I'mmmmmm gonna need a source on that because I don't see that anywhere in Google. Not in the old paintings, not in the pages I've read over, nada.
I do see where they shaved their faces back then so they looked clean for when they went into battle. In fact, I also see that if someone had scruffy, unkempt facial hair, they were more than likely poor or a slave.
Men also cut their hair back then, you can't do battle with long hair, that's basically asking to die.
This is why we hate you, normies. You know nothing, you don't even care to find out, you constantly lie and then you have the gall to downvote us. Get the fuck out.
Wikipedia is not a credible source, dude. It's a site of information that can be changed in a moment's notice. If you have taken graduate level courses IN COLLEGE instead of on Youtube, you would know better than to site that terrible website.
I searched multiple sites, looked through multiple paintings. I did not see multiple slaves with shaved heads anywhere.
They shorn the hair, not shaved bald. It showed ultimate submission and it was used for war prisoners as well. It was not because of women, you ignorant fuck. It was because of the times.
If you have taken graduate level courses IN COLLEGE instead of on Youtube, you would know better than to site that terrible website.
If you have taken writing classes in college, it's spelled as 'cite'. English is my second language and even I know that.
I searched multiple sites, looked through multiple paintings. I did not see multiple slaves with shaved heads anywhere.
Do you honestly think that medieval artists gave a fuck about slaves?!
They shorn the hair, not shaved bald. It showed ultimate submission and it was used for war prisoners as well. It was not because of women, you ignorant fuck. It was because of the times.
Yeah, exactly. And nowadays feminists are trying to abuse it for their own gains to force men into submission.
Also: You want to be seen as a man and get sex, yet when someone doubts you, the first thing you do is call them a vulgar name.
Yeah, because there is an endless amount of you idiots prancing around on this sub. One of you leaves, then two take her place. I don't have the patience of a saint to deal with this shit.
That's not normal human behavior and women don't like that. At all. We actually make fun of boys like you because you're just oversized babies with a giant red flag flying above you that has the words "DANGER" on it.
Oh boy, here we go. 'If only you behaved better, girls would like you and you would find a girlfriend!' I was a bluepilled beta cuck for a large part in my life, no girls liked me back then anyway. Now that I have seen the world for what it truly is, you still try to pull the wool over my eyes. Yeah, that's not going to happen, find your simps in real life. If you want validation, then I suggest starting off in your local university's philosophy/liberal arts departments, there still might be a few guys there who haven't been pushed out by women yet.
First of all, excuse me for my one spelling mistake. One.
Second of all, Wikipedia is STILL not a credible source for information. Many people do not use it as it can be altered by anyone, even if it's locked. The administrators of the site can change it or a person with good computer knowledge and nothing better to do can as well.
Slaves were depicted in paintings many, many times. One google search will show you that.
What actual evidence do you have to support your claim about women using it for gain? It's a fashion statement/empowerment statement. Any woman will tell you that.
You have absolutely no idea how hard women have worked to be where we are now. That doesn't matter to you or other incels though because no one wants to fuck you and that's just NoT aCcEpTaBlE so you have to make women your enemy.
You have no patience at all. You could have had a cordial conversation with me to show me how I was wrong (even though technically I was not), but you chose to be rude.
Finally, your last statement makes absolutely no sense. It's literally a bunch of word garbage. Maybe it's my age, but it looks like a bunch of hub bub you put together to make your final insult seem like it meant something. It did not.
I won't be replying anymore, so go ahead with more insults and rants. I won't read it and I won't respond. Good luck.
It's 2018, yes it is. Stop parading around false information just because your college professor said it once 6 years ago. You cannot edit wiki pages on a whim and every page literally has all of its sources cited at the bottom of each page.
its brutal to think that some of the "normies" here giving all sorts of "advice" and those that are supposedly only posting here between their slaying session look like this
I'm balding rapidly myself and this image is making me hyperventilate. I'm going to go totally bald before I hold hands with a female, and once I'm bald the chance of holding hands drops to zero. Fuck.
Hair serves an important evolutionary role of keeping exposed extremities warm and protected from water. Is evolutionary biology a product of patriarchy, too?
I'mmmmmm gonna need a source on that because I don't see that anywhere in Google. Not in the old paintings, not in the pages I've read over, nada.
I do see where they shaved their faces back then so they looked clean for when they went into battle. In fact, I also see that if someone had scruffy, unkempt facial hair, they were more than likely poor or a slave.
Men also cut their hair back then, you can't do battle with long hair, that's basically asking to die.
27 comments
1 anonymousvirgin88 2018-02-18
How retarded do you have to be to think hair is oppressive?
1 Incel9876 2018-02-18
No hair = castrated eunuch look. Hair and not Alpha male = man who doesn't know his male in the feminist supremacy.
1 crackedpaint 2018-02-18
What about skinheads?
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-02-18
During medieval ages, free men had long hair: slaves had their heads shaven. Go figure on how feminism is trying to abuse men's natural behavior.
1 crackedpaint 2018-02-18
I'mmmmmm gonna need a source on that because I don't see that anywhere in Google. Not in the old paintings, not in the pages I've read over, nada.
I do see where they shaved their faces back then so they looked clean for when they went into battle. In fact, I also see that if someone had scruffy, unkempt facial hair, they were more than likely poor or a slave.
Men also cut their hair back then, you can't do battle with long hair, that's basically asking to die.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-02-18
1) You searched for nothing, lying filth. The first sentence in the Wikipedia article on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_hair#Middle_Ages
2) Nice of you to downvote me for this.
This is why we hate you, normies. You know nothing, you don't even care to find out, you constantly lie and then you have the gall to downvote us. Get the fuck out.
1 crackedpaint 2018-02-18
Wikipedia is not a credible source, dude. It's a site of information that can be changed in a moment's notice. If you have taken graduate level courses IN COLLEGE instead of on Youtube, you would know better than to site that terrible website.
I searched multiple sites, looked through multiple paintings. I did not see multiple slaves with shaved heads anywhere.
http://www.historyundressed.com/2008/03/ladies-have-you-ever-forgotten-to-shave.html?m=1
http://thehistoryofthehairsworld.com/middle_ages_renaissance.html
They shorn the hair, not shaved bald. It showed ultimate submission and it was used for war prisoners as well. It was not because of women, you ignorant fuck. It was because of the times.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-02-18
Not writing a research article here, matey.
If you have taken writing classes in college, it's spelled as 'cite'. English is my second language and even I know that.
Do you honestly think that medieval artists gave a fuck about slaves?!
Yeah, exactly. And nowadays feminists are trying to abuse it for their own gains to force men into submission.
Yeah, because there is an endless amount of you idiots prancing around on this sub. One of you leaves, then two take her place. I don't have the patience of a saint to deal with this shit.
Oh boy, here we go. 'If only you behaved better, girls would like you and you would find a girlfriend!' I was a bluepilled beta cuck for a large part in my life, no girls liked me back then anyway. Now that I have seen the world for what it truly is, you still try to pull the wool over my eyes. Yeah, that's not going to happen, find your simps in real life. If you want validation, then I suggest starting off in your local university's philosophy/liberal arts departments, there still might be a few guys there who haven't been pushed out by women yet.
1 crackedpaint 2018-02-18
First of all, excuse me for my one spelling mistake. One.
Second of all, Wikipedia is STILL not a credible source for information. Many people do not use it as it can be altered by anyone, even if it's locked. The administrators of the site can change it or a person with good computer knowledge and nothing better to do can as well.
Slaves were depicted in paintings many, many times. One google search will show you that.
What actual evidence do you have to support your claim about women using it for gain? It's a fashion statement/empowerment statement. Any woman will tell you that.
You have absolutely no idea how hard women have worked to be where we are now. That doesn't matter to you or other incels though because no one wants to fuck you and that's just NoT aCcEpTaBlE so you have to make women your enemy.
You have no patience at all. You could have had a cordial conversation with me to show me how I was wrong (even though technically I was not), but you chose to be rude.
Finally, your last statement makes absolutely no sense. It's literally a bunch of word garbage. Maybe it's my age, but it looks like a bunch of hub bub you put together to make your final insult seem like it meant something. It did not.
I won't be replying anymore, so go ahead with more insults and rants. I won't read it and I won't respond. Good luck.
1 geneticSubhumanTrash 2018-02-18
And nothing of value was lost, roastie.
1 iQ9k 2018-02-18
It's 2018, yes it is. Stop parading around false information just because your college professor said it once 6 years ago. You cannot edit wiki pages on a whim and every page literally has all of its sources cited at the bottom of each page.
1 Hal_Inceldenza 2018-02-18
From incel to incel transformation.
1 frankwashere44 2018-02-18
from numale cuck to cancer survivor.
1 PROLAPSED_SUBWOOFER 2018-02-18
Feminism is cancer confirmed.
1 carpathianflorist 2018-02-18
If I ever need chemo I’m going to post this exact thing verbatim.
1 5f2BaldIndianJanitor 2018-02-18
The existence of incels is oppressive to females.
1 GenetikiApotixia 2018-02-18
oh my god
1 GenetikiApotixia 2018-02-18
its brutal to think that some of the "normies" here giving all sorts of "advice" and those that are supposedly only posting here between their slaying session look like this
1 mens-libthrowaway 2018-02-18
I'm balding rapidly myself and this image is making me hyperventilate. I'm going to go totally bald before I hold hands with a female, and once I'm bald the chance of holding hands drops to zero. Fuck.
1 Lord_of_the_Banana 2018-02-18
Are you able to grow a beard?
1 mens-libthrowaway 2018-02-18
No
1 Kennnny27 2018-02-18
this is your brain on feminism
1 NightmareOfMensis 2018-02-18
But that's not all...
THIS IS WHAT YOUR FAMILY GOES THROUGH!!!
AND YOUR FRIENDS!!!
1 dogeprkle 2018-02-18
Yeah it's actually a guy after and before chemotherapy...
1 Berxity 2018-02-18
more specific: the one on the right is him in chemotherapy, the one on the left is him celebrating him beating cancer by growing a beard
1 NightmareOfMensis 2018-02-18
Hair serves an important evolutionary role of keeping exposed extremities warm and protected from water. Is evolutionary biology a product of patriarchy, too?
1 mentalhealthcel 2018-02-18
What’s so oppressive about facial hair? I mean I shave regularly, but that’s because I can’t grow a beard.
1 FAwomenJustLul 2018-02-18
Feminism lul.
1 CreampiesforBlackVag 2018-02-18
From nucel to nucel.
1 crackedpaint 2018-02-18
I'mmmmmm gonna need a source on that because I don't see that anywhere in Google. Not in the old paintings, not in the pages I've read over, nada.
I do see where they shaved their faces back then so they looked clean for when they went into battle. In fact, I also see that if someone had scruffy, unkempt facial hair, they were more than likely poor or a slave.
Men also cut their hair back then, you can't do battle with long hair, that's basically asking to die.