lol, why do they look at childless men and childless women only, and why those particular ages? They're clearly manipulating the data there. You are a sucker if you repost this garbage.
Because it isn't statistically fair to compare people with kids to kidless ones, as the first have less time to devote to their career than the former do. It's not rocket science.
See, math and science are sexist because cis scum men created them and made them hard to understand, and they don't like it when we try to get ahead. They need to make it easy like my basket weaving major, so women can have good jobs too.
This isn't what is meant by a wage gap... women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position. I don't know if that is still the case but that is what it used to be about.
This is like saying more people named Tim get beaten up than people named Tom, so it's okay for Tim to beat up Tom. It has no bearing on individual levels.
And men are privileged in many other ways compared to women. Other men are privileged in many respects to you and vice versa. That's not really a basis for anything.
It's easier for men to get positions in companies, easier to get loans at banks for a start-up, easier to get projects approved, easier to get art projects promoted, easier to get subsidies for events etc etc etc
Its been illegal to discriminate against women in the workplace since 1963. The Civil Rights act of 1964 doubled down on this. In the 70's they fortified these laws. The Obama administration made it easier to sue if you think someone is discriminating against you in 2009. How much money and effort do we need to waste to ensure total equality?
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States labor law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap). It was signed into law on June 10, 1963, by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program. In passing the bill, Congress stated that sex discrimination:
depresses wages and living standards for employees necessary for their health and efficiency;
prevents the maximum utilization of the available labor resources;
tends to cause labor disputes, thereby burdening, affecting, and obstructing commerce;
burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and
Are you living in the 1890s or something? Both startups and internationals organize events for women all the time. Women don't even need to go to a bank to get a loan, they have all kinds of special funds for start-up funding. Same for getting projects approved and promotions and subsidies because of diversity checkboxes needing to get ticked.
I'm sorry, but if a woman complains about not being able to get scholarships or a job or startup funding in this day and age, she is either very very lazy or very very incompetent.
I can't be fine with the wage gap, because it is a thought up concept by feminists to get even more tax dollars out of the pockets of beta men for spehsul duhversity programs.
And why those programs exist? It's simple: man bad, woman good. Chads and finance alphas are fine anyway and laughing on their way to the bank. Women are happy because they get more money. Betas are too brainwashed to even care how they are financially raped and think that everything is fine anyway. Omegas do not matter in this equation because they are lucky enough to have minimum wage jobs.
Kids? I'm 32 and many others are also in their late 20s/early 30s (older ones already roped), so unless you are in your 60s, lay off with that.
And if you don't think that people posting feminazi shit on tumblr and reddit do not have real world effect, then you are hypocritical or deluded. Wait, isn't the reason why reddit SJWs want places like the_donald and incels banned 'real world effects'? So alt-right shitposting has real world effects, but regressive left shitposting does not? smh
I don't actually agree that that's the case (men having an easier time getting loans, etc.), but I was merely saying that even if that were so, only the privileged few partake in it anyway, so that's not something that men generally would enjoy. Also, you're wrong on your second point - because women very much use their female privilege to get free stuff, including meals and drinks.
No, I don't speak for all women, I was pointing out I'm a woman so that it might be clear that I know quite a few other women and am party to our supposed scheming.
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
Almost everything you listed is easier for a woman if they applied themselves. The company I'm working for is literally begging for women to come work for them and would choose less compentent women over more competent men.
Why not? It's the same logic feminists apply to the (supposed) economic power that men have. Men should give up some of their power to make women equal.
Females have vast sexual power over men, they should be made to give up their power and make men equal.
Why is female sexual preference not an "Institutional unfairness"? I mean all females purposefully discriminate against incels, how is this discrimination ok fine and good, but other forms of discrimination are not?
This form of discrimination is also far more damaging because it leads to genetic extermination of incel genes. The (supposed) wage gap just results in some meager income loss.
Because that isn't discrimination in the negative form. It's personal preference. Should Nickelback sue you because you buy Radiohead albums or vice versa?
Yes, I do. But there's not really a point in arguing with you anyway. Feminists are like religous nutcases that refuse to see that they are wrong. Or rather they are purposefully being ignorant because they are trying to establish female supremacy (what feminism should be called).
So society can take advantage of men to benefit women's supposed problem but it's HORRIBLE to even consider helping men out with relationships or sex...
Helping out, yes. You want tips? On grooming? Flirting? Relationship advice? Hook you up with a date? A makeover? Dating websites?
Funny, you act like the most skewed against men option out there is something viable for most of us
I haven't got a single piece of advice for trying to meet women that hasn't been burning away hours doing something I hate and forcing myself to continue on the fucking off chance that I meet a girl, I fucking hate when people give me that bullshit advice. I've been able to find girls now, but it doeesn't really matter because that's it, I have just found them and all I can do is watch and think about how NONE of them find me attractive and get pissed off about it.
It's not women's fault you are unattractive though. We don't decide who is and who isn't. We don't decide what is attractive or what we are attracted to. We just do exactly as you would do; date people we find attractive. There is nothing wrong with doing that, in fact, it's normal. I mean, sure it's unfair that not everybody is attractive but we didn't make it so.
Oh, fuck off, you have no clue how much easier women have it and then you act like there is nothing fucking wrong with the shit you do to us, I'm pissed off because they won't settle and have too many options but if anyone brings that up pretty much anywhere else except here they are laughed at at best.
I wouldn't just date women I find attractive, my standards are low enough that I will date without attraction, as long as I'm not too repulsed, the fact that I have to sink to that level while still not succeeding is fucked up. When someone gets pissed off because of shit like this everyone fucking ignores the reason being that the dude had been ignored by women and women having so many advantages in the dating market as well as being whores who fuck every dude they are attracted to. Nobody even gives a shit if a dude is lonely until he's violent because of it, cunts like you drive people to it... think about that you peice of shit.
Because if they are a big enough company and/or publicly listed, they would get fined by the feminazi government bureaucrats. And sometimes when feminazis need a new target to pump money out from, they start a new social media shitstorm on Twitter against the company.
If this was the case, which btw is forbidden by law in a lot of countries, why don’t employers hire females for this positions? I mean every companies goal is to maximize their profits and if they could easily save 25% with this one simple trick, why don’t they do it?
This isn't what is meant by a wage gap... women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position
Was your initial argument which is wrong. The wage gap started out as flat out comparing the average salaries of men to the average salaries of women without accounting for the different jobs both genders tend to do. If anyone argues that the wage gap is real they always use this statistic.
Are you not better than a fucking suicidal, depressed, lonely, bullied... the list goes on... adult male virgin? You really want to come down to our level? Be my guest then.
Yes, and there no absolute requirement for females in porn, unlike for males, who must have a huge dick (even though the porn is directed at straight males.).
Too true. From landwhales to grandmas to barely 18's, busty or not, black, white or asian. There is no discrimination. But males? 6 ft+ with an 8 incher minimum. White/black. Seems fair
Well, I guess you don't jack off to enough gay porn to raise their pay. Perhaps you should sue them. Or is this also part of a big feminist conspiracy?
No, not really. Just tired of dumbing it down and explaining everything like to a toddler to people who want to believe gibberish. Feel free to wallow in negativity though, I'll leave you to it and go back to having a laugh in inceltears.
If we had to explain what braincels and inceltears were about, it would be as such: braincels hate women for not giving them a chance. inceltears hate braincels for being lonely virgins. Yeah, I'm pretty sure if u tell this to anyone in real life, they would call u a negative person
Oh nonononono again, that is not gonna fly. Inceltears hate rabid asshats who hate everyone and everything because they're not getting laid. Don't dissemble.
It doesn't. I could say the same thing to you, seems like you're an IT subscriber so I would question whether or not your opinion of IT is biased or not.
why hasn't a company innovated(like humans do) and just tried to hire only women, surely they would be paying the staff less and getting the same productivity and beat all the other competition?
So you're saying if a woman, who perceive women as equally competent, started a company and hired only women, they should be able to out compete everyone else? Why don't you do that?
I'm a woman and I work for a woman owned law firm. Incidentally, she is far away the best as well. Quiet funny watching the competition struggle for her scraps heh.
I gave you an answer. If you are so far removed from reality that you can't figure out what it means then I don't think I can properly communicate with you.
I googled it and found dozens, you can do the same. Of course, you either won't or will come up with vapid excuses as to why they are all part of some tinfoil conspiracy to keep men down. Color me surprised
women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position.
Same position/title does not mean same job assignments. Salespeople are probably the best example for that, but it applies to all jobs. I clocked in a lot of overtime during one job grinding out CRUD web apps, but most of us had the same job titles of developer (recent grads junior and the guys who did not burn out after a few years of development got promoted to team leads/PMs).
And if some feminazi-type government worker checks the wages, she would see that men get paid more than women and would go all REEEEEE. And at the same time, conveniently forgetting that the men were girlfriendless nerds who had no other life besides their job. If the choice is between going home and being alone, you might as well be at the office and making more money for the next gaming rig upgrade.
That's not what is meant by that. Which assignment you get in a position is determined by your employer anyway but it used to simply be Same job, less pay.
That argument is retarded. If you could pay less for the same job just by hiring a woman, no employer would ever hire men. I am not seeing that happening, though?
And it is even claimed to work on the take-home pay. So let's say the wage gap actually exists and a man takes home 3000 EUR per month, causing the employer costs of 5200 EUR per month total. If a woman earned 30% less and takes home 3100 EUR per month, employer would have costs of 3650 EUR per month. That's 1550 EUR per month per employee.
So let's say that you have a small company of 50 employees, that's 50 * 12 * 1550 = 930k EUR that you could save on wages per year by solely replacing all men with women. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't like to leave 930k EUR just on the table.
Not everyone gets paid the same salary even in the same position. You think all Software Engineer I in Google all make the same salary? Women take what they can get and they don't negotiate as hard as men.
I don't know if there is one, there used to be one. You know I've only ever heard men complain about women complaining about wagegaps in the last 15 years or so. I've never actually heard a woman complain about a wagegap.
Just use google, dude. Idk about the US / Europe, but here in Canada women make virtually the same as men in terms of hourly rate, equal positions being considered.
The wage gap is usually calculated by taking the difference between men's and women's respective median income. That's it, that's all. It is literally retarded.
Jesus wept, I've never even said there is a wagegap nowadays, I said there was one in the past and that I don't know or particularly care whether there still is one.
Yes there was one in the past. Anyway, I was just venting off. Some people get their panties in a bunch because "femoid sluts won't suck them off", while I get my feelings hurt by retarded sampling methods.
You are literally asking this under a post where men complain about that in a sub where men complain about anything and everything they can think of as an excuse for why they can't get their dick wet.
Yeah your reaction is telling. "What? Men complaining online? Unacceptable."
Women always fucking complain. Look at the fat acceptance movement and "fatphobia" or whatever those obese cunts call it, women are the main advocates for it. You don't see fat men get triggered by "fatphobia". That's because men shut the fuck up when they're in pain or suffering, because society expects them to. And here we have 1 sub to complain, and all the normies go batshit crazy. Fuck you, and all the normie cunts that come here to tell me I'm not allowed to complain. Go fuck yourself.
I didn't say it was unacceptable? I also didn't say there aren't any women who complain? I said your point that men don't complain as well is nonsense. But yes, I do see a lot of fat men getting triggered. And yes, you are allowed to complain about it. But don't blame women. As if we made you fat or unattractive or decide what attractive is pfff
Feminism will never strife to achieve equality. Will never happen, not in a million fucking years. Women are sociopaths. Men are the gullible fucking idiots that keep believing female lies.
If women only make $0.77c for every $1.00 a man gets, how do women account for 85% of all consumer purchases? Where do they get all that extra money? HMMM?
Oh I see, in this case I support paying women more and paying men less. This way men will have less money to give women. In fact I support paying men a maximum wage of $15 an hour so no man can afford to give money to women.
Because women don't do hard or dangerous jobs? Many men have no choice or say in that matter, they have to do those jobs.
I'm personally for a 50-50 quota for all jobs. And the higher the gender ratio is currently skewed the higher the priority for fixing this ratio should be. Women would be forced to do shitty and dangerous jobs, while men would get access to cushy and nice jobs. Equality über alles.
No you wouldn't. Men would still do the more dangerous and laborious things within those jobs. ie front line in the army, operating heavy machinery etc.
Even if they were split with such specificity, men would be the ones doing the dangerous/laborious/physically intensive aspects more. Because chivalry and functionality. Female firefighters aren't pulling people out of burning buildings. If you have a female and a male porter, guess which one does the heavy lifting? And so on.
I really hope the government goes against the free market and mandates that companies pay women more. This will make women more expensive to hire and hopefully result in more jobs for men.
Well a lot of wage gap studies have found that women with the same creditials as a man working the same job as a man are likely to be paid less. What's more, women are less likely to be hired for jobs they are qualified for. Statistics can be a complicated thing so you should remember that what people are often referring to as the wage gap is not that women on average make less money. It's that when compared against men in the same line of work they make less money on average.
Its their choice to have a baby and there is literally nothing wrong with raising it. The fact that raising a child is unpaid work is not some sexist conspiracy.
Wasn't saying that. It contributes to the lower wage. Why would an employer offer raises or give competitive salaries to someone not currently working/will not be for a good 1-5 years, due to pregnancy?
Even if the wage gape was real, don't you think that all the vast and numerous privileges that women enjoy would make up for it? I'd gladly take a 25% paycut if I could live life on tutorial mode.
Yup, as do I. Taking a paycut of 25% and having free and easy access to sex and relationships would be the best deal I'd have ever taken. You'd be insane as a man to refuse such an offer.
Exactly. They get to have the best of both worlds. The same economic power as men, plus the vast and extreme sexual power as women. How this isn't unfair for men I'll never understand.
That's not what is meant by that. Which assignment you get in a position is determined by your employer anyway but it used to simply be Same job, less pay.
Why not? It's the same logic feminists apply to the (supposed) economic power that men have. Men should give up some of their power to make women equal.
Females have vast sexual power over men, they should be made to give up their power and make men equal.
This isn't what is meant by a wage gap... women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position
Was your initial argument which is wrong. The wage gap started out as flat out comparing the average salaries of men to the average salaries of women without accounting for the different jobs both genders tend to do. If anyone argues that the wage gap is real they always use this statistic.
Kids? I'm 32 and many others are also in their late 20s/early 30s (older ones already roped), so unless you are in your 60s, lay off with that.
And if you don't think that people posting feminazi shit on tumblr and reddit do not have real world effect, then you are hypocritical or deluded. Wait, isn't the reason why reddit SJWs want places like the_donald and incels banned 'real world effects'? So alt-right shitposting has real world effects, but regressive left shitposting does not? smh
No, not really. Just tired of dumbing it down and explaining everything like to a toddler to people who want to believe gibberish. Feel free to wallow in negativity though, I'll leave you to it and go back to having a laugh in inceltears.
Its their choice to have a baby and there is literally nothing wrong with raising it. The fact that raising a child is unpaid work is not some sexist conspiracy.
196 comments
2 St_Blackops2cel 2018-03-13
Feminism is a ploy to push for female white supremacy. The other races exist to support their propaganda, by giving them a small piece of the pie.
2 anonymousvirgin88 2018-03-13
The truth cannot be denied forever.
2 Sniveling_Cur 2018-03-13
I mean not even normies deny that wage gap is bs...
1 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
Everyone knows it is. Numales keep their mouth shut, but pretty much all normie males know it's pure bs.
2 [deleted] 2018-03-13
[deleted]
2 fryxtz 2018-03-13
lol, why do they look at childless men and childless women only, and why those particular ages? They're clearly manipulating the data there. You are a sucker if you repost this garbage.
1 FF1750 2018-03-13
Because it isn't statistically fair to compare people with kids to kidless ones, as the first have less time to devote to their career than the former do. It's not rocket science.
0 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Because if she's married with kids, she has access to her husband's cash in addition to her own, and the government will help her, too.
0 Texas_Indian 2018-03-13
Because women tend to go to work less after having children
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Also, women actually end up spending most of the money that men earn anyway.
1 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
Lol, true.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Women also receive more in government benefits than they pay in taxes.
1 chadeet 2018-03-13
See, math and science are sexist because cis scum men created them and made them hard to understand, and they don't like it when we try to get ahead. They need to make it easy like my basket weaving major, so women can have good jobs too.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
This isn't what is meant by a wage gap... women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position. I don't know if that is still the case but that is what it used to be about.
This is like saying more people named Tim get beaten up than people named Tom, so it's okay for Tim to beat up Tom. It has no bearing on individual levels.
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
And what is wrong with that? Women are privileged in many respects compared to men, it's just fair that they get paid less.
2 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
And men are privileged in many other ways compared to women. Other men are privileged in many respects to you and vice versa. That's not really a basis for anything.
0 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Like where?
That's not what feminism is about though, that's more a topic for communism/marxism.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
It's easier for men to get positions in companies, easier to get loans at banks for a start-up, easier to get projects approved, easier to get art projects promoted, easier to get subsidies for events etc etc etc
1 geneticwaste43 2018-03-13
This is called discrimination and would lead to lawsuits and does not happen.
Imagine being this dumb. Holy shit
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
And it often does, yes. This is discrimination, yes.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Lol what? What kind of events? Usually females are subsidized or even get free entry or drinks.
1 idratherbedrunkk 2018-03-13
Oh yeah, my unemployment is just my fault, right? If I actually applied myself, I could take some poor woman's job
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Oh stop reading individualisms into macro societal issues. You're just looking for an excuse to get angry and end up tilting at windmills.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Its been illegal to discriminate against women in the workplace since 1963. The Civil Rights act of 1964 doubled down on this. In the 70's they fortified these laws. The Obama administration made it easier to sue if you think someone is discriminating against you in 2009. How much money and effort do we need to waste to ensure total equality?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963
1 WikiTextBot 2018-03-13
Equal Pay Act of 1963
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a United States labor law amending the Fair Labor Standards Act, aimed at abolishing wage disparity based on sex (see Gender pay gap). It was signed into law on June 10, 1963, by John F. Kennedy as part of his New Frontier Program. In passing the bill, Congress stated that sex discrimination:
depresses wages and living standards for employees necessary for their health and efficiency;
prevents the maximum utilization of the available labor resources;
tends to cause labor disputes, thereby burdening, affecting, and obstructing commerce;
burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and
constitutes an unfair method of competition.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
0 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Are you living in the 1890s or something? Both startups and internationals organize events for women all the time. Women don't even need to go to a bank to get a loan, they have all kinds of special funds for start-up funding. Same for getting projects approved and promotions and subsidies because of diversity checkboxes needing to get ticked.
I'm sorry, but if a woman complains about not being able to get scholarships or a job or startup funding in this day and age, she is either very very lazy or very very incompetent.
2 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Sorry, but you are fine with a wagegap and are asking me if I'm living the 1890's?
And yes, there are special diversity programs for that. Why do you think that is?
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
I can't be fine with the wage gap, because it is a thought up concept by feminists to get even more tax dollars out of the pockets of beta men for spehsul duhversity programs.
And why those programs exist? It's simple: man bad, woman good. Chads and finance alphas are fine anyway and laughing on their way to the bank. Women are happy because they get more money. Betas are too brainwashed to even care how they are financially raped and think that everything is fine anyway. Omegas do not matter in this equation because they are lucky enough to have minimum wage jobs.
It's AFBB on a society-wide level.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
God, you are hopelessly deluded. So long and good luck
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Hopelessly deluded for pointing out how feminism actually works? I'm pretty sure that I'm not the one with a problem here.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
How "feminism" actually works. God, some of you kids think the world happens on tumblr and reddit, I swear.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Kids? I'm 32 and many others are also in their late 20s/early 30s (older ones already roped), so unless you are in your 60s, lay off with that.
And if you don't think that people posting feminazi shit on tumblr and reddit do not have real world effect, then you are hypocritical or deluded. Wait, isn't the reason why reddit SJWs want places like the_donald and incels banned 'real world effects'? So alt-right shitposting has real world effects, but regressive left shitposting does not? smh
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I'm not your strawman but feel free to keep going
0 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Most men don't do any of that shit though.
0 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
That's beside the point though, isn't it? Whether you use it is up to you. Most women don't go to bars for free drinks or meals or whatever either.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
I don't actually agree that that's the case (men having an easier time getting loans, etc.), but I was merely saying that even if that were so, only the privileged few partake in it anyway, so that's not something that men generally would enjoy. Also, you're wrong on your second point - because women very much use their female privilege to get free stuff, including meals and drinks.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I can't think of any women I know who do that, out of hand. And I am a woman.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
So you speak for all women now? Do you also value personality more than looks in a potential partner?
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
No, I don't speak for all women, I was pointing out I'm a woman so that it might be clear that I know quite a few other women and am party to our supposed scheming.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
I notice you didn't bother to answer my second question.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Sorry, I'm answering a lot of rapethreats in PM. For me looks draw me in, that's the first thing. If the personality is nice too they are relationship material.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
I appreciate the sincerity.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Well, I am sincere. It's usually not appreciated in here though, thanks.
0 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
None of those are true, you do know that, right?
Almost everything you listed is easier for a woman if they applied themselves. The company I'm working for is literally begging for women to come work for them and would choose less compentent women over more competent men.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
And why would they do that?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Because of brainwashed "diversity" bullshit.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Because of prejudicial disadvantages requiring incentive to be rectified. For good or ill.
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
You mean just like female sexual preferences?
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Uh no lol
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Why not? It's the same logic feminists apply to the (supposed) economic power that men have. Men should give up some of their power to make women equal.
Females have vast sexual power over men, they should be made to give up their power and make men equal.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Institutional unfairness does not mean women should be sexual slaves. Jesus wept, I can't believe I had to type that sentence.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Institutional unfairness does not mean women should be sexual slaves. Jesus wept, I can't believe I had to type that sentence.
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Why is female sexual preference not an "Institutional unfairness"? I mean all females purposefully discriminate against incels, how is this discrimination ok fine and good, but other forms of discrimination are not?
This form of discrimination is also far more damaging because it leads to genetic extermination of incel genes. The (supposed) wage gap just results in some meager income loss.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Because that isn't discrimination in the negative form. It's personal preference. Should Nickelback sue you because you buy Radiohead albums or vice versa?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
It isn't personal though, it is "Institutional". All women discriminate against incels.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yes and all women are individuals.
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
As are all men, so men can't discriminate against women. Gotcha.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Do you really think that holds water or can I be excused of having to point out why that isn't a solid argument?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Yes, I do. But there's not really a point in arguing with you anyway. Feminists are like religous nutcases that refuse to see that they are wrong. Or rather they are purposefully being ignorant because they are trying to establish female supremacy (what feminism should be called).
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I'm not even a feminist, I'm just not some weird conspiracy nut.
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Then stop arguing for feminism. It's not a valid idelogy but more akin to a weird fucked up religion. Done here.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yes, and I'm against weird fucked up religions, whether it's feminism or the manosphere.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-03-13
So society can take advantage of men to benefit women's supposed problem but it's HORRIBLE to even consider helping men out with relationships or sex...
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Helping out, yes. You want tips? On grooming? Flirting? Relationship advice? Hook you up with a date? A makeover? Dating websites?
People will help you.
Having sex with someone against their will? No.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-03-13
Funny, you act like the most skewed against men option out there is something viable for most of us
I haven't got a single piece of advice for trying to meet women that hasn't been burning away hours doing something I hate and forcing myself to continue on the fucking off chance that I meet a girl, I fucking hate when people give me that bullshit advice. I've been able to find girls now, but it doeesn't really matter because that's it, I have just found them and all I can do is watch and think about how NONE of them find me attractive and get pissed off about it.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
It's not women's fault you are unattractive though. We don't decide who is and who isn't. We don't decide what is attractive or what we are attracted to. We just do exactly as you would do; date people we find attractive. There is nothing wrong with doing that, in fact, it's normal. I mean, sure it's unfair that not everybody is attractive but we didn't make it so.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-03-13
Oh, fuck off, you have no clue how much easier women have it and then you act like there is nothing fucking wrong with the shit you do to us, I'm pissed off because they won't settle and have too many options but if anyone brings that up pretty much anywhere else except here they are laughed at at best.
I wouldn't just date women I find attractive, my standards are low enough that I will date without attraction, as long as I'm not too repulsed, the fact that I have to sink to that level while still not succeeding is fucked up. When someone gets pissed off because of shit like this everyone fucking ignores the reason being that the dude had been ignored by women and women having so many advantages in the dating market as well as being whores who fuck every dude they are attracted to. Nobody even gives a shit if a dude is lonely until he's violent because of it, cunts like you drive people to it... think about that you peice of shit.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
We don't DO anything to you. We just do exactly what you would do; date someone you're attracted to.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-03-13
We settle for women we aren't attracted to you....
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Same difference, if you didn't have to do so then you wouldn't do so.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Because if they are a big enough company and/or publicly listed, they would get fined by the feminazi government bureaucrats. And sometimes when feminazis need a new target to pump money out from, they start a new social media shitstorm on Twitter against the company.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
"Feminazis" Oh god, am I in a time machine?
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
If this was the case, which btw is forbidden by law in a lot of countries, why don’t employers hire females for this positions? I mean every companies goal is to maximize their profits and if they could easily save 25% with this one simple trick, why don’t they do it?
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Probably because it's not allowed anymore. You should pay closer attention to what people write really.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Was your initial argument which is wrong. The wage gap started out as flat out comparing the average salaries of men to the average salaries of women without accounting for the different jobs both genders tend to do. If anyone argues that the wage gap is real they always use this statistic.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Yes, you are right.
You should also try to not be a little condescending bitch.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I wouldn't be talking down if most of you boys here didn't choose to sink so low.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Are you not better than a fucking suicidal, depressed, lonely, bullied... the list goes on... adult male virgin? You really want to come down to our level? Be my guest then.
1 hiiamwhoiam 2018-03-13
Female porn stars and cam girls earn more money than their male counterparts just for being female. How is that fair?
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Yes, and there no absolute requirement for females in porn, unlike for males, who must have a huge dick (even though the porn is directed at straight males.).
1 PeppyHydra 2018-03-13
Too true. From landwhales to grandmas to barely 18's, busty or not, black, white or asian. There is no discrimination. But males? 6 ft+ with an 8 incher minimum. White/black. Seems fair
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Jesus wept! Really??
1 hiiamwhoiam 2018-03-13
Sorry?
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Well, I guess you don't jack off to enough gay porn to raise their pay. Perhaps you should sue them. Or is this also part of a big feminist conspiracy?
1 hiiamwhoiam 2018-03-13
You are so dumb.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yeaaaaah uhhuh
1 iQ9k 2018-03-13
Whew
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
No, not really. Just tired of dumbing it down and explaining everything like to a toddler to people who want to believe gibberish. Feel free to wallow in negativity though, I'll leave you to it and go back to having a laugh in inceltears.
1 Demod_Board_Gaming 2018-03-13
The irony is very strong
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yeeaah there is no way that comparison is going to fly, dude.
1 Demod_Board_Gaming 2018-03-13
If we had to explain what braincels and inceltears were about, it would be as such: braincels hate women for not giving them a chance. inceltears hate braincels for being lonely virgins. Yeah, I'm pretty sure if u tell this to anyone in real life, they would call u a negative person
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Oh nonononono again, that is not gonna fly. Inceltears hate rabid asshats who hate everyone and everything because they're not getting laid. Don't dissemble.
1 iQ9k 2018-03-13
Nah IT is pretty sad and pathetic and you know it
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Your flair reads "make braincels great again", that calls into question your ability to make value judgements about other subs.
1 iQ9k 2018-03-13
It doesn't. I could say the same thing to you, seems like you're an IT subscriber so I would question whether or not your opinion of IT is biased or not.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
You would, yes.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
If women earn less per hour for the exact same work, why don't companies save on wages by hiring only women?
1 PM_ME_RAREST_PEPES 2018-03-13
Because companies also perceive men as more competent.
1 Awesomefusion 2018-03-13
why hasn't a company innovated(like humans do) and just tried to hire only women, surely they would be paying the staff less and getting the same productivity and beat all the other competition?
1 [deleted] 2018-03-13
[removed]
1 Flamescoito 2018-03-13
Because they're striving for equality, what you guys suggested will just create a gender war and extremely hypocritical.
1 PM_ME_RAREST_PEPES 2018-03-13
Because there are laws against that.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
So you're saying if a woman, who perceive women as equally competent, started a company and hired only women, they should be able to out compete everyone else? Why don't you do that?
1 PM_ME_RAREST_PEPES 2018-03-13
I'm a woman and I work for a woman owned law firm. Incidentally, she is far away the best as well. Quiet funny watching the competition struggle for her scraps heh.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Men are more competent
Blind recruitment trial to boost gender equality making things worse, study reveals
1 PM_ME_RAREST_PEPES 2018-03-13
So if you think men are more competent, that should explain to you why companies pay them more.
1 idratherbedrunkk 2018-03-13
Yeah that's not true
1 stygianStruthio 2018-03-13
https://youtu.be/wjWBXbGVyQU
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
"women literally would earn less per hour than a man in exactly the same position"
source pls
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
God, just google it and pick any of the dozens of links you come across. Of course, they're all written by numale cucks, I know the drill around here.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
Why don’t companies hire only men then?
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Because not everybody has their head up their arse so far they can't tell the difference between nutcase conspiracy and simple reality.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
Wow, a woman who can’t answer a question, that is rare
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I gave you an answer. If you are so far removed from reality that you can't figure out what it means then I don't think I can properly communicate with you.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
You got that right, though I don’t think you can properly communicate with anybody else either.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
But dude, what you think is neither relevant or of any consequence.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
So that’s why you keep replying to me. Makes perfect sense (it doesn’t, but you’re a woman, we forgive you)
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I reply to you because I enjoy it really
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
Glad I can give you enjoyment.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
wow, no answer, color me surprised
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I googled it and found dozens, you can do the same. Of course, you either won't or will come up with vapid excuses as to why they are all part of some tinfoil conspiracy to keep men down. Color me surprised
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
Why don’t companies hire only men then?
0 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Same position/title does not mean same job assignments. Salespeople are probably the best example for that, but it applies to all jobs. I clocked in a lot of overtime during one job grinding out CRUD web apps, but most of us had the same job titles of developer (recent grads junior and the guys who did not burn out after a few years of development got promoted to team leads/PMs).
And if some feminazi-type government worker checks the wages, she would see that men get paid more than women and would go all REEEEEE. And at the same time, conveniently forgetting that the men were girlfriendless nerds who had no other life besides their job. If the choice is between going home and being alone, you might as well be at the office and making more money for the next gaming rig upgrade.
Wage gap my fucking ass.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
That's not what is meant by that. Which assignment you get in a position is determined by your employer anyway but it used to simply be Same job, less pay.
0 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
That argument is retarded. If you could pay less for the same job just by hiring a woman, no employer would ever hire men. I am not seeing that happening, though?
And it is even claimed to work on the take-home pay. So let's say the wage gap actually exists and a man takes home 3000 EUR per month, causing the employer costs of 5200 EUR per month total. If a woman earned 30% less and takes home 3100 EUR per month, employer would have costs of 3650 EUR per month. That's 1550 EUR per month per employee.
So let's say that you have a small company of 50 employees, that's 50 * 12 * 1550 = 930k EUR that you could save on wages per year by solely replacing all men with women. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't like to leave 930k EUR just on the table.
tl;dr: u r pretty stupid
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yes, it is retarded, that's why it was fought so hard. I did not make it so...
0 ClintonShockTrooper 2018-03-13
Not everyone gets paid the same salary even in the same position. You think all Software Engineer I in Google all make the same salary? Women take what they can get and they don't negotiate as hard as men.
There is no wage gap.
0 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I don't know if there is one, there used to be one. You know I've only ever heard men complain about women complaining about wagegaps in the last 15 years or so. I've never actually heard a woman complain about a wagegap.
1 ClintonShockTrooper 2018-03-13
lolwut
Jokes on you. My gf is an engineer and gets paid more than me in the same company. She complains about women complaining about wage gap bs.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
So someone else who complains about people complaining.
1 FF1750 2018-03-13
Just use google, dude. Idk about the US / Europe, but here in Canada women make virtually the same as men in terms of hourly rate, equal positions being considered.
The wage gap is usually calculated by taking the difference between men's and women's respective median income. That's it, that's all. It is literally retarded.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Jesus wept, I've never even said there is a wagegap nowadays, I said there was one in the past and that I don't know or particularly care whether there still is one.
1 FF1750 2018-03-13
Yes there was one in the past. Anyway, I was just venting off. Some people get their panties in a bunch because "femoid sluts won't suck them off", while I get my feelings hurt by retarded sampling methods.
1 PeppyHydra 2018-03-13
Because women always fucking complain. Nothing is ever good enough for them.
Where do you see men complain that they are 9x more likely to die at work? Nowhere, because men take the risks and shoulder it.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
You are literally asking this under a post where men complain about that in a sub where men complain about anything and everything they can think of as an excuse for why they can't get their dick wet.
1 PeppyHydra 2018-03-13
Yeah your reaction is telling. "What? Men complaining online? Unacceptable."
Women always fucking complain. Look at the fat acceptance movement and "fatphobia" or whatever those obese cunts call it, women are the main advocates for it. You don't see fat men get triggered by "fatphobia". That's because men shut the fuck up when they're in pain or suffering, because society expects them to. And here we have 1 sub to complain, and all the normies go batshit crazy. Fuck you, and all the normie cunts that come here to tell me I'm not allowed to complain. Go fuck yourself.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
I didn't say it was unacceptable? I also didn't say there aren't any women who complain? I said your point that men don't complain as well is nonsense. But yes, I do see a lot of fat men getting triggered. And yes, you are allowed to complain about it. But don't blame women. As if we made you fat or unattractive or decide what attractive is pfff
1 PeppyHydra 2018-03-13
You're retarded.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
That doesn't mean anything
0 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
Yes, they are all hilarious.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Notice the number of subs designed exclusively to attack ugly males.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Incels get 0 women for every 100 women chad gets.
How are we going to fix this feminists?
1 DrFeel_MD_PHD_NOGF 2018-03-13
We need to address the sex gap NOW
1 cookin_breakfast 2018-03-13
Lol feminism has numales screaming for the correction of the false wage gap, while also managing to convince them that the sex gap isn't real
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Feminism will never strife to achieve equality. Will never happen, not in a million fucking years. Women are sociopaths. Men are the gullible fucking idiots that keep believing female lies.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Women, women never changes
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
If women only make $0.77c for every $1.00 a man gets, how do women account for 85% of all consumer purchases? Where do they get all that extra money? HMMM?
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
From the patriarchy.
1 not_good_looking 2018-03-13
Daddy, husbands, Betas and sugar daddies
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Oh I see, in this case I support paying women more and paying men less. This way men will have less money to give women. In fact I support paying men a maximum wage of $15 an hour so no man can afford to give money to women.
1 not_good_looking 2018-03-13
Inceltears betas will always find a way to fish their bottom dollar for their landwhale mates.
1 frankwashere44 2018-03-13
And tax.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Women don't need to work to get money.
1 Ron_Jeremy6969 2018-03-13
sucking foreign cock is work tho :thinking:
/s
1 chadicide 2018-03-13
Who cares if a guy is more likely to die. Work place death has nothing to do with gender,
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Because women don't do hard or dangerous jobs? Many men have no choice or say in that matter, they have to do those jobs.
I'm personally for a 50-50 quota for all jobs. And the higher the gender ratio is currently skewed the higher the priority for fixing this ratio should be. Women would be forced to do shitty and dangerous jobs, while men would get access to cushy and nice jobs. Equality über alles.
1 chadicide 2018-03-13
If there was a 50-50 ratio in the jobs, we would see a 50-50split in death ratio. There is nothing inherently sexist about the death ratio its self.
1 frankwashere44 2018-03-13
No you wouldn't. Men would still do the more dangerous and laborious things within those jobs. ie front line in the army, operating heavy machinery etc.
1 chadicide 2018-03-13
These jobs would be a 50-50 split.
1 frankwashere44 2018-03-13
Even if they were split with such specificity, men would be the ones doing the dangerous/laborious/physically intensive aspects more. Because chivalry and functionality. Female firefighters aren't pulling people out of burning buildings. If you have a female and a male porter, guess which one does the heavy lifting? And so on.
1 reptidad 2018-03-13
You're dead fucking wrong about the firefighters bud. TAKE IT BACK HEATHEN
1 MRAGGGAN 2018-03-13
Women typically don’t do hard/dangerous jobs.
Plenty of women DO them.
The access for women to do the shitty jobs is there, but most women won’t, true.
However, being a person who works in a VERY dangerous job environment, it’s very much harder for a woman to succeed.
And it’s not because we’re typically weaker.
I had a fucking tag line taken out of my hands today, and got told “Don’t worry sweetie, I can do this.”
It was 24 ft of fucking pipe. I’ve rigged, walked, and place pipe that was 50+ feet with no problems.
But a man who’s never seen me work before decided little ole me couldn’t do the work.
1 Board_Gaming 2018-03-13
There are some guys that don't think women can do certain work. Like mod an Incels sub for example.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Hahahahahhaaha, I'm dying.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Or construction
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Most men are stronger and more athletic than you.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
[Europe’s Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards Failed to Do Much for Women
](http://www.iwf.org/blog/2805872/Europe’s-Gender-Quotas-for-Corporate-Boards-Failed-to-Do-Much-for-Women)
1 not_good_looking 2018-03-13
Are you fucking serious?
1 chadicide 2018-03-13
Yes, those people would have died if they were female.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Who cares if women make less money. Wages have nothing to do with gender.
1 Board_Gaming 2018-03-13
Not all women make less money.
1 frankwashere44 2018-03-13
Not all women work less.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Wha... why did you have to chime in with something totally irrelevant? What's your point?
1 Crackcel 2018-03-13
That's her thing. She makes short brainless comments
1 Cuckfestus69 2018-03-13
hey, i'm really hungry when is our bull going to be ready? you haven't fed me in a few days :(
1 Board_Gaming 2018-03-13
Look around, there's plenty of bull on this sub.
1 boredyeah 2018-03-13
Other men make me sick.
1 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
You mean the cucked men?
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
I really hope the government goes against the free market and mandates that companies pay women more. This will make women more expensive to hire and hopefully result in more jobs for men.
1 hooooot13 2018-03-13
Well a lot of wage gap studies have found that women with the same creditials as a man working the same job as a man are likely to be paid less. What's more, women are less likely to be hired for jobs they are qualified for. Statistics can be a complicated thing so you should remember that what people are often referring to as the wage gap is not that women on average make less money. It's that when compared against men in the same line of work they make less money on average.
1 susifu 2018-03-13
Yes. Exactly this Happened at my university last year
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Those studies usually find a gap of 1-5%. Not 20%. Most of that is because women are bad negotiators. There is bacilli no evidence of discrimination.
1 Lara_the_dog 2018-03-13
Yeah cause you need to prove it yourself. And then you need to ask people how much they make.
1 Yemanthing 2018-03-13
They also leave work to care for the baby.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Its their choice to have a baby and there is literally nothing wrong with raising it. The fact that raising a child is unpaid work is not some sexist conspiracy.
1 Yemanthing 2018-03-13
Wasn't saying that. It contributes to the lower wage. Why would an employer offer raises or give competitive salaries to someone not currently working/will not be for a good 1-5 years, due to pregnancy?
1 giokve 2018-03-13
Women in general are more agreeable than men: Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. That generally makes them bad negotiators. Whether this counts as discrimination or not has been talked about in the Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. It's a highly interesting watch.
1 snorkelbagel 2018-03-13
Being a shitty negotiator doesn’t make it a wage gap. It’s a self-inflicted disability.
If I went to a lot to buy a car at sticker price, it doesn’t mean I was discriminated against. It just means I didn’t apply appropriate leverage.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
The average man works 200+ house more a year than the average woman.
1 Ron_Jeremy6969 2018-03-13
women are property and must be treated as such
1 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
That's true.
0 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Even if the wage gape was real, don't you think that all the vast and numerous privileges that women enjoy would make up for it? I'd gladly take a 25% paycut if I could live life on tutorial mode.
0 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Men literally pay thousands of dollars just to have sex. In some countries something like 80% of men see prostitutes.
0 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Yup, as do I. Taking a paycut of 25% and having free and easy access to sex and relationships would be the best deal I'd have ever taken. You'd be insane as a man to refuse such an offer.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Yeah. But women don't actually get a pay cut (I know you're speaking speculatively, but I wanna get this point across).
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Exactly. They get to have the best of both worlds. The same economic power as men, plus the vast and extreme sexual power as women. How this isn't unfair for men I'll never understand.
1 vvvvvvvvvvv11 2018-03-13
Lol, true.
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
That's not what is meant by that. Which assignment you get in a position is determined by your employer anyway but it used to simply be Same job, less pay.
1 IlliterateAndProud 2018-03-13
Yeah. But women don't actually get a pay cut (I know you're speaking speculatively, but I wanna get this point across).
1 xxgtxy 2018-03-13
Why not? It's the same logic feminists apply to the (supposed) economic power that men have. Men should give up some of their power to make women equal.
Females have vast sexual power over men, they should be made to give up their power and make men equal.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Was your initial argument which is wrong. The wage gap started out as flat out comparing the average salaries of men to the average salaries of women without accounting for the different jobs both genders tend to do. If anyone argues that the wage gap is real they always use this statistic.
1 Hopecel 2018-03-13
Yes, you are right.
You should also try to not be a little condescending bitch.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-03-13
Kids? I'm 32 and many others are also in their late 20s/early 30s (older ones already roped), so unless you are in your 60s, lay off with that.
And if you don't think that people posting feminazi shit on tumblr and reddit do not have real world effect, then you are hypocritical or deluded. Wait, isn't the reason why reddit SJWs want places like the_donald and incels banned 'real world effects'? So alt-right shitposting has real world effects, but regressive left shitposting does not? smh
1 Relax_ItsJustAPhase 2018-03-13
No, not really. Just tired of dumbing it down and explaining everything like to a toddler to people who want to believe gibberish. Feel free to wallow in negativity though, I'll leave you to it and go back to having a laugh in inceltears.
1 CptErection23 2018-03-13
Women, women never changes
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Women also receive more in government benefits than they pay in taxes.
1 Dingus_Incel 2018-03-13
Its their choice to have a baby and there is literally nothing wrong with raising it. The fact that raising a child is unpaid work is not some sexist conspiracy.
1 Idk12344482305 2018-03-13
Glad I can give you enjoyment.