I meant from their perspective. All those women are say "oh I'd totally date you, you're great" or otherwise tell you you're a good guy (nobody's ever told me I'm a bad person) don't ever actually have to live up to those words and take you out on a date.
Why do you guys insist so much on "Face is everything"? In my personal experience ugly tall guys pick more chicks than handsome short ones, or at least the same. Pretty and short guys tend to come out as too girly.
If anything I would say height and face are more or less even in importance.
Technically if they lived on an island with limited resources the smaller dude would be more fit. Survival of the fittest implies someone is “best fit for a particular environment” it does not inherently mean strong or big...
That’s not necessarily true either. You could say that the guy on the left is most well adapted for this particular environment (modern industrial world) if there is a consensus that his body type is the best for sexual selection. Certain women are going to want a smaller dude though it is all preference. However, there’s more to human adaptation than just physical appearance, like what is their mental health? If there were a famine would the larger guy be fucked at needing additional resources to stay alive? Perhaps he could return to “might is right”. It all depends on what the particular environment is like. Everyone is uniquely adapted for different types of niches in the same environment. For example, a musician or athlete have carved themselves unique niches which cater to their particular adaptations. I’m a non aggressive person, so I become suicidal when considering corruption in the world and injustice. The person with antisocial personality disorder is probably better adapted than I am in that regard.
34 comments
1 Dusty715 2018-03-12
Same age? No way.
1 fuckin_kiddin_me_rn 2018-03-12
One could be 7', the other 4'. It's possible
1 GuyFromDaStore 2018-03-12
One of them will be spreading his genes to the next generation, one won't.
1 AbuIncelAlAustrali 2018-03-12
I still bet a roastie is going to comment they prefer the right because he is more cute teehee
1 Yemanthing 2018-03-12
Good thing they never have to actually go through with it.
1 PeppyHydra 2018-03-12
It's not though, is it?
That would be the literal solution to inceldom.
1 Yemanthing 2018-03-12
I meant from their perspective. All those women are say "oh I'd totally date you, you're great" or otherwise tell you you're a good guy (nobody's ever told me I'm a bad person) don't ever actually have to live up to those words and take you out on a date.
1 theOriginalDeVito 2018-03-12
I doubt that
1 rubbish_everywhere 2018-03-12
Holy shit. Put this up in the mog hall of fame along with the STEM chad + ricecel
1 changeIsTheWay 2018-03-12
How short is the guy on the right?
1 superman1145 2018-03-12
If your height begins with a number less than 5 you don't even classify as a guy anymore this is truecel territory
1 changeIsTheWay 2018-03-12
Cope.
Face is everything. But yeah, if you have a below average face, a shit height will just be fuel to the fire.
1 superman1145 2018-03-12
Bro, face can compensate for 5'6 5'7 etc. but this guy is sub 5 ft, literally no hope at that point
1 changeIsTheWay 2018-03-12
Ah yeah. He def seems like 4'10"-4'11".
I didn't read your comment completely lmfao.
1 EvilBananaManRD 2018-03-12
Why do you guys insist so much on "Face is everything"? In my personal experience ugly tall guys pick more chicks than handsome short ones, or at least the same. Pretty and short guys tend to come out as too girly.
If anything I would say height and face are more or less even in importance.
1 changeIsTheWay 2018-03-12
Tall average looking guys maybe. But never y’all ugly guys.
1 Rafique020902 2018-03-12
that guy on the right is way too short.
1 KhalilYousuf3 2018-03-12
should be no problem according to IncelTears
Science says otherwise though
1 opsecincels 2018-03-12
Holy shit wasn't ready for that blackpill
1 nejigsk 2018-03-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbBcxOcoZ_4
JFL
1 crash11235 2018-03-12
Also probably has a shit-tier personality
1 gnair3 2018-03-12
I’m 6” lol but I’m still a subhuman? Height doth not an incel make.
1 xtsv 2018-03-12
Being NT is all that matters.
1 dontcomplain1 2018-03-12
1 Treyspurlock 2018-03-12
your point is?
1 Coconuthead93 2018-03-12
6"1 vs 5"11
1 Dellarie 2018-03-12
Manlet facemogs him, not that it makes any difference though
1 iQ9k 2018-03-12
Are you fucking high
1 random1234lol 2018-03-12
the guy on the right reminds me of myself
jfl
1 YuffieKisaragi 2018-03-12
Wood not smash either of them to be honest
1 alonelybirb 2018-03-12
G e n e t i c s
1 raywilliam639 2018-03-12
Survival of the fittest
1 Skyvoid 2018-03-12
Technically if they lived on an island with limited resources the smaller dude would be more fit. Survival of the fittest implies someone is “best fit for a particular environment” it does not inherently mean strong or big...
1 rest_me123 2018-03-12
Survival of the most adapted.
1 Skyvoid 2018-03-12
That’s not necessarily true either. You could say that the guy on the left is most well adapted for this particular environment (modern industrial world) if there is a consensus that his body type is the best for sexual selection. Certain women are going to want a smaller dude though it is all preference. However, there’s more to human adaptation than just physical appearance, like what is their mental health? If there were a famine would the larger guy be fucked at needing additional resources to stay alive? Perhaps he could return to “might is right”. It all depends on what the particular environment is like. Everyone is uniquely adapted for different types of niches in the same environment. For example, a musician or athlete have carved themselves unique niches which cater to their particular adaptations. I’m a non aggressive person, so I become suicidal when considering corruption in the world and injustice. The person with antisocial personality disorder is probably better adapted than I am in that regard.