when what's really happening is their irl sample size is garbage
fuck off with this subjective, personal experience meme
we have showed over and over through scientific articles with sample sizes magnitudes higher than you or any of us will ever experience and yet we get "oh why do you just approach more"
I've read all your science, both when I was blackpilled and more recently.
It just shows trends and associations, and then you interpret them as laws that fuck you from birth.
The way you guys abuse statistics, you would conclude that the Decemberists have never been listened to or appreciated because studies clearly shows that Americans listen to Katy Perry and Taylor Swift.
By taking some study that reaches a conclusion like "74% of women are attracted to x at first sight" and somehow interpreting that to mean "I AM NOT X SO SCIENCE SAYS I WILL DIE ALONE."
Yeah, I could easily dig up, say, that OkCupid blog that shows that upon first glance, women think attractive men are also nicer. And then I could point out all the outliers, how the correlation isn't that strong, and how anyway clicking a number is much different behavior than meeting a man and going out on a date.
also not all of the studies are proof for saying its over, some are for debunking common """advice""" that gets spewed out of normies mouths every time
are you talking about the one where they show looks = personality? where they took away peoples bios and asked to rate personality?
I don't deny that it's a valid study, but you have to keep in mind that it's exactly what it is: a study on first impressions from behind a computer screen.
Not only is the correlation it shows imperfect, but it also bears only a passing resemblance to what a woman might be feeling after being spoken to for half an hour.
you would have to be legally blind to say its not a STRONG correlation
'The two scores are within a half point of each other for 92% of the sample after just 25 votes (and that percentage approaches 100% as vote totals get higher).'
it also bears a resemblance to what would initially drive the first connection, if they are ugly the connection/like/swipe whatever the fuck it is would never be there in the first place
also, when we say its over we do not mean ZERO women will date us. we mean 0.00001% will and you would have to meet so many girls to get one that it would be physically impossible
And where are you getting "0.00001%"?? What in any study suggests that it's not, say, 2%?
I mean, you just finished telling me that a 92% correlation is incredibly strong, but it also leaves 8% of women disagreeing with their peers.
And there are studies suggesting 7.5% of women are taller than their partner, so there's another 8% right there.
And no, being shown a picture and being asked "do you want this y/n" does not bear much resemblance to meeting someone and talking to them for even five minutes. There's so much that doesn't come across in one picture!
Also, it completely cuts women's own anxieties out of the loop; it's so much easier to rate a guy you think is out of your league than it is to speak to him.
Also, it completely cuts women's own anxieties out of the loop; it's so much easier to rate a guy you think is out of your league than it is to speak to him.
there it is
the cope. that statement doesnt even make sense, your just rationalising something
And there are studies suggesting 7.5% of women are taller than their partner, so there's another 8% right there.
actually its way less, something like less than 2% (there was even a study done on 400 couples and none were taller)
wow you want me to fucking calculate the exact chance of me finding a girl to 7 digits or something
ONCE you factor in EVERYTHING ugly + short + feminine frame your dating pool becomes so fucking limited its like searching a desert for water
Of course it makes sense. Just think about it from your own perspective. You're sitting behind a computer screen and you see a picture of a super hot girl with the text "rate this girl" and you click 10/10.
Does that mean no 5/10 would have a chance with you? Does it mean you expect to date the 10/10? Does it mean you'd even be comfortable approaching her?
Girls could see your data and become depressed even though all you were doing is following the directions.
You have no idea how many times I've been in Internet arguments over the last twenty years where the other guy says: "Provide a cite. Provide a cite. Provide a cite." So I did - I spent like 45 minutes going out and summarizing links and putting together basically a bit homework assignment - and he just replied, basically, "ur wrong."
At some point Charlie Brown really should stop kicking for the football. 99% of the people who say "prove it or ur wrong" are just terminally lazy and not actually interested in evidence.
And in this particular case I was being asked to explain the inapplicability of dozens of studies. Lol. Sure. Buy a plane ticket out here and meet me in public with a binder full of studies and then maybe I'll consider putting in the effort you won't.
The fact that you're tired to provide backing for your words is still just an excuse. That's how a debate should be - the side that makes an argument should provide a proof for a said argument.
That's exactly how it happens, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. And when somebody else provides an argument - they are required to provide evidence and proof for their statement.
See, there's multiple ways a disagreement can go down.
There's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Prove it or shut up.
That's obnoxious, because it's clear B thinks he's just found a strategy to "win" every conversation and validate his worldview.
Then there's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Interesting, but I believe x is untrue for the following reasons.
A. Prove it's untrue or shut up.
This is even more unreasonable; A is shifting the burden of proof while at the same time asking B to prove a negative.
Unfortunately that's exactly what happened in this thread. Someone spouted off theories with no evidence beyond "I read some once" and then thought it was other people's burden to disprove his theories.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but that ain't debate.
Man don't take it bad but your story is pure death fuel. You tolerate dudes fucking you in the ass just because the cuddles and making out beforehand relieves you from the skin hunger roasties have forced on you. Female hypergamy is the devil.
it means they find you somewhat attractive in a familial way ( they see you as a brother), but theywill never bang you or accept your offers for a relationship.
When I was in seventh grade, in the hallways, a pair of eight-grade girls just blurted out that I reminded them of a little brother. I didn't even know them. They just saw me and kind of giggled while they said that to my face. That comment pissed me off by then. Yep, women will never see me as a real man.
RIP. if your a manlet (no matter how handsome) or a babyfaced dude, girls will never be sexually attracted to you, judging from my friends experiences irl.
Cute is the best compliment you can get if one is a manlet. I never heard a short man be called handsome before, so I am quite content with cute. Yep, it's over.
On that note, my sis use to have a crush on Zac Efron and then when we turned 14 or 15, she started liking Andy Biersack (6'4") a lot more. Worst of all, she is 3 inches shorter than me. Haha, manlets don't even stand a chance with very short girls.
Peter Dinklage is 4 foot 5 inches. He's married to a cutie, and has been since 2005 (before he was famous). I think he's handsome, and apparently his wife does, too.
I'm not really into the whole "mommy-gf" thing, because there's just some weird connotations that don't sit right with me. I do however manage to play "mum" quite successfully.
nah their options are limited. you'll have to make good money aswell even though they are used up, unless you go to florida where i can see that being an exception since all the landwhales and crazy fucks managed to be grouped up in one place kek.
I’m a bisexual woman (attracted to men and women but only really feel a romantic connection with women) and I can honestly say a lot of the guys on here really aren’t as bad as they’ve convinced themselves they are. I’m not saying there are top tier lookers on here but you all beat yourself up a lot and act like you look like trolls when in reality many of you are average looking and many more of you could be even better looking with little effort.
4/10 females in the US are obese. On reddit... I'd go ahead and guess it's at least 2x more. I live in Chicago and have never seen any sort of attractive girl using reddit.. but I have seen landwhales perched at Starbucks, Wholefoods, etc on it. Sooo... this means there's a very high percent chance you are a landwhale with extremely low standards. I instinctually do not find fat women attractive, I think some guys.. no matter how ugly they are.. need to feel like their partner takes care of their body. But because of the math with so many American Women being obese.. the game is unfair.
Your entire comment was fixated on American women so I just thought I’d correct you and ignore the rest of the ignorant and irrelevant sentences that had literally nothing to do with what my original comment was about. Please get some help.
What does obesity have to do with my original post? I don’t even think you’re an incel. Women don’t want to date you because of your illiteracy and because you hate them, not because you’re ugly. Bro, seriously chill tf out I wasn’t even saying anything horrible in my comments. I’m not even mad at you I genuinely feel bad for you at how negatively you escalated this.
I love women. Key word women. And no I'm not an incel nor am I ugly luckily. But I do feel bad for incels and understand how the dating 'game' works and it's terrible and unfair for them unless they are very successful business-wise or want to get rejected 20 times per 1 hookup which can be exhausting I'm sure
That doesn't mean I hate women. Just because you are a nice community college with a lot to offer doesn't make someone an asshole for choosing to go for Yale because they can get in. Same thing applies to females with guys. We do the same thing.. try to fuck the hottest girls possible until we settle down for one who will be faithful long term.
But what I don't respect is women who can't take care of their weight. Staying in shape is relatively easy.. if a woman goes on a 40 minute walk every day and works out even 3 days a week.. she will look great and can eat literally anything she wants.
I wouldn't because you're too young, for one thing and I'm a single mom and have had sex with more than one person so you wouldn't date me either. I can still tell the difference between ugly and cute.
I really think a lot of you have body dysmorohic disorder focused on your faces from watching too much porn, spending way too much time on date swiping sites, and social media.
i dont even care what you have. 1. i watch porn once every 2 weeks 2. i dont go on date swiping sites and have never been on it and 3. i dont use social media
and before you say wah wah thats just you, i bet at least 80% of us dont go on dating sites or use social media because we know what will happen if we do
I have been called hot by a woman then ghosted, women don’t need to call you anything when you are genuinely atttactive they will ask for your details immediately. JFL they are evolutionary programmed to lie for their own safety
when what's really happening is their irl sample size is garbage
fuck off with this subjective, personal experience meme
we have showed over and over through scientific articles with sample sizes magnitudes higher than you or any of us will ever experience and yet we get "oh why do you just approach more"
See, there's multiple ways a disagreement can go down.
There's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Prove it or shut up.
That's obnoxious, because it's clear B thinks he's just found a strategy to "win" every conversation and validate his worldview.
Then there's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Interesting, but I believe x is untrue for the following reasons.
A. Prove it's untrue or shut up.
This is even more unreasonable; A is shifting the burden of proof while at the same time asking B to prove a negative.
Unfortunately that's exactly what happened in this thread. Someone spouted off theories with no evidence beyond "I read some once" and then thought it was other people's burden to disprove his theories.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but that ain't debate.
Peter Dinklage is 4 foot 5 inches. He's married to a cutie, and has been since 2005 (before he was famous). I think he's handsome, and apparently his wife does, too.
90 comments
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
They might!
Some people interact with like 50 women online for every 2 women they even attempt to have a conversation with irl.
Then they conclude their essential nature is different, when what's really happening is their irl sample size is garbage.
1 geneticwaste43 2018-05-02
Women want us all GASSED.
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
Lol. No.
1 geneticwaste43 2018-05-02
FACT
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
fuck off with this subjective, personal experience meme
we have showed over and over through scientific articles with sample sizes magnitudes higher than you or any of us will ever experience and yet we get "oh why do you just approach more"
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
I've read all your science, both when I was blackpilled and more recently.
It just shows trends and associations, and then you interpret them as laws that fuck you from birth.
The way you guys abuse statistics, you would conclude that the Decemberists have never been listened to or appreciated because studies clearly shows that Americans listen to Katy Perry and Taylor Swift.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
not an argument
how do we 'abuse' them? by pointing out the truth?
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
By taking some study that reaches a conclusion like "74% of women are attracted to x at first sight" and somehow interpreting that to mean "I AM NOT X SO SCIENCE SAYS I WILL DIE ALONE."
I see that shit like ten times a day here.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
show me proof
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
Wait, you want me to pull up a hundred scientific studies and demonstrate that nowhere in any of them does it say you'll die alone??
That's not a reasonable request.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
you said 10 a day, should be able to find one in a few mins then
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
Yeah, I could easily dig up, say, that OkCupid blog that shows that upon first glance, women think attractive men are also nicer. And then I could point out all the outliers, how the correlation isn't that strong, and how anyway clicking a number is much different behavior than meeting a man and going out on a date.
Then you would just say the word "cope."
Why would I waste my time with that?
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
no i wouldnt
also not all of the studies are proof for saying its over, some are for debunking common """advice""" that gets spewed out of normies mouths every time
are you talking about the one where they show looks = personality? where they took away peoples bios and asked to rate personality?
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
Yeah, that's the one I'm talking about.
I don't deny that it's a valid study, but you have to keep in mind that it's exactly what it is: a study on first impressions from behind a computer screen.
Not only is the correlation it shows imperfect, but it also bears only a passing resemblance to what a woman might be feeling after being spoken to for half an hour.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
you would have to be legally blind to say its not a STRONG correlation
'The two scores are within a half point of each other for 92% of the sample after just 25 votes (and that percentage approaches 100% as vote totals get higher).'
it also bears a resemblance to what would initially drive the first connection, if they are ugly the connection/like/swipe whatever the fuck it is would never be there in the first place
also, when we say its over we do not mean ZERO women will date us. we mean 0.00001% will and you would have to meet so many girls to get one that it would be physically impossible
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
And where are you getting "0.00001%"?? What in any study suggests that it's not, say, 2%?
I mean, you just finished telling me that a 92% correlation is incredibly strong, but it also leaves 8% of women disagreeing with their peers.
And there are studies suggesting 7.5% of women are taller than their partner, so there's another 8% right there.
And no, being shown a picture and being asked "do you want this y/n" does not bear much resemblance to meeting someone and talking to them for even five minutes. There's so much that doesn't come across in one picture!
Also, it completely cuts women's own anxieties out of the loop; it's so much easier to rate a guy you think is out of your league than it is to speak to him.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
there it is
the cope. that statement doesnt even make sense, your just rationalising something
actually its way less, something like less than 2% (there was even a study done on 400 couples and none were taller)
wow you want me to fucking calculate the exact chance of me finding a girl to 7 digits or something
ONCE you factor in EVERYTHING ugly + short + feminine frame your dating pool becomes so fucking limited its like searching a desert for water
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
Of course it makes sense. Just think about it from your own perspective. You're sitting behind a computer screen and you see a picture of a super hot girl with the text "rate this girl" and you click 10/10.
Does that mean no 5/10 would have a chance with you? Does it mean you expect to date the 10/10? Does it mean you'd even be comfortable approaching her?
Girls could see your data and become depressed even though all you were doing is following the directions.
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-02
Don't make excuses as to why you wouldn't provide proof. You either do or you don't.
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
You have no idea how many times I've been in Internet arguments over the last twenty years where the other guy says: "Provide a cite. Provide a cite. Provide a cite." So I did - I spent like 45 minutes going out and summarizing links and putting together basically a bit homework assignment - and he just replied, basically, "ur wrong."
At some point Charlie Brown really should stop kicking for the football. 99% of the people who say "prove it or ur wrong" are just terminally lazy and not actually interested in evidence.
And in this particular case I was being asked to explain the inapplicability of dozens of studies. Lol. Sure. Buy a plane ticket out here and meet me in public with a binder full of studies and then maybe I'll consider putting in the effort you won't.
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-02
The fact that you're tired to provide backing for your words is still just an excuse. That's how a debate should be - the side that makes an argument should provide a proof for a said argument.
The rest is just you being whiny.
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
A debate doesn't work with one guy saying "provide me a mountain of evidence" and another guy going off to do just that.
That's not called debate. It's called homework. Do your own.
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-02
That's exactly how it happens, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. And when somebody else provides an argument - they are required to provide evidence and proof for their statement.
And that's the way it is - huh.
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
See, there's multiple ways a disagreement can go down.
There's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Prove it or shut up.
That's obnoxious, because it's clear B thinks he's just found a strategy to "win" every conversation and validate his worldview.
Then there's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Interesting, but I believe x is untrue for the following reasons.
A. Prove it's untrue or shut up.
This is even more unreasonable; A is shifting the burden of proof while at the same time asking B to prove a negative.
Unfortunately that's exactly what happened in this thread. Someone spouted off theories with no evidence beyond "I read some once" and then thought it was other people's burden to disprove his theories.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but that ain't debate.
1 Guatchman 2018-05-02
Women mistreat, insult and humiliate incels everytime they please to do it.
1 kj107 2018-05-02
high IQ truth.
Nothing different then when females say, "Some girl will be lucky to have you! Not me tho! TEEHEE"
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
I get that here. I also get called cute by women.
1 bcat124 2018-05-02
Did you get to buttfuck a gay dude yet or did you just take it in the ass so far?
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
Only taking it in so far.
1 bcat124 2018-05-02
Man don't take it bad but your story is pure death fuel. You tolerate dudes fucking you in the ass just because the cuddles and making out beforehand relieves you from the skin hunger roasties have forced on you. Female hypergamy is the devil.
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
It's OVER!
1 PM_ME_TENDIE_STORIES 2018-05-02
You should run Bruno Mars game.
1 PixuIe 2018-05-02
Surely you are joking
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
I am clearly not.
1 PixuIe 2018-05-02
You got fucked by a gay dude ?
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
Yep.
1 itsbeenover 2018-05-02
st.blackops2cel, guru curryopscel
bless this man's asshole
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
I am clearly not.
1 PixuIe 2018-05-02
Thats gay
1 harambeazn 2018-05-02
it means they find you somewhat attractive in a familial way ( they see you as a brother), but theywill never bang you or accept your offers for a relationship.
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
When I was in seventh grade, in the hallways, a pair of eight-grade girls just blurted out that I reminded them of a little brother. I didn't even know them. They just saw me and kind of giggled while they said that to my face. That comment pissed me off by then. Yep, women will never see me as a real man.
1 harambeazn 2018-05-02
RIP. if your a manlet (no matter how handsome) or a babyfaced dude, girls will never be sexually attracted to you, judging from my friends experiences irl.
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
Cute is the best compliment you can get if one is a manlet. I never heard a short man be called handsome before, so I am quite content with cute. Yep, it's over.
1 harambeazn 2018-05-02
RIP manlets.
1 Salvador66 2018-05-02
On that note, my sis use to have a crush on Zac Efron and then when we turned 14 or 15, she started liking Andy Biersack (6'4") a lot more. Worst of all, she is 3 inches shorter than me. Haha, manlets don't even stand a chance with very short girls.
1 Bot_Metric 2018-05-02
3.0 inches = 7.62 centimetres.
I'm a bot. Downvote to 0 to delete this comment. Info
1 harambeazn 2018-05-02
womanlets are cruel towards manlets
1 illtimish 2018-05-02
Peter Dinklage is 4 foot 5 inches. He's married to a cutie, and has been since 2005 (before he was famous). I think he's handsome, and apparently his wife does, too.
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-02
Pretty-boy Chads are a thing.
1 35yoGeneticTrash 2018-05-02
Cute is an express train to friend-zone row. Unless a foid calls you hot she's not going to ever fuck you.
1 Gtj_2036 2018-05-02
As a "cute" guy myself, it means you're in the friend zone. I know from experience
1 UnfitForReproduction 2018-05-02
"you arent ugly"=sexually invisible
1 Revoltization 2018-05-02
the femoids here can't deny this
1 MagratM 2018-05-02
I don't deny it, but I'm old and broken, and wouldn't inflict a relationship with me on anyone inexperienced and wanting a sex life.
I thought that might make my outlook a bit more honest, since there is no ulterior motive to telling you what your pic is like.
1 PixuIe 2018-05-02
Your right you are old
1 MagratM 2018-05-02
I'm 45. Practically dead. Half way through an average life span...
1 illtimish 2018-05-02
Lol!
1 Revoltization 2018-05-02
i'd still make you my mommyGF 👦🍼
1 MagratM 2018-05-02
I'm not really into the whole "mommy-gf" thing, because there's just some weird connotations that don't sit right with me. I do however manage to play "mum" quite successfully.
1 Revoltization 2018-05-02
but baby daddy is completely fine? i wouldn't mind being with a cougar even if sex wasnt involved tbh. but only chads have that power.
1 Revoltization 2018-05-02
but baby daddy is completely fine? i wouldn't mind being with a cougar tbh but only chads can have that.
1 MagratM 2018-05-02
I'm not sure what "baby daddy" is other than the father of a single mother's child...
Cougars will date a wide variety of guys, not just chads.
1 Revoltization 2018-05-02
nah their options are limited. you'll have to make good money aswell even though they are used up, unless you go to florida where i can see that being an exception since all the landwhales and crazy fucks managed to be grouped up in one place kek.
1 PM_ME_TENDIE_STORIES 2018-05-02
No they won’t. I tried to run cub game with zero success.
1 RegisteredLolicon 2018-05-02
Wide variety still doesn't include incels
1 PM_ME_TENDIE_STORIES 2018-05-02
Wide variety= chads + chadlites. Maybe high-tier normies if they're feeling generous.
1 wfltg 2018-05-02
Notice how it's "you're not ugly" and not "you're handsome".
1 Gtj_2036 2018-05-02
Always
1 geneticwaste43 2018-05-02
You arent really that ugly but youre still ugly.
INCELS BTFO
1 boredyahh 2018-05-02
virtue signal heaven right here
1 itsbeenover 2018-05-02
facts
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
I’m a bisexual woman (attracted to men and women but only really feel a romantic connection with women) and I can honestly say a lot of the guys on here really aren’t as bad as they’ve convinced themselves they are. I’m not saying there are top tier lookers on here but you all beat yourself up a lot and act like you look like trolls when in reality many of you are average looking and many more of you could be even better looking with little effort.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
4/10 females in the US are obese. On reddit... I'd go ahead and guess it's at least 2x more. I live in Chicago and have never seen any sort of attractive girl using reddit.. but I have seen landwhales perched at Starbucks, Wholefoods, etc on it. Sooo... this means there's a very high percent chance you are a landwhale with extremely low standards. I instinctually do not find fat women attractive, I think some guys.. no matter how ugly they are.. need to feel like their partner takes care of their body. But because of the math with so many American Women being obese.. the game is unfair.
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
I’m not even in the U.S. but thanks for that bizarre analysis lmao.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
Oh. I forgot that outside the US there aren't fat women. You are fat and stupid, aren't you sweetie?
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
Your entire comment was fixated on American women so I just thought I’d correct you and ignore the rest of the ignorant and irrelevant sentences that had literally nothing to do with what my original comment was about. Please get some help.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
Worldwide obesity is higher than ever you stupid fucking whore. Slit your wrists.
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
What does obesity have to do with my original post? I don’t even think you’re an incel. Women don’t want to date you because of your illiteracy and because you hate them, not because you’re ugly. Bro, seriously chill tf out I wasn’t even saying anything horrible in my comments. I’m not even mad at you I genuinely feel bad for you at how negatively you escalated this.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
I love women. Key word women. And no I'm not an incel nor am I ugly luckily. But I do feel bad for incels and understand how the dating 'game' works and it's terrible and unfair for them unless they are very successful business-wise or want to get rejected 20 times per 1 hookup which can be exhausting I'm sure
That doesn't mean I hate women. Just because you are a nice community college with a lot to offer doesn't make someone an asshole for choosing to go for Yale because they can get in. Same thing applies to females with guys. We do the same thing.. try to fuck the hottest girls possible until we settle down for one who will be faithful long term.
But what I don't respect is women who can't take care of their weight. Staying in shape is relatively easy.. if a woman goes on a 40 minute walk every day and works out even 3 days a week.. she will look great and can eat literally anything she wants.
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
I get what you’re saying but why do you keep bringing up weight? I wasn’t even talking about weight, you made it about it.
1 KenGriffeyII 2018-05-02
Most “incels” are just assholes.
1 brenda_walsh 2018-05-02
Lol @ 7.5/10. If you have to say that, you definitely aren’t.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
Brenda tends to be a fat woman name..
1 brenda_walsh 2018-05-02
4minutemilesss is also known as a fat person name.
1 4minutemilesss 2018-05-02
Very intellectual. Now I'm getting ghetto single mother vibes..
1 brenda_walsh 2018-05-02
Yep. You figured me out. Very ghetto.
1 brenda_walsh 2018-05-02
The point was that it’s not my real name.
1 PM_ME_TENDIE_STORIES 2018-05-02
More like 2.5/10 lol
1 fuckredditcomments 2018-05-02
You’re basically just saying what this post is about. We’re not ugly, but you still wouldn’t be attracted to or date any of us.
1 beenhereallalong52 2018-05-02
No I’m saying I don’t date any guys and that some of you are actually attractive and act like you’re not.
1 trawid2016 2018-05-02
I wouldn't because you're too young, for one thing and I'm a single mom and have had sex with more than one person so you wouldn't date me either. I can still tell the difference between ugly and cute. I really think a lot of you have body dysmorohic disorder focused on your faces from watching too much porn, spending way too much time on date swiping sites, and social media.
1 trawid2016 2018-05-02
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/body-dysmorphic-disorder-mirror-man-omari-eccleston-brown-self-image-confidence-public-a7555511.html
BTW that's a cute guy.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
thanks for the psychoanalysis armchair Freud but you dont know what your talking about
1 trawid2016 2018-05-02
I do have a degree in psychology and I did have that myself so yeah I kind of do know what I'm talking about.
1 MozzerDozzer 2018-05-02
Have you actually observed him prior to making that DS? Text cannot be a substitute for live observation.
1 trawid2016 2018-05-02
Uh no, that's why I said "I think". It's a theory based on real experience, not a diagnosis.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
i dont even care what you have. 1. i watch porn once every 2 weeks 2. i dont go on date swiping sites and have never been on it and 3. i dont use social media
and before you say wah wah thats just you, i bet at least 80% of us dont go on dating sites or use social media because we know what will happen if we do
1 illtimish 2018-05-02
Self-fulfilling prophecy then.
1 Luna_Tuna_456 2018-05-02
The one partner thing is a meme. Also I doubt many of us use much date swiping sites except the people who use it to promote the blackpill
1 DEPTHERROR 2018-05-02
I have been called hot by a woman then ghosted, women don’t need to call you anything when you are genuinely atttactive they will ask for your details immediately. JFL they are evolutionary programmed to lie for their own safety
1 qwertx0815 2018-05-02
i mean yeah, they won't date you because of your personality...
1 restlessly_injected 2018-05-02
Ahmen to this. People should really take this in.
1 AcrobaticMaterial 2018-05-02
The ordering of the words also matters
To Chad if he (somehow, god knows how) thinks he's ugly: You REALLY aren't ugly!
To an incel/low-tier normie: You aren't really that ugly...
1 bhavv 2018-05-02
True that. Same with all the people telling me not to hate my skin colour, they wouldn't ever date Asians IRL.
1 geneticwaste43 2018-05-02
Women want us all GASSED.
1 supermentalcel 2018-05-02
fuck off with this subjective, personal experience meme
we have showed over and over through scientific articles with sample sizes magnitudes higher than you or any of us will ever experience and yet we get "oh why do you just approach more"
1 harambeazn 2018-05-02
RIP manlets.
1 hematomatoed 2018-05-02
See, there's multiple ways a disagreement can go down.
There's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Prove it or shut up.
That's obnoxious, because it's clear B thinks he's just found a strategy to "win" every conversation and validate his worldview.
Then there's this one:
A. I believe x is true.
B. Interesting, but I believe x is untrue for the following reasons.
A. Prove it's untrue or shut up.
This is even more unreasonable; A is shifting the burden of proof while at the same time asking B to prove a negative.
Unfortunately that's exactly what happened in this thread. Someone spouted off theories with no evidence beyond "I read some once" and then thought it was other people's burden to disprove his theories.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but that ain't debate.
1 illtimish 2018-05-02
Peter Dinklage is 4 foot 5 inches. He's married to a cutie, and has been since 2005 (before he was famous). I think he's handsome, and apparently his wife does, too.