Here is a cached version of the Daily Mail content OP are linking to.

This cached version of the webpage doesn't register as a page view, and also doesn't give the Daily Mail advertising revenue.

Why? The Daily Mail is known for holding controversial opinions within its articles which promotes hate. The outlet also is known for being highly biased and also publishing false and misleading articles.

I'm a bot! This comment was posted automatically. Feedback? Something wrong? Send me a PM.

Good bot!

Thank you, Nomadic_Sushi, for voting on Daily_Hate_Mail_Bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.

^{Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!}

wow, nice, reading this caused me to click it 5 times

eat shit liberals

Here is a cached version of the Daily Mail content OP are linking to.

This cached version of the webpage doesn't register as a page view, and also doesn't give the Daily Mail advertising revenue.

There are 18 images in this article.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Why? The Daily Mail is known for holding controversial opinions within its articles. It should not be tolerated. The outlet also is known for being highly biased and also publishing false and misleading articles.

I'm a bot! This comment was posted automatically. Feedback? Something wrong? Send me a PM.

changed "It should not be tolerated" to "which promotes hate."

And then there are people like Meeks that get million dollar deals and rich women throwing themselves at him after being a gang-affiliated felon.

Good. Incels need to be incarcerated and their subhuman virgin asses raped to death by Tyrone with a shiv.

Oh hey u/burnercel, already back at it?

Where are all the social movements and twitter hashtags to defend ugly people from biased prosecution like they do for black people? Where are the progressives spewing out apologetics to justify and defend our anger as it is the result of a system working against us and our happiness?

Oh right, nobody actually gives a shit about subhumans lol.

society will be willing to care only if the subhumans were female

One thing at a time. We still can’t get clean water for some.

I'm assuming they're talking about the western world where mostly everyone has clean water.

Because lookism doesn’t effect females nobody gives a shit.

nobody likes ugly people not even other ugly people. and nobody wants to identify as "the ugly people". imagine telling some poor fucker feeling bad about his life to join the "ugly movement". might be enough to make him rope

Less likely to get an ascend, lower wages, more propense to suicide thanks to social ostracization etc.

Not to mention totally screwed in today sexual market(males only) unless we get wealthy or status to catch some used-up goldigger in his 30.

Imagine being both ugly AND black. You'd get a life sentence for a woman breaking her hand punching your face.

Your looks don't matter.

IT cucks.

If you're a criminal defendant, it may help—a lot—to be a woman. At least, that's what Prof. Sonja Starr's research on federal criminal cases suggests. Prof. Starr's recent paper, "Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases," looks closely at a large dataset of federal cases, and reveals some significant findings. After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper.

Looks are all that matters.

Attractive people literally cannot lose at life. It is almost funny how pathetic it is.

I'm assuming they're talking about the western world where mostly everyone has clean water.