We should just rate people with ELO like in Chess.
This stuff of numbers confuses me so much, a 1400 would be better looking than 80% of the population but theres still 2000 , 2600 people even 2700 that are like 1000 times better looking
I don't understand what's wrong with a 0-10 scale where 0 is worse than virtually everyone, 10 is better than virtually everyone, 1/10 implies bottom 10% (90% of population looks better than you), 9/10 means you mog 9/10 of the population, and so forth where 5/10 is average. Anyone who is like a 9.5 is, in stat terminology, unusually good looking and 0.5s are unusually ugly. This is the only we we can all stay on the same scale.
Women rate ~80% of men as below medium in attractiveness.
And based on the numbers I've heard women throw around for guys, I think they do recognize that 5 corresponds to "medium." I've seen them rate good-looking actors 3/10, etc.
What's interesting is how women are so ridiculous about rating men's looks, but they're much more lenient with everything else. Check the IMDB ratings, for example. Women rate TV shows and movies higher than men virtually every single time.
"OMGZ, 10/10 dis show is soooooo good" - women.
Then again, I've also encountered some retarded men who went, "I mean, it's good. I give it 3/10"...apparently clueless as to what the numbers correspond to. There is no universe in which 3/10 is "good," no matter how you look at the ratings system.
Women are designed/evolved to be harsh judges of physical appearance, their hormones and brains are literally built for discriminating specifically by looks. Women are the primitive sex, it is males that are the romantic sexual, driven by hormones to romanticize even the mundane.
Due to their history as food scavengers rather than hunters. Those who could differentiate between poisonous and safe berries & mushrooms had a survival advantage.
Maybe. To me it's their hormones and social factors that cause them to be shallow and materialistic.
Not only do women lack much of the listful hormones that help men feel the sincere attraction we have for them, but socially speaking, many women obviously have an inferiority complex that motivates many of them to view men as status symbols moreso than human beings.
A woman, to myself and many "average" men, is a potential wife and mother. A man to a woman, however,...is an object meant to help them impress people.
That makes no sense at all. Women like Chad because women who were predisposed to liking Chad either outbred those who didn’t or because of an inherent survival advantage due to Chads’ physiological prowess.
It's far more likely that, for the vast majority of human history, women had little to no say in who their mate(s) would be. The strongest males bred. Having a strong mate was preferable for women as it meant healthier offspring and greater physical security. It's only relatively recently in our history that women stopped being property.
It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users.
I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!
Do you have a good jaw, styled hair, nice clothes, and a athletic body? All u need to get changlite status. chang means you look like an asian superman. asiancels dont even need to have super good looking faces to get cute girlfriends imo.
Totally agree. Fuck those guys in the 1-6 range for existing as subhuman filth. The average looking 7 should be thankful that a girl found it in her heart to settle down for him.
A 7 is two standard deviations to the right. Thats 2% of the population. Shes literally saying 98% of the male population is below par for her. Its over.
I would argue that natural Chads occupy the top 10% and ascended Chad-lites the next 10%, then it leaves the normies the other 10% to lookmax hard all live to be considered normal
Women are designed/evolved to be harsh judges of physical appearance, their hormones and brains are literally built for discriminating specifically by looks. Women are the primitive sex, it is males that are the romantic sexual, driven by hormones to romanticize even the mundane.
It's far more likely that, for the vast majority of human history, women had little to no say in who their mate(s) would be. The strongest males bred. Having a strong mate was preferable for women as it meant healthier offspring and greater physical security. It's only relatively recently in our history that women stopped being property.
80 comments
1 Plague-Lord 2018-05-07
normshits are notoriously bad at rating. They think 7 means average and 5 means ugly..
1 ripmynigharambe 2018-05-07
They go based on a school type rating system, anything below a 5 is a fail
1 hitman6actual 2018-05-07
In a lot of university programs, a 6 is a fail.
1 martelaxe 2018-05-07
We should just rate people with ELO like in Chess. This stuff of numbers confuses me so much, a 1400 would be better looking than 80% of the population but theres still 2000 , 2600 people even 2700 that are like 1000 times better looking
1 iQ9k 2018-05-07
That sounds autistic
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-05-07
That's how Facebook got started though. lul
1 scurvyneville 2018-05-07
Where do you think you are?
1 hitman6actual 2018-05-07
Proceeds to outline a more complicated numerical system that is even more arbitrary (particularly since this isn't a zero sum game).
1 Mr-Mercedes- 2018-05-07
I don't understand what's wrong with a 0-10 scale where 0 is worse than virtually everyone, 10 is better than virtually everyone, 1/10 implies bottom 10% (90% of population looks better than you), 9/10 means you mog 9/10 of the population, and so forth where 5/10 is average. Anyone who is like a 9.5 is, in stat terminology, unusually good looking and 0.5s are unusually ugly. This is the only we we can all stay on the same scale.
1 mr4ffe 2018-05-07
I prefer a bell curve. Kind of like with IQ where most people land around 100, with looks, most people would land around 5.
1 EverythingIsSoSincur 2018-05-07
Women rate ~80% of men as below medium in attractiveness.
And based on the numbers I've heard women throw around for guys, I think they do recognize that 5 corresponds to "medium." I've seen them rate good-looking actors 3/10, etc.
What's interesting is how women are so ridiculous about rating men's looks, but they're much more lenient with everything else. Check the IMDB ratings, for example. Women rate TV shows and movies higher than men virtually every single time.
"OMGZ, 10/10 dis show is soooooo good" - women.
Then again, I've also encountered some retarded men who went, "I mean, it's good. I give it 3/10"...apparently clueless as to what the numbers correspond to. There is no universe in which 3/10 is "good," no matter how you look at the ratings system.
1 literallyarealperson 2018-05-07
Women are designed/evolved to be harsh judges of physical appearance, their hormones and brains are literally built for discriminating specifically by looks. Women are the primitive sex, it is males that are the romantic sexual, driven by hormones to romanticize even the mundane.
1 PanderjitSingh 2018-05-07
Due to their history as food scavengers rather than hunters. Those who could differentiate between poisonous and safe berries & mushrooms had a survival advantage.
1 literallyarealperson 2018-05-07
Maybe. To me it's their hormones and social factors that cause them to be shallow and materialistic.
Not only do women lack much of the listful hormones that help men feel the sincere attraction we have for them, but socially speaking, many women obviously have an inferiority complex that motivates many of them to view men as status symbols moreso than human beings.
A woman, to myself and many "average" men, is a potential wife and mother. A man to a woman, however,...is an object meant to help them impress people.
1 damnsong 2018-05-07
That makes no sense at all. Women like Chad because women who were predisposed to liking Chad either outbred those who didn’t or because of an inherent survival advantage due to Chads’ physiological prowess.
1 hitman6actual 2018-05-07
It's far more likely that, for the vast majority of human history, women had little to no say in who their mate(s) would be. The strongest males bred. Having a strong mate was preferable for women as it meant healthier offspring and greater physical security. It's only relatively recently in our history that women stopped being property.
1 whogivesafucc 2018-05-07
This tbh.
in reality most people are 4.5
1 FilmingAction 2018-05-07
If 5 is statistically average (the average person is a 5) then 5 IS ugly. It's been shown that women find most men unattractive.
1 kj107 2018-05-07
"Once you're tired of Chad pump and dumps, just go for the Chadlite beta bux!"
JFML
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-05-07
Sometimes I feel that we don't even need /r/blackpillscience, the blackpill is writing itself. Just screencap that shit, no need to comment anything.
1 TheMubarak1 2018-05-07
Nope they wont go to that, they want THE FUNNY chadlite beta bux. It's over if you are 7 with no personality
1 acoverover1 2018-05-07
Chadlite bux, Gigachad fux
1 throwawayricecel 2018-05-07
I’m a legit 7/10 if you’re a female pm me
1 DEPTHERROR 2018-05-07
Ricecel-7/10 KEK
1 throwawayricecel 2018-05-07
I would not you not eve going to lie. I’m Changlite
1 Rhodri_Kraakman 2018-05-07
Chang is worth approximately 1/2 a chad. You’re a 3.5/10 to women.
1 throwawayricecel 2018-05-07
No I would mog you not lying
1 Get_Thee_2_A_Nunnery 2018-05-07
Cope my friend
1 Rhodri_Kraakman 2018-05-07
pic?
1 throwawayricecel 2018-05-07
Don’t want to
1 Rhodri_Kraakman 2018-05-07
lol
1 FatFingerHelperBot 2018-05-07
It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!
Here is link number 1 - Previous text "lol"
Please PM /u/eganwall with issues or feedback! | Delete
1 throwawayricecel 2018-05-07
I'm Changlite I'm like the full chink version of Elliot Rodger to give you a sense of what I look like tho I wear glasses and am taller.
1 harambeazn 2018-05-07
Do you have a good jaw, styled hair, nice clothes, and a athletic body? All u need to get changlite status. chang means you look like an asian superman. asiancels dont even need to have super good looking faces to get cute girlfriends imo.
1 Chadbutblackpilled 2018-05-07
JFL when will ricecels learn 😑
1 BloodlustDota 2018-05-07
Just Be Asian law. Exhibit A. STPeach 10/10 stacey and her asian bf.
1 Worse_Username 2018-05-07
You forgot about being able to make her laugh...
1 ShadowMforce 2018-05-07
So? A 7/10 is a reasonable number to settle with. You want her to settle down with someone who she has no sexual desire towards?
1 fukworld_2 2018-05-07
Totally agree. Fuck those guys in the 1-6 range for existing as subhuman filth. The average looking 7 should be thankful that a girl found it in her heart to settle down for him.
1 Roastie_the_redditor 2018-05-07
You really hate yourself don't you
1 Idk12344482305 2018-05-07
You really can’t handle sarcasm, can’t you
1 Roastie_the_redditor 2018-05-07
No but I can take tyrones ten inches like a champ.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-05-07
I hope you wash your filthy pussy afterwards.
1 Roastie_the_redditor 2018-05-07
I'm a man, I only have a filthy ass full of Chad and tyrones superior sperm
1 theonenamedkirk 2018-05-07
not as much as the normies who spend all day lurking on here to feel better about what massive cunts they are.
1 Roastie_the_redditor 2018-05-07
Speaking of massive counts, how big is your dick hole? Do you like putting stuff in it?
1 keyandfeels 2018-05-07
Jesus Christ dude do something better with your time
1 TheiWindFelt 2018-05-07
Nah. Fk em.
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-07
LMAO
Imagine """"settling """" for a 7
JUST FUCKING LOL
1 pineapplepj 2018-05-07
it’d be settling if she’s an 8+
1 NightSkyPill 2018-05-07
Sure, but since when would an 8+ woman add an incel on FB?
1 Senzurann 2018-05-07
A 7 is two standard deviations to the right. Thats 2% of the population. Shes literally saying 98% of the male population is below par for her. Its over.
1 hugeostrichegg 2018-05-07
Hot guys are overrated. Just settle for a hot guy that wears glasses.
1 bopoll 2018-05-07
She's literally saying that she's not sexually attracted to 70% of men.
Her scale literally puts 7 at the MINIMUM for looks.
1 The-Drapery-Falls 2018-05-07
Google, what is a bell curve?
1 bopoll 2018-05-07
One that skews left for men, from women's point of view
1 trevmon 2018-05-07
kek
1 keyandfeels 2018-05-07
P E R S O N A L I T Y
1 SlashSero 2018-05-07
Reminder that in the eyes of men a 6 or 7 is average while for women a 7 means top 20%.
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-05-07
Uhm no it‘s the other way around.
A femoid thinks a 7 man is average.
Whereas men think a 4 or 5 femoids is average
1 mr4ffe 2018-05-07
5 is literally average.
1 CallahanWalnut 2018-05-07
Depends if it’s weighed or not
1 Easy_Toast 2018-05-07
no 5 is the middle... google the diff between "average" and "middle"
1 m41aspd 2018-05-07
It's not "7", she just misspelled "someone"
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-05-07
I bet she wanted to type "5'2 bald Indian janitor" but it got auto corrected
1 BleedingAssWound 2018-05-07
She said 7 not a 2.
1 superman1145 2018-05-07
Ur so retarded
1 BleedingAssWound 2018-05-07
k
1 The_Real_Cannaman 2018-05-07
What a cope!
1 keyandfeels 2018-05-07
high iq comment
1 geneticwaste43 2018-05-07
Just find a chad girlos
Probably a chunker too
1 jaghatarhonor 2018-05-07
I've been saying this forever. Females think 7 is average and when they say "I don't like Chads" this is what they mean.
1 The_Real_Cannaman 2018-05-07
So fuckin true, that is becoz sub5 males are invisible
1 otter6461a 2018-05-07
Finally a woman willing to lower her standards to two entire points above average. She’s a keeper!
1 Bloody69Hell 2018-05-07
0-70% - trash
70-80% - normal
80-100% - hot
I would argue that natural Chads occupy the top 10% and ascended Chad-lites the next 10%, then it leaves the normies the other 10% to lookmax hard all live to be considered normal
Works out
1 chillenyo2 2018-05-07
Haha omg cant be real jwtf
1 iQ9k 2018-05-07
To be fair, normies use 7/10 as their "average" since 70% on most school tests is considered average.
1 Bob4Fettuccine 2018-05-07
I saw this posted on Facebook un ironically. Made me think of you guys. Shoulda reaped that sweet karma when I had the chance lol.
1 Kar98kSnipe 2018-05-07
It’s OVER if you’re 7/10 and not funny
1 Cold_Establishment 2018-05-07
Femoids don't understand the bell curve so to them a 7/10 is just someone in the top 30% of attractiveness but not in the top 20% of attractiveness.
1 GuyFromDaStore 2018-05-07
A guy has to be hot to be 7/10, all a girl has to do to be 7/10 is not be a fucking overweight pig.
1 KingAliReshad 2018-05-07
When they whore out all their lives, hit the wall and their sexual market value starts going down, they look for average looking (good) guys.
1 strange_to_be 2018-05-07
Bro, I've heard this along with 'i like mah girls with a little meat on them' about a trillion times from men.
1 organism007 2018-05-07
I bet her vagina hole is 2 feet wide by now
1 Soiled_Bugman 2018-05-07
7= chadlite.
1 Pastelitomaracucho 2018-05-07
Become a 7, but don't let them settle for you! :)
1 mr4ffe 2018-05-07
5 is literally average.
1 literallyarealperson 2018-05-07
Women are designed/evolved to be harsh judges of physical appearance, their hormones and brains are literally built for discriminating specifically by looks. Women are the primitive sex, it is males that are the romantic sexual, driven by hormones to romanticize even the mundane.
1 BleedingAssWound 2018-05-07
k
1 hitman6actual 2018-05-07
It's far more likely that, for the vast majority of human history, women had little to no say in who their mate(s) would be. The strongest males bred. Having a strong mate was preferable for women as it meant healthier offspring and greater physical security. It's only relatively recently in our history that women stopped being property.