The dating game is completely rigged in women's favor and that should change.

46  2018-03-31 by SaltShaker8383

The sexual marketplace, just like any other gender discriminatory system that highly favors one gender over the other needs to be leveled out.

For the women here about about to rant and rave, just remember:

"When you're accustomed to privelege, equality feels like oppression"

98 comments

So then change it. Stop dating down, only date celebrities and supermodels. Be the change you wish to see in the world, you bold, brave man.

I wouldn't date supermodels because that would be me dating up, I would date my looksmatch but under the current system it's not really possible, which is why there needs to be change.

Could you post an image of a woman you would consider your "looksmatch"?

fuck me, those 5/10's all look like 6-7/10 to me. It is fuckin over. I looked up 5/10 indian girls and little kids are showing up wtf.

Coz theyr 6-7

Or just rope since we are fucked here kid

Woman detected.

...am I right?

"When you're accustomed to privelege, equality feels like oppression"

Really think about that and why the manosphere / alt right thing is on the rise one generation after women's lib

There's no privilege in being an ugly minority male

It's objectively better for minorities now than it's ever been. We're gonna lot getting more media control, the racism representation is getting a bit less blatant. Black guy was just allowed to win an Oscar.

The parents of millenials are the ones who struck down segregation and the last of the eugenics laws which expanded the dating pool by many times fold. And men still have it better than women.

If you think you're ugly it would have been worst for you in the past. If you are actually ugly enough to be "true cel" you would have been subject to ugly laws that weren't all repealed until pure parents were of dating age

nigga this equality horseshit has openeed up women to race mixing. currycels have no future. It is already over for them. First currycels used to compete with other indian males, now its the entire fucking world - jamal, chad, Jose, Assad and I don't know who the fuck else.

One of my best buddies is an Indian urdhu who's around 5 7ish. He's the shortest in his family (as far as I can see) and he says it's due to the steroid medication he had to take when he was younger due to Crohns disease. He's not muscular at all (as far as I can tell) yet I've never seen him single for more than 2 months (as far as I can tell). He literally lives with his parents and isn't rich at all. And no, they are all attractive and none are land whales. The girls he's been with range from Asian to white, I've never seen him date anything else actually, but that's the east bay for ya. I don't know why he doesn't date within his own ethnicity, I doubt he is trying to avoid that though.

This whole "I'm ugly because of my race!" thing the manosphere pushes is just meant to turn you against your own and penalize you twice for the same thing a white guy would be penalized once for.

If you were a "white" guy you'd be a looksmatched white incel who believes that if he were to move to a brown country no one would be able to tell he was ugly

Crohn's disease

lucky fucker.

Why?

I thought that was a terminal disease or something, but looks like it related to digestion or something gay like that. I like fibrous food.

Yea. You eat your granular goods and enjoy them.

There's a difference between privelege and things getting better lol. Would you say blacks were a priveleged class when slavery was just abolished? No.

All men don't have it better than woman. People like me and most on this sub definitely dont

There's a difference between privelege and things getting better lol. Would you say blacks were a priveleged class when slavery was just abolished? No.

Yea so why are you claiming women are a privileged class when women's lib just kicked into gear?

All men don't have it better than woman. People like me and most on this sub definitely dont

Yea but you wouldn't have had it better in the past either. In the 60s you would have been targeted by another kind of cult.

There have always been men who struggle. That's why even among Islamo Terrorists they promise 72 virgins

The difference between women and blacks is there are pretty much no advantages you get from being black besides maybe some better physical ability, I'm not saying women are a priveleged class, I'm saying they have a lot of privelege when it comes to dating and it's unfair to men, if we want to reach a fair and equal society then we need to attack gender power differences from every angle.

I'm not saying ugly people would have had it better in the past, that's kind of irrelevant, I'm saying that it should change in the future. Yeah it's gotten better, but im not content with crumbs from the masters plate

The difference between women and blacks is there are pretty much no advantages you get from being black besides maybe some better physical ability, I'm not saying women are a priveleged class, I'm saying they have a lot of privelege when it comes to dating and it's unfair to men, if we want to reach a fair and equal society then we need to attack gender power differences from every angle.

That's how we got into this mess to begin with. The attack on gender roles destroyed dating signals so then a bunch of men were convinced that you should just try to bribe a women's affection with niceness. E g. If you're nice to her she'll just become attracted to you by magic. This only works if you have a certain packaging that is already associated to the traits she is romantically attracted to. Among the population of pc culture subjects it left dating entirely in the hands of media representations.

These same guys then got conned by pua TRP etc which are variations of the same mistake.

Meanwhile everyone else acted normal and continued getting laid. That's why black culture was the least impacted.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/science/millennials-sex.html?referer=https://www.bing.com/search?q=millenials+having.sex.&PC=SMSM&FORM=MBDPSB

Black culture is grounded in its own culture and is naturally skeptical of "white culture" or mainstream culture.

I'm not saying ugly people would have had it better in the past, that's kind of irrelevant, I'm saying that it should change in the future. Yeah it's gotten better, but im not content with crumbs from the masters plate

The more a person is indoctrinated by mainstream culture the more they will leave things in the hands of lookism. Obviously if a bunch of men are only bribing women with niceness the only men she will be attracted to among that group are the men who look like the packaging that has all the most positive romantic personality traits associated by default.

Women don't have it easier at all. They get kidnapped, raped murdered all the time.

1 generation? Women were burning their bras in the 1960’s. A generation is 20 years. It probably has more to do with anonymity and the freedom of speech on the internet.

A generation is about 33 years. But the crucial factor is that the parents of millenials are the boomers who started the Civil rights Era. The boomers who were opposed to it are leafing the push back

So people pushing for societal change in the 1960’s waiting until the 1980’s have children? Let’s see. 18 years old at the passing of the Civil Rights act of 1964. Wait until 1984 to give birth to an early millennial... 38 years old having a child in the 1980’s? Lol, nope.

Try again bruh.

People born in the 60s were the boomers. They pushed for civil rights through out the 60 and 70s.. Had kids from like 18 - 35

So people born in the 60’s pushed for civil rights change when they were young teens?

Boomers where born from 1945 through about 1970. The early boomers, the ones who destroyed the US, are not the parents of millenials, they’re the parents of Gen X. A boomer born at the height of the baby boom (let’s say 1955), was only 20 in 1975, right before the Civil Rights era came to a close, we achieved equality, and minority communities fell apart.

So people born in the 60’s pushed for civil rights change when they were young teens?

The hippie generation are who were referring to. They were the ones who pushed against the old world. The 1964 Civil rights act wasn't the only thing. It wasn't even the only civil rights act.

Boomers where born from 1945 through about 1970. The early boomers, the ones who destroyed the US, are not the parents of millenials, they’re the parents of Gen X. A boomer born at the height of the baby boom (let’s say 1955), was only 20 in 1975, right before the Civil Rights era came to a close, we achieved equality, and minority communities fell apart.

The Civil rights Era never came to a close... We ate still battling it right now, it's just having a pendulum swing the other way. That's the point, what do you think he manosphere is attacking?

When he said that minority communities fell apart what he meant was that they descended into rampant unemployment, violent crime everywhere, drug addiction, and single motherhood. Not that they ceased to exist.

Oh.. Yea... Because ghettos were always the best places

"Minority community" and "ghetto" are not synonymous.

Yes indeed. Sorry but equal

Just shut up.

Naw. Everyone is starting to see the alt right core and lots of people are waking up to it. Why would I shut up?

There was even a post recently trying to claim "Braincels isn't alt right". I'm getting to you

You aren't getting to me. I'm indifferent to the problems of black Americans. All I have to say is that if you were born black then sucks to be you.

I'm not trying to get to you. I'm exposing the alt right core to discredit everything you say

When you talk about the "alt-right" what you mean is "everyone hates blacks except for mudsharks and wiggers". I find it laughable how blacks are hated almost to the same level as Jews. I think you should be thankful for northern Europeans while they still exist since they are your bread and butter. Once they're gone the slaughter will commence. The only blacks who will be left alive will be the smart ones who converted to Islam and switched their identification from "black" to "Muslim".

Lol. No. Not everyone hates blacks at all

Do I hate blacks? No. I am indifferent to them and their seemingly neverending problems. The opposite of love isn't hate but rather indifference. Understood?

Doesn't really matter how you feel. The threat of the alt right is only in their propaganda and parroting of spin on the interest of their masters.

This may seem dark, but your masters are all killing themselves in record numbers anyway or are otherwise dying off.

The alt right his an attempt at a legacy but it just ends up being their death rattle. If the alt right disappeared from the face of the earth we'd all be better off.

Instead we have a group of young men force fed bullshit so that they're conned into identifying with a bunch of old rich white cucks, and then they're trying to convince all men who happen to be struggling for any reason that their struggles are the same as the likes of weinstein, Stephen Molyneux, Gavin McInnes, Richard Spencer etc. Men who are really only struggling because they can't cope with a level playing field.

statistics show other wise. wth does women lib have to do with anything. look at suicide alone. women have it easier, there is no question about that.

look at suicide for example.

Yep. Read my thread about this.

sexual marketplace

go back to theredpill. We don't want multiple partners, just one.

It doesn't have to do with multiple partners. Sexual markplace just means people have a general value in the dating/romance culture which is dependant on certain positive and negative traits

Yeah but the change has to start with the guys. Women pick the best they can get so men would have to pick better than they can get and not date down or send a thousand girls messages.

No, it starts with controlling women

Two things need to happen.

  1. Men need to reduce their thirst (ALL men! Especially the alphas)

  2. Women’s sexually needs to be controlled.

1 never gonna happen. That's why 2 was the norm for the entirety of human civilization until recently.

I know!!!! Damn it.

Don't worry. Once they squirt out a bastard and/or hit their 30's it all reverses.

No it doesn't. A 30-year-old single mother still has men wanting to date her. Incels Don't.

Seize the means of reproduction!

i am serious , this should change and we need to bring equality with force wether physical or ideological

This is why the patriarchy used to be a thing in every successful civilisation, hence why western civilisation has no future.

The men made a truce to avoid competing for women in order to improve cooperation to create great civilisations.

Women are completely dependent on men. If tomorrow an absolute majority of men decided to unite and reinstall a strict patriarchy with monogamous marriages where promiscuity, premarital sex and adultery are punishable by death, they would have no choice but to comply.

Lmao. Yes, because guns don't exist

Vast majority of women dont know how to use a gun. Nor the balls

Enough do, so do their partners, fathers, brothers, sons and friends.

Patriarchy is a system for goat fucking desert nomads, and other societies pre-steam engine

you were referring to an all out gender war

Lmao. The guys unable to fulfill the absolute basic function of life want to talk about life. Okay then !

keep fantasizing about women winning some gender war

oh boy, the cucks will fight in a war to make sure that their wife can keep fucking Tyrone on the side. I'm scared!!! kek

But how will the enlightened incels fight, when they're too afraid to even talk?

i'm not fighting shit.

That much is clear

"I will die so my wife can have the freedom to cheat on me!"

Pre-steam engine? But according to feminists, America is still a patriarchy.

wtf, what are you even saying? you're fantasizing over an all-out gender war where women would actually win, because they have access to guns? That men also have access to? Are you for real?

This guy's a hardcore normie redditor, too, check out his profile. Accumulated 130,000 karma on his account. This is the type of shit normie redditors think about.

It's also very telling that in your fantasy world, women are the victors of the Great Gender War. You're probably a man, too, so that just shows how sad the situation is with modern western men.

The only one thinking about "gender war" is you. It won't be a "women vs men", it's going to be "incel vs Maas shooting victims", at most

he literally told you what the scenario is and you just blurted out a stupid reply and now you're trying to cover it. he said if a majority of men.... etc. nice try tho

Women drove them to that, they are an example of what lack of affection does to a person.

He's fantasizing over a society where only women have guns and they have DNA tests to make sure that you are a woman built into the triggers...

Men are faster, stronger, shoot more accurate, are more durable and more tolerant of same-sex peers meaning they coöperate better than women.

It's not even a question, men would absolutely slaughter women in a firefight.

high-iq-cel.

Women have all those disadvantages, but they're offset by the fact that they have life on ez mode.

It is hilarious hearing about "independent" women.

By definition, you aren't independent. You're being propped up by men. You're just blinded by your privilege that men have given you. If one day they decided to take all your stupid rights away, you would have no choice but to submit.

I tell you one thing men, if it was the other wat around women would be marching in the streets, think about that

Not if they weren't allowed to be IN the streets without their husband under penalty of death by firing squad. women march and a firing squad gets sent in. Women would not be marching for long after that.

Cope, men are the only ones that dating market apps and websites make money off

I think you can only get this through patriarchal, religious societies. That stuff is dying off in the west, so unless there's some sort of revival of that stuff, it just won't happen. Although I do think the model where people get married young and are expected to take the union seriously for life is better than what we have now. I watched a documentary of some Amish kids and one of them was talking about marriage being sacred, waiting for her husband etc. Her mom was showing her wedding dress to her and explaining how the white represented being a pure virgin for your wife. I felt so depressed and broken in that moment because comparitevly our society and lives are garbage.

I dont think western society with feminism will last another 200 years.

Patriarchal societies like Islam have and exploding population so it will be interesting what will happen in the next 100 years.

Unless the west is willing to put its foot down and is willing to establish a "Christian Sharia"

I've legit considered starting a Christian sect focused on purity of women and monogamy, and showing how much women's rights have ruined society even affecting christian communities and how we as men need to take back our rights, and I'd make sure as the leader that no women will have any sort of rank in my church other than being a nun.

Some might call me crazy but at least it's an attempt to preserve society.

"When you're accustomed to privelege, equality feels like oppression"

True LOL. No wonder normies say we want to take away women's autonomy when we simply ask for a more egalitarian restructuring of the dating market.

more egalitarian restructuring of the dating market.

Holy fuck I lost it hahahaha. So fucked in the head. No words.

what would you expect when even shampoo advertizements are displaying "you deserve it" 10 times a day.

What are you talking about?

They might be referring to L'oreal adverts ("because you're worth it") possibly inflating women's self worth somehow? Not 100% sure.

The sexual marketplace, just like any other gender discriminatory system that highly favors one gender over the other needs to be leveled out.

Leftard cuck.

Shh, he's playing the leftard card to let us be recognized as the oppressed class, we can get rid of the leftards when the work is done.

How would you go about leveling the system out

Sharia law. Women need to be impeded for there to be equality of outcome

Well that’s gonna make dating harder...

Option 1. Male scarcity due to war Option 2. Severe social regulations akin to the Victorian era Option 3. Go your own way. Leave the dating market and pursue other things

I prefer number 2

  1. Severe social regulations akin to the Victorian era

No joke, the mention of more social regulations literally gave me a huge feeling of excitement just from reading it.

According to popular opinion here, it wouldn't matter. Incels want womens true desire, not just sex or a relationship. Women's behavior can be suppressed by a restrictive culture, but her true desires cannot be negotiated. She has always wanted Chad all through out history and she always will. The lie of women desiring the beta bux they were stuck with in times past has been revealed. She never loved sub8s, she never could, she never will

I'd still rather have a girl forced to be with me and acting like she cares, I dont want a girl acting like a slut even if its only for me.

This is the opposite of what happens. A shortage of men leads to more casual sex. A shortage of women leads to earlier marriage.

Not true. There's a shortage of women in China, and people marry later in life.

Excuse the formatting. It's towards the end.

http://web.simmons.edu/%7Eturnerg/MCC/Matechoice2PDF.pdf

In 

the United States , the m ost recent subs tantive im bal- ance i n the OSR occ urre d fr om 19 65 thr ough t he 1970s.
During th is time , there w ere mo re w ome n th an me n lo ok-
ing fo r m arriage par tners,
whic h ena bled m en to bet ter pu r- sue their re productive preferen ces. In c omparison
to other
historical
periods , these ske wed OSRs are characterize d by
libe ral se xua l m ores (i.e.,
many short-te rm mates for both
sexes);
high divorce rates; in creases in
the
num ber of out- of-we dlock births a nd
the n umber of fam ilies heade d by
single w omen; an increase
in
women’s participation in the wor kforce; a nd l ower l evels
of paterna l invest ment
(Guttentag & Secord,
1983).
Duri ng thes e peri ods , m en are bette r able to express their prefer ence for a variety of sexu-
al part ners an d relat ively low leve ls of
pater nal i nves tment
(Pede rsen, 1991). A ve ry differe nt pa ttern em erges when
there is an
oversupply of me n (Gut tenta g & Secord, 1 983).
Here, wom en are be tter a ble
to e nforc e the ir preferences tha n are m en. As a result, these periods a re characte rized by an increase in the le vel of c omm itm ent of m en to m arriage,
as indexe d by declining
divorce ra tes and greater
leve ls of pater nal inves tment (Pe ders en, 1991).

"The economy is rigged, we should adopt communism"

  • OP

No, it's more like when feminists say "Women get paid less than men, we should change that" there's a lot more than one step between capitalism and communism

Da comrade!

There's a difference between privelege and things getting better lol. Would you say blacks were a priveleged class when slavery was just abolished? No.

Yea so why are you claiming women are a privileged class when women's lib just kicked into gear?

All men don't have it better than woman. People like me and most on this sub definitely dont

Yea but you wouldn't have had it better in the past either. In the 60s you would have been targeted by another kind of cult.

There have always been men who struggle. That's why even among Islamo Terrorists they promise 72 virgins

Coz theyr 6-7

That much is clear

I prefer number 2

  1. Severe social regulations akin to the Victorian era

No joke, the mention of more social regulations literally gave me a huge feeling of excitement just from reading it.

According to popular opinion here, it wouldn't matter. Incels want womens true desire, not just sex or a relationship. Women's behavior can be suppressed by a restrictive culture, but her true desires cannot be negotiated. She has always wanted Chad all through out history and she always will. The lie of women desiring the beta bux they were stuck with in times past has been revealed. She never loved sub8s, she never could, she never will

I'd still rather have a girl forced to be with me and acting like she cares, I dont want a girl acting like a slut even if its only for me.

This is the opposite of what happens. A shortage of men leads to more casual sex. A shortage of women leads to earlier marriage.