I've seen this posted to alt-right subs like r/CringeAnarchy and white supremacist boards on 4chan.
They are implying the only types of people who don't hate minorities and want to ethnically cleanse all ethnics from America are numale cucks and soyboys.
I have no intention of getting "femnazi pussy". Extreme feminists are just as bad as the worst misogynists. I am a feminist because I support equality.
I just don't see today's society as one where women are given equal rights to men, women are still underpaid compared to male colleagues working in the same capacity, so yeah, society as a whole is still rather patriarchal.
Look at this thread. It's a good study in how everyone treats and judges men.
Guy in the vid is weak, soft looking man who doesn't measure up to society's standards, and everyone in the thread, through their gut reaction, look for a reason to tear him down and laugh at his failure. It's systemic.
You're correlating two different things here. You see him as a weak, soft-looking man, and you see people laughing at him for his failure. One doesn't cause the other.
What, of mentally/emotionally unstable women abusing their husbands/boyfriends? If you take that as the normal way women behave, no wonder you think the way you do.
Society doesn't treat most people like shit, but women are at a disadvantage. Stop blaming other groups for your own insecurities and inadequacies, and get up and do something about it.
We seem to be stuck in a discussion trap, neither willing to budge from our POVs, with more than enough name-calling. So, I respectfully leave this conversation here.
So... him? Well then, continue in asserting male superiority. I feel like you're the edgy one here, being part of a community that blames other people for your failures in dating/having sex, never once realising that maybe YOU are the problem?
Yes we are always the problem. Literally everything bad that has ever happened to a woman is all our fault. If a woman is getting abused by her husband it is our fault for 3 reasons:
We're incels
We should've been there to defend m'lady
Maybe if incels weren't so misogynistic she'd be dating us instead of wife-beater Chad.
I kinda disagree with the title though. That guy would probably be one of the guys that comes here and tells us to kill ourselves. He doesn't have time for rational discussion. His brain is to feminized.
Oh no no no, my friend, being pegged is an awesome experience. Haven't tried it personally, but a few of my friends have and it is apparently excellent. They are in it for the thrills, it's not about being degenerate or whatever shit reason you have for people who like being pegged.
Lol. As if those two are the same thing. Pegging is rather invasive from what I hear, so it's likely done with explicit consent. I haven't tried it because I don't have a girlfriend, but my friends have told me it feels great, so I'm inclined to think it's an awesome experience. Better?
1- I believe that incest is a bad idea for biological and sociological reasons. It's none of my business if other adults are interested in it, but personally I don't have the slightest interest in it.
2- I'm not attracted to him, or to anyone else in my family for that matter, possibly because of reason number 1.
Now, why don't you tell me why you think that people are degenerate and have no dignity based on a harmless kink? Why do you think that sex should only involve a man and wife, in the missionary position, with the lights off, and only for procreation?
I just feel somewhat baffled by the fact that people would take what would seem to be a sex act that is vey pleasurable for men and frame it as an insult to "masculinity".
Not really, I thought it was funny some people used that as a point of argument. I'd argue against anything that people might say is an affront to "masculinity". BTW, another bit of evidence against being here just to "argue for the pegging", is that I have made a lot of other comments on this sub, none of which have anything to do with pegging.
You started by asking if I came to the thread to defend pegging. I said I didn't and gave a perfectly good explanation that I would defend anything that may be derided as "unmanly" or "non-masculine" behaviour. I did defend pegging, but pegging isn't the real focus of my argument, jut an example. My real argument is that no action should be said as being "unmanly" or "non-masculine".
Then we're doing different things here. But, yes, I did defend pegging, but it was not my only intention, and I don't mind making it clear that I think I'd enjoy a good pegging, if only for the pleasure.
You didn't literally ask for it. That was my way of saying, "Your dickish, misogynistic behaviour led me to decide to tell you that I would like a good pegging." Is that a better way of putting it?
Again, it's just about this thread. It's about your attitude in general. BTW Repeatedly trying to needle me on whether I was defending pegging or not, is a good example, because defending pegging wasn't my point. But yes, I do think someone can still be "masculine" while enjoying pegging.
Nah, it's just that if you aren't white a white identitarian (not me) might say that there's nothing wrong with you making yourself feminine, as they (not me) would perceive you as a rival who has eliminated himself.
I'm Chinese, but I just don't adhere to traditional concepts of "masculinity" and "femininity". I am a straight male, with a few "feminine" traits. If anything, those traits help me better empathise with people.
Instead of channeling your ancient Chinese energy and learning how to field strip and clean your SKS you got fucked in the ass by your girlfriend. Both your ancestors and descendants (of relatives, obviously you won't have any) will spit on you in the afterlife.
You're taking a statement like "people can tell when you have a fucked up attitude and poor social skills from non-verbal cues and demeanor" and distilling that down to "People can tell everything about you just by looking at your face".
If you show me a simple headshot of a person with a neutral expression, no distinguishing marks, tattoos, or clothing and a bland background then I really can't know anything about them beyond their facial features.
But if you show me a short video of that same person looming over someone well within their personal space, refusing to make eye contact, squeezing their fist or gnashing their teeth while looking at that person's tits
people can tell when you have a fucked up attitude and poor social skills from non-verbal cues and demeanor
Never heard that one before and even if I did, it doesn't apply to me. I get along very well with my family, friends, coworkers, even get along with complete strangers. (for the most part)
If you show me a simple headshot of a person with a neutral expression, no distinguishing marks, tattoos, or clothing and a bland background then I really can't know anything about them beyond their facial features.
That's actually true. BUT, what you're forgetting is the natural bias known as the Halo effect.
Yeah, I'm aware of it. I know that being good looking makes your life easier in many ways, and that being worse-looking than average can have negative effects. I just don't consider the latter to be a death sentence for your dating life.
Nor do I know your circumstances in particular: If you have a good social life, why do you think that you might have dating troubles?
When I was younger I had no shortage of friends. In school, work, I said funny stuff that made everyone laugh. As I got older, childhood friends gradually left my life when they got serious with their SO or when life got in the way.
The problem is I'm just ugly and on top of that pretty poor at 32. I don't blame women for not being attracted to me, especially when there are so many handsomer and more successful 32-year old men out there.
Not at all though. The most common IT zinger is "dis is y ur incel" as if femoids can tell when we type misogynist stuff online. Women won't have creep radars. If they did, which IT implies they do, then you should be able to identify Weev's evil personality (much worse than mine) from a distance.
I've never had to think about it. I'm all about peaceful protest but riots are probably too much for me. Violent crime and bigotry along with pedophilia and bestiality are my top turn offs so anyone that participates in anything like that is a deal breaker for me.
I guess not? Like I said, to actually sleep with someone I have to get to know them first. But based on appearance alone I would bang this guy, the stickers on his computer also show that we have similar views on things. but I have no idea who he is.
I´m not 100% sure if I get this picture, but my guess is it´s posted by the guy it to show that you don´t have to be an asshole to be an incel.
If so, all you have is a dry spell. That didn´t kill anyone.
I assume you´re a virgin, but seriously, in high school (going from the sticker...) or college you´re definitely not the only one.
If you do more than putting stickers on your computer, you´re probably in some groups with common interest, that´s the best way to meet girls!
And if you think you´re too ugly to be datable, don´t worry, you´re quite a handsome guy.
I admit, I might be totally wrong about this culture, but what else is this post about? Even if it is about making fun of this guy, wouldn´t the result be exactly the same? And if it was posted by someone else just to prove that he is way too ugly to ever have a girlfriend, that just is not true
"Quite handsome" seems more like a subjective descriptor here. I'm not attracted to him, but I don't see anything obviously wrong with his looks either.
Heh, maybe I should, but then I'd have to shave my own as well. Beards are like haircuts: Some look good on others but not on you, some need more work and attention, and some should really just accept reality and start shaving.
Eh, maybe. Like you said, maybe I need to start hanging around fewer bearded people, but going by that pic it doesn't look too bad. For all I know he might look like he's 12 without it.
"Quite handsome" doesn´t mean "I just saw him crush three kitten´s skulls, would smash", it means he looks alright, not undateable because he is too ugly.
Yeah, that would be enough. Most incels think they´re so ugly noone can look at them without dryretching. This guy looks totally normal. To a girl who is in love with him he looks really gorgeous.
Probably, but it´s really easy to get frustrated around here. I´m really sorry, I think you need and deserve help, but changing tabs gets you to really disgusting ideas. Do you understand that you´re getting into something that is really getting to hurt you? You´re really intersted in getting a girlfriend, but what will you do with her while you don´t have hot sex? It is really important to have something else, even if she is just an 8 or (god forbid) a 7
Yeah sorry, I just think some of you would do better with having a girlfriend. Obviously you just need someone whose asshole you can spit into, so go along
If you think fighting for equality must take the form of rioting, then yes. But let me tell you a fascinating bit of news: it doesn't. There are lots of ways people fight for equality. "Rioting" is simply the most visible.
Who's talking about gulags and secret police? All most level-headed people who fight for equality are talking about are for people to be more accepting of those who are disadvantaged by society, which does not include incels, since their problem lies in their personality, and is not inherent in society.
He endorses rioting. I don't, though I do endorse the general concept of fighting for equality, just not the more outrageous methods like rioting.
I don’t know that making an observation vis a vis cause and effect is the same thing as an endorsement.
ok you're saying that observing that rights were gained through riots isn't the same as endorsing riots
in the context of his other stickers, all of which are saying things like "vote labour" and "against nazis", it seems unlikely that it's a simple observation unless you're a naive idiot, and very likely that it's an endorsement
If you can’t understand what I just posted, then you’re too fucking stupid to be having this debate in the first place.
It seems obvious in the context of his stickers that he would endorse what he would consider “productive” or “good” riots, much as I’d expect you to support violent resistance to a totalitarian state that sends people to gulags on the backs of its secret police, or as most people endorse wars they consider “productive” or “good”.
Your full-stop antagonism towards rioting (ostensibly because it is violent) only makes sense if it is part of an absolute program of pacifism, in which case I cede the point - if you think all violence not matter what is reprehensible than yeah, I understand where you’re coming from.
But most people don’t think that.
The observation vis a vis riots and rights obviously supplies the nature of his endorsement (ie he supports riots that win people their rights, and within this likely only those rights he agrees with) - it doesn’t, however, tell us anything about what other options he endorses to attain those rights either before or after the act of rioting, and so any implication that he is a de facto supporter of riots (from his stickers I think it’s safe to assume he would be against, say, a riot of white seperatists or guns rights activists) is pretty fucking specious.
It seems obvious in the context of his stickers that he would endorse what he would consider “productive” or “good” riots
ah so he's pro-good things and anti-bad things, very insightful
Your full-stop antagonism towards rioting (ostensibly because it is violent) only makes sense if it is part of an absolute program of pacifism
no i am against rioting because i am against MOB violence
The observation vis a vis riots and rights obviously supplies the nature of his endorsement (ie he supports riots that win people their rights, and within this likely only those rights he agrees with) - it doesn’t, however, tell us anything about what other options he endorses to attain those rights either before or after the act of rioting, and so any implication that he is a de facto supporter of riots (from his stickers I think it’s safe to assume he would be against, say, a riot of white seperatists or guns rights activists) is pretty fucking specious.
so you think he thinks "riots that get rights good, other riots bad" but you took an entire paragraph because you are bad with words
i think all riots are bad, therefore i think his supposed support of "only good riots" is bad. if your point was literally "you can't say he endorses riots because you don't know that he supports ALL riots" then you're an idiot because i clearly meant "he endorses AT LEAST SOME riots".
Well, not necessarily. I listed cases in which rights were being won by rioters he might hypothetically disagree with, and so even the statement that he endorses all riots that win rights is incorrect.
It’s interesting that you claim to think all riots are bad. That squares you against the victims of the communist totalitarians of the 20th century, who rioted out of starvation caused by famine borne of incompetent administration.
Well, not necessarily. I listed cases in which rights were being won by rioters he might hypothetically disagree with, and so even the statement that he endorses all riots that win rights is incorrect.
i love how you're pretending "riots that get rights good" is a serious statement
That squares you against the victims of the communist totalitarians of the 20th century, who rioted out of starvation caused by famine borne of incompetent administration.
Gegen nazis: against nazis in german. Im sorry if you only speak one language but its not me whos the idiot here.
i understood what the swastika fist sticker was about and i didn't refer to it
The rioting sticker is a factual historical statement. Had it not been for popular violence we wouldnt have achieved a lo of rights the dominant classes restricted from us.
removed for glorifying violence and shitty history
If from that you interpret that we should riot is only because you have a fine historical perspective on current struggles.
lmao at the german stickers. That cuckisnt even german. He looks like subhuman turk that has been brainwashed by the jews to promote open borders & degeneracy. Good thing actually that he posted that photo. I will save it and show it to Gestapo once WW3 breaks out.
This ugly motherfucker's hiding his subpar facial features behind a beard and numale glasses. The fact that his ugly comes out even through these and a low-res picture is telling--guy's an incel through and through.
The point is that the dude of the photo is into a lot of social work, maybe helps in the Government or NGOs, gives part of his time for causes. Still, does not matter.
If you think about it, the "cucks" and "numales" who advocate for a good personality being a key component in dating are actually dating people. Yet the "black-pilled" incels who believe looks are all that matter are not able to make any meaningful intimate connections with anyone outside their family.
I wonder why that is? Are all the numales just attractive enough to get laid?
d "numales" who advocate for a good personality being a key component in dating are actually dating people. Yet the "black-pilled" incels who believe looks are all that matter are not able to make any meaningful intimate connections wi
Nu males get the girl tyrone fucked in the ass and in the mouth. You see them with girls but you never know the story behind it. Why do American girls fuck tyrone in college and then marry the nerdiest guy possible?
I'm writing this off a computer housed in a shoe box and built out of the PC parts other people threw away. My keyboard is almost as old as I am, I don't have a mouse.
I wish I was that guy. Maybe I could afford to eat something that didn't come out of the reduced section once in a while.
The point is that the dude of the photo is into a lot of social work, maybe helps in the Government or NGOs, gives part of his time for causes. Still, does not matter.
302 comments
2 sailorgangordie 2018-03-19
It looks like the Alt-Right is infiltrating Braincels now, soon the mods will all be Nazis and ethnicels will be banned on sight.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Better than CuckTears brigading tbh
1 PhucCheet 2018-03-19
Ethnicels are the only Truecels.
Alt-Right whitecels who mog BlackOps2 are volcels
1 winjaturta 2018-03-19
alt-right and incels go hand in hand, see 4chan
1 FEDORA_GOD 2018-03-19
well no, a lot of people left 4chan when the fifteen year old /pol/tards started spamming every board
now they're spreading onto this subreddit
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-03-19
1 Cristalline144hz 2018-03-19
Not if the mods are ethnicels.
Report racebaiting post and we will take care of them. I don't think that post is breaking any rule.
1 GeneticCleansing 2018-03-19
What's the alt-right got to do with this post? It's a white numale feminist being mocked in the OP.
1 sailorgangordie 2018-03-19
I've seen this posted to alt-right subs like r/CringeAnarchy and white supremacist boards on 4chan.
They are implying the only types of people who don't hate minorities and want to ethnically cleanse all ethnics from America are numale cucks and soyboys.
1 GeneticCleansing 2018-03-19
That doesn't mean that it is an alt right meme lol.
I bet people on those boards drink water too, doesn't make water alt-right inflitration.
No that's really not what this post is saying.
I don't see a reason to get mad at this meme unless you are a liberal white numale cuck.
1 fuckitidunno 2018-03-19
TFW you're defense for people sharing alt-right meme pics is "They drink water too".
1 carpathianflorist 2018-03-19
That poor macbook
1 marcin_koniecki 2018-03-19
if you own anything with ios you're a cuck by deafult
1 carpathianflorist 2018-03-19
Macs use OS X tho
1 armandltr 2018-03-19
Thats what the android virgin peasants tell themselves all the time
1 marcin_koniecki 2018-03-19
good goy
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
It lost MacBook status about 5 stickers ago, it's now a CuckBook®.
1 incelbeast 2018-03-19
:Ddd soy face
1 warmestblack 2018-03-19
Numales have somehow manage to make beards feminine.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
If you aren't soymaxxing, you're a volcel.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Love that "numale" designation, as if someone fighting for equality is some sort of diseased subhuman.
1 warmestblack 2018-03-19
Ahahahaha
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Trust me, if the situation was reversed, if women have all the power, you'd be begging for equality.
1 warmestblack 2018-03-19
Thats not why im laughing.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Why are you laughing then? Enlighten me.
1 BatBatB 2018-03-19
Stupid cucks just say they’re feminists to get feminazi pussy
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I have no intention of getting "femnazi pussy". Extreme feminists are just as bad as the worst misogynists. I am a feminist because I support equality.
1 rustybuckets 2018-03-19
So wait wouldn’t that make them smart
1 BatBatB 2018-03-19
No because it doesn’t work
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-03-19
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHA
0 veronchung 2018-03-19
Did I just break your incel logic?
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-03-19
pls stop
You're literally going to make me die of laughter
0 veronchung 2018-03-19
Stop and think about it for a second. You know you would want equality if you were part of a group that is unfairly treated, right?
1 Sniveling_Cur 2018-03-19
Okay you broke it. Now it's not funny anymore, just pathetic.
Begone
0 veronchung 2018-03-19
I never said whatever you quoted.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
You're describing modern society, correct? Then you did just say that.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I still see society as androcentric/patriarchal for the most part.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
How could you possibly think that at this point?
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I just don't see today's society as one where women are given equal rights to men, women are still underpaid compared to male colleagues working in the same capacity, so yeah, society as a whole is still rather patriarchal.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/85gh8o/the_ultimate_trick_question_on_who_wants_to_be_a/
Look at this thread. It's a good study in how everyone treats and judges men.
Guy in the vid is weak, soft looking man who doesn't measure up to society's standards, and everyone in the thread, through their gut reaction, look for a reason to tear him down and laugh at his failure. It's systemic.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
You're correlating two different things here. You see him as a weak, soft-looking man, and you see people laughing at him for his failure. One doesn't cause the other.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Lol that's all that feminism did in the past. "There's no female video game protagonists therefore women are oppressed!!!".
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Well, if you simplify feminist arguments to that, then of course, but feminism is more than that. Read up on it, then argue with me.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
You read up on the mistreatment of men first.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
What, of mentally/emotionally unstable women abusing their husbands/boyfriends? If you take that as the normal way women behave, no wonder you think the way you do.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
You're an idiot.
Also men are mistreated by society more than women are. I know it triggers you to hear that, but it's true.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Evidence?
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Male suicide rates for one.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Ever consider that there are many reasons for suicide, and it's often a mixed bag of various factors that lead them to take their own lives.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Ever consider that it's because society treats men like shit? Nah, can't be.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Society doesn't treat most people like shit, but women are at a disadvantage. Stop blaming other groups for your own insecurities and inadequacies, and get up and do something about it.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
jfc.... the lack of self-awareness is astonishing.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
You do know that incels lack self-awareness, right? Oh, wait... you're an incel.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Lol, retard.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Thanks for insulting my intelligence for trying to reason with you.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
What intelligence?
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Intelligence that allows me to be a reasonable human.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Dunning Krugar is what allows you to say this stupid shit.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Sure, unless you can prove I am intellectually inferior, I am at least of average intelligence.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
You've already proven you're an idiot.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
By being reasonable? Hahahahahahahahaha...no. Just no.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Hahahahahahahahaha...no. Just no.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
We seem to be stuck in a discussion trap, neither willing to budge from our POVs, with more than enough name-calling. So, I respectfully leave this conversation here.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Moron.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Sure.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Lol thought you were leaving... guess you really don't have anything better to do.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I have a lot of things I could do, but I really enjoy your predictable responses, and I'm pretty sure you can totally predict mine as well, right?
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Lol, who are you trying to kid?
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
Wtf does he really gotta fight for besides edgyness?
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
"He" as in the one who used numale, or me?
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
The guy in the pic einstein
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
So... him? Well then, continue in asserting male superiority. I feel like you're the edgy one here, being part of a community that blames other people for your failures in dating/having sex, never once realising that maybe YOU are the problem?
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
Damn how fucked up are you?
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
Yes we are always the problem. Literally everything bad that has ever happened to a woman is all our fault. If a woman is getting abused by her husband it is our fault for 3 reasons:
We're incels
We should've been there to defend m'lady
Maybe if incels weren't so misogynistic she'd be dating us instead of wife-beater Chad.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I meant that as in "you yourself are the reason why you fail to have relationships/sex".
1 hockeychick23 2018-03-19
Who’s that dude?
1 prophetpepe 2018-03-19
A member of the soyim class.
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
An inceltears prodigy preparing
1 GeneticCleansing 2018-03-19
JFL @ that pic
I kinda disagree with the title though. That guy would probably be one of the guys that comes here and tells us to kill ourselves. He doesn't have time for rational discussion. His brain is to feminized.
2 incelliarmus 2018-03-19
Agreed
1 justforlulzandkeks 2018-03-19
Every time
1 TsarHarkinian 2018-03-19
See that's why i will never take low test numales seriously
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
why do they all have beards
more like because the middle class lost its stomach for putting down riots, iran seems to be doing fine in the face of sedition
1 comeondantheman 2018-03-19
Awful jaw lines
1 Stoic_Stranger 2018-03-19
That's it. I'm shaving my beard.
1 revengepony 2018-03-19
He's amazing, what are you talking about?
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
Until he asks you to pwg him.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
The type of guy with a lot of soy in his diet.
1 revengepony 2018-03-19
Some people are into that.
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
some people are degenerate
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Oh no no no, my friend, being pegged is an awesome experience. Haven't tried it personally, but a few of my friends have and it is apparently excellent. They are in it for the thrills, it's not about being degenerate or whatever shit reason you have for people who like being pegged.
1 Involuntarily 2018-03-19
being raped is an awesome experience. Haven't tried it personally
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Lol. As if those two are the same thing. Pegging is rather invasive from what I hear, so it's likely done with explicit consent. I haven't tried it because I don't have a girlfriend, but my friends have told me it feels great, so I'm inclined to think it's an awesome experience. Better?
1 AjitPaiFan 2018-03-19
! GAY NIGGA DETECTED !
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Not gay. More like heterosexual, and possibly bi-curious.
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Try having sex before commenting on kinks, would ya? At this point, you literally don't know what you're talking about.
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
Lets me ask a theoretical question. Would you fuck your dad?
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
No, I would not:
1- I believe that incest is a bad idea for biological and sociological reasons. It's none of my business if other adults are interested in it, but personally I don't have the slightest interest in it.
2- I'm not attracted to him, or to anyone else in my family for that matter, possibly because of reason number 1.
Now, why don't you tell me why you think that people are degenerate and have no dignity based on a harmless kink? Why do you think that sex should only involve a man and wife, in the missionary position, with the lights off, and only for procreation?
1 awe300 2018-03-19
Ironic
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
So?
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
10/10 wood bang
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
really that's a 10 for you
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
My type.
1 prophetpepe 2018-03-19
might as well shove tofu up your ass.
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I'm good with just eating it but thanks
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
What's wrong with expressing one's own sexual preference? What's wrong with men not acting like the stereotypical "macho man"?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
did you come into this thread just to defend pegging lmao
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Not really, I just want to shatter some people preconceptions of what a man has to be.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
yeah but you seem really focused on the pegging aspects
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I just feel somewhat baffled by the fact that people would take what would seem to be a sex act that is vey pleasurable for men and frame it as an insult to "masculinity".
1 prophetpepe 2018-03-19
even for a faggot, falling for a soyboy numale is a new low.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Me? You're mistaken, I'm afraid. I am heterosexual.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
so you did come here for the pegging lol
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Not really, I thought it was funny some people used that as a point of argument. I'd argue against anything that people might say is an affront to "masculinity". BTW, another bit of evidence against being here just to "argue for the pegging", is that I have made a lot of other comments on this sub, none of which have anything to do with pegging.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i said thread, not sub
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Still no, because if people raised another point about how "x" is not "masculine behaviour, I'd still argue against that point.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i'm focusing on what you did, not what you would do
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
You started by asking if I came to the thread to defend pegging. I said I didn't and gave a perfectly good explanation that I would defend anything that may be derided as "unmanly" or "non-masculine" behaviour. I did defend pegging, but pegging isn't the real focus of my argument, jut an example. My real argument is that no action should be said as being "unmanly" or "non-masculine".
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
but the unmanly behaviour was pegging and only pegging
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
On this thread? Yes, but I was being more general with my defence.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
well i was being specific with my questioning
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Then we're doing different things here. But, yes, I did defend pegging, but it was not my only intention, and I don't mind making it clear that I think I'd enjoy a good pegging, if only for the pleasure.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i didn't want to know
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
You asked for it buddy.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
please, i didn't ask if you enjoyed pegging
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
You didn't literally ask for it. That was my way of saying, "Your dickish, misogynistic behaviour led me to decide to tell you that I would like a good pegging." Is that a better way of putting it?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
lol what did i say that was dickish or misogynistic in this thread
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Again, it's just about this thread. It's about your attitude in general. BTW Repeatedly trying to needle me on whether I was defending pegging or not, is a good example, because defending pegging wasn't my point. But yes, I do think someone can still be "masculine" while enjoying pegging.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
maybe your love of pegging makes you a little irritable
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Well then I apologize.
1 dullsite 2018-03-19
Are you white?
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Is skin color a main factor in sexual preferences?
1 dullsite 2018-03-19
Nah, it's just that if you aren't white a white identitarian (not me) might say that there's nothing wrong with you making yourself feminine, as they (not me) would perceive you as a rival who has eliminated himself.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I'm Chinese, but I just don't adhere to traditional concepts of "masculinity" and "femininity". I am a straight male, with a few "feminine" traits. If anything, those traits help me better empathise with people.
1 dullsite 2018-03-19
Instead of channeling your ancient Chinese energy and learning how to field strip and clean your SKS you got fucked in the ass by your girlfriend. Both your ancestors and descendants (of relatives, obviously you won't have any) will spit on you in the afterlife.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
What's SKS? As I said, I don't have a girlfriend right now. Also, I am an atheist, so I don't believe in the afterlife, or "ancient Chinese energy".
1 dullsite 2018-03-19
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKS#Chinese
I don't care if you don't believe in an afterlife, for this reason the shame to your family is doubled.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I don't like guns either, and I don't see why you get to decide if my atheism shames my family (it doesn't, if you must know).
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
https://nyoobserver.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/weev.jpg?quality=80
how about this guy
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
maybe if he trimmed that beard and hair up a bit.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
you just ADMITTED you would potentially fuck notorious neo-nazi weev auernheimer
disgusting
1 TotesMessenger 2018-03-19
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Kinda hard to tell that from a headshot, especially if you've never heard of weev before.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i thought women could tell someone's bad personality just by looking at them
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
I've literally never heard that statement made by a non-incel.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
We're just repeating the dumb BS that incelTears members tell us.
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
No, bud, you're oversimplifying it.
You're taking a statement like "people can tell when you have a fucked up attitude and poor social skills from non-verbal cues and demeanor" and distilling that down to "People can tell everything about you just by looking at your face".
If you show me a simple headshot of a person with a neutral expression, no distinguishing marks, tattoos, or clothing and a bland background then I really can't know anything about them beyond their facial features.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
is this what you think incels do
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
No, I'm just using an example that most people could easily understand.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
suuuuuuuuuuure
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Well, if you refuse to entertain another viewpoint, then you're getting nowhere.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i just think that with that example some people, like me, will mistakenly assume he was saying that incels did those things
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Well, he clearly said your assumption was wrong.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
that doesn't mean it's wrong to assume that wrong assumption
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
No, it's not wrong, but he did clarify that the assumption was wrong, so why don't you accept that you made a wrong assumption?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i did, i just think it's a mistake to use an example like that
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Ah, well, fair enough.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
Never heard that one before and even if I did, it doesn't apply to me. I get along very well with my family, friends, coworkers, even get along with complete strangers. (for the most part)
That's actually true. BUT, what you're forgetting is the natural bias known as the Halo effect.
Here's a more in-depth piece of literature on the topic.
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Yeah, I'm aware of it. I know that being good looking makes your life easier in many ways, and that being worse-looking than average can have negative effects. I just don't consider the latter to be a death sentence for your dating life.
Nor do I know your circumstances in particular: If you have a good social life, why do you think that you might have dating troubles?
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
When I was younger I had no shortage of friends. In school, work, I said funny stuff that made everyone laugh. As I got older, childhood friends gradually left my life when they got serious with their SO or when life got in the way.
The problem is I'm just ugly and on top of that pretty poor at 32. I don't blame women for not being attracted to me, especially when there are so many handsomer and more successful 32-year old men out there.
1 GeneticCleansing 2018-03-19
Not at all though. The most common IT zinger is "dis is y ur incel" as if femoids can tell when we type misogynist stuff online. Women won't have creep radars. If they did, which IT implies they do, then you should be able to identify Weev's evil personality (much worse than mine) from a distance.
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Distance, yes. Anonymous and neutral headshot? That's not identification, it's fortune telling.
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I mean I don't fuck anyone without getting to know them first and neo-nazis top my list of deal breakers so knowing that information, no I would not.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
confirmed fat
do those who endorse rioting also top your list of deal-breakers
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I've never had to think about it. I'm all about peaceful protest but riots are probably too much for me. Violent crime and bigotry along with pedophilia and bestiality are my top turn offs so anyone that participates in anything like that is a deal breaker for me.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
so i guess you don't like this guy after all
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I guess not? Like I said, to actually sleep with someone I have to get to know them first. But based on appearance alone I would bang this guy, the stickers on his computer also show that we have similar views on things. but I have no idea who he is.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
yeah well based on appearance alone you'd bang weev if he shaved a little
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I said maybe. And not shaved, trimmed up. But that doesn't matter since I literally never bang anyone based on appearance alone.
1 maybethrowed 2018-03-19
what a faggot
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-03-19
Every one of those stickers is disgusting. And so is using apple products.
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
Fun fact virgins are 14% more likely to use apple
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-03-19
That fact is not fun.
1 Loser_Bug 2018-03-19
might not be fun, but sure is funny.
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
I´m not 100% sure if I get this picture, but my guess is it´s posted by the guy it to show that you don´t have to be an asshole to be an incel. If so, all you have is a dry spell. That didn´t kill anyone. I assume you´re a virgin, but seriously, in high school (going from the sticker...) or college you´re definitely not the only one. If you do more than putting stickers on your computer, you´re probably in some groups with common interest, that´s the best way to meet girls! And if you think you´re too ugly to be datable, don´t worry, you´re quite a handsome guy.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
lmao
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
I admit, I might be totally wrong about this culture, but what else is this post about? Even if it is about making fun of this guy, wouldn´t the result be exactly the same? And if it was posted by someone else just to prove that he is way too ugly to ever have a girlfriend, that just is not true
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
because he's a ridiculous tryhard with extremist views and an eyesore of a beard
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Dude looks pretty average to me
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
is the average guy "quite handsome" now
also you should hang around fewer guys with beards
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
"Quite handsome" seems more like a subjective descriptor here. I'm not attracted to him, but I don't see anything obviously wrong with his looks either.
Heh, maybe I should, but then I'd have to shave my own as well. Beards are like haircuts: Some look good on others but not on you, some need more work and attention, and some should really just accept reality and start shaving.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
like this guy
1 eliechallita 2018-03-19
Eh, maybe. Like you said, maybe I need to start hanging around fewer bearded people, but going by that pic it doesn't look too bad. For all I know he might look like he's 12 without it.
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
"Quite handsome" doesn´t mean "I just saw him crush three kitten´s skulls, would smash", it means he looks alright, not undateable because he is too ugly.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
so quite handsome means "not physically repulsive" now
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Yeah, that would be enough. Most incels think they´re so ugly noone can look at them without dryretching. This guy looks totally normal. To a girl who is in love with him he looks really gorgeous.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
ok, i just think that's a stretch
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Why?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
saying "quite handsome" means "at most, not physically repulsive" is what some people would call a stretch
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Exactly, and this guy is a guy who wouldn´t repulse anyone at all
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Sorry, I just read your drivel wrong. Yeah, he seems nice. I guess your parents are at least 9.5s, how else would you have been born?
1 Kayles_Butt 2018-03-19
Idk, how were you born? What kind of question is that?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
are you even the same person i was talking to
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Probably, but it´s really easy to get frustrated around here. I´m really sorry, I think you need and deserve help, but changing tabs gets you to really disgusting ideas. Do you understand that you´re getting into something that is really getting to hurt you? You´re really intersted in getting a girlfriend, but what will you do with her while you don´t have hot sex? It is really important to have something else, even if she is just an 8 or (god forbid) a 7
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
what the fuck man
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Yeah sorry, I just think some of you would do better with having a girlfriend. Obviously you just need someone whose asshole you can spit into, so go along
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
what the fuck
1 Kayles_Butt 2018-03-19
Haha, is this normally the kind of shit you see on this sub looooooooool.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
idk i'm barely here
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Do you care? If so, I´d like to be around you.
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Ah, so you definitely know more about him than I do. Sorry for interrupting.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
it's called deduction man, just look at the stickers
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Is fighting for equality "extremist views" now? sigh
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
oh so you endorse rioting as well as pegging lol
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
If you think fighting for equality must take the form of rioting, then yes. But let me tell you a fascinating bit of news: it doesn't. There are lots of ways people fight for equality. "Rioting" is simply the most visible.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
so if you think fighting for equality must take the form of the gulag and secret police that's ok then?
one of his stickers explicitly endorses rioting
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Who's talking about gulags and secret police? All most level-headed people who fight for equality are talking about are for people to be more accepting of those who are disadvantaged by society, which does not include incels, since their problem lies in their personality, and is not inherent in society.
He endorses rioting. I don't, though I do endorse the general concept of fighting for equality, just not the more outrageous methods like rioting.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
ok you don't endorse rioting, that's all you had to say
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
But that's not my full argument.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i roughly accept your full argument and you backing down from this statement:
by saying this
2 veronchung 2018-03-19
My full argument is that rioting is bad anyway, but it doesn't mean people shouldn't fight for equality.
0 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
so you're saying rioting is permissible/ morally good or what
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
I'm saying rioting is bad, that there are other better ways of fighting for equality. A lot of people use those other ways to fight for equality.
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
I don’t know that making an observation vis a vis cause and effect is the same thing as an endorsement.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
in english please professor
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
If you can’t understand what I just posted, then you’re too fucking stupid to be having this debate in the first place.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
lol calm down susan
ok you're saying that observing that rights were gained through riots isn't the same as endorsing riots
in the context of his other stickers, all of which are saying things like "vote labour" and "against nazis", it seems unlikely that it's a simple observation unless you're a naive idiot, and very likely that it's an endorsement
are you sure we're having the same debate
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
It seems obvious in the context of his stickers that he would endorse what he would consider “productive” or “good” riots, much as I’d expect you to support violent resistance to a totalitarian state that sends people to gulags on the backs of its secret police, or as most people endorse wars they consider “productive” or “good”.
Your full-stop antagonism towards rioting (ostensibly because it is violent) only makes sense if it is part of an absolute program of pacifism, in which case I cede the point - if you think all violence not matter what is reprehensible than yeah, I understand where you’re coming from. But most people don’t think that.
The observation vis a vis riots and rights obviously supplies the nature of his endorsement (ie he supports riots that win people their rights, and within this likely only those rights he agrees with) - it doesn’t, however, tell us anything about what other options he endorses to attain those rights either before or after the act of rioting, and so any implication that he is a de facto supporter of riots (from his stickers I think it’s safe to assume he would be against, say, a riot of white seperatists or guns rights activists) is pretty fucking specious.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
ah so he's pro-good things and anti-bad things, very insightful
no i am against rioting because i am against MOB violence
so you think he thinks "riots that get rights good, other riots bad" but you took an entire paragraph because you are bad with words
i think all riots are bad, therefore i think his supposed support of "only good riots" is bad. if your point was literally "you can't say he endorses riots because you don't know that he supports ALL riots" then you're an idiot because i clearly meant "he endorses AT LEAST SOME riots".
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
Well, not necessarily. I listed cases in which rights were being won by rioters he might hypothetically disagree with, and so even the statement that he endorses all riots that win rights is incorrect.
It’s interesting that you claim to think all riots are bad. That squares you against the victims of the communist totalitarians of the 20th century, who rioted out of starvation caused by famine borne of incompetent administration.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i love how you're pretending "riots that get rights good" is a serious statement
yes, i am evil
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
Not evil, just full of shit.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
ok more lazy than evil
idrc about famine victims
1 TheBravados 2018-03-19
Nah, still just full of shit.
1 JoakingtheSecond 2018-03-19
What is exactly extremist in his views?
So the "normal" thing to do is discriminate every now and then and support nazis esporadically?
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
endorsing rioting
what the fuck are you talking about you idiot
1 [deleted] 2018-03-19
[removed]
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i understood what the swastika fist sticker was about and i didn't refer to it
removed for glorifying violence and shitty history
word salad
1 [deleted] 2018-03-19
[deleted]
1 FEDORA_GOD 2018-03-19
mogs every incel into the nether region
1 ScrewWomyn 2018-03-19
Not the mentalcels
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
Id say i mog him
but your right this sub is full of mentalcels like myself
1 PhucCheet 2018-03-19
Manlets don't mog
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
true, but the guy in OPs pic looks short as well. I meant relative to him
1 GeneticCleansing 2018-03-19
How tall are you? 5'6"?
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
5'8"
1 r4risbullshit 2018-03-19
I find you less spammy than dontcomplain and pretty_boy_game tbh.
1 MaleFAer 2018-03-19
Ah nu-males, the most pathetic life form there ist.
2 alfons100 2018-03-19
I think you guys forgot one type before them... cough
1 Zangano1 2018-03-19
Women.
1 alfons100 2018-03-19
I’m not sure why I am even trying with this subreddit.
1 behindcloseddoors1 2018-03-19
"Oh no, I voluntarily came to this subreddit and got offended. How could this happen!"
1 alfons100 2018-03-19
I'm afraid that is the case.
1 ComicWriter2020 2018-03-19
It’s funny how you contradict your own post.
1 Zangano1 2018-03-19
Women and numales are not part of the human race.
1 ComicWriter2020 2018-03-19
It must be really sad having all that hate in you.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
You? Yep, that's it. Gotta hand it to you, good self-awareness there.
1 [deleted] 2018-03-19
[removed]
1 IncelSlayerZero 2018-03-19
Yup, incelcucks. No need to cough, we see you!
1 Lapatik 2018-03-19
Try saying that again while looking at yourself in the mirror.
1 slaughterthepig 2018-03-19
This why you ain't got bitches on ya dick
1 incelbeast 2018-03-19
"ya" PUhFF "y'all" HAHAHAH OH GOD NO
1 slaughterthepig 2018-03-19
This why ya ain't fuckin mad bitches rn
1 incelbeast 2018-03-19
"ya" LMAFOO
1 JackhusChanhus 2018-03-19
That dude isn’t an incel, he’s hot 😂
1 MotivationHacker 2018-03-19
Looks aren't subjective dude. Incels = ugly. Chads = attractive. Fact. GTFO
1 JackhusChanhus 2018-03-19
If looks weren’t subjective why the KKK😂😂😂
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
It´s not all there is. Ugly man fun to be around= sex all night. Totally man but asshole=braincel talk all night
1 Incel_Executioner 2018-03-19
Is this satire?
1 bdoderdb 2018-03-19
Is this what it´s about?
1 PhucCheet 2018-03-19
They aren't subjective, and he's objectively NuMale HipsterNorman. Not incel.
IRL guys like that are snagging HB8 leftists.
1 spicycough 2018-03-19
I thought I was looking at an incel. Certainly looks like one, and apparently quacks like one too.
1 xenodit 2018-03-19
lmao at the german stickers. That cuckisnt even german. He looks like subhuman turk that has been brainwashed by the jews to promote open borders & degeneracy. Good thing actually that he posted that photo. I will save it and show it to Gestapo once WW3 breaks out.
1 B45T4RD 2018-03-19
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
Biggeat virgin of all time.
1 ScionOfTheLion 2018-03-19
This ugly motherfucker's hiding his subpar facial features behind a beard and numale glasses. The fact that his ugly comes out even through these and a low-res picture is telling--guy's an incel through and through.
Also, my kitchen mogs his to oblivion.
1 69SRDP69 2018-03-19
So is this sub now the_donald 2.0? Seems like the next logical step for both communities to merge
1 utopista114 2018-03-19
The point is that the dude of the photo is into a lot of social work, maybe helps in the Government or NGOs, gives part of his time for causes. Still, does not matter.
1 behindcloseddoors1 2018-03-19
The Donald hates curries almost as much as women lul, we will never merge with them.
1 69SRDP69 2018-03-19
I'm sure both communities ignorance will unite them regardless
1 RIPMYPOOPCHUTE 2018-03-19
It's because he has an Apple laptop, that and bad hair.
1 DryYard 2018-03-19
What's the point? This is an actual instance of where poor looks and being the bad guy actually intersect.
1 kysacademy 2018-03-19
Here come the Normans.
1 gooseyhouse 2018-03-19
He’s hot??
1 gay4konyyl 2018-03-19
What a hottie goddamn
1 PrincessOfCuteness 2018-03-19
But this guy is cute?
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-03-19
He's not an incel, and if you didn't get that, you need to lurk moar.
1 willengineer4beer 2018-03-19
Ahh ok. That makes wayyy more sense. Was about to say guys that look like that in Atlanta seem to do extremely well for themselves.
1 LimitlessEnergy3000 2018-03-19
Donald Trump fake news.
1 lichnomusic 2018-03-19
Who is the female moderator's boyfriend?
1 inuyoshi2 2018-03-19
Always white
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-03-19
If he actually loves equality, he would support equality of opportunity for ugly males in the dating market.
1 Loser_Bug 2018-03-19
That implies that the woman he wants to date is obligated to give him her time.
1 bigantennaemay1 2018-03-19
Which should be a reasonable request if she's both single and in his league.
1 Loser_Bug 2018-03-19
Ah. That explains a lot.
1 Zangano1 2018-03-19
This is the average r/numaletears poster. A lot of the normtards dont seem to get that.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-03-19
I think some of these "normies" are legitimately autistic or something.
1 DiscombobulatedLake 2018-03-19
god-level cuck
1 Idrahaje 2018-03-19
I bet that guy gets laid though.
1 boredyeah 2018-03-19
no chance
1 Idrahaje 2018-03-19
See my below response.
0 LDAR_Scrolls 2018-03-19
lol, no
2 Idrahaje 2018-03-19
Yep, the guy at my school who has a laptop that looks like that gets ALL the ass (of both genders too, I might add)
1 Rubissrox 2018-03-19
If you think about it, the "cucks" and "numales" who advocate for a good personality being a key component in dating are actually dating people. Yet the "black-pilled" incels who believe looks are all that matter are not able to make any meaningful intimate connections with anyone outside their family.
I wonder why that is? Are all the numales just attractive enough to get laid?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-19
Yes.
1 Rubissrox 2018-03-19
What about the less attractive ones? How do they do it? Are all incels just incredibly ugly, even more so than any numale?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-19
Yes.
1 LimitlessEnergy3000 2018-03-19
Nu males get the girl tyrone fucked in the ass and in the mouth. You see them with girls but you never know the story behind it. Why do American girls fuck tyrone in college and then marry the nerdiest guy possible?
1 Rubissrox 2018-03-19
What about the girls in college who date numales? Why has every argument in this thread been a sweeping generalization?
1 LimitlessEnergy3000 2018-03-19
If you see a weird geeky guy with a pretty girl,chances are she slept around beforehand. It is American tradition.
1 [deleted] 2018-03-19
[removed]
1 Loser_Bug 2018-03-19
alpha position is better for orgasm, beta position is better for your long game.
1 WaylanderTS 2018-03-19
I'm writing this off a computer housed in a shoe box and built out of the PC parts other people threw away. My keyboard is almost as old as I am, I don't have a mouse.
I wish I was that guy. Maybe I could afford to eat something that didn't come out of the reduced section once in a while.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i thought women could tell someone's bad personality just by looking at them
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
like this guy
2 alfons100 2018-03-19
I think you guys forgot one type before them... cough
1 Lapatik 2018-03-19
Try saying that again while looking at yourself in the mirror.
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-19
I said maybe. And not shaved, trimmed up. But that doesn't matter since I literally never bang anyone based on appearance alone.
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
i didn't want to know
1 slaughterthepig 2018-03-19
This why you ain't got bitches on ya dick
1 sc2isadeadgame 2018-03-19
lol what did i say that was dickish or misogynistic in this thread
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-19
Id say i mog him
but your right this sub is full of mentalcels like myself
1 B45T4RD 2018-03-19
1 utopista114 2018-03-19
The point is that the dude of the photo is into a lot of social work, maybe helps in the Government or NGOs, gives part of his time for causes. Still, does not matter.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
You read up on the mistreatment of men first.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Ever consider that it's because society treats men like shit? Nah, can't be.
2 Idrahaje 2018-03-19
Yep, the guy at my school who has a laptop that looks like that gets ALL the ass (of both genders too, I might add)
1 Kayles_Butt 2018-03-19
Haha, is this normally the kind of shit you see on this sub looooooooool.
1 behindcloseddoors1 2018-03-19
The Donald hates curries almost as much as women lul, we will never merge with them.
1 Mr_Breast 2018-03-19
Dunning Krugar is what allows you to say this stupid shit.
1 veronchung 2018-03-19
Sure.