thread is having a life, then I guess I'm good. I'll continuey my "no-life" existence.
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
read the sources section dumb ass
1 tallchad 2018-05-09
TEEHEE I'm a slut btw xd
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-09
r/ihaveautism
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
You try, and link me to it. I have tried searching all the terms, plus the link goes to a 2006 issue of Human Reproduction. I can't find an S Clark PhD at Exeter with vaginal studies either.
This is what it links to:
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/21/6/1618/724374
1 MagratM 2018-05-09
I don't believe in an invisible sky-fairy watching everything I do. I don't need the crutch of religion to get me through the night.
As for being a slut? Meh... Beyond that now, since it's all broken.
1 theonetruekike 2018-05-09
Sluts like you should be publicly executed
1 themannamedme 2018-05-09
Does it look like I care what god thinks?