No, it isn't. Any study or survey will tell you that this is wildly outside the norm. I've only met three people with a partner count above 20. One of them was manic depressive and had tons of random sex when she was in her manic phases. She's now getting married and is monogamous.
He's probably just happy to be a betabux or isn't aware of her vagina mileage. Poor guy will one day come home tired from work only to find chad deep inside her beef flaps.
That is a very real scenario and not an exaggeration, unfortunately. The woman has bipolar. Just go read up on bipolar and their relationship to sex and promiscuity. It's over for that beta bux buddy boyo.
I'm a white knight for trying to understand this convoluted, nonsensical logic? If it all makes so much sense you'd think it'd be so easy to explain and shut me up for good.
But you can't even answer basic, obvious questions about your claims.
Just like everywhere in life, there are different opinions regarding different social aspects of life.
Yes, it takes much bigger effort for a man to be a slut, unless they've naturally rolled the genetic lottery for sexual appeal and even then it differs from person to person.
Yes, it's much easier for a woman to be promiscuous because there's a much bigger demand for women than there are for men. I personally don't think that women deserve scorn for promiscuity but it just speaks volumes about the woman's character. But hey, that's just me, what do I know?
As a man you have to actually put shit tons of work to get laid, whereas a an ugly fat femoid slut doesn‘t even have to do anything but being lazy. There will always be horny males she can have sex with.
But people in this community don't just "not praise" female sluts. They actively insult them. They're considered worthless, diseased, disgusting. But the same doesn't apply to men.
If having sex with 30 people makes you a gross, used up piece of meat then why would we praise men for achieving that, even if it takes effort? You're not even remotely being logically consistent.
Oh yes, I'd love to see those scientific studies. Because every time an incel posts one it doesn't actually prove what you claim it proves. It demonstrates something under narrow circumstances, and then you all get to speculating and applying that information in ways that the authors of the study would never in a million years agree with.
Disclaimer: not incel, just attempting to explain this double standard.
People who consider sexually promiscuous women immoral and disgusting believe in traditional notions of sexual purity, which also applies to men. A conservative Christian would say it's just as bad for a man to sleep around as for a woman.
So why the difference? Well, if we accept the previously mentioned premise that it's much harder for a man to be promiscuous than a woman, then the disapproval for a man's immoral promiscuity is overshadowed by being impressed at his achievement. Think about heist movies like Ocean's Eleven. The protagonists are doing something immoral and criminal: stealing. Yet they are the heroes of the story and viewers feel inclined to cheer for their success because they are so impressed by the elaborate planning and skillful execution of the heist.
Even when something like this happens in real life - when there's a real news report of someone pulling off a uniquely clever criminal act - you'll see lots of people comment that they're impressed, even if they still agree the crime is immoral. It also applies to everyday moments: "I'm not even mad, I'm impressed."
Where do you get that fuxking notion dude? I’m convinced you live on the internet. Any girl who is willing to fuck a dude who has had 20+ partners is probably just as fucking gross as he is.
They ARE worthless diseased and disgusting, when a man does it it's from actual effort and desire, a woman does it on a whim with lack of self control.
Did you not look at the image? Literally all you need to be a slut is a vagina, you don't even need to be attractive, you just need to be a woman. To be a stud you have to be charismatic, charming, fit, attractive, etc. Plus, it's fun making fun of slutty girls.
MANIC. Jesus, you guys need to work on reading comprehension. Manic means impulsive, making lots of poor decisions because you're wound up and aren't thinking straight. It's fairly common for people with bipolar to have a lot of promiscuous sex in their manic phases.
Of course the men had those partner counts without any help from mental illness...but not a peep about how disgusting they are. Shocking.
You entirely missed the point. If you choose to get married to a women, prepare yourself for divorce rape after you come home to chad’s cock filling your wife’s beef flaps.
Listen carefully, if a chad wants to, he will fuck you whilst your husband isn't home. Once you're bored of fucking your normie husband, your eyes will sway and this is when that Tinder chad comes over to fill you up.
I've never been on tinder. What's a tinder Chad and how does he differ from a regular Chad? Also, is there chad-repellant? I fear I may be allergic to Chads.
I've only slept with 2 guys and I've been with my now husband for 8 years. It hasn't been an issue so far. But I'll be sure to let my husband know to set some traps for the Chads so they can be safely re-released back into the wild of tinder. We're a proud catch and release family.
It's not even a good argument. It would be one thing if we were saying it was less impressive of women to be "sluts" than it is for men to be "studs", but it doesn't make sense to say it goes from a good thing to a bad things based on how difficult it was to achieve.
According to the article she had sex almost everyday for 13 years.
100 thrusts per session * 5 sessions per week * 11 inches (5.5 inches in, 5.5 inches out) = 5500 inches of dick per week * 676 weeks = 3718000 inches of dick which is 58.68 miles
You would need to drive almost an hour on a highway to reach the length of dicks she's taken.
It's not even a good argument. It would be one thing if we were saying it was less impressive of women to be "sluts" than it is for men to be "studs", but it doesn't make sense to say it goes from a good thing to a bad things based on how difficult it was to achieve.
86 comments
1 lortnoc1 2018-02-18
It's hard being a modern female
1 half_acre_lot 2018-02-18
teehee
1 NeedinStitches 2018-02-18
I worry about women like her. There is definitely something wrong there.
1 -justthathohoho- 2018-02-18
Lmao that's not normal
1 AprilYi2 2018-02-18
In 2018 it is.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
No, it isn't. Any study or survey will tell you that this is wildly outside the norm. I've only met three people with a partner count above 20. One of them was manic depressive and had tons of random sex when she was in her manic phases. She's now getting married and is monogamous.
The other two were men.
1 warmestblack 2018-02-18
Lol @ that poor bastard that's marrying her.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
He's probably just happy to be a betabux or isn't aware of her vagina mileage. Poor guy will one day come home tired from work only to find chad deep inside her beef flaps.
1 warmestblack 2018-02-18
That is a very real scenario and not an exaggeration, unfortunately. The woman has bipolar. Just go read up on bipolar and their relationship to sex and promiscuity. It's over for that beta bux buddy boyo.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
And yet not a word about the men with similarly high partner counts.
Shocking.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
There’s a gargantuan difference
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Saved.
Sums it up sooooo well.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
Oh I see. So it's a massive achievement for a man to be a slut.
But for women, it's easy...and so they deserve scorn?
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
Let me get that speck of dirt out of your white shiny chest piece, Ser Knight.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
I'm a white knight for trying to understand this convoluted, nonsensical logic? If it all makes so much sense you'd think it'd be so easy to explain and shut me up for good.
But you can't even answer basic, obvious questions about your claims.
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
Just like everywhere in life, there are different opinions regarding different social aspects of life.
Yes, it takes much bigger effort for a man to be a slut, unless they've naturally rolled the genetic lottery for sexual appeal and even then it differs from person to person.
Yes, it's much easier for a woman to be promiscuous because there's a much bigger demand for women than there are for men. I personally don't think that women deserve scorn for promiscuity but it just speaks volumes about the woman's character. But hey, that's just me, what do I know?
1 fuckitidunno 2018-02-18
More or less, yeah. It's easy for women to get sex, so who gives a fuck when they do it a lot, it's hard for a man to get sex, however.
1 OfSpock 2018-02-18
So, men put heaps of effort into something undesirable? Then we should judge them even more harshly than women.
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Your logic is shocking.
As a man you have to actually put shit tons of work to get laid, whereas a an ugly fat femoid slut doesn‘t even have to do anything but being lazy. There will always be horny males she can have sex with.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
So because it's hard to be a male slut, they deserve praise.
But women sluts are disgusting, used up pieces of garbage...
Why would we praise a man for becoming a used up piece of garbage?
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Of course they deserve praise. We praise everyone that does tons of work and is succesful.
I‘ll praise a self-made millionaire.
I surely won‘t praise someone that inherited millions that his parents made.
You get the difference?
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
But people in this community don't just "not praise" female sluts. They actively insult them. They're considered worthless, diseased, disgusting. But the same doesn't apply to men.
If having sex with 30 people makes you a gross, used up piece of meat then why would we praise men for achieving that, even if it takes effort? You're not even remotely being logically consistent.
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Of course are the disgusting. They only fuck with top tier men.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
So if a man only fucks top tier women, he is also worthy of hatred?
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Men are social creatures. They don‘t just fuck top tier women.
Even the most beautiful male model chad will fuck ugly girls.
Men will satisfy all women, even women that are way uglier than the men when it comes to looks.
Whereas women only want men that look better than themselves. Or at least the same.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
Oooh, of course. My absurd scenario is impossible, but your absurd scenario is exactly how the world works!
Makes perfect sense.
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Exactly. May sound absurd in your eyes, but that‘s unfortunately how society works.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
No, it really doesn't. Evidence of this supposedly society-wide phenomenon consists of...a few YouTube videos and...Tinder experiments.
How have I avoided all this hypergamy while dating??? Am I secretly a Chad???
1 IsThisRealReddit 2018-02-18
Youtube videos, Tinder Experiments.... and.... scientific studies.
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
Oh yes, I'd love to see those scientific studies. Because every time an incel posts one it doesn't actually prove what you claim it proves. It demonstrates something under narrow circumstances, and then you all get to speculating and applying that information in ways that the authors of the study would never in a million years agree with.
1 yuluswug 2018-02-18
Disclaimer: not incel, just attempting to explain this double standard.
People who consider sexually promiscuous women immoral and disgusting believe in traditional notions of sexual purity, which also applies to men. A conservative Christian would say it's just as bad for a man to sleep around as for a woman.
So why the difference? Well, if we accept the previously mentioned premise that it's much harder for a man to be promiscuous than a woman, then the disapproval for a man's immoral promiscuity is overshadowed by being impressed at his achievement. Think about heist movies like Ocean's Eleven. The protagonists are doing something immoral and criminal: stealing. Yet they are the heroes of the story and viewers feel inclined to cheer for their success because they are so impressed by the elaborate planning and skillful execution of the heist.
Even when something like this happens in real life - when there's a real news report of someone pulling off a uniquely clever criminal act - you'll see lots of people comment that they're impressed, even if they still agree the crime is immoral. It also applies to everyday moments: "I'm not even mad, I'm impressed."
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
Beautifully put and wonderful analogy. Comment saved.
1 fuckitidunno 2018-02-18
Of course they do, because it's fun. I'm not an incel and I don't respect sluts.
1 faget420 2018-02-18
Where do you get that fuxking notion dude? I’m convinced you live on the internet. Any girl who is willing to fuck a dude who has had 20+ partners is probably just as fucking gross as he is.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-02-18
They ARE worthless diseased and disgusting, when a man does it it's from actual effort and desire, a woman does it on a whim with lack of self control.
1 fuckitidunno 2018-02-18
Did you not look at the image? Literally all you need to be a slut is a vagina, you don't even need to be attractive, you just need to be a woman. To be a stud you have to be charismatic, charming, fit, attractive, etc. Plus, it's fun making fun of slutty girls.
1 warmestblack 2018-02-18
There are a bunch of ppl here on this site that hate on Chads.
1 AprilYi2 2018-02-18
Depressed but has sex LOL
1 Build_that_Bear 2018-02-18
MANIC. Jesus, you guys need to work on reading comprehension. Manic means impulsive, making lots of poor decisions because you're wound up and aren't thinking straight. It's fairly common for people with bipolar to have a lot of promiscuous sex in their manic phases.
Of course the men had those partner counts without any help from mental illness...but not a peep about how disgusting they are. Shocking.
1 ceDrowRanger 2018-02-18
But under those conditions a man wouldn't be able to get a woman...
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Yes, women can like sex too.
Jealousy will get you nowhere.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
You entirely missed the point. If you choose to get married to a women, prepare yourself for divorce rape after you come home to chad’s cock filling your wife’s beef flaps.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
As a married woman, I have yet to experience any of that lmao.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
That's because only chad decides when it's your time to experience it.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Whose Chad and why are you guys so obsessed with him?
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
chad
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Oh, so Chad is all those guys. They a Korean pop group or something?
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
Chad is top 0.2-0.5% of all males. He decides when it's your turn to be filled after approaching you.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Is he a robot? How will I know when I meet Chad? How should I introduce my family to him?
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
Listen carefully, if a chad wants to, he will fuck you whilst your husband isn't home. Once you're bored of fucking your normie husband, your eyes will sway and this is when that Tinder chad comes over to fill you up.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
I've never been on tinder. What's a tinder Chad and how does he differ from a regular Chad? Also, is there chad-repellant? I fear I may be allergic to Chads.
1 fishet 2018-02-18
Or you know, the woman decides she doesn't want sex becsuse she's married
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Is there an opt-out option?
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
No wahmyn, married or single, can resist the urge to have chad DNA pumped deep inside her beef flaps.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
I've only slept with 2 guys and I've been with my now husband for 8 years. It hasn't been an issue so far. But I'll be sure to let my husband know to set some traps for the Chads so they can be safely re-released back into the wild of tinder. We're a proud catch and release family.
1 fishet 2018-02-18
Jesus Christ I don't think you even realise hie insane you sound
1 dslyker 2018-02-18
The lack of vagina in his sad life has left him delusional and insane
1 fishet 2018-02-18
I think there's a cream for that
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
Send bobs pls
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Bob is on his way.
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
"female humour"
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
I'd say it's more "dad humour" since it's pun based.
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
Sickening, imagine how loose her disgusting vagina must be.
1 fishet 2018-02-18
You don't know how vaginas work do you
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
You still take the bait.
1 fishet 2018-02-18
Tbh it could have been bait or a legitimate statement. The autism runs deep in this sub
1 dslyker 2018-02-18
You could only imagine, since you've never felt one
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
I felt your mom's
1 dslyker 2018-02-18
Hur Hur. Great one
1 Stagetail 2018-02-18
ooo got e
1 AprilYi2 2018-02-18
A IT poster future ex wife
1 Board_Gaming 2018-02-18
There are guys that have sex with lots of women, shame them too.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
No
1 fishet 2018-02-18
Yes because one random person offered a fallible argument to my case it must be true
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
Either provide a counter-argument to that or STFU.
1 morete 2018-02-18
It's not even a good argument. It would be one thing if we were saying it was less impressive of women to be "sluts" than it is for men to be "studs", but it doesn't make sense to say it goes from a good thing to a bad things based on how difficult it was to achieve.
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
Parse your sentence and try again.
1 morete 2018-02-18
Pretty sure you get the point I'm making bad writing aside.
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
Promiscuity in both genders is equally derided and praised, so no illogicality there.
It's much harder to be a stud than to be a slut.
1 morete 2018-02-18
That first point is just so apparently untrue, even just by considering that slut is nearly exclusively used as an insult. Whereas stud is not.
1 daskettenkrad 2018-02-18
change "stud" to fuckboy and we have a total equivalency.
Or a pig, or a dog. Take your pick.
1 BBC_theory 2018-02-18
Of course her dad is a BBC. She definitely is just trying to get back at black men like her dad by sleeping with 400 white cucks
1 CptErection23 2018-02-18
According to the article she had sex almost everyday for 13 years.
100 thrusts per session * 5 sessions per week * 11 inches (5.5 inches in, 5.5 inches out) = 5500 inches of dick per week * 676 weeks = 3718000 inches of dick which is 58.68 miles
You would need to drive almost an hour on a highway to reach the length of dicks she's taken.
1 AbyssWolf 2018-02-18
Must have been a slow week if it was only 370.
1 silkygoombah 2018-02-18
UH...this magazine looks like a tabloid you would see at every check stand. Next item was probably about a half woman half bat.
1 WhiteWomf 2018-02-18
Who. Fucking. Cares?!?
1 avittamboy 2018-02-18
Exactly what you'd expect from librral wahmyn.
1 MGTOWAcolyte 2018-02-18
That's because only chad decides when it's your time to experience it.
1 Zombombaby 2018-02-18
Bob is on his way.
1 morete 2018-02-18
It's not even a good argument. It would be one thing if we were saying it was less impressive of women to be "sluts" than it is for men to be "studs", but it doesn't make sense to say it goes from a good thing to a bad things based on how difficult it was to achieve.