Want some sui fuel? Change the photo to a 8/10. The numbers go up exponentially.

The sad thing is that most of those women will be either ignored or used by the Chads meanwhile us normal looking guys are ignored

Now think of all the boys born within the last decade or so. By the time they grow up, literally everything (including the refinement of your peer-group) will almost entirely be done through internet-enabled technology.

The dating scene of the near future will make getting Tinder matches in 2018 look like a cake-walk.

It's exponentially over for the next generation of incels.

Changing the picture to a 2/10 is even more discouraging. Look at the piglady experiment.

like i keep saying tinder is the ultimate black pill

Tinder just confirms what i thought was happening in the 90's

According to the Pew research center, 5% of current committed relationships are a result of any online dating app, let alone tinder. Tinder is for the beautiful people.

This is something this sub never acknowledges when they worship tinder matches like they are representative of the dating scene.

I had over 200 matches and 500 messages in the first 3 days

Chad

He's not talking about himself lol

Ima brainlet sorry about that

Tell them to send you money for an Uber ride cuz you're broke or something

I'm afraid to do tinder experiments because I think the reality would be way too harsh.

Some "Black Knight" you are.

"But, but, but... meaningless sex is of no value! I want a loving relationship!" said the roastie to the incel.

"But, but, but... a cheap mcdonalds meal is of no value! I want lobster and caviar for dinner!" said the millionaire to the starving kid.

Good analogy +1

Meaningless sex is of no value to someone who isn't interested in it. For others it has great value.

Casual sex is infrequent for the vast majority of people regardless of availability.

my sister who left her husband got on tinder and got all these matches and thought it was cuz she's special. I dropped a truthpill and said that's how it is for all women and she started screaming

ya it sounded like reeeeeeeeeeee

lmao life fuel

Lol screaming what a freak

a common occurrence to be fair

Yeah but the biggest problem is 9 times out of 10 a guy won't show up for a date so what's the point.

If you're at least a 5.5/10, guys will even uber an hour to meet you.

I literally had plans to meet a guy at a hotel 100% just to bone and he flaked the day of. This has been my tinder experience. Glad I don't have to worry about that bullshit anymore.

If you're at least a 5.5/10, guys will even uber an hour to meet you.

Well then you're clearly below average looking or just large.

Nah, I'd say I'm at least a 7 and the only place I am large is in my chest.

lol ok

It's alright, I'm getting laid on the regs now.

Okay?

tits or gtfo

Most people think they are at least 7s...

Cool, most people are.

Well, you can't have most people be above average.

Eh, I don't' look at it that way, I just look at it as a scale.

And what do the numbers on your scale mean?

Just level of attractiveness, not relative to anyone else.

the numbers on the scale depend on who is rating them. as a roastie you can't accurately guage, you only want chad but don't realize it, your brain doesn't decide your tingles do.

I have literally never dated chad, only nerdy guys.

I'm talking scrawny guys with glasses and no muscle definition, sometimes even beer bellies. plays video games and doesn't spend all their time at the gym.

Chads have nice faces. Body type doesn't really matter

ok.

Meaning you have dated Chads.

I mean not by my understanding but what do I know

All Chads have nice faces, and all guys with nice faces are Chads. That's all there is to it

Let's say 7 is "decently attractive, would smash"... and you are talking to one person, who has extremely low standards and finds almost everyone fuckable, and another person, who has extremely high standards and finds 99% of humans disgustingly ugly...

One guy has Danny Devito in mind, the other Chris Pine...

Yeah I guess I'm the guy that would fuck Danny Devito.

So saying that you are a 7 only means that you'd fuck yourself

I guess not!

Not true, nine 10/10s and one 1/10 would give an average of 9.1/10, with 90% above average.

Are you retarded?

I don’t think so:

( (9 x 10) + (1 x 1) ) / 10 = 9.1

9 people above average out of 10.

Yes, you are.

But... maths? Numbers?

Not sure if you are actually brainlet or just autistic about mean vs. median vs. mode...

"above average looking" normally means "better looking than most people"

I understand but in my example the mode, mean and median are all above average.

Bruh I can't tell if you're being serious or not lmao

Either you live in Hollywood or you're reeaaally bad at math. Also I'm gonna go on a whim and say you're actually a 3

Oh, no! When that happens once out of every like 20 solidly arranged dates, it's so sad!

More like 1 out of 20 arranged dates actually happened

Oh no. You had to move on to the next most attractive guy and arrange to bone him instead.

If only!

Not many attractive guys around are there?

Not many guys that actually show up for dates at all.

Whats the point in not showing up

I wish I fucking knew. This is why I quit Tinder months ago even before meeting the guy I am dating.

How did you meet him

Amazingly at a bar which is not how I usually try to meet guys. He actually approached me and it turned out we had tons in common and lots of chemistry

Cool. Did tinder work at all when u tried it

Yeah, maybe I met one guy every three months but it never lead to anything. Unfortunately I had zero success with the girls

Wait are u a guy or a girl

Lol am I playing Pokémon? I’m a girl.

Lol what. Dont get it whoops

It’s a meme. When you start any Pokémon game the professor asks you “are you a boy or a girl?” The joke being you are standing right in front of him so he should be able to tell.

Oh lol. Dunno how i never came across that

Masssssssive problem honeyyyyyyyy!!!!!!

Just remember, this means you are facing 32:1 odds of getting a relationship.

Matches mean nothing. I hadn’t had many myself but I’ve read on some German PUA forum for a popular online dating app that some guys would get 30 matches a day but only 1 in 20 or 30 would respond. Now if 1/30 responds, how many are actually going to set up a date and meet you? It’s over if you ain’t Chad.

That's the guys perspective, from a womans perspective, she has matches, and likely messages, from a larger number of men.

Do you think tinder is how most people meet?

Try making a fake chad account. It’s even far worse. You get messages by 4/10s that think they are entitled to you. Sadly enough chads actually fuck them.

I did this roughly 5 years ago, on OKCupid. Tinder wasn’t a year old yet. Same thing really; average looking mid 20’s pic with a purposeful ambiguous profile. I think OKC puts new profiles toward the front, or maybe it can be filtered as such. The number of messages was insane for the first two days, like once every 10 minutes. After a week it tapered off and averaged out to one message every 20 minutes. Only a handful were the same guy, and not nearly as many were straight up sexual.

On a positive note, 99% of men out there have no chance. I feel like “it’s all about face” because as a whole men have nothing to say. Why would anyone expect a response with just “hey” or “what’s up”? You’re definitely going to get nexted for someone better looking who also just said “hey” or “what’s up”, because that’s all she has to go on.

Then again, bitches don’t use these apps to actually meet anyone. Over 70% of millennial users (people under 30) have actually used Tinder to meet someone. They’re only there for the validation. Plus your awesome opener and carefully tailored profile and perfect pics could just get lost in the deluge.

Why would anyone expect a response with just “hey” or “what’s up”?

Females always say don’t say “hey”. They say use a funny, unique opener but when they message Chad it’s always “hey”. Fucking hypocrites.

Men and women aren’t the same, so the rules don’t apply equally. For instance, if you send a woman unsolicited nudes it’s probably a crime. If she does it it’s a welcome invitation to fuck.

That's because the guys won't filter her out because of a non-funny opener

When they message Chad they open with "wow you're hot 😍" or "heyyy cutie"

If you're good looking you can afford to be less interesting. That doesn't mean it isn't good advice to try something a bit more gripping than 'hey' if you're just average. If all the messages a woman gets are just a greeting then of course she'll go for the most attractive one.

If all the messages a woman gets are just a greeting then of course she'll go for the most attractive one.

What does it mean "of course she'll go for the most attractive one"? Every single person has a unique personality and isn't that what people favor the most? Why doesn't she just respond the anyone randomly and picks out the most attractive one? Why do attractive people receiver different treatment? It's all just wasted time to handcraft personal first messages based on her bio or her pics. There was an incel who matched with a girl on his Chadfish and his regular account. To the Chad she was like bring lube when you come to my home and to the incel she's like "I'm not having sex on first dates.". Why are females so god damn hypocritical?

Over 70% of millennial users (people under 30) have actually used Tinder to meet someone.

It's the opposite. In a survey of 1000 college age females 70% of the women surveyed stated that they had never met up with a single guy off the app. They use that shit purely for an ego boost, it's like drugs for women.

It triggers the same part of the brain thst getting checked out does for women. I.e. ecstacy

That 70% is quite a telling number, but also it's important to remember that the 1000 sample size is only representative of that specific college campus in that specific state/city and nothing else. This does not mean that 70% of people on tinder never meet, and this does not mean 70% of all women on college campuses do not meet.

That number could very well be 10% at another campus or 100%.

Not to mention, the 1000 sample size was quite big, but how many times was it sampled? They could survey another 1000 different people and get a completely different result.

Basically, though statistics can tell a pretty good story, take statistics with one or two grains of salt

A good amount of females probably lied too because they don’t want to appear like sluts.

Did this on a dating website. Plenty of fish i think it was. Anyway over 1000 messages in 3 to 4 days. She was a legit 8/10 with big tits and ass. Its so easy for woman nowadays.

This is the reason sub 8 males get ghosted 24/7 by femoids. Tutorial mode kicks in and they have hundreds of matches in a matter of days.

Should i go on a date with Chad,Brad,Brian or Tyler its like being at a casino where your always up your chasing the billions while soyboy numales get 2 matches per month.

It's playing Little Big Planet with cheats.

Lmao bruh

Its outlandishly ridiculous yup

Reminds me of that book called Night about Jews during the holocaust.

In one part a ton of Jews were on a Nazi transport train, and for fun the Nazis threw the starving malnourished Jews a piece of bread into the crowd prompting them to fight and murder one another for the bread.

Men are like that on Tinder, but why? Why is average to hot pussy (a biological resource and addiction like heroin) so scarce, therefore inflating the value exponentially? There is definitely a biological component, but this seems like it's greatly enhanced.

Why is average to hot pussy (a biological resource and addiction like heroin) so scarce, therefore inflating the value exponentially?

Only young women are hot and interesting for men and all men ,from young to old, are competing for those prime women. It's a simple demand and supply issue.

I think there is a shortage of attractive women because of the obesity epidemic. 70% of women in America are overweight and like 40% obese. Fat isn't attractive to most men and a only a minority of women aren't fat, so that creates scarcity.

Who is pro-fat? Feminists and powerful fast food and restaurant chains - the latter is like big tobacco. Combine that with making it politically incorrect for women to be thin and attractive to men, and you have a lot of fat enablers. To be fat to these fanatics is equivalent to bra burning, it's a rebellion against patriarchy and sexual objectification. While men on the other hand have no problem shaping their personalities, behavior, and body to be as attractive to women as possible.

I'm not in the us, women and people in general are not fat here. Women are still a rare commodity. Might be that we are importing millions and millions of young men and skewing the gender ratio into the extreme though, idk.

Depends on the country. The UK is just as bad as America I think when it comes to obesity.

Chads sees numerous women, if one man takes two women in a 50/50 male/female population, half of men are left with nothing. Increase the male population and the number becomes greater; then consider obesity rates and the situation is very dire. Social unrest is inevitable in such climates. Monogamy was a system that was supposed to prevent Chad (usually rich powerful men with harems) from hogging up all the female resources via polygyny, but that seems to be a thing of the past considering apps like Tinder and no fault divorce.

relates Holocaust to an idiotic dating app

Just imagine...whenever you look at any femoid, realize how much dick she has probably taken. You know how when you're horny, you go on pornhub and watch some porn and fap? Girls just go on tinder and actually order a real, breathing guy to come over and fuck them.

Yo how much did the trampoline cost?

You know it's true, faggot.

I don't know which part of your comment jumps to a further and wronger conclusion;

• You, laughably believing that all women don't masturbate (?) and instead "order a Chad whenever they want to get off";
  

-The pathetic illustration of women who have sex as soulless whores who just can't keep a singke partner cuz duh! obviously they gonna sleep around!1!

-Whatever mental gymnastics you did there to somehow link your lonesome ass not getting any to Democrats brainwashing people and "destroying families"

-Or maybe the (again, extremely wrong and easily proven so) claim that rich people are somehow more faithful, as if cases of famous people hooking around/buying high-class escorts/prostitutes/just straight out cheating isn't extremely common (didn't a certain president pay about 100K to a certain pornstar to hush a one night stand? But sure, it's always the Dems isn't it)

But hey sure! It's someone's agenda you're not getting any, isn't it?

I never said women don't masturbate. I was insinuating that for a lot of women, it is just as easy for them to get the real thing as it is for us to stream porn.

Famous people are not the wealthy ones I was talking about. Your idea of wealth is poisoned by hollywood. Do you think Bill Gates sleeps around? Do you think his daughter does?

Wake up, you fucking liberals.

I was insinuating that for a lot of women, it is just as easy for them to get the real thing as it is for us to stream porn

You do realize that's also true for a majority/big % of guys, and not just Chads, too, right? Like, what's your point.... that people have sex when they want to? Lol...

Do you think Bill Gates sleeps around? Do you think his daughter does?

From everything I know about Bill, he seems like a sensible guy, so I don't really see him -or his daughter, I guess?- cheating, but once again this proves absolutely nothing - I can think of dozens of people with less than 0,0001% of Bill's money who also wouldn't sleep around. So, again, people cheat sometimes! Big revelation, I guess?

You mentioned Trump.

I did, not because I care about him in the slightest but because he contradicts your earlier statements of "You'll notice that the extremely wealthy and successful are generally a lot more chaste, only dating within their circles", circles which he surely has some trouble keeping himself into. Purely an example, regardless of whatever conspiracy theories you hold against him.

So what's the reality we gotta wake up to? Some girls hook up? And the people in this sub don't? Like, isn't that the entire point of the sub?

P.S. the argument about moral degradation is very, very tired. Without fail, the previous generation complains about the perversion of the young, the sexual deviancy, the moral corruption... Only for everyone to turn out just fine. It's been going on since the 1800's and it's a bit of a repetitive charade.

I mean, if I speak in generalities, and you show me specific counterexamples, that won't negate my point. If you want to argue semantics, then I will say "Many" or "Most", rather than all. The point still stands.

And people haven't turned out just fine. In fact, you can very clearly see that while our government has grown bigger and spending has increased, test scores have remained the same while standards have dropped, divorce rates have increased, depression rates are up, privacy laws and freedom have been degraded, and we can see the US is no longer the most economically free state in the world.

Like many rooted in liberal rhetoric, you want to ignore the trends in favor of your narrative. For example, blacks, on average commit disproportionately more crime than asians in the US. Not all blacks are criminals, but the trend still holds.

I'm going to have to preface this comment by explicitly saying I'm not from the US - I frankly didn't think the convo would turn so political in nature when the original point was women phoning up Chads to get some.

I'll give a second opening comment and say, you can't seriously expect me to believe all these wild claims being thrown left and right, can you? "Most guys will have 5-8 partners over the course of their lives." cool number right there, absolutely arbitrary I'm guessing.... moving on.

Some shit about the US government I strangely find myself in agreement with (though I certainly don't hold your views on the cause of these issues), and then "blacks, on average commit disproportionately more crime than asians in the US" what? Why you think this (yet again unsourced) claim can be relevant to the discussion is beyond me.

I'm not going to complain about unsourced BS claims a third time - oh, hold on, I am! But the thing that I don't get, the single thing that doesn't make sense, is who can possibly benefit from this imaginary complot to get women to have sex out of wedlock. Is it a feminist behind-the-scenes nation leader who just wants all women to sexually enjoy themselves? Is it the lizard people, conducting more and more research on human intercourse and breeding? Just who comes out winning out of a higher divorce rate?

On a more serious note, I want to address the fundamental problem I've seen with this sub; you're way too gullible and believing of just about any theory or explanation which shifts the blame away from yourself. It's not that you're fundamentally unlikeable, it's surely the femoids who go after Chads and leave us white knights behind! It's not that society is coming to healthier terms with relationships, it's all a plot to attack the nuclear family! Like, seriously - sometimes things just aren't that deep.

One more thing! Just because you think some girls like to sleep with a lot of guys doesn't make it true. I love how you say me pointing out specific instances isn't going to negate your points, yet all your generalities can't make a single strong point together. Again, some girls sleep around, some guys sleep around, it actually tends to average out between popular boys and girls (and also between unpopular boys and girls). This sub's conception of every guy but themselves as Chads and every single woman as a femoid slut who can't keep her pants on for god's sake is quite frankly puzzling and borderline ridiculous.

A simple google search will confirm the numbers I stated. This isn't an academic paper, and I'm not going to waste my time citing everything. Google "race and homicide statistics." Google "average number of sexual partners." It's really not hard to do, so if that is your line of attack, it's weak as hell.

If you are going to make me dig up sources, I will, but this is ridiculous. Just google it. It's all, to my knowledge, true.

Now you are strawmanning me and talking about lizard people and shit. I explained how there is a very real agenda and you can see it in the trend. Not sure why it is so hard to believe. I am not to blame for the degeneracy of society, so I don't see how I am trying to shift any blame from myself.

It absolutely does not average out. Women are, on average more promiscuous than men. This is due to the fact that there is greater sexual inequality in men. (A greater proportion of men remain virgins than women. A small, but significant portion of men, who we refer to as Chads, bang hundreds or thousands of women.)

What's the source for Chads banging hundreds or thousands of women? It's hard to Google that since "Chad" isn't exactly recognized as a formal scientific term.

LOL now you're just nitpicking semantics, but I'll bite. Gene Simmons of kiss claims to have bedded over a thousand women. Wilt Chamberlain claimed to as well. There are several other extremely elite and famous people who claim to have bedded hundreds. Obviously, these are all claims which have not been scientifically tested. This doesn't mean they are lying. We know Genghis Khan fathered thousands of children based on DNA evidence. You guys are resorting to semantic disputes while not addressing the core point of what I am saying.

Hooking up takes way too much effort

Stuff like this is why incels aren't taken seriously - and that's a shame. Women have an easier time with online dating, and that's a valid point, but the vast majority of women have far fewer partners than you're making out here. All you're doing is undermining the actual useful point with absurdities.

lol Sure thing cuck. Whatever she tells you, multiply by 3. Have you seen the number of femoids on tinder? Chad is getting sex from someone.

Yeah, Chads are getting sex sonewhere. Generally with the kind of people that enjoy casual sex. I know a few; like girls that have had dozens of one night stands but no real relationships.

Most girls will try a ONS then decide it isn't for them. Hell, that's true for men as well. I've done it only once and hated it. It's just not the same if you lack that emotional connection.

Nah roast beef is real alright

Sounds like cope to me.

Sounds like cope to me.

Cope harder

I'm doing fine, thanks.

Huh you're straying even further from baseline incels. And I'm the disgusting one

It's all true boyo.

Yeah but you typing it like that make you sound like some kind of left wing conspiracy nut. Your views are very unpopular

They would be unpopular since they aren't liberal, and most people are liberals. But if you think about what I am saying, and look at media trends, you will see that it is all true.

Idk man that seems a bit out there. But the hell do I know, I'm not even a us citizen yet

Just keep an open mind and think about it. Look at how media has changed. Look at what kind of things are being promoted as normal to kids. They have 6 year olds singing along to "Side to side", a song about getting fucked so hard you can't walk. Look at the GoT tv show. How is that obscenity allowed on TV? A show like that would never be allowed on the air 60 years ago. Don't act dumb.

You can fuck off.

Wincel is correct.

He still sound like a conspiracy theorist. But hey maybe he got it right all along

This really just opened my fuckin eyes

Glad someone understands. Remember that there is an agenda being pushed.

I see your perspective, but this isn’t entirely true. There are a lot of gorgeous women out there that don’t just sleep around. Just because it’s available to them doesn’t mean they all just fuck a dude when they’re horny.

I personally have met a ton of girls that only sleep with dudes they actually enjoy being around. I’m considered to be a pretty attractive dude (even been called a Chad 😂) and if I wanted to I could sleep with a lot of girls but after you do it, it’s not as interesting. I’d rather jerk off than fuck some random girl (of course alcohol changes that).

Now that I’ve been with attractive girls ive started to just realize that sex is really just sex, because once you forge an actual relationship with someone it genuinely does become more than just sex.

Again, not all but many or possibly most. It is human nature to want to fuck. Women on tinder can and do have casual sex. It's absurd to think women aren't using tinder. A LOT of women use online dating for hookups, and yes, they absolutely are fucking. Most humans prefer to fuck rather than masturbate, so it makes sense.

Thwre may be exceptions, but it would be irrational to think that most women aren't doing this. Again, Chad has to be fucking someone. People are having a lot of sex.

Again I absolutely see what point you are making but in my opinion I think the numbers you are putting out there are a lot lower in reality.

In reality, any girl that is worth your time isn’t just hooking up with dudes when they’re horny.

Another thing to think about is does it even matter if a girl slept with a few dudes? Like after the sex happened why does it matter? If a girl was ready to commit herself to you and fall in love with you, would you deny that because she had sex with a number of people over the span of her life prior to meeting you?

I realize it hurts the narrative and it is a tough pill to swallow, but horny women absolutely do go out and fuck men, many of them Chads. You would be shocked. To a lot of women, it's "just sex" and they will go right home and play wifey or gf. It definitely does happen, and more often than you want to believe, thanks to the existence of online dating.

I absolutely would deny a woman for that reason. I am a virgin, and I expect the same or something near it from my partner. If she were in a committed relationship, and he cheated or died, and this happened maybe 2 or 3 times, I might excuse it. A girl with a 10+ kill count likely has no excuse.

Ohhhhhh I see from your perspective. Sex was a lot more important to me when I was virgin.

For most generations prior to the most recent three, people generally remained virgins until marriage.

if an insanely gorgeous, absolute smoke show walked into your room and wanted to fuck on the spot, would you do it?

Not without more information, but when I was a young teenager, yes. And that is the problem. A lot of young women who don't know any better go on these dating sites and end up banging Chads when they get very horny.

I believe that it happens a lot, but dude women have done that shit forever. Like in the 70s bitches would just go to bars and pick up dudes.

I agree that this is a thing that is happening, but I guess I’m just seeing it from my stance of really not caring if someone’s had sex. If someone’s recently had a crazy number of sexual partners then no, I’m not interested in starting a relationship there because clearly she isn’t ready for that sort of thing. I had my stage of life where my number went really high, I’m sure a lot of girls have that stage too.

Prior to the '60's VERY few people had hookups.

Casual sex is not good for society.

Shekelstein, lmfao

I once helped a girl set up an online dating account for fun. She received 700 matches in one week. I had been on it for a year and had just reached 80.

I was PMing with a girl here on Reddit and she swore on her life that "guys don't really like her" and "she's not attractive enough etc" all that. She let me use her pics, and I made a Tinder profile for her, location based in my hometown. This was the result.

Told this above average looking chick to make a Tinder, would likely get 100 matches pretty quick. Within 2 days, she got a notification from Tinder telling her she just received her 1000th swipe.

I was smiling and reading through this thread.

I clicked your photo. My eyes just gazed at it and my smile just vanished off the face of the universe.

4,000. Over three months I got one match and she didn't respond.

This is about a months worth of likes. I used Tinder gold to see the specific likes and so I could set a different location (because I’m in South Korea and she’s in the US).

I set the location as my hometown, which is about 20-ish minutes away from Chicago. I wanted the experiment to simulate her situation since she lives in Los Angeles. I also want to add that she is average (not in a bad way), she isn’t a super model or anything by any means, she’s cute, but average.

I also want to add that she is average (not in a bad way), she isn’t a super model or anything by any means, she’s cute, but average.

Dude, this just sounds like an atomic black pill waiting to be shown. Especially if you're just using an average looking chick.

But I understand it'd be a bad idea to show her pics.

I’m in South Korea

;) Your secret is safe with me. Yes, it shore is.

This was the result.

I want to jump off my office building.

It's not women's fault that their sexual value is so high. Supply and demand people...

Yeah I downloaded Tinder once and got a tonne of matches. Supply and demand tbh. That's all I can say.

I play on my daughter's PlayStation account and I witnessed this first hand with horny males wanting to chat

So yeap, we, women get 100 creeps sending us texts "hey wanna fuck" or going on to dates (almost never get an actual date invite) which follow 2 scenarios: a. we fuck - he disappears b. we don't fuck - he disappears. This is so much fun! I love it! My dating life has never been better! So easy and so amazing! Really? Ffs

Meanwhile, last year, I got 70 women saying at most "hi" and none of them ended up wanting to even go out on a date in the first place.

Much less kiss or fuck or anything else really.

I never got a chance to not disappear. But sure put all men in the same pot.

I have about 4 years of statistics. Not sure if that counts as stronger evidence, and yet, lol. All men here all women in the same pot "looks are important", "they want a tall guy", "go to the gym". Which is not accurate either.

Wrong. 85% of those guys send actual, personalized messages, but you ignore them because they are sub8.

what's sub8? i never ignore anyone, a habit of mine: replying to all texts I get. plus, i normally text myself, kind of even asking out myself if im in a mood. its just really, i believe that most people look for hookups online. we have a group with girls - we all get texts from the same guys, texting us at the same time even, saying same things. hard to believe there is real interest when they are multitasking like that - all of us girls have nothing in common in terms of appearance/personalities. Basically, guys dont care. As long as they get laid, I guess. I sound bitter lol

Guys text different girls because guys have a wide range of taste in women, unlike women who only want Chad.

Logical fallacy.

Established truth.

I had a friend who downloaded tinder and then deleted it because she was getting way too many creepy messages. Sure they're personalized, but they're all about how they want to sniff their feet or some shit

IM A MALE AND HAVE 250 MATCHES ON TINDER. only 2 dates and 1 gf out of it though. im a 6/10 at most.

Why tf you lyin (8)

just checked again. I was wrong its 216 matches.

When I was on tinder I had 2000 matches in 8 months.

You guys are such hypocritical cry-babies.

You're bitching that "Aw, poor women, they get so many matches and they don't know how worthless they are in reality !", but if YOU would get as many matches, you wouldn't think that you're worthless either, would you ? ;)

lol ok

tits or gtfo

Most people think they are at least 7s...

I mean not by my understanding but what do I know

I wish I fucking knew. This is why I quit Tinder months ago even before meeting the guy I am dating.

You know it's true, faggot.

For most generations prior to the most recent three, people generally remained virgins until marriage.