lol lemme whip out the atomic currypill

Imagine how much of an assailed the person at (4.5,2.7) must have been lol

Imagine how much he still got laid even when they know he’s a dick

seriously underrated data

Clearly people with great personalities are rewarded with great looks. Just be a nicer person

High IQ

[removed]

Minority men must be showing less than white men obviously

LOL 79% upvoted. The dislikes are from the blue pilled numales who don't want to learn to truth. Fucking hamsters

BlackPill Capsule

Too much blackpill I'm about to od

Wow. Women can't predict the personality of someone based on a online profile....

Oh, They can't? Hmm. That's odd.

why do they do then

They don't. But if you get a survey. You have to guess. So then you can look nice. Usually is because of a smile.

[https://theblog.okcupid.com/the-4-big-myths-of-profile-pictures-41bedf26e4d](WRONG)

that's ruthless

this is one of the biggest blackpills and completely confirms the blackpill and incel's ideology. Incels and blackpillers layed down the foundation for a new view on human nature and society, something these low iq professors could never do cause it was such a taboo. The new dividing line in society is between the good looking people and the average and bad looking.

For online dating. What about cold approach, warm approach and social circle?

Same. You just have to walk up a mountain everywhere if you don't meet the looks treshold. Live, sex, jobs and relationships are 100 times more difficult than if you were GL. And then we here people say 'you can become everything you want'. Fuck the American dream.

I agree looks are very important. Online dating is not the best example though because of the fact that supply vs demand is much worse for men and because with majority of communication being non-verbal you can't really gauge someone's full personality without meeting in person. So all women can judge people on is looks.

So maybe this disproves blue pillers but to disprove red pillers (who believe in game) you'd need to use other examples.

Lately the counterargument from normies to disprove the tinderexperiments and statistics, is 'but the real world is not like that'. Actually, it's way easier for an ugly male to find a partner online than in real life. He can post his best pic, he can play way more numbers online. So online is easier. He go out to a club - and I've been too many clubs - and he'll make absolutely/almost no chance. Basically, he needs to go out to so many clubs and keep talking and talking to so many strangers and women, to get one mediocre woman once in a blue moon. The extreme focus on looks by women makes it very difficult nowadays. I've also been out with fairly good looking guys, and even they had difficulties to find girls, cause these girls tend to flock towards the best looking guys. They just want the best of the best. The average guys you see in a club with girls are the ones that play social circle game, or they are ugly but have a lot of masculinity. It's safe to say that 10-20 percent of guys fuck 70 percent of women, and 70-80 percent of guys fuck the bottom 30 percent. Game works but only if you have absolute top game or play the numbers game (which isn't really game). You're not allowed to make mistakes when you're average or ugly, cause you're not only trying to convince the girl you're talking to, you're fighting against het whole circle of friends, who just don't find you attractive, so their opinion will always be negative. If you listen carefully to conversations of women in clubs, it's always about looks: this guy is ugly/that guy is bald/that one has big ears, it goes on and on. They need the best looking guys/best genes, just like in the animal kingdom. The best looking and biggest animals get the females, it's the same with human beings. Only social factors can change this, like money. But now that money plays a less important role in the western world, women go back to their nature and natural state. You go to third world countries and money still plays a big role. So even ugly guys can get good looking women in third world countries, but these women need to act against their nature. They don't really love the guy, they don't find him physically attractive, sometimes they even despise his looks. But they are forced to be with him for the money. Imagine the hypothetical situation that we guys need to fuck a fat ugly whale, to survive. We don't want to do it, maybe we would despise her, but we will do it for the money.

Leagues are a thing.

What is the “warm approach”?

Trying to seduce through friendship, aka become an orbiter

Jeeeez. Is this satire? Do people like this really exist?

And he’s wondering why he’s a normie... I think need some eye bleech after this. 😭

This is online dating, is anyone really surprised? Fucking lol at people who write essays on their profiles to show of personality

ok so what is your take here? that attractive people get more dates? is that the black pill? ground breaking.

yeah, that's been known for a while now too, of course attractive people are perceived to have better personalities, because they generally have them too. Honestly this is basic adult shit. No, they are not better people necessarily, they can be manipulative assholes, charismatic, but assholes. and No, it's not necessarily something related to genetics, you can have the best of genes and still be fat, for example. Being attractive means a lot of things. Working out, having social skills, being confident. It takes money and time, but above all, it takes motivation, and that motivation comes from having a healthy self-esteem. So? what comes first? having a great personality or being attractive physically? My take is that it's a chicken and egg question, they go hand in hand. Or, as someone called me out early in life "you can be ugly and that's a problem, you can be ugly, bitter, depressed awkward and boring, that's a bunch of problems". I know you guys are convinced this black pill stuff changes a lot of minds, but it really doesn't, most of the answers it gets is... yeah, so?

Now tell us how white people are generally better than black people.

What?? Where did that come from?

I do recognize your face and height are outside your control and dating for straights, men and women, is a mindfuck. It's not as if I don't sympathize, to a degree, with you guys. It's a weird situation, because apparently this shit is the reason we have antisocial men killing random people and rapists. But it seems like most of you guys see themselves as the victims of female liberation movements. Tell me, do you see any way to solve your problems outside of regressing society to severely repress women?

well that's depressing. anyways, have as nice a life as you can, that's all any of us can do honestly.

These scores are just based on their profile picture, there's no way to judge "how they behave".

This only shows halo effect. If you're trying to argue that how someone actually interacts in person has zero influence, this does not show that.

Halo effect is an essential part of blackpill

Low iq

Same. You just have to walk up a mountain everywhere if you don't meet the looks treshold. Live, sex, jobs and relationships are 100 times more difficult than if you were GL. And then we here people say 'you can become everything you want'. Fuck the American dream.

Leagues are a thing.

What is the “warm approach”?

I agree looks are very important. Online dating is not the best example though because of the fact that supply vs demand is much worse for men and because with majority of communication being non-verbal you can't really gauge someone's full personality without meeting in person. So all women can judge people on is looks.

So maybe this disproves blue pillers but to disprove red pillers (who believe in game) you'd need to use other examples.

What?? Where did that come from?