Messages received after 4 months on fake profiles

54  2018-03-08 by RedOranges12

82 comments

Source:

http://jonmillward.com/blog/attraction-dating/cupid-on-trial-a-4-month-online-dating-experiment/

Let the results speak for itself. At the end the author goes on a beta tangent talking about how "men and women have different obstacles" because having more options is worse than having little to no options apparently

In the end men and women probably do have it about equal, it’s just a bit differentfor (sic) each.

It's like staring at 2 + 2 = 4, complete with multiple proofs laid out in neat pictographs showing that yes, two plus two equals four, and then coming up with "Two plus two equals tomato!"

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Four. I suppose there are four. I would see five if I could. I am trying to see five.'

'Which do you wish: to persuade me that you see five, or really to see them?'

'Really to see them.'

'Again,' said O'Brien.

The true hallmark of a numale cuck is defying solid data in order to not hurt muh wimmins' feelings

Why is it so taboo to just admit women have it so much easier in terms of dating?

Women get to pick, men have to settle with who picks them. That's dating. How does denying this help them?

the rich force feminism on us to divide and conquer and keep themselves from being guillotined. any facts that disprove their propaganda gets denied.

I'm pretty new here. Is that a widely held belief? I'm not doubting, but if you have the time I'd be interested in hearing an example or two.

"The rich force [whatever] on us to divide and conquer" is definitely believable. I guess I'm just curious how feminism would help achieve those goals. Just more chaos?

it ruins lives of regular men making them more focused on their depression and anxiety than overthrowing the rich

who pushes feminism? women? No, the MSM media. Who controls it. 6 rich guys.

who pushes feminism? women? No, the MSM media. Who controls it. 6 rich guys.

https://m.imgur.com/gallery/ixSdAMb

If men didn't have to devote a large portion of their lives this day in age to be sexually satisfied, the globalists would be gone pretty fast.

Well, they do. It's because we are the hunters. That's just how it is. Take some pride in the hunt.

Because it hurts the ego of men who constantly have zero luck on the platform. Surely it's not this easy for the opposite sex... right? Why won't anyone give me action?

It's like Bill Gates explaining to a homeless person that he shouldn't want to be a billionaire because you pay more taxes. Ridiculous.

JFL, those two women are not even stacy level and yet their inbox is full.

Meanwhile a fat whale with pasty skin is getting as much matches as a chadlite male. The second dude on the right is not even incel tier and he only got 2 messages lmfao, it's so over.

Comparing numbers without knowing the male/female ratio of users LUL. Of course women tend to have way more matches because most users are dudes

Valid point. But this still clearly shows that in online dating women receive a LOT more attention than males do and that even guys aren't necessarily ugly get passed up.

more blackpills. women don't even need to use dating apps cuz they get hit on by chad in the wild

k

women don't even need to use dating apps cuz they get hit on by chad in the wild

I'm not chad and I hit on women while out and about, I get decent success, confidence + interests = success.

Looks aren't everything, sure they count but as long as you display confidence, can hold an interesting conversation and don't look like a hobo, you'll be okay.

That shows even moreso that women can get partners whenever they want, and that normies are desperate to beta bux

Most dating sites have an almost equal ratio of females to males.

and how many of them are fake accounts made by you faggots ? xd

You seem like an incel in denial.

ofc, my cel name is killyourcelf

Given the frequency of posts about them - a tiny fraction.

But sure, grab desperately at excuses - you make a great show.

Lmao blaming me of making up excuses on a sub whose sole purpose is to find excuses for why stacies don't want to suck your micro penis is kinda big dont you think ?

Whether or not it's appropriate for me to blame you for making excuses is irrelevant. It's still a fact that you're making excuses and talking about something you have no knowledge of.

So how are you guys qualified to talk about women all day long ? After all you're talking about something you have no knowledge of.

So you just implied that the only way for someone to know anything about women is to fuck women, essentially reducing women's humanity, women's lives, women's feelings, experiences and pretty much everything else, to just their vaginas.

Holy shit you ITers have some fucked up views.

Nope didn't say that, but if you can't notice your own hipocrisy I can't help you

I never claimed you said that, moron.

So you just implied that..

same thing, how fucking dense are you ?

Women gain their power from men with no restraint. Men should shake things up by collectively agreeing to stop approaching women.

Now filter out all the terrible nonsense, bots, sexual proposals.

When you filter out the bots, the two ugly guys that got messages would be 0. The more attractive guys would probably be halved. With the women even if you filtered out everything you mentioned, even if it's 75%, the women still have way more. And who's to say they don't want sexual proposals? Plenty of women have jumped on Chad's cock that way

Yeah, no.

I think you meant that he's right and you have no arguments.

Cool argument bro

Couldn’t this just be cultural though. From the early movies about romance etc., it was always the mans job to make the first step. One of the best looking guys from this list has about as many messages as the least attractive girls, isn’t this prove enough

It still is but the problem is it had gone from something relevant about their interests to "muh dik" from chads and the latter working every time.

that's not just from movies it is basic biology

Obviously, but throwing around words like biology in an incel sub is dangerous lol

neo. where are you at?!

Online dateing for men is like looking for what moves ya , sort of speak, for women it how much are u worth and what gets them wet, or what u can do that they cannot, and if u can mutitask and fk .

Men are significantly thirstier than women? This isn't exactly new.

Teehee I'll go on a dating site, post seductive pics and write a profile saying I want to be treated right and post my IG so I get followers. All I want is to feel wanted because I'm a girl and I can get it anytime. Those stupid incels have no right to feel that way

/u/board_gaming is a liar. She claimed that she couldn't get dates on OKCupid and said that only Stacey's can yet the data says otherwise.

More proof that every woman who isn't in a relationship is volcel including BBW_Gaming

I'm not a liar. I didn't get any dates from OkCupid. I've already told the story about my OkCupid disaster.

Explain how even the unattractive women got more matches than the Chad used in the experiment.

Because men are expected to be the one to initiate conversation and are the ones who actively pursue women. That’s simply our culture, that is not to say more women were not attracted to the men, just simply that they wouldn’t initiate talking. Also consider there are way more men on these websites. Really it’s simple but you just want confirmation bias on why you can’t date

All of those points prove why board_gaming has no excuses

God leave her be lol

Tinder: 50/50 split Match: 60% female Bumble: 59% female

Coffee meets bagel: 58% female Okcupid: 50% female Hinge: 30% female

Does dick size matter?

Not to me.

MODS!!

???

Told them all No?

You didn't read it, I presume.

Yeah, the story about how you made an OkCupid profile, didn't like any of the guys it matched you with, and deleted your profile to make sure none of them can message you.

That's not true and you know it. You keep telling lies about me to attempt to discredit me.

Which part of it isn't true?

  • OkCupid doesn't (or didn't when I used it), match people with each other. It showed a match percentage. I specifically messaged a guy with a 99% match percentage even though his bio was negative.

  • I didn't delete my profile because I didn't want guys to message me. I deleted it because I wasn't having any success and thought I'd try again after I lost weight.

Wordplay and a blatant excuse. I get why you usually keep your replies so flat and brief - unlike other ITers you must know that you're not intelligent enough to be subtle or smart. But this time you just couldn't resist, could you.

You're assuming you have any "credit" on this sub. You've done plenty to discredit yourself.

Well, it's true that she didn't get any dates on OkCupid - she rejected three guys and deleted her profile.

Just lol the Tom Cruise lookalike can't get more than thirty eight matches. It's over.

Even chad can only get 38 messages

they made the profiles of the women have really good personality obviously

Yeah, that's the blackpill. Now gulp it down with a whisky chaser. So what does that prove? It proves that cute young girls are overwhelmed with attention and have to find a basis for making a choice. Warren Farrel pointed that out 30 years ago in his blockbuster "Why Men Are the Way They Are".

All hot women are inundated with attention from thirsty losers. So who do hot women look for? Guys who aren't thirsty losers. Wouldn't you? My mother always used to tell me that "beautiful girls are a dime a dozen". You know what? She was right. They are. There are way more cute girls than masculine men.

Those very numbers prove something very important, that 99% of all men are thirsty losers. So if the world is full of cute girls and nearly every guy is a thirsty loser, guess what? Stop being a thirsty loser and you jump to the top 1% of men. Okay, time to head out and ignore cute women. It's like taking candy from a baby :-)

10/10 satire

men generally approach women not the other way around. This is a norm in our society. This only proves that men approach women more and nothing more.

Its almost as if there are more men on tinder than women. gasp

why is that exactly? there should be roughly the same number of men and women who are single, do half of single women have 0 interest in dating or just meet guys elsewhere

Most women dont go on tinder. Its a hookup app. Most women dont want to just hook up.

Most women dont want to just hook up.

nice slut shaming

lul wut.

lul wut. i cant tell if this is a meme. nothing wrong with being a slut. both genders do it. Im just speaking the truth.

lul wut. i cant tell if this is a meme. nothing wrong with being a slut. both genders do it. Im just speaking the truth.

truth: casual sex is normal for most women outside saudi

Most women don't need an app to find casual sex if they want it

Most single women don't go on Tinder. When it's raining men, why bothering using an app? The Tinder user base is over 60% male profiles.

Then some female profiles are fakes (incels gathering data). Some female profiles are just for self-esteem (getting a lot of messages to feel better, without intention of dating). Some are bots. Many are inactive.

i wish men werent so thirsty. we might be making some progress if we werent

In the end men and women probably do have it about equal, it’s just a bit differentfor (sic) each.

It's like staring at 2 + 2 = 4, complete with multiple proofs laid out in neat pictographs showing that yes, two plus two equals four, and then coming up with "Two plus two equals tomato!"

The true hallmark of a numale cuck is defying solid data in order to not hurt muh wimmins' feelings

It's like Bill Gates explaining to a homeless person that he shouldn't want to be a billionaire because you pay more taxes. Ridiculous.

All of those points prove why board_gaming has no excuses

Tinder: 50/50 split Match: 60% female Bumble: 59% female

Coffee meets bagel: 58% female Okcupid: 50% female Hinge: 30% female