oof. the absolute truth in this.

red pill women makes no sense. Isn't the red pill based on female nature?

No it is cope, blackpill is based on female nature. Red pill women is indeed about women keeping chad.

When I first heard of it I was like "wtf they need help picking up men for?" but I visited and it's like OP says, women discussing strategies on trying to get the high quality men to commit to them, or trying to improve their marriages etc.

Red pill is based on truth. There is a red pill in philosophy, there is a red pill in politics. Not only sexual dynamics.

Some autists wanted to feel special so they invented more pills. Blackpill, Purple pill, Green pill idc.

Redpill is about truth

Fuck off you Kurdish subhuman goat fucker.

Did I hurt your feelings? Poor incel..

Gtfo of this sub you Kurdish subhuman goat fucker.

Kurdish people are better in every way that you are. I am not incel like your genetic failured life

Kurdish people are born subhuman by default because of shit genetics.

Like having thick masculine eyebrows/ High testosterone/ Big browridges/ Average length of 6'' - 6''1/ Masculine noses/ Strong chins/ Warriorblood?

We have superior genetics and lots of masculine features. Even the women look masculine. Kurdish men + kurdish women == extra masculine child. Kurdish girls are ugly.. but the men like me.. I am f*cking kurdish chad in this bitch

Chad doesn’t post in incels nor does he cope with red pills. Chad is what PUAcopers call naturals because they have looks and don’t need to do anything.

Chad doesn't even exist. It's just some guy who has his shit together

no. TRP is The Blue Pill, just reworded and focused around PUA rather than personality.

God damn that is true as fuck. Foids are just hungry baby machines that want to spew mini chads across the universe. I am a non sexual being to them; In a parallel world with less laws I’m sure I’d be mushed into a fine paste and formed into a protein bar for Chads and Stacies

Implying you're even worth making protein bars off

Just kidding, nothing serious.

Idk I've seen even the ugliest, most awkward men have commitment issues.

RPW looks like they're dragging women back into the fifties, where women cooked cleaned, made sure their make up was perfect at all times, made sure dinner was on the table exactly when Chad wants it, and making sure never to have any individual thoughts ever in case you upset your Chad.

It makes me want to throw up.

Many women (even feminist women) still do that. But for Chad only. Plenty of women will abandon their own ideology for a certain guy. It's kinda sad and hilarious.

I used to do little things for my partner to just give him something special for dinner, or make sure birthday and Christmas gifts were thoughtful and personal, but there's no way on god's green earth you'd get me fussing around like a good little hausfrau, making sure I had my make-up and hair done at all times so he didn't have to look at someone who looked tired or stressed, or making sure I kept conversation light, so as not to disturb him, and never ask questions about his work because I'm just not clever enough to understand the complexity of any job a man could do...

Even typing that made me feel kind of dirty... eww... Imagine having to stop being a person and become a pretty little "yes dear" slave...

That's because your partner was not Chad.

How do you know?

You described your behavior around him.

Which behaviour? Little things like meaningful gifts on birthdays and such? You mean you wouldn't buy your partner something thoughtful for a birthday? Or treat them to a nice meal somewhere occasionally?

Which behaviour?

This part: "but there's no way on god's green earth you'd get me fussing around like a good little hausfrau".

You mean you wouldn't buy your partner something thoughtful for a birthday? Or treat them to a nice meal somewhere occasionally?

I'm not a femoid so that's irrelevant.

I wouldn't fuss around anyone like a good little hausfrau. It's just not who I am.

Yeah, except for Chad.

Not even for God.

Maybe even for beta buxx after hitting the wall. Not for long, though.

Unlikely, especially given my current situation.

So you're saying there's a chance?

Not even slightly.

Stereotyping accomplishes nothing. It's a massive cope.

What do you think I'm trying to accomplish here and how is it a cope?

I think you're just venting in a non-productive manner. It's coping because you're trying to dehumanize what you can't have. Women are people too and have individual thoughts and preferences. To try to dumb her down to giving away her will to "Chad" is simply you coping by making her choices arbitrary. By doing so, you can absolve yourself for not being Chad.

You're simply not educated about female nature and I'm just stating the facts, AWALT. As for this not being productive I agree but the same applies to your comments and this whole sub, probably.

Thing is, it's not a fact. AWALT is massive cope.

Our argument basically boils down to biology vs blue pill lies.

Biology can't predict the patterns of an entire sex. There is no science or published study that will make this claim. It's cope vs reality and your side isn't reality.

Biology can't predict the patterns of an entire sex.

Why not? Every femoid has an instinct to look for Chad genes. There's plenty of red pill "science" to confirm. As for published studies, they wouldn't be politically correct and also would damage motivation of beta cucks so of course we can't have such studies. Also, how would you perform such an experiment?

Cope is having a false hope. Accepting facts for reality is simply being honest with yourself.

Doesn't explain how less than attractive people have partners and are successful. If you dumb down an entire sex, you're going to meet resistance because your sex could be just as easily dumbed down.

No science is 100% predictive of an entire sex. At best you have "some". It's common sense that people are individuals.

Doesn't explain how less than attractive people have partners and are successful

Beta buxx

If you dumb down an entire sex, you're going to meet resistance because your sex could be just as easily dumbed down

And?

It's common sense that people are individuals.

Like it was common sense that earth is flat, etc.

Beta > Omega.

What's your point? The earth being flat can be disproven with science. Women all being the same can't be proven. There is no science claiming this and certainly nothing peer-reviewed or published either. The "blackpilled" truth was nothing concrete.

That's just femoid logic, aka hamstering, safe to disregard.

Can you describe what you refer to as omega (people, not wolves)?

Why would I bother when you would clearly just brand it as "femoid" logic?

Why even post if you can't explain what you meant to say?

Well I tried to explain earlier and you disregarded it as "femoid logic" so why would I spend more time explaining myself if you're not even willing to listen? You've already proven yourself to be ignorant as you subscribe to AWALT. There's nothing to be gained by speaking with you anymore. You won't be convinced and cling to shaky at best evidence.

So weaseling your way out of providing an actual answer? Of course I won't be convinced, just interested in femoid's perspective.

That's just femoid logic, aka hamstering, safe to disregard.

Circular reasoning mate.

Can you describe what you refer to as omega

Omega is the end of the Greek alphabet ( Alpha is the beginning).

u/Rubissrox doesn't care if you call him beta and makes punn that tries to put it perspective. If you call Rubissrox beta there is still gamma under that, if you call Rubissrox gamma there's delta under that etc. etc. cause rubissrox doesn't really care where exactly you put him on your scale if you don't have any good arguments etc. that would make rubissrox put any vallue in your system or consider you above them.

Omega is the end of the Greek alphabet ( Alpha is the beginning).

Hello, Captain Obvious.

u/Rubissrox doesn't care if you call him beta

• her

"Omega" is an actual social rank in ethology

Ethology is the study of animal behavior and she already expressed that she doesn't put any value in your interpretation of biology when it comes to human behavior...

u/Rubissrox doesn't care if you call him beta *her

k.

Ethology is the study of animal behavior

Humans included.

and she already expressed that she doesn't put any value in your interpretation of biology when it comes to human behavior...

What's the point of using terms without even thinking what they mean then? Oh, I remember, that's what femoids do.

What's the point of using terms without even thinking what they mean then?

They can also 'mean' letters of the Greek alphabet. again ,PUNN.

Then that's just spam, not an argument.

Thank you.

Like it was common sense that earth is flat, etc.

That's a myth people in modern times believe man, Columbus didn't discover the world was round , the freaking Greeks could tell you that from looking at ships going past the horizon.

The fact that there was "no way in hell" you would be at your very best at all times for him.

While you obviously just didn't feel like going through the effort, this is a statement that reflects upon a deeper value. In a way, you don't think he deserved you at your best, or your high effort meals, etc., all the time.

I've seen it with my own eyes. Women turn on their "pretty nice and sweet girl" mode around chad. In a relationship with them, they always try to do what they can to make chad happy.

You can almost 100% tell what the guy looks like in comparison to what the girl looks like by the way the girl describes her actions towards him. She worships him? He mogs the shit out of her. She is nice sometimes but isn't really going through the efforts to be the best she can (likely because she thinks she can do better or that he doesn't deserve her)? They're looksmatched. He's in the friendzone? He's uglier.

I didn't say I wouldn't give my best. What I said was that I wouldn't be a little hausfrau. I went out to work too. I didn't stay home doing all the cooking, cleaning, polishing, dusting, and scrubbing. We shared the cooking and the housework.

Tits or gtfo

Umm... Neither :)

Imagine having to stop being a person and become a pretty little "yes dear" slave..

But if it was for 50 shades Chad then no problem right?

Nope. Why do people not get this?

Just because you think Chad is God and would drop your pants and bend over for him doesn't mean I would.

But you would. Why else would you watch 50 shades a dozen times?

But you would. Why dont you get it, the jig is up. It's clear to us now that women are willing to become docile sex slaves to certain type of men (Chads) while being extremely hostile and abusive to other types, solely based on their appearance and status.

If this weren't true, movies like 50 shades of grey would never have been successful and there would be widespread outrage over it. I bet you watched the movies a dozen times now

I refused to read the books and I point blank will not subject myself to the crap of the films. It is a story of abuse, not BDSM. Abuse, plain and simple. I find it revolting, and suggest to anyone contemplating reading it that they rethink their book choice.

I would not be some willing little docile creature. I have never been a willing little docile creature. I don't care who it was. It is not in my nature to be that sort of person.

I find it revolting, and suggest to anyone contemplating reading it that they rethink their book choice.

Well you are in the minority. Over 100 Million copies sold. Best selling book of all time on Amazon.

Yuk. I can't think of anything worse.

And she's utterly pathetic too.

Ok...what the fuck? I am a redpill woman and what you say is wrong. What do you mean we dont have any individual thoughts??? Just because we want to be good wives it doesnt make us weak. Feminists like you are cancer and why this society is going to shit. You think the patriarchy is evil when in fact, women like you are evil! No man has EVER been as nasty to me as women have. Even these incels who "hate" me for being a woman and being here are like a warm hug compared to how many things evil things women have done to me.

What's so wrong with taking care of your family?? Do you think it's easy for the redpill man to have the burden of supporting a family? You think his life is easy by any means???

And no, redpill men aren't "Chads", those are fuckboys. A true redpill man is someone conservative and a gentleman. The guys talking about spinning plates and sleeping around are mgtows who dont wanna marry anyway so redpill women arent interested in them anyway.

And here we go.

I'm not a cancerous feminist, but I am also not a doormat.

Do you think anyone's life is easy? Do you not think that the responsibility should be shared equally? Do you really need to add all those extra question marks?

How about you don't make assumptions about me based on one post about some thread and I won't tell you to fuck off and get "welcome" tattooed on your forehead. Deal?

How am I a doormat? Do you think cooking and cleaning is such an effort when I get to have WAY more money than I usually would because my husband makes a ton more? That I get to live in a great neighbourhood, house, holidays abroad and all that just for this small price? How does this make me a doormat?

How arent our responsabilities shared equally? For the amount of extra money he makes over me I "pay him" in return by cooking, cleaning,etc. This is really fair, how is it not equal?

Well bully for you, with your perfect little rose garden life. Just be careful your make-up doesn't get smudged, because he might just trade you in for a younger model.

My makeup was perfect even before getting married and even if were to die alone I would still always take care of myself.

Well aren't you just peachy?

@MagratM you are really coming across as a hateful cunt

Oh well. Never mind. I'm sure you'll get over it.

Women hate each other more than incels ever could. JFL

You're essentially a paid and a prostitute at that rate. It's fine for a woman to cook and clean for her household. It's her choice. If you take that choice away, then you're making a mistake.

To expect a woman to completely handle all household chores is simply wrong. If the argument is money, then you're not really factoring in why employment really is.

For example, if you compare an entry level programmer to a shelf stocker, the programmer makes more money, but the shelf stocker works harder physically. Is it really fair for them to also have to work maintain a clean household solely by themselves?

I think the cooking and cleaning dynamic should be left to the couple. But to shame a woman for wanting to share responsibility is just wrong.

How am I a maid and a prostitute? I like cleaning the house, I would clean my house even when I lived alone. I am longer at home since he works longer hours. He actually surprised me once with cleaning the house and I recleaned it when he left because I dont think anyone could clean as good as I can. He initially said to get a cleaner but I dont want some strange woman going through my things.

And how am I a prostitute?? I actually enjoy sex with my husband very much.

I didnt say I expect a woman to handle all house chores, I expect the person who makes less money to make up in other ways-like cleaning cooking. You expect my husband to bring home a lot more than me and then to do the house chores on top of that? That would make me a user.

How am I shaming someone for sharing responsbilty??? I AM sharing responsabilty. He makes more than me and it's our money so I pull my weight in other ways. This is literally what fair looks like.

You're misunderstanding what I meant when I said you're essentially a maid and a prostitute. You claim you clean and cook because you have to. He makes more money than you so you have to pay him back. He is essentially paying you to clean his house if you approach it like that. That makes you a maid. I'm not shaming you for wanting a clean house. I am shaming you for thinking it is your place to clean. Do you understand what I mean?

You're also not really understanding what I said about employment. Making more money isn't really an indicator of working "harder". I made more as a supervisor than a cashier but cashiers definitely had a more tiring job than me. You're looking at it solely from a financial standpoint, which is rather interesting. Because using that logic, if you made more than your husband you would expect him to become the house's maid. If you won the lottery, he would be your butler until your marriage was over. That kind of thinking is very bizarre to me.

You're shaming women for not wanting to completely handle the cooking and cleaning in their households if they make less money. You are implying that a man should do the same if they make less... that's less incorrect but still faulty to me. If you make 45,000 and your husband makes 60,000, you can essentially saying that he is paying you 15,000 a year to clean his house. That makes you a maid, from your perspective. That's what I meant.

Again, you can manage your household dynamic as you see fit. I take issue with you claiming it is the correct way and shaming other women or even men really, for not being the housemaid because they make less.

I dont clean and cook because I have to in the sense that he said I have to. I do it because I would feel bad within myself, I would feel as a freeloader and like I take advntage. Like I said, he initially said to get a cleaner and I said no. I need to feel like I dont owe him anything. And this feeling is important to me in any relationship/interaction in my life.

Well, he is making more than me, allowing me to live in a better house, to have better holidays and have nicer things. A pornstar makes more than a brain surgeoun, if it's fair or not it's not the point. The point is he brings more to the table than me.

I think any relationship should be at close to 50/50 as possible. I dont think anyone should be taken advantage of. This is why I talked about cleaning and cooking. And the most important aspect is that the person needs to want to do this, you cant nag or threaten or "make" someone do it because it will then cause resentment.

That's fair. Like I said, it's your household, you can manage your own dynamic. I only took issue with it being forced on others, which may have been me misunderstanding your original point.

Oh femoid, how deluded you truly are, when it suits you you would burn your husband that you 'love' in a fire and laugh about it. You have no clue about the true heartless nature that resides within you.

To expect a woman to completely handle all household chores is simply wrong.

If she works, correct.

If she doesn't work and her husband does, then you're full of shit.

What kind of man wants to work all day long to come home to a wife who has sat on the sofa all day eating cheetos and done nothing with the kids or house?

That's called an unfair relationship. If the man is literally doing everything while the woman does nothing, then the guy is literally work-cucking himself.

Now if both the man and the woman work, and they share house responsibilities, then that's a fair relationship. But we weren't describing that.

I suggest you read the thread before commenting next time. We were always talking about when both parties work. Never once were we discussing a spouse staying at home and not working expecting an equal share in household responsibilities.

We were always talking about when both parties work.

Since when? I've been reading the entire thread and I don't see where we were talking exclusively about where both parties work. Perhaps I missed it.

I didnt say I expect a woman to handle all house chores, I expect the person who makes less money to make up in other ways-like cleaning cooking. You expect my husband to bring home a lot more than me and then to do the house chores on top of that? That would make me a user.

I was arguing against this.

Thank you for putting this attention seeking bitch in her place, tradthot.

I am not a thot, I've only slept with my husband.

“Feminists like you are cancer.”

EXACTLY.

As an aside, what is so wrong and dehumanising about cooking and cleaning? Explain it to me, feminists. Cooking is a heap of fun, and I keep an impeccably tidy home.

Don't try to argue with blackpillers.

Fuck off you Kurdish subhuman goat fucker.

Damn.

Maybe tradmaxxing is legit? Or am I coping boyos?

I dont get it

He's saying to become traditional and live a Conservative lifestyle.

Well...my husband is super hot. If this guy is incel then...he's incel. It doesnt matter if he's conservative or liberal.

Hope = destroyed.

redpill, bluepill,

you're all whorepill

that there is the blackpill

Even these incels who "hate" me for being a woman and being here are like a warm hug compared to how many things evil things women have done to me.

We need to step it up bois

Why so negative?

Read some advice.

Your retarded feminism-brainwashed vision of fifties makes me want to throw up.

That's nice dear.

Yeah yeah but feminism and incels are sexist. /s

That sounds good to me.

Because they are focusing on how to keep CHAD. Men struggle with just getting girls but for women the struggle is just pinning down Chad - not even acquiring him in the first place!

While they're keeping chad and having a great life you are dying inside in your moms basement.

Fuck off you Kurdish subhuman goat fucker.

They're both after Stacy and Chad lol

/r/RedPillWomen is proof that roasties would rather be Chad's maid and sex slave than be an incel's (or a norman's) equal.

High IQ post

You described your behavior around him.

Not even for God.

Stereotyping accomplishes nothing. It's a massive cope.

Doesn't explain how less than attractive people have partners and are successful. If you dumb down an entire sex, you're going to meet resistance because your sex could be just as easily dumbed down.

No science is 100% predictive of an entire sex. At best you have "some". It's common sense that people are individuals.

Then that's just spam, not an argument.