The personality thing is such fucking bs. I mean, just look at how most dating happens now, tinder and similar apps. Photos first, then maybe you look at the bio. We've all seen the giga-chad pedo blackpill, fucking disgusting. Though that's even worse, that's actively accepting shit personality, not just ignoring it.
No woman sees an ugly man and says "oh, maybe his personality is great, I'll check his bio". No, she's already swiped left. I've seen an attractive girl use tinder. They fucking fly through people because they know there's a stack of like 30+ dudes that have already swiped right on her and just waiting.
Total normie here. Yeah yeah fuck me for being a blackpilled guy who isn't ugly. I legitimately sympathize and lurk this sub because fuck the way dating and relationships work now.
I toy around with my tinder profile often and I've found my bio has little to no impact on my matches, granted I've never purposefully had an agressive or mean bio. It's entirely photos.
Added a photo of me standing with another guy that is slightly shorter than me, more matches. Photo of me actually doing hobbies that I find interesting? No change. If anything, less matches.
I've heard less photos is actually better than more. If you're attractive, you have their attention. More photos just give them a reason to swipe left, not right.
That sums up a good bit. If you're attractive, all you have to do is just not fuck it up. If you're ugly you have to claw your way up for attention. And that cutoff is so sharp too. I'd say I'm barely past whatever boundary is "attractive" and the amount of attention I get compared to my buddy is absurd. He's hilarious, makes 6 figures in his 20s, and goes all out for women any chance he gets, if anything I've told him to tone it down. But no women see that because they never match with his photos.
Bull fucking shit. 13ms isn't even enough for your eyes to respond to a visual stimulus. Average human reaction time when fully alert is around 200ms. Training and good genetics can get that down to 130ish ms.
Takes around 9ms just for the electric signal to travel from your eyes to your brain. Then your subconscious would have to analyse that data in 4ms which is impossible.
It might be possible to get some sort of response with a 13ms exposure time but that response would still be delayed by at least 150ms.
There's a clip somewhere of a bunch of girls streaming Tinder to a TV and going through dudes for a fun night in. When some jock looking guy comes up they are all SCREECHING like synchronized banshees in less than a second. It's absolutely incredible how quick they can make the call if you're attractive or not. There is no middle ground boyos, it's absolutely binary and it's instant. Supercomputer shit.
13 comments
1 genetically_cursed 2018-05-07
source https://psychologyofbeauty.wordpress.com/category/the-face/page/2/
r/BlackPillScience/
1 dontcomplain1 2018-05-07
He has a good personality and just took a shower.
1 FinalFantasycel 2018-05-07
that’s why they can sense our misogynistic personalities when they look at our subhuman faces
1 thisnameisunique123 2018-05-07
The personality thing is such fucking bs. I mean, just look at how most dating happens now, tinder and similar apps. Photos first, then maybe you look at the bio. We've all seen the giga-chad pedo blackpill, fucking disgusting. Though that's even worse, that's actively accepting shit personality, not just ignoring it.
No woman sees an ugly man and says "oh, maybe his personality is great, I'll check his bio". No, she's already swiped left. I've seen an attractive girl use tinder. They fucking fly through people because they know there's a stack of like 30+ dudes that have already swiped right on her and just waiting.
Total normie here. Yeah yeah fuck me for being a blackpilled guy who isn't ugly. I legitimately sympathize and lurk this sub because fuck the way dating and relationships work now.
I toy around with my tinder profile often and I've found my bio has little to no impact on my matches, granted I've never purposefully had an agressive or mean bio. It's entirely photos.
Added a photo of me standing with another guy that is slightly shorter than me, more matches. Photo of me actually doing hobbies that I find interesting? No change. If anything, less matches.
I've heard less photos is actually better than more. If you're attractive, you have their attention. More photos just give them a reason to swipe left, not right.
That sums up a good bit. If you're attractive, all you have to do is just not fuck it up. If you're ugly you have to claw your way up for attention. And that cutoff is so sharp too. I'd say I'm barely past whatever boundary is "attractive" and the amount of attention I get compared to my buddy is absurd. He's hilarious, makes 6 figures in his 20s, and goes all out for women any chance he gets, if anything I've told him to tone it down. But no women see that because they never match with his photos.
1 Mest666 2018-05-07
it's over for humanity when femoids prefer traits which are useless for survival in 2018
1 bengalsturntup5532 2018-05-07
Ty for your support
1 VartanX 2018-05-07
Copeists: "He's got a bit of negative canthal tilt. It's over for him"
1 -100K 2018-05-07
Honestly not to much to ask.
1 mittrinilli 2018-05-07
P E R S O N A L I T Y
1 Frikgeek 2018-05-07
Bull fucking shit. 13ms isn't even enough for your eyes to respond to a visual stimulus. Average human reaction time when fully alert is around 200ms. Training and good genetics can get that down to 130ish ms.
13ms is absolutely fucking ridiculous.
1 finnanut27 2018-05-07
Holy shit, your brain is fucked
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-07
autism
1 kurdishpower01 2018-05-07
The subconcious picks it up. Even if that's false it's true
1 Frikgeek 2018-05-07
Takes around 9ms just for the electric signal to travel from your eyes to your brain. Then your subconscious would have to analyse that data in 4ms which is impossible.
It might be possible to get some sort of response with a 13ms exposure time but that response would still be delayed by at least 150ms.
1 kurdishpower01 2018-05-07
You're right.. 13 ms is too fast. 2-3 seconds should be more accurate to determine someone's looks
1 Frikgeek 2018-05-07
Right, so you have around 2.5 seconds to convey how funny, kind, and great you are before you get discarded on the basis of looks. Seems doable.
1 kurdishpower01 2018-05-07
Funny, kind and great? Just looks
1 Invisible_247 2018-05-07
There's a clip somewhere of a bunch of girls streaming Tinder to a TV and going through dudes for a fun night in. When some jock looking guy comes up they are all SCREECHING like synchronized banshees in less than a second. It's absolutely incredible how quick they can make the call if you're attractive or not. There is no middle ground boyos, it's absolutely binary and it's instant. Supercomputer shit.